+
Table of Contents
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 2
Sections Page #
Section 1 – Highway Safety Planning Process and Problem Identification
1.1 Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process 3
Section 2 – Public Participation and Engagement
2.1 Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement 11
2.2 Profile of Arkansas’ Growing Hispanic Population 26
2.3 Resource Collaboration 28
2.4 Coordination of THSP and SHSP 30
Section 3 – Performance Plan
3.1 FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets 31
3.2 Performance Plan Chart 38
Section 4 – Countermeasure Strategy for Programming Funds
4.1 Occupant Protection 41
4.2 Impaired Driving 52
4.3 Speed 65
4.4 Distracted Driving 70
4.5 Motorcycle Safety 76
4.6 Young Driver Safety 79
4.7 Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety 82
4.8 Traffic Records 87
4.9 Roadway Safety 91
4.10 Planning and Administration 94
Section 5 – Performance Report
5.1 Grant Program Activity Reporting 96
5.2 Target Progress from Previous Year 97
Section 6 – Reference Charts and Information
6.1 Estimated 3-Year Funding Allocation by Planned Activity 99
6.2 High Five Survey Results 100
6.3 STEP Survey Results 101
6.4 Mini-STEP Survey Results 108
6.5 General Agreement Survey Results 112
6.6 2022 Teen Leadership Conference Evaluation Summary 115
6.7 ACH – Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory Results 116
6.8 Data Used for High Five Selection 118
6.9 Overrepresented Population Data by County 120
6.10 ACHI Analysis: Arkansas Pedestrian Fatalities, By Race, 2016-2021 122
6.11 Natural Wonders Partnership Council July 28, 2023, Meeting Feedback 123
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 3
Title 23 U.S.C. Section 402 requires each state to have a highway safety program sponsored by the U.S.
Secretary of Transportation and for which the Governor of the state shall be responsible. In Arkansas, the
Governor has designated the Secretary of the Department of Public Safety as the Governor’s Highway Safety
Representative for the state and has established the Arkansas State Police, Highway Safety Office or Arkansas
Highway Safety Office (AHSO) as the state highway safety agency.
The purpose of the highway safety program is to provide a coordinated federal state and local effort to reduce
traffic-related deaths, injuries, and property damage crashes.
The AHSO analyzes historical crash data for 5-10 preceding years along with current crash data to determine
traffic fatality and injury trends. Basic crash data are obtained from National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data which includes annual tabulations
of statewide fatality counts for FARS based core performance measures (e.g., total traffic fatalities; speed-
related fatalities; fatalities from alcohol impaired driving crashes (BAC of 0.08% plus); and unrestrained
passenger vehicle fatalities. Data reflecting the number of serious injuries in traffic crashes is obtained from
Arkansas’ electronic crash reporting system (eCrash) which compiles data from crash reports filed by local law
enforcement agencies and the Arkansas State Police. Citation and conviction data are gathered from agency
reports and the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration’s Driver Services. Statewide
demographics, vehicle miles traveled, and statewide observational safety belt use surveys were also evaluated
along with census data to identify underserved and overrepresented populations.
Public Participation & Engagement has been and continues to be an important part of constructing effective
traffic safety programs based on the needs of disproportionately affected communities impacted by traffic
crashes that result in injuries and fatalities. The Arkansas Highway Safety Office is building on its community
engagement process by soliciting additional feedback from stakeholders, grantees, community groups and
organizations. Surveys and questionnaires were developed and distributed for use by existing projects to obtain
feedback on project effectiveness and to solicit feedback from the target populations of those projects. These
surveys will provide information on how programming efforts can be improved to better serve existing program
areas and expanded to additional locations that have been identified as problematic. AHSO staff has identified
coalitions and community organizations in affected areas and begun attending meetings, providing educational
information, and making presentations. The Natural Wonders Partnership Council (NWPC) is one of these
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 4
coalitions with representation from diverse child health organizations, nonprofits, agencies, and funders
(membership list at the end of Section 6.11) that work together to address the changing health needs of
Arkansans. The Council has a statewide membership with groups and organizations located in targeted counties
The NWPC was a logical starting place for AHSO as the council’s strategy involves building on the momentum
of engaged communities. They are a natural partner of the HSO since the coalition is based in Pulaski County
and with the majority of the organization membership’s agencies headquartered in Pulaski County and operating
across the state (see chart at the bottom of page 14).
The AHSO will use information gathered from surveys and participation in “community conversations” with
coalitions and community work groups to provide insight on the need for and type of new programming efforts
required to address traffic safety issues and communities identified as underserved and overrepresented.
In addition to traffic safety problems directly identifiable and measurable by crash and other traffic safety data,
additional problems/deficiencies were identified through programmatic reviews and assessments. For example,
deficiencies in the traffic records system cannot be ascertained from crash data analysis. Nevertheless, it is
important that such problems be alleviated, as doing so can have a significant traffic safety program benefit.
Per NHTSA requirements targets have been set and programming plans established to address Arkansas’
Highway safety issues based on data provided by the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement and the Arkansas
SWOT Analysis
Arkansas’ Performance Plan and Highway Safety Plan will focus on these identified areas. Targets are based
on information derived from 5 year rolling averages utilizing current FARS data in conjunction with National
Safety Council (NSC) and eCrash data which the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) has
“cleaned up” to delete duplicates errors etc., and in consideration of internal and external factors, guidelines
from NHTSA and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), meetings with collaborating agencies,
community outreach efforts, input from staff at the ARDOT, other stakeholders and recommendations of AHSO
staff.
Crash Analysis -
Analysis of crashes, crash fatalities, and injuries in areas of highest risk.
STEP projects will include high visibility and sustained enforcement of impaired driving, occupant protection
and speed limit laws by approximately 36 local law enforcement agencies and the Arkansas State Police. A
191
153
140
75
66
64
41
5
33%
26%
24%
13%
11%
11%
7%
1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Average Yearly Fatalities and Percentage of All Fatalities (2017-
2021)
Avg Yearly Fatalities % of All Fatalities
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 5
continuing initiative is focused on 50+ smaller law enforcement agencies that will be participating in mini-
STEP grants. These grants fund overtime enforcement and/or equipment to agencies that participate in national
safety campaigns and state mobilizations, targeted media, including paid television, radio, billboards, and
internet will support these campaigns, which include Click It or Ticket (CIOT) and Drive Sober or Get Pulled
Over (DSOGPO).
Data for Arkansas, (based on the 5-year period 2018-2022) shows the number of fatalities at 520 in 2018 and
644 for 2022. The fatality rate per 100 MVMT also shows an increase from 1.418 (2018) to 1.677 (2022).
Serious injuries (2’s only) increased from 2,272 in 2018 to 2,694 in 2022.
An average of 605 motorists loses their lives and another 2,532 are seriously injured each year on Arkansas’s
roadways. Preliminary data for 2022 shows fatalities at 644. Over the past five years, alcohol-related fatalities
averaged 146.4 per year. In 2022, 165 alcohol-related (involving a driver or motorcycle operator at .08 BAC
or above) fatalities were reported – 25.6% of the total fatalities.
A major area of concern continues to be the relatively low seat belt use rate in the state. In 2017, there were
374 passenger vehicle occupant fatalities. Of these fatalities, 180 or 48.1% were unrestrained. In 2021
Arkansas’s Seat Belt use rate was 84.2%. There were 228 unrestrained fatalities in 2021 and 448 passenger
vehicle fatalities or 50.9%. The use rate decreased to 79.1% in 2022. Preliminary results of the 2023 Seat Belt
Survey appear to show some improvement, but Arkansas is still a long way from the 2022 NHTSA National
Occupant Protection use rate (NOPUS) of 91.6%.
If the State is to increase seat belt use, law enforcement agencies must make seat belt enforcement a priority.
During FY23, approximately 150 agencies participated in CIOT including STEP, Mini-STEP, and volunteer
agencies. The AHSO in-house Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL) retired in October of 2021 and since that time
County 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Pulaski
60
70
62
81
70
343
10.10%
Benton 15 18 23 35 35 126
5.05%
Scott 10 7 15 15 29 76
4.18%
Washington 24 18 21 28 29 120
4.18%
Garland
13
18
21
18
23
93
3.32%
Faulkner 19 21 4 15 21 80
3.03%
Independence 6 7 11 17 20 61
2.89%
Sevier
14
15
9
15
20
73
2.89%
White
10
7
14
20
20
71
2.89%
Craighead 17 18 18 20 19 92
2.74%
County 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Pulaski 367 290 302 397 367 1,723 71.82%
Washington 154 155 155 142 151 757 29.55%
Benton 151 143 119 151 139 703
27.20%
Craighead 109 113 177 116 123 638
24.07%
Saline 80 66 75 76 100 397 19.57%
Garland 118 105 132 97 95 547 18.59%
Faulkner 89 67 65 87 91 399
17.81%
White 73 72 47 57 72 321
14.09%
Pope 67 59 57 49 70 302 13.70%
Lonoke 67 40 51 56 69 283 13.50%
Fatalities: Arkansas Top 10 Counties % of 2021
Total 693
Serious Injuries: Arkansas Top 10 Counties
% of 2021
Total 2,792
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 6
there has been a drop in the number of participating agencies. The AHSO obtained approval this June for a full
time LEL position and hope to fill that position in 2023.
Despite a decline in the number of agencies participating in STEP and Mini-STEP programs and a decrease in
enforcement due to the COVID Pandemic and other issues, the outlook is optimistic about increasing
enforcement efforts. In FY24-26 communication will be a priority through hosting an Annual Coordinator’s
Conference, and regional “Lunch and Learns” with a concentrated focus on recruiting agencies to expand
enforcement and education efforts in areas with high crash rates and low seat belt use rates. LEL duties will
include soliciting non-STEP agencies to voluntarily participate in mobilizations or apply for mini-STEP
grants. STEP and Mini-STEP grants provide funds to pay for overtime enforcement and/or equipment.
Law enforcement agencies will be encouraged to involve and inform the media during special enforcement
events. The national tagline of “Click It or Ticket” will be used in efforts to promote occupant protection. To
promote the use of safety belts and support NHTSA’s “Click It or Ticket” national mobilization and the state’s
two-week STEP effort, CJRW, Arkansas’s advertising agency of record will secure paid media per NHTSA’s
pre-determined media timeline for the campaign.
The Click It or Ticket (CIOT) Campaign has been instrumental in raising the adult seat belt use rate and will
continue to play an important part in Arkansas’ efforts to increase the state’s usage rate. The projects mentioned
above, along with the CIOT program, will continue to be an integral part of the FY24 Triennial Highway Safety
Plan (THSP). Efforts in FY24-26 will include emphasis on increasing total enforcement efforts, the number of
agencies participating and encouraging agencies outside of STEP to address seat belt enforcement at a much
higher level. The AHSO will also develop media ads and other materials designed to raise awareness about the
dangers of leaving children unattended in vehicles to be used starting with the Click It or Ticket campaign and
throughout the summer.
The AHSO also recognizes the significance and impact that motorcycle related crashes are having on the overall
fatality picture in Arkansas. Between 2017-2021 motorcycle fatalities accounted for approximately 13 percent
of Arkansas’ total traffic fatalities. In 2017 this number stood at 69 and increased to 96 in 2021. There were
377 motorcycle involved traffic fatalities in Arkansas during the 5-year period 2017-2021. A universal helmet
law is recognized as the single most effective way for states to save lives in motorcycle crashes, but Arkansas
does not have a Helmet law for those over age 21.
In FY24-26, AHSO will contract with Alliance to attend a minimum of 20 days of motorcycle rallies, and 10
different rally events each year. Alliance will utilize an updated public opinion survey at motorcycle rallies to
determine the most critical traffic safety issues, from the perspective of the community, that the AHSO needs
to address. Other planned efforts include working with the Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration
(ADF&A) to distribute motorcycle endorsement envelope stuffers, a project which began in FY 23, to provide
information on registration, licensing, and training opportunities.
The AHSO is working with local STEP and Mini-STEP agencies to utilize the Arkansas Crash Analytics Tool
(ACAT) which displays crash locations on the Towards Zero Deaths (TZD) website online maps. These maps
pinpoint high crash areas and road segments and assist local and statewide agencies to better target enforcement
efforts. 97% of Arkansas’ law enforcement agencies utilize the AR eCrash system which has significantly
improved crash reporting and agency access to information. The long-term goal is to have 100% participation
in eCrash/eCite and to develop a comprehensive traffic safety program in each geographical area.
The AHSO is collaborating with partners to encourage seat belt use, develop relevant information materials and
implement evidence-based prevention activities statewide. From 2019 thru 2021, approximately 64.3 percent
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 7
of fatalities were in rural areas of the state. During the triennial period, the AHSO plans to expand its initial
“High Five” demonstration project targeting rural counties (See Section 6.8 for information used to select
demonstration counties). Based on higher fatality rates, low belt use and overrepresented populations, an
additional 5 rural counties will be identified each year to participate in this project. This project will increase
enforcement efforts, and public education and information to raise seat belt use rates. In addition, the AHSO
will continue its partnership with ARDOT to conduct road assessments and identify infrastructure issues in
these targeted rural communities.
In each year of FY24-26 Arkansas’ Highway Safety Office will issue sub-grants to 100+ agencies and courts
statewide to target Highway Safety issues. Agencies include state, county, and municipal law enforcement
agencies in urban and rural locations. Other sub-grantees include, but are not limited to, the Arkansas
Department of Transportation, Administrative Office of the Courts, University of Arkansas System, Arkansas
Department of Health, Arkansas Children’s Hospital and the Black River Technical College Law Enforcement
Training Academy. The AHSO will continue to focus on creating aggressive, innovative and well publicized
enforcement in conjunction with educational programs and an increased focus on community engagement and
feedback.
The AHSO has partnered with the Department of Civil Engineering (CVEG) at the University of Arkansas
(UA) to conduct a Safety Awareness Survey. The 2023 survey will differ from the previous 2018 survey in
two key areas. First, the 2023 survey will be conducted as a paper-based survey that will include an option for
online completion. The 2018 survey was conducted as a phone interview. Second, the 2023 survey will target
1
Lawrence
54.0 26
Miller
29.4 51
Baxter
20.3
2
Monroe
52.2 27
Hempstead
28.5 52
Columbia
20.0
3
Calhoun
49.9 28
Carroll
28.4 53
Arkansas
19.7
4
Searcy
48.3 29
Scott
28.2 54
Johnson
19.3
5
Newton
46.3 30
Randolph
28.2 55
Garland
18.7
6
Montgomery
42.2 31
Van Buren
27.8 56
White
18.4
7
St. Francis
40.6 32
Cross
27.2 57
Dallas
18.1
8
Fulton
39.8 33
Madison
26.7 58
Greene
18.0
9
Prairie
38.5 34
Ouachita
26.2 59
Izard
17.6
10
Franklin
38.5 35
Conway
26.1 60
Mississippi
17.5
11
Clark
38.0 36
Phillips
26.0 61
Pulaski
17.4
12
Nevada
36.0 37
Union
26.0 62
Desha
17.3
13
Sharp
36.0 38
Perry
25.9 63
Lincoln
16.8
14
Bradley
35.9 39
Crittenden
25.2 64
Craighead
16.7
15
Grant
34.6 40
Lee
24.9 65
Crawford
15.9
16
Cleburne
33.8 41
Sevier
24.9 66
Pope
15.8
17
Poinsett
32.7 42
Jackson
24.9 67
Lonoke
14.6
18
Independence
32.3 43
Boone
24.6 68
Faulkner
13.0
19
Cleveland
31.4 44
Stone
24.3 69
Woodruff
12.6
20
Clay
31.4 45
Drew
24.0 70
Lafayette
12.6
21
Chicot
30.8 46
Polk
23.6 71
Saline
12.4
22
Yell
30.3 47
Ashley
22.7 72
Pike
11.7
23
Hot Spring
30.2 48
Logan
22.5 73
Sebastian
11.4
24
Little River
29.7 49
Marion
21.5 74
Washington
9.9
25
Howard
29.5 50
Jefferson
21.4 75
Benton
9.0
per ACHI Rural Health Insites, May 2020
Urban Counties
Annual Average Roadway Fatality Rate per 100K Residents, by County 2017 - 2021
Rural Counties
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 8
a sample with wider representation from the Arkansas population. The 2018 survey estimated weights based
on 7 age-groups (16 to 20 years of age, 21 to 25, 26 to 34, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, and 65+) and two gender
categories. The 2023 survey will gather sociodemographic and geographic data to potentially produce more
detailed weighting procedures for a more representative survey that will provide the AHSO with information
on the effectiveness of its safety campaigns and activities.
Plans are in place to host an Arkansas Traffic Safety conference every May starting in May 2024. The
conference will be designed to incorporate discussions on innovations around the country. Emphasis will be
placed on community input and involvement to increase the effectiveness of Arkansas’ Highway Safety
program efforts. Regional “Lunch and Learns” will also be held periodically throughout the year. These
“Lunch and Learn” events will focus on the problem areas identified in the AR Data Deep Dive with
underserved or overrepresented populations and on recruiting agencies not currently participating in STEP or
Mini-STEP programs.
The AHSO evidence-based (E-BE) traffic safety enforcement program is focused on preventing traffic crashes
and crash-related fatalities and injuries. Analysis of Arkansas’ crashes, crash fatalities and serious injuries were
extracted from Arkansas State Traffic Records Data (eCrash), Arkansas Crash Analytics Tool (ACAT) and
FARS. This information was supplemented with the data analysis conducted by the Arkansas Center for Health
Improvement for the AR Data Deep Dive. Utilizing this data, priority areas have been identified to implement
proven enforcement activities. Arkansas’s E-BE is implemented through deployment of its resources in these
areas throughout the year and mobilizing the entire state during the “Click It or Ticket” (CIOT) mobilizations
and “Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over” (DSOGPO) crackdowns. At the conclusion of these events the
enforcement efforts are analyzed so that adjustments can be made to the E-BE going forward.
The AHSO utilizes projects for selective overtime enforcement efforts in the areas of alcohol, speed, distracted
driving, and Occupant Protection. Funding assistance will be awarded to law enforcement agencies statewide
with a special focus on priority areas identified in the AR Data Deep Dive analysis. Additional projects will
target priority areas with public information and education for specific dates and times of enforcement efforts.
Agencies are recruited to participate in national and statewide mobilizations and crackdowns. FY24-26
Mobilizations will include the following:
FY24 – FY26 Mobilizations
Mobilizations Timeline of High Visibility Enforcement
State Distracted Driving Mobilization
1
-
week mid
-
October
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 9
State Seat Belt Mobilization
1 week, the week of Thanksgiving
National Winter DWI Mobilization
2 weeks, ending New Years Day coordinated by NHTSA
State St. Patrick’s Day DWI Mobilization
3 to 5 days around St. Patrick’s Day
State Distracted Driving Mobilization
1
-
week, Early April
420 Campaign
3 to 5 days including April 20
th
, coordinated by NHTSA Region 7
National Memorial Day Seat Belt Mobilization
2 weeks, including Memorial Day
Weekend, coordinated by NHTSA
State July 4th Holiday DWI Mobilization
1 week, the week of July 4
th
State Speed Mobilization
2 to 3 weeks the end of July
National Labor Day DWI Mobilization
3 weeks including Labor Day, coordinated by NHTSA
Checkpoints and Saturation patrols will be conducted at least four nights during National DWI mobilizations.
Who, what, when, where and why are used to determine where to direct resources for the greatest impact. Data
is broken down by type of crash, i.e., speed, alcohol, restraint usage, impaired driving etc. Arkansas’s fatal, and
serious injury crash data is utilized to determine priority areas and provide direction on how to make the greatest
impact.
The enforcement program is implemented by awarding selective traffic enforcement overtime grants to law
enforcement agencies in these priority areas. Funding for overtime salaries and traffic related equipment is
eligible for reimbursement. Agencies applying for funding assistance for selective overtime enforcement are
encouraged to do problem identification within their city or county to determine when and where to conduct
enforcement for the greatest impact. Other components of these awards include PI&E and required activity
reporting. The enforcement program includes statewide enforcement efforts for mobilizations and crackdowns
which involve extensive national and state media campaigns. Agencies will be encouraged to increase
participation for the 420 Campaign this year.
All law enforcement working alcohol and seat belt selective overtime must provide proof of successful
completion of the Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) training and Traffic Occupant and Protection
Strategies (TOPS) training.
AHSO conducted surveys of all Sub-Contractor Projects for FY2023 (in LR/NLR, Northwest AR, and Rural
counties) to assess feedback and interactions they were getting from their local communities. They reported
the following feedback:
Positive community feedback
Citizens extremely supportive of the Distracted Driving, Speed, and DWI Enforcements.
Lots of positive feedback on Facebook posts and DWI checkpoints.
Citizens appreciate the extra officers on the street. They recognize that many crimes may have
been prevented because those persons decided to go somewhere else due to the officers being
seen on duty.
Would like to see more “Checkpoints and Saturations” Distracted Driving/Impaired Driving
More Distracted Driving information and awareness Outreach efforts
More Speed Mobilizations
More education for youth on Distracted Driving/Seat Belts
The AHSO monitors and assesses each of the selective traffic enforcement overtime grants upon receipt of the
activity report and reimbursement request and adjustments are made as needed. Seat Belt survey results along
with performance standards results (officer violator contacts/stops and arrests per hour) are evaluated to adjust
enforcement strategies and determine future awards. Adjustments to enforcement plans continue throughout the
year. The AHSO staff reviews the results of each activity/mobilization. Likewise, state, local and county law
enforcement agencies work with their program managers to review their activity and jurisdictional crash data
Section 1.1 - Highway Safety Planning & Problem Identification Process
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 10
on a regular basis. Based upon these reviews, continuous follow-up and timely adjustments are made to
enforcement plans to improve sustained and High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) effectiveness.
Deployment of Resources
The Arkansas Highway Safety Office considers safety issues by focusing on behavioral aspects at the driver
level. The goal is to reduce highway fatalities by better identifying driver behaviors that cause fatal crashes and
targeting problem areas where fatal crashes occur. The AHSO’s evidence-based Traffic Safety Enforcement
Plan (E-BE) has been developed to reduce injuries and fatalities in the State.
Attention is focused on participation in impaired driving, occupant protection and speed enforcement through
Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEPs & Mini-STEPs). This program will include active participation
by 90+ Arkansas law enforcement agencies in the state. The charts in section “Grant Program Activity
Reporting” show the citations issued by STEP & Mini-STEP agencies 2018 through 2022.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 11
Background
The Triennial Highway Safety Plan (THSP) is the document the State submits once every three fiscal years to
document its highway safety program, including the State’s highway safety planning process and problem
identification, public participation and engagement, performance plan, countermeasure strategies for
programming, and performance report.
The highway safety grant program plays an important role, and the meaningful public participation and
engagement requirements are a critical part of the Arkansas Highway Safety Office’s (AHSO) planning efforts
to ensure that equity is centered in the grant program. Under BIL, States are expected to engage affected and
potentially affected communities during the triennial HSP planning process and throughout the life of the THSP,
with particular emphasis on underserved communities and populations that are overrepresented in the data.
Underserved populations are groups that share a particular characteristic or geographic location and have been
systematically denied an equitable opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life.
In the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), Congress added a requirement that State highway safety programs
implement meaningful public participation and engagement activities that target affected communities,
particularly those that have been identified in the data as being significantly impacted by traffic crashes that
resulted in injuries and fatalities. The public engagement requirements for this regulation implement the
requirements set out in the BIL in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964/Title VI. The
following section outlines the public participation and engagement process carried out by the AHSO in
compliance with these requirements to ensure that equity is centered in the planning and implementation of the
Arkansas highway safety grant program.
The purpose of the AHSO’s comprehensive public participation and engagement effort is to ensure that diverse
views are acknowledged and considered throughout all stages of the THSP consultation, planning, and decision-
making process. The PPE will serve as a guide for the resulting programmatic efforts by giving applicants and
recipients an active role in the development of these projects and providing them with information about how
programs or activities can benefit their affected communities.
The AHSO is committed to engaging communities in Arkansas that are underserved and overrepresented in
traffic data to inform traffic safety programs that will promote safe and accessible roadways while reducing
transportation-related disparities, adverse community impacts, and negative health effects.
Arkansas Highway Safety Office THSP Engagement Planning
As a precursor to implementing an intensive community outreach/engagement initiative, the Arkansas Highway
Safety Office contracted with the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement (ACHI) to conduct a “Data Deep
Dive”, which gathered fatality and injury data for Arkansas from multiple sources including: FARS (Fatality
Analysis Reporting System), FIRST (Fatality and Injury Reporting System Tool), NEMSIS (National Medical
Services Information System), AR State Police Crash Records, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, US Census Bureau, Publicly available National and State Data, Data compiled for National
Safety Council provided through AR State Police, Arkansas State Medical Examiner, NewZ service, AR Crime
lab and toxicology reports, summaries of fatality and injury crashes, and reports from border states with a focus
on sources that provided insight into potential traffic safety patterns and disparities. ACHI utilized available
data to profile motor vehicle crash and related statistics for use in a SWOT Analysis with stakeholder groups
conducted in May 2023. During the SWOT Analysis, this data together with other pertinent information; was
reviewed; analyzed; and evaluated with 25+ participants representing a variety of agencies, groups and
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 12
individuals. Crash statistics were compiled for all counties in the state and used to ascertain the extent of the
problems in the respective locations. (See charts Section 6.8 and Section 6.9).
Based on the problems identified, the AHSO has developed a 3-year Highway Safety Plan with proposed
projects and countermeasures to promote highway safety and reduce the incidence and severity of traffic crashes
in Arkansas. Priorities for project implementation will be based on this analysis. Plans are to continue the
AHSO’s partnership with the ARDOT/SHSP Planning Group and others to incorporate the Safe System
Approach and leverage existing stakeholder groups for similar SWOT analyses going forward. AHSO will
continue to contract with ACHI to do extensive data analysis that will drive programming and outreach efforts.
Statement of Starting Goals for Public Engagement
The initial goal will build on current community engagement activities by soliciting and increasing feedback
from stakeholders, grantees, community groups and organizations. Surveys and questionnaires previously
developed and distributed to existing projects to obtain feedback on project effectiveness have been redesigned
to incorporate feedback from the target populations of those projects. The AHSO will use feedback obtained
from these surveys to inform program efforts going forward. Current projects will be improved, and new
projects will be developed to better serve existing program areas. Selected projects will be expanded, and new
projects created based on community feedback to target additional locations that are identified as problem areas
with underserved or overrepresented populations.
A second goal of the AHSO community engagement process involves a “work group” composed of
representatives from the Arkansas SWOT meeting to identify coalitions, community groups and organizations
in designated target areas. These target areas have been carefully chosen based on data-driven analysis, taking
into account multiple factors such as high crash rates, traffic congestion, environmental factors, road conditions
and areas with vulnerable populations. By collaborating with these local stakeholders, AHSO aims to establish
strong partnerships that will not only enhance the effectiveness of our highway safety initiatives but also ensure
that our efforts are tailored to the unique needs and challenges of each community. This community-centered
approach is vital in our commitment to creating safer roadways and reducing crashes and fatalities across the
state of Arkansas.
Identification of the Affected and Potentially Affected Communities – Underserved and
Overrepresented Populations
Problem ID: It is clear from AR SWOT Analysis and other data analysis that Black People are
disproportionately represented in fatal traffic crashes. (See charts Section 6.8 and Section 6.9). This
corresponds with an analysis of FARS data (2015-2019) showing black persons having the second highest rate
of total traffic deaths in the US for pedestrian, bicyclist, and total traffic deaths.
AR population percentage (Black) 2016-2021 AR percentage of fatalities (Black)
15.1% 18.2%
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 13
The AHSO is also aware that the Hispanic population in Arkansas is growing with nearly 250,000 Arkansas
identifying as Hispanic/Latino that currently make up 7.6% of AR population and 6.5% of fatalities. AHSO is
monitoring this population through continued data analysis to stay abreast of any changes that warrant
programmatic efforts. Section 2.2 profiles the AR Hispanic population with a summary of potential activities
to be conducted.
AHSO will improve its understanding of risk factors contributing to disproportionate fatalities in Black and
Hispanic populations in Arkansas through consistent engagement efforts and will conduct detailed data analyses
to understand the characteristics of the groups most adversely affected by traffic crashes. The AHSO will
leverage a community outreach program to expand engagement with the affected communities and adjust
strategies and programming based on their feedback.
Affected Communities
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 14
The Black population in AR is significantly overrepresented in traffic fatalities. (See section 6.8 and 6.9)
Top five counties for occupant protection fatalities among Arkansas’ Black population include:
Craighead, Mississippi, Monroe, Pulaski, and St. Francis counties (See chart Section 6.9 showing ratio
for all AR counties)
Top five counties for pedestrian fatalities among Arkansas’ Black population include: Craighead,
Crittenden, Jefferson, Miller, and Pulaski counties (See chart Section 6.9 showing ratio for all AR
counties)
Historically Black Colleges and Universities are located in the Central Arkansas counties of Pulaski
and Jefferson.
Counties with HBCUs
Black or African American Fatalities in Counties with HBCUs 2017-2021
County
% of Total
Population
% of Total
Fatalities
% of
Total
Pedestrian
Fatalities
% of Total
Unrestrained
Fatalities
Pulaski
36.89%
39.74%
39.34%
43.90%
Jefferson
55.77%
57.14%
73.33%
37.50%
Counties Adjacent to HBCUs
Black or African American Fatalities in Counties adjacent to HBCUs 2017-2021
Counties
% of Total
Population
% of Total
Fatalities
% of Total
Pedestrian
Fatalities
% of Total
Unrestrained
Fatalities
Arkansas
25.12%
36.36%
50.00%
16.67%
Cleveland
13.48%
20.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Grant
2.51%
8.57%
0.00%
0.00%
Lincoln
30.25%
33.33%
100.00%
0.00%
Lonoke
5.46%
13.04%
0.00%
8.33%
Perry
2.56%
5.88%
0.00%
0.00%
Saline
7.61%
12.94%
0.00%
20.00%
Overrepresented Fatalities
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 15
Arkansas Highway Safety Office THSP - Engagement Outcomes:
Several groups have been identified and contact information provided to AHSO Staff. Introductions were made
to local community leaders and invitations extended to AHSO staff requesting educational information and/or
presentations. AHSO staff or Project Coordinators have participated in activities with the Natural Wonders
Partnership Council and Philander Smith HBCU.
Natural Wonders Partnership Council (NWPC)
The NWPC was suggested to the AHSO at the SWOT Analysis by Sharonda Love, Community Health & Safety
Director for Community Engagement, Advocacy, and Health at Arkansas Children's Hospital and was a logical
starting place for AHSO as the council’s strategy involves building on the momentum of engaged communities.
Arkansas Highway Safety Office (AHSO) wanted to work with community health advocates such as the
organizations represented in the Natural Wonders Partnership Council (NWPC) to ensure that they have an
active voice in determining countermeasures that can best impact the local communities surrounding the greater
Little Rock area. The membership groups of the NWPC who participated in the AHSO SWOT analysis
recognized that the NWPC would be a valuable partner in creating measurable programming efforts utilizing
data analysis to identify gaps relative to crashes and fatalities in the underserved communities of Pulaski and
Jefferson counties where data analysis shows significant pedestrian and unrestrained related incidences.
NWPC is a coalition of diverse child health organizations, nonprofits, agencies, and funders (membership list
Section 6.11) that work together to address the changing health needs of children and families in Arkansas.
Since 2006, Arkansas Children’s Hospital has served as the backbone agency for NWPC and helped coordinate
strategic initiatives that make measurable improvements in the health and quality of life of Arkansas children
and families. The Council has a statewide membership with groups and organizations located in targeted
counties that the AHSO has identified as having underserved and overrepresented populations adversely
affected by injuries and fatalities resulting from traffic crashes.
The AHSO and the Natural Wonders working partnership is based on the council’s multi-faceted approach to
saving lives and reducing injuries to the children and families in Arkansas, particularly in underserved and
overrepresented populations. For this reason, the council has a vested interest in the future development of the
THSP, given its purpose is to decrease injuries and fatalities resulting from traffic crashes in Arkansas - which
aligns with their core goal.
NWPC is headquartered in Pulaski County. Its membership includes the leaders of public health agencies in
Pulaski and Jefferson Counties which are targeted counties for AHSO PPE efforts based on problem
identification (see chart at bottom of page 14). The AHSO’s meetings with this group have resulted in the
identification of several countermeasures and opportunities identified on page 15.
NWPC Activities Conducted:
Natural Wonders Partnership Council (NWPC) – Introductory Meeting- June 6, 2023
o Use of Collective Impact Model to guide work of partners to improve the health of children
and families through networking.
Natural Wonders Partnership/Building Community Assets Workgroup (NWP/BCA) Quarterly Zoom
Meeting – July 28, 2023
o AHSO provided data analysis overview and goals for community outreach efforts discussion.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 16
NWPC Accessibility:
The NWPC meetings on June 6 and July 28, 2023, were virtual meetings which by nature allow greater
accessibility for persons that might have issues attending an in-person meeting. The virtual meeting software
provided Closed Captioning for a real time transcript of the meeting for the hearing impaired.
NWPC Engagement Outcomes:
The Natural Wonders Partnership Council (NWPC) workgroup “Building Community Assets” (BCA) which
included representatives from communities identified as overrepresented in fatalities met with the AHSO on
June 6, 2023. During this meeting the AHSO presented data and information identified in the SWOT analysis
regarding communities and populations that are overrepresented in Arkansas traffic fatalities and serious
injuries and an overview of AHSO goals and objectives for PPE efforts to address this issue. Members of the
NWPC “Building Community Assets” workgroup identified areas that would benefit from assistance by
reviewing the census data (provided by AHSO) for black people as well as FARS data to understand which
program areas were the most severely impacted. It was apparent that Pulaski County is one of the largest
counties in Arkansas with a large African American overrepresentation in terms of pedestrian and unrestrained
fatalities. Pulaski County (shown in dark green-Center of map on page 12) had the highest number of African
Americans at 147,543. African Americans constitute 37.62% of the county's population with Little Rock having
an even greater concentration at 42.6%. Pulaski County had the #1 rate for roadway fatalities in 2020 at 19.6
and Little Rock is a key area to target for interventions to reduce black pedestrian fatalities.
After this meeting an invitation was extended to the AHSO to do a more in-depth presentation for the full
NWPC membership at their July 28, 2023, meeting. As a result of discussions with NWPC partners, it was
determined that an initial means to accomplish our common goal of reducing fatalities and injuries in Arkansas
could be accomplished by the sharing of health data (CDC data, hospital discharge data, insurance claim
information, etc.) and by bringing health and safety advocates to the table to assist with the ongoing
development of the 2024 THSP.
Based on data analysis, the AHSO and the membership of the NWPC focused on a community-based strategy
to create opportunities for feedback among different leaders in affected communities. Feedback from the
SWOT analysis had already indicated that effective programming should include seatbelt surveys and
educational forums on pedestrian and seat belt safety. Additionally, a local engineer from ARDOT who
participated in the SWOT had provided information on funding possibilities for signage and signal lights at
intersections for pedestrians.
When the full membership of the Natural Wonders Partnership council met on July 28, the attendees included
organizations and groups from targeted communities where black people were overrepresented in fatalities.
During this meeting presentations were given by Dean Scott NHTSA Region 7 and Debra Hollis AHSO. They
discussed how the model of the Safe System Approach and National Roadway Safety Strategy could be used
to build sustainable programs in Pulaski and Jefferson counties incorporating countermeasure strategies
previously identified at the BCA workgroup meeting. Additional input was solicited from the full membership
group and the AHSO received valuable feedback from this discussion. It was determined that the
countermeasures identified in the meeting (listed on page 15) could be effective for the counties of Pulaski and
Jefferson. A summary of the NWPC meeting can be found in section 6.11. Some of the countermeasure
strategies discussed during the meeting were: walking patrols, seat belt surveys, and educational activities that
could be implemented in areas identified by data analysis as critical.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 17
ATTENDEES OF NWPC JULY 28, 2023, VIRTUAL MEETING
Name Organization Represented Organization Reach & HQ Location
Loretta Alexander
AR Advocates for Children and Family
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Raymond Long
AR Blue Cross Blue
Shield
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Jasmine Zandi
AR Hunger Relief Alliance
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Lynn Hawkins
AR Rural Health Partnership
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Craig Wilson
Arkansas Center for Health Improvement
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Anna Strong
Arkansas Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Beatriz Mondragon
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Holly Terry
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Laura Taylor
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Lessa Payne
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Sarah Harlan
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
ShaRhonda Love
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Charles Maxwell
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Lauren Morris
Arkansas Community Foundation
Statewide
–
Pulaski Counties
Cheria McDonald
Arkansas Department of Education
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Nidhi Patel
Arkansas Department of Health
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Shanetta Agnew
Arkansas Department of Health
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Shannon Borchert
Arkansas Department of Health
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Chad Rodgers
Arkansas
Foundation for Medical Care
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Shaneca Smith
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Sheryl Hurt
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Thedrick
Arkansas Foundation for
Medical Care
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Debra Hollis
Arkansas Highway Safety Office
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Peyton Reeves
Arkansas Highway Safety Office
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Kenya Eddings
Arkansas Minority Health Commission
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Katie Stahler
Baptist Health
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Angela Flynn
Department of Human Services
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Hannah Raines
Department of Human Services
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Iris Goacher
Department of Human
Services
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Angela Duran
Excel by 8
Jefferson and Pulaski Counties
Randy Jumper
First North Little Rock
North Little Rock
–
Pulaski County
Allie Staton
Immunize Arkansas
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Heather Mercer
Immunize
Arkansas
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Mary Otwell
Little Rock School District
Little Rock
–
Pulaski County
Dean Scott
National Highway Transportation Safety Administration
Nationwide
–
Missouri
Susan DeCourcy
National Highway Transportation Safety
Administration
Nationwide
–
Missouri
Ana Miller
Sanofi
Multinational
–
Benton County
Danielle Wright
The Root Creation
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Diana Gonzalez Worthen
University of Arkansas
Statewide
–
Washington County
Christopher Smith
University of Arkansas Medical Sciences
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Kim Scott
University of Arkansas Medical Sciences
Statewide
–
Pulaski County
Recommended Countermeasure Strategies from NWPC Meeting Attendees on July 28, 2023:
Use back to school events to promote Seat Belt and Pedestrian Educational Programs
Contact programs with Junior Auxiliary, fraternity/sorority organizations and rotary clubs to set up Seat
Belt and Pedestrian Programs and conduct local surveys /education in underserved communities.
Engage faith-based organizations and Boys & Girls Clubs that serve underserved and overrepresented
communities in Pulaski and Jefferson Counties.
Train medical providers to include traffic safety conversations, specifically Seat Belt and Pedestrian
Safety, in every health contact and remind all primary care providers periodically.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 18
Develop projects with local African American and Latino community-based organizations in Pulaski
and Jefferson Counties to deliver messaging for back-to-school events and festivals.
Model messaging and programs based on what has worked with vaccine education in identified
communities.
During this discussion it was determined that countermeasure strategies should include law enforcement
walking patrols in areas where impaired pedestrians are common. High Visibility Enforcement will still be
highly prevalent and utilized to combat unrestrained fatalities in overrepresented communities, but law
enforcement will incorporate educational opportunities in addition to writing citations.
The AHSO and the NWPC membership will work together on these countermeasures to implement projects
based on the above feedback and to involve teachers, students, administrators, medical providers, African
American and Latino community-based organizations as well as city and county officials. Focus groups, town
hall meetings, presentations to civic groups, faith-based and other community-based groups will be organized
and scheduled to solicit additional guidance for project planning and implementation. All feedback will be
coordinated with AHSO partners and subgrantees to identify potential opportunities within their scope of work.
These organizations will look for engagement opportunities such as interactive workshops and presentations,
mock pedestrian crosswalks, seat belt demonstrations, interactive games/activities etc. to further seat belt and
pedestrian safety. Organizations will follow up with evaluations to review and improve the process. The AHSO
will use this feedback along with any suggestions to identify and implement new countermeasure strategies and
revisions to the FY 24-26 THSP.
How NWPC Members Feedback Has Been Incorporated Into The THSP
Based on the Problem ID from the SWOT and feedback from the NWPC July 28, 2023, meeting, the AHSO is
coordinating with ACH to expand both the CPS and Teen program staff in FY24. Specific goals are to increase
child safety seat (CSS) inspections stations in Pulaski and Jefferson counties in areas that are readily accessible
to underserved communities. ACH will also look at periodically extending or altering the hours of CSS
inspection stations to accommodate “normal work hours” so that citizens will be less likely to need to take off
work to have a car seat inspection. The ACH CPS program will partner with community organizations in Pulaski
and Jefferson Counties that work with underrepresented communities to train CPS technicians and provide them
with the necessary equipment to conduct car seat events. They will also provide information to medical
providers and encourage them to educate their patients. The goal is to find CPS technicians in these communities
that can become certified trainers and to increase the number of CPS technicians and medical providers
providing education on passenger safety in these communities.
Two of the recommendations from the NWPC meeting on July 28, 2023, were:
Set up Seat Belt and Pedestrian Programs and conduct local surveys/education in underserved
communities.
Train medical providers to include traffic safety conversations, specifically Seat Belt and
Pedestrian Safety, in every health contact and remind all primary care providers periodically.
Consistent with the feedback from this meeting and our problem identification, the CPS program will include
technicians conducting seat belt surveys in underrepresented communities of adults that come into CSS
inspection stations and providing educational materials on the importance of seat belt use for those adults as
well as proper use of child safety seats. The program will also train medical providers to include traffic safety
conversations, specifically Seat Belt and Pedestrian Safety, in every health contact with adults and children and
remind these primary care providers periodically. The goal is to ensure that the necessary education is provided
for parents and other caregivers seeking CPS resources and to reinforce the importance of all vehicle
occupants/passengers being properly restrained.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 19
In conjunction with the above program, the ACH Teen programs on pedestrian and bicycle safety which include
educational activities with schools and colleges, will be expanded to include an educational campaign targeting
underserved and overrepresented populations in Pulaski and Jefferson counties.
A meeting with the NWPC has been set for December 5, 2023, to develop an action plan for identifying
community groups in these areas to address the remaining recommended countermeasure strategies from the
July 28, 2023, meeting, identify potential projects that can be implemented to reduce pedestrian and
unrestrained fatalities, and continue to inform AHSO programming efforts.
NWPC Ongoing Engagement Planning
Sharonda Love, Community Health & Safety Director for Community Engagement, Advocacy, and Health at
Arkansas Children's Hospital agreed to put together a roundtable discussion during the upcoming May 2024
AHSO Traffic Safety Conference. Presenters at this conference will speak to countermeasure strategies
developed during the Building Community Assets (BCA) workgroup meeting. Attendees at the conference will
include representatives from underserved and overrepresented populations identified by data analysis and
targeted for programming. The comments and views of these communities will be incorporated in future
revisions of the 2024 THSP as strategies are finalized through further collaboration. A summary of the
suggestions and feedback from the NWPC July 28, 2023, meeting can be found in Section 6.11
The AHSO will continue to identify additional coalitions, work groups and community residents in targeted
areas for underserved and overrepresented populations (see charts in Section 6.9). Meetings and events will be
planned and promoted as “Community Conversations” that will allow citizens to provide insight and
recommendations on issues affecting their communities and offer suggestions to improve existing programs
and create new programming efforts that can create safer Arkansas roads and drivers.
Plans include changes to projects targeting teens as a result of feedback from the SWOT, NWPC July 28, 2023,
meeting and the Philander Smith HBCU meeting. Additional staff are needed and will be added to assist with
expanding this programming and working with more targeted high schools in the underserved communities of
Pulaski and Jefferson Counties while also expanding Seat Belt and Pedestrian Safety awareness campaigns to
HBCUs located in Pulaski and Jefferson Counties.
Philander Smith HBCU
Philander Smith College is a private historically black college in Little Rock, Arkansas. It is affiliated with the
United Methodist Church and is a founding member of the United Negro College Fund. It has a total enrollment
of 710 (all undergraduate students) for academic year 2021-2022. There are 613 full-time and 97 part-time
students with gender distribution of 256 male and 454 female students. The enrolled student population at
Philander Smith College, both undergraduate and graduate, is 91.4% Black or African American, 2.5% Hispanic
or Latino, 1.75% Two or More Races, 0.25% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders, 0.125% American
Indian or Alaska Native, 0.125% White, and 0% Asian.
Philander Smith College is a prominent well-known Arkansas HBCU and as such attracts African American
students from across the entire state of Arkansas. It is estimated that 25% of the student body commutes from
Southeast AR with 25% from Southwest AR, 40% from Central AR (where Pulaski County is located) and
10% from NW AR, therefore the student population represents all the targeted counties identified on page 17
and 18. Philander Smith is viewed as another critical partner due to its location in Pulaski County with a student
body consisting primarily of African American students from Pulaski County.
African Americans are over-represented in Arkansas’ pedestrian fatalities as indicated by the map in Section
6.10. Most of these fatalities occur in Pulaski County where Philander Smith College is located. Philander
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 20
Smith and the other selected HBCUs are engagement opportunities because they provide an opportunity to
reach the underserved and overrepresented populations in Pulaski and Jefferson counties identified by data
analysis as target areas.
Philander Smith HBCU Activities Conducted:
Philander Smith HBCU December 14, 2022
o AHSO Administrator and AR NHTSA Regional Program Manager met with Angela Davis,
Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement, to discuss areas for collaboration and
engagement.
o As Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement, Ms. Davis was able to advise the AHSO on
ways to involve the student body and obtain access to the groups and events most conducive to
engaging the student population.
Philander Smith HBCU April 12, 2023
o Annual Career Day – Set up Booth with informational materials.
o Attended by 100-200 students
o AHSO personnel interacted with approximately 50 students. Discussions included traffic
safety issues in Pulaski County and how students could participate in developing projects and
programming to educate citizens and encourage best practices for pedestrian, seat belt usage
and traffic safety in general.
Philander Smith Accessibility
The event at the Philander Smith HBCU on April 12, 2023, was held on campus. The event location offered
ramps that allowed accessibility for wheelchair users/ mobility device user and persons with other medical
equipment; the restrooms nearest the event were marked and accessible as defined by the American Disabilities
Act (ADA) and ADA handicap parking was available near the building. Participants were allowed to stand at
the back of the event space if needed.
Philander Smith HBCU Engagement Outcomes:
AHSO Administrator, Bridget White and AR NHTSA Regional Program Manager, Dean Scott met with Angela
Davis, Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement, to discuss areas for collaboration and engagement on
December 14, 2022. As Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement, Ms. Davis was the most appropriate
person to advise the AHSO on ways to involve the student body and obtain access to the groups and events
conducive to engaging the student population. This meeting was successful and the AHSO secured invitations
to Philander Smith’s “Career Day” which opened doors for continued dialogue with students at Philander Smith
and other counties and organizations with large African American populations that were represented at this
event.
Discussions with Angela Davis (Philander Smith College, Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement) and
students during this event included the idea of partnering with the AHSO to create traffic safety programming
within their existing health and safety programs and the possibility of expanding current efforts at Philander
Smith and three other existing HBCU’s in Pulaski and Jefferson counties to include traffic safety programming
and initiatives.
Student feedback from the meeting was that they would like to see law enforcement educate the public about
traffic safety issues versus writing citations for minor infractions and/or targeting minority communities to
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 21
make quota’s by writing speed citations. Philander Smith College students also indicated that they would like
to see more traffic safety education as a part of the overall health initiatives within their school programs.
After the initial meeting with the Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement and at the request of the college,
the AHSO participated in Philander Smith’s “Work with An Intern” career day program that promotes diversity
and equity (April 12, 2023). Discussions at this event included setting up VIN Checks, vehicle recalls and
establishing a partnership to implement programming for seatbelt and other traffic safety initiatives as a part of
their existing health program. Students who attended this event agreed to help with the messaging of “wearing
a seatbelt saves lives” and participate in pedestrian safety events for Pulaski County where black people are
overrepresented in certain areas and cities (See page 17). Students agreed to be a part of conducting seat belt
surveys, promoting seat belt safety, and pedestrian safety events including conducting pedestrian safety forums.
In addition, they will develop social media posts which will allow for further student involvement.
The AHSO also interacted with three other HBCU’s (University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Shorter College,
and Arkansas Baptist) represented at this event and doors were opened for continued conversations on the
development of the same initiatives with those HBCUs and with students in other targeted counties and
organizations that have large African American populations. AHSO is working with them to include a seatbelt
program as part of their health and safety programs.
How Feedback Has Been Incorporated Into The THSP (Philander Smith Annual Career Day)
In development of the FY 24-26 THSP the AHSO considered the feedback that was given from the Dean and
students who attended the Philander Smith “Career Day” event. Many of the students noted that they would
like to see more investment in their communities concerning homeless populations getting hit by cars and police
officers pulling people over for minor infractions and writing them citations. They indicated that there was a
lack of education on traffic safety in their communities and wanted to learn more about seatbelt usage and
pedestrian safety. The AHSO was able to connect Ms. Angela Davis (Dean of Student Leadership and
Engagement) in contact with Mary Porter (Coordinator of the AHSO funded Teen and Pedestrian Project at
Arkansas Children’s Hospital (ACH) to educate black students on these issues. As indicated above, the
Philander Smith students who attended this event agreed to help with the messaging of “wearing a seatbelt saves
lives” and participate in pedestrian safety events for Pulaski County where black people are overrepresented in
certain areas and cities (See page 17). These students agreed to be a part of conducting seat belt surveys,
promoting seat belt safety, and pedestrian safety events including conducting pedestrian safety forums. They
also agreed to develop and make social media posts which will allow for further student involvement. The
AHSO will facilitate this partnership to assist students in planning activities and creating messaging and
educational opportunities around those events. These activities have been incorporated into the Teen and
Pedestrian program in the THSP.
Philander Smith HBCU Ongoing Engagement Planning
Pedestrian Safety Awareness programs will be expanded into the HBCUs in Pulaski and Jefferson Counties
based on the successful Career Day discussion with Philander Smith students. The ACH “TEEN” coordinator
has begun to work with the Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement at Philander Smith to initiate the
program for FY24 and to develop additional Traffic Safety programs on campus. Additional staff support will
be provided to allow the ACH TEEN program to coordinate a HBCU summit meeting scheduled for March 5,
2024, with the Directors of Student Affairs from all 4 HBCUs in Arkansas. The summit is designed to help
extend Seat Belt and Pedestrian safety programs into all the Arkansas HBCU campuses.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 22
The Dean of Student Leadership and Engagement at Philander Smith college will also be speaking at the May
2024 Annual Arkansas Traffic Safety Conference. She will be leading a panel to discuss outreach strategies
that traffic safety partners can use to engage with underserved communities and develop projects and
community partnerships to decrease traffic fatalities and injuries.
The intention of the Philander Smith HBCU engagement is to leverage the experience of that engagement to
develop, design and conduct pedestrian, bicycle and seat belt surveys, design social media posts and carry out
forums to impact the young people in Jefferson and Pulaski Counties. Philander Smith will act as a catalyst for
the three other HBCUs to come on board.
Arkansas Baptist HBCU
Arkansas Baptist College, founded in 1884 is a private Baptist-affiliated historically black college in Little
Rock, Arkansas. It is the only historically black Baptist school west of the Mississippi River.
Located in Little Rock AR with a total enrollment of 414 with a gender distribution of 78.26% male
(324 students) and 21.74% female (90 students).
79.7% Black or African American, 8.21% White, 3.38% Hispanic or Latino, 1.69% Two or More
Races, 0.966% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders, and 0.242% American Indian or Alaska
Native. (See LR and Pulaski demographics under Philander Smith College)
Shorter College HBCU
Shorter College is a private, historically black, liberal arts junior college in North Little Rock, Arkansas. It is
the only private historically black junior college in the United States.
Enrollment of 1,410 students, 1077 undergraduate, 61 graduate.
56% women 39.1%, men
61.4% White, 22.8% Black, 6.3% Hispanic, and 10% other.
North Little Rock has a population of 63,168 with demographics showing White (48.01%), Black or
African American (43.77%) Two or more races (4.65%) Other (2.45%) Asian (0.91%) Native
American (0.2%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 0%
University of Arkansas Pine Bluff HBCU
The University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (UAPB) is a public historically black university in Pine Bluff,
Arkansas. Founded in 1873, it is the second oldest public college or university in the state of Arkansas.
Fall 2022 student enrollment totaled 2,387; by race/ethnicity 0.5% are American Indian, 0.4% are
Asian, 88.9% are Black, 0.1% are Native Hawaiian; 2.4% are Hispanic, 2.4% are Nonresident Alien
(International) 3.2% are White, and 2.0% are two or more races.
By gender 56% are female and 44% are male.
Pine Bluff has a total population of 39,295 with 76.9% Black. According to the most recent data
released for the Pine Bluff metropolitan statistical area (MSA) showed a 12.5% decline over the last
decade from 2010 to 2020. This is the most for any MSA in the country.
Future Ongoing Engagement Planning
Goals
The AHSO will build on the initial goals and projects developed for community engagement by utilizing
feedback from students involved in the HBCU campus traffic safety programs and Summit Meeting, Round
Table discussions planned for the AHSO Annual Conference and the Neighborhood Group “Open Houses” to
be coordinated with the NWPC.
AHSO Staff will continue to:
Identify key factors contributing to traffic accidents and fatalities.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 23
Identify and target communities that are underserved with overrepresented groups.
Engage targeted groups to address specific needs in those communities.
Develop and implement evidence-based countermeasures.
Increase public awareness and engage AR residents in addressing road safety issues.
Identification Of Affected Communities
AHSO will analyze fatality, serious injury, census, and socio-economic data to isolate geographic regions and
communities that are underserved and overrepresented in the data. The AHSO will continue to work with the
groups represented in the SWOT analysis and new partners from the NWPC and Philander Smith with a
common goal of making these communities safer. Existing partnerships will be leveraged and new working
relationships developed to implement efficient and effective countermeasures that will reduce fatalities and
injuries caused by traffic crashes.
Steps Planned To Reach And Engage Affected Communities
The following areas have been identified as opportunities per community and project feedback from the HBCU
and NWPC meetings:
1. HBCU’s (Black Population): Ongoing education and engagement events programming for seatbelt &
other traffic safety initiatives as part of existing health programs. with (Philander Smith College,
University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Shorter College and Arkansas Baptist)
2. Natural Wonders Partnership/Building Community Assets Workgroup (NWP/BCA) Quarterly
Meetings (Provide Information and schedule “Open Houses” for Neighborhood Groups). The meeting
feedback from Natural Wonders in Section 6.11 will be used to further countermeasure exploration.
Success of community engagement events will be based on the quality of input rather than the number of
participants. AHSO will work to include audiences who feel they have been historically ignored or unheard.
Large numbers with several attendees or viewers and numerous survey responses might not be realistic until
we build trust and an audience. While working to engage historically marginalized communities and
community members, we may need to adjust our expectations. We may miss opportunities to connect. Starting
out, the AHSO will value high quality input from a lower number of participants, as that may be the most
realistic outcome.
Accessibility And Inclusivity Measures For Future Ongoing Engagements
Future events for ongoing engagements will take into consideration all accessibility measures listed previously
to meet all attendees needs and ensure the venue complies with all ADA regulations.
The following will be key to increasing accessibility and inclusivity in all Arkansas’ community engagement
efforts.
1. The best community contact is a trusted community organization working within a formal partnership
to facilitate engagement. The AHSO will work with identified groups to develop partnerships for
community participation events including:
Community meetings and in-person open houses
Briefings for community groups and organizations
One on one discussions in person, over the phone, or by email
Online open houses and live streaming when available
Surveys - online, in person, and by mail.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 24
Information packages (in multiple languages, braille and other mediums as needed) to share with
members of community groups and organizations.
Accessible presentation recordings
Narrated and captioned presentations posted online.
2. Throwing dense data or complex plans at people and then asking for input can be confusing and
create barriers to participation. AHSO staff will ensure participants have adequate time to process
information and provide feedback.
Share information 3-7 days before a meeting or presentation. Make content accessible, and let
people know it's available either online or by hard copy.
Be available to discuss and clarify information for people who need more time or would like to
discuss to fully understand the issue and seek their input.
Pair meeting or workshop with online and hard copy (translated) versions and an opportunity for
input; post the online “open house” for a long period of time after the meeting to give people with
time to interact, process the information, and respond.
For in person meetings, not limiting the time people can ask questions or make comments.
For live presentations, either online or in person, speak slowly and clearly to help the whole
audience better understand the information.
Provide interpreters as necessary.
AHSO will utilize presenters who are subject matter experts and use language that everyone can
relate to instead of technical terms and acronyms.
Provide Communication Access Real Time Transcription (CART) for larger events, that include
the public. This is useful for those who are deaf or hard of hearing and helpful for those with
limited English proficiency, as it provides a secondary method by which to process information.
3. Consider the space before the event or meeting is scheduled.
Ensure that wheelchair users/mobility device users or persons with another piece of equipment
can access rooms.
Allow for the adjustment of room lighting.
Allow participants to stand in the back, if needed
Restrooms nearest the training, meeting, or event space will be ADA accessible.
4. AHSO will research advancing technology to help welcome more people into the conversation.
Assistive hearing devices and microphones to reduce barriers for people who are hard of hearing.
Software developers’ accessibility checkers and opportunities to create accessible content for
people who are low vision/blind or dyslexic.
Engage people through smartphones.
AHSO Follow Up For Engagement Activities
After each outreach campaign, AHSO staff will thank people for their participation, to show that they were
heard, and assure them that AHSO will respond. If there are instances where the AHSO cannot use the input,
AHSO will let people know that they were heard, follow up and provide an explanation on why. However, the
feedback will be embraced and used to improve communication and community engagement.
An AHSO newsletter will be available beginning in FY 24. The newsletter will provide current information on
events/grant etc. It will be available in English and Spanish at events, on the AHSO website and by email upon
request. The AHSO will also provide copies (bilingual) to community groups and coalitions for distribution.
Section 2.1 - Comprehensive Public Participation & Engagement
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 25
Priority for programming and project implementation will be based on problem identification and indicators
from data analyses. Strategies and countermeasures from NHTSA’s “Countermeasures That Work” along with
innovative approaches developed through collaborative efforts with communities and partner agencies will be
implemented. Applications will be submitted through the Arkansas eGrants system. Targeted agencies and
organizations will be informed of the application process and proposal period.
Based on the issues addressed in a particular community, action committees and workgroups will be set up
immediately, allowing participants to have a role. AHSO staff will attend these meetings as requested and
participants will be advised on how the AHSO will use the insights, ideas, and input in planning and decision-
making; as well as how things will change because of their participation. The AHSO will share reports,
publicize decisions, and demonstrate how the AHSO will use or plan to use what is learned from these groups
so that participants see the impact that their participation has made or is making. Email updates will be provided
on specific issues and included in the AHSO newsletter. Participants will be invited to follow the AHSO on
social media. The AHSO website provides a place for public comments and questions, and this will be
highlighted.
How Community Feedback Will Be Incorporated Into The THSP
Incorporating the voice of affected communities into the THSP is essential to ensure that the plan is effective,
inclusive and reflects the needs and concerns of the local community. Community members often have intimate
knowledge of the local road conditions, traffic patterns and safety issues that might not be apparent to
transportation authorities. Incorporating community feedback ensures that the THSP aligns with the unique
needs and priorities of the local area. It makes the plan more relevant and targeted in addressing the specific
safety concerns of the community.
Engaging with the community and taking their comments into account fosters trust and transparency in the
planning process. This can lead to greater public support and acceptance of the safety plan, making it more
likely to be implemented successfully. Additionally, diverse perspectives lead to better decision-making. When
safety plans consider the input of various stakeholders, they are more likely to be comprehensive and well-
informed. Some of the methods that AHSO will implement to incorporate feedback into the THSP is:
Establish an online portal and email address for community members to provide feedback, concerns,
and suggestions.
Periodically review and respond to the feedback received, ensuring transparency and accountability.
Recommendations and findings from all meetings with community groups, partners and stakeholders
will be considered when revising the plan.
Regularly assess the impact of implemented safety measures in affected communities.
Use this evaluation to make necessary adjustments to the HSP to address emerging concerns and
challenges.
Provide annual reports on the progress of the THSP, including a section dedicated to how community
feedback has influenced safety initiatives and outcomes.
Section 2.2 – Profile of Arkansas’ Growing Hispanic Population
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 26
The Hispanic community in Arkansas is the fastest growing ethnic group with projections of topping 600,000
by 2060 and representing 20% of the Arkansas population. Developing programs for the Hispanic community
is not only a matter of equity and inclusivity but also an effective approach to improving overall road safety
and fostering positive community engagement. By addressing the specific needs and concerns of the Hispanic
population, Arkansas will be proactive in creating a safer and more inclusive road environment for everyone.
AR Hispanic population is growing and represents 6.5% of traffic fatalities in AR.
Large concentrations of Hispanic population identified in Springdale, DeQueen, Jonesboro, Little Rock,
North Little Rock, and Searcy. Hispanic Advisory Groups are in these areas.
The AHSO is aware of the growing Hispanic population in Arkansas and is working to ensure that safety
information and education is available to this population. AHSO staff are in the process of scheduling meetings
with Hispanic Advisory Groups located in Springdale (Washington and Benton Counties), DeQueen (Sevier
County), Jonesboro (Craighead County), Little Rock North (Pulaski County), Little Rock (Pulaski County), and
Searcy (White County). These efforts will continue throughout the triennial period of this THSP. The AHSO
will use the information gained from the above meetings in conjunction with ongoing data analysis to project
future needs and schedule events and programming as indicated.
Potential Activities include:
Meetings with Hispanic community leader/advisory groups in (Springdale, DeQueen, Jonesboro, Little
Rock, North Little Rock, and Searcy)
Creation of workgroup for input on Ad Campaigns/Events/Articles
Utilization of Hispanic Law Enforcement Officers for education and outreach
Section 2.2 – Profile of Arkansas’ Growing Hispanic Population
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 27
Ten Most Densely Hispanic Populated Counties 2017-2021
County Population
% of Total
Population
% of Total
Fatalities
% of Total
Pedestrian
Fatalities
% of Tota
Unrestrained
Fatalities
Benton
45,827
16.76%
9.62%
5.56%
20.69%
Washington
39,898
16.89%
12.34%
25.71%
10.00%
Pulaski
24,214
6.16%
2.82%
2.46%
2.44%
Sebastian
18,397
14.41%
11.36%
20.00%
0.00%
Saline
6,017
4.97%
7.06%
0.00%
10.00%
Pope
5,882
9.20%
3.64%
0.00%
15.38%
Garland
5,699
5.75%
3.23%
7.69%
5.00%
Sevier
5,686
33.55%
7.41%
0.00%
0.00%
Craighead
5,604
5.14%
3.64%
0.00%
0.00%
Faulkner
5,192
4.16%
2.11%
10.00%
0.00%
Overrepresented fatalities
Feedback/suggestions received from meetings with representatives from publishers of AR Total to date and
meetings scheduled to be conducted with Hispanic Advisory Groups, the AHSO is working to create an
advisory workgroup for ads, events, and articles and to identify Hispanic law enforcement officers that have an
interest in assisting with education and outreach.
Section 2.3 – Resource Collaboration
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 28
Collaboration and planning with the AHSO highway safety partners and stakeholders is a critical part of the
Arkansas THSP. The Safe System Approach is an effective way to address and mitigate the risks inherent in
the transportation system by building and reinforcing multiple layers of protection to prevent crashes from
happening in the first place and minimize the harm caused to those involved when crashes do occur. It is a shift
from a conventional safety approach because it focuses on both human mistakes and human vulnerability to
design a system with redundancies to protect everyone. The Safe System Approach incorporates the following
principles which are vital if the AHSO is to achieve the goals to which it aspires.
Death and Serious Injuries Unacceptable: Prioritize the elimination of crashes that result in death and
serious injuries.
Humans Make Mistakes: People make mistakes and decisions that lead or contribute to crashes, but the
transportation system can be designed to accommodate certain types/levels of human mistakes and avoid death
and serious injuries when a crash occurs.
Humans Are Vulnerable: Human bodies have physical limits for tolerating crash forces before death or
serious injury occurs; therefore, it is critical to design and operate a transportation system that is human-centric
and accommodates physical human vulnerabilities.
Responsibility is Shared: All stakeholders—including government at all levels, industry, non-
profit/advocacy, researchers, and the general public—are vital to preventing fatalities and serious injuries on
Arkansas roadways.
Safety is Proactive: Proactive tools should be used to identify and address safety issues in the transportation
system, rather than waiting for crashes to occur and reacting afterwards.
Redundancy is Crucial: Reducing risks requires that all parts of the transportation system be strengthened,
so that if one part fails, the other parts still protect people.
Safer Roads: Design roadway environments to mitigate human mistakes and account for injury tolerances,
encourage safer behaviors, and facilitate safe travel by the most vulnerable users.
Objectives of this approach include:
Safer Vehicles: Expand/Advocate the availability of vehicle systems and features that help to prevent crashes
and minimize the impact of crashes on both occupants and non-occupants.
Safer Speeds: Promote safer speeds in all roadway environments through a combination of thoughtful,
equitable, context-appropriate roadway design, appropriate speed-limit setting, targeted education, outreach
campaigns, and enforcement.
Post Crash Care: Enhance the survivability of crashes through expedient access to emergency medical care,
while creating a safe working environment for vital first responders and preventing secondary crashes through
robust traffic incident management practices.
In support of this approach, the AHSO will work with all its traffic safety partners and stakeholders to create
safety programs that incorporate all aspects affecting these outcomes.
The AHSO is an active participant in the following groups to identify emerging problems:
Strategic Highway Safety Steering Committee (Crash data analysis and Target Setting)
Section 2.3 – Resource Collaboration
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 29
Crash Data Analysis - May 4
SHSP Steering Committee - June 21
Building Consensus for Safer Teen Driving Coalition- Coalitions (Central AR and NW AR)
Due to pandemic, both coalitions were held together either virtual or in person. Last meeting was on
Thursday, August 25, 2022. It was an in-person meeting, centrally located, with a virtual option.
Northwest AR members were in attendance virtually.
Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Injury Prevention Center (ACH/ACHI projects)
Community Engagement Opportunities - March 9
Health Data Initiative – May 3
Arkansas Impaired Driving Taskforce 2022-2023 Meetings
October 11, 2022
December 13, 2022
February 14, 2023
April 11, 2023
June 13, 2023
August 8, 2023
Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC) – Discussions with representative of working sections:
December 2022 March 2023 June 2023
The AHSO also coordinates with the following State and local agencies to obtain data and other information.
Criminal Justice Institute Arkansas Department of Education
Arkansas Highway Police EMS/Emergency Services for Children Advisory Committee
Arkansas Crime Laboratory Building Consensus for Safer Teen Driving Coalition
Arkansas Department of Health Arkansas Impaired Driving Task Force
Local Law Enforcement Agencies Arkansas Center for Health Improvement
Arkansas Crime Information Center City of Little Rock Bicycle/Pedestrian Program
Office of Driver Services (DFA) Arkansas Office of the Prosecutor Coordinator
Arkansas Sheriff’s Association Arkansas Association of Chiefs of Police
Arkansas Department of Transportation Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts
Section 2.4 - Coordination of THSP and SHSP
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 30
Outcomes from the coordination of the Highway Safety Plan (HSP), data collection and information
systems with the State Strategic Highway Safety plan (SHSP)
Identified emphasis areas were selected and reviewed to assure that they are consistent with the guidelines and
emphasis areas established by the U.S. Department of Transportation, and National Highway and Traffic Safety
Administration. Using the experience and expertise of the Arkansas Highway Safety Office (AHSO) and
Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) professional staff, FARS and state crash data, appropriate
overall statewide performance goals and performance measures for selected emphasis areas have been
established. Projections are based on 5 year rolling averages and collaboration between ARDOT and Highway
Safety Office Staff. Specific goals and target dates are based on past trends, external factors and the staff’s
experience. Historical trends were established using graph and chart information. Personnel from the ARDOT,
Federal Highways Administration (FHWA), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and the AHSO held
several meetings and conducted an in-depth analysis of data for fatalities, fatality rate, and serious
(incapacitating) injuries. The goals/targets outlined for these performance measures in the FY24-26 THSP are
based on this analysis.
The national performance management measures for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) are
shown below. Number of Fatalities, Rate of Fatalities, and Serious Injuries targets were coordinated between
ARDOT and the AHSO. Each performance measure is based on 5-year rolling averages. (See
Section 3.1)
Number of fatalities
Rate of fatalities
Number of serious injuries
Rate of serious injuries
Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries
Through extensive coordination the Arkansas Highway Safety Office (AHSO), Arkansas Department of
Transportation (ARDOT), Federal Highways Administration (FHWA), National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and other stakeholders, agreed on the
targets shown on pages 20-21.
Targets were calculated using the method below:
Calculate the moving average for the last five years (2013-2017, 2014-2018, 2015-2019, 2016-2020 and
2017-2021).
Calculate the average of these five data points.
Evaluate trend lines and percentage changes.
Calculate average percentage change and adjust targets.
For number of serious injuries and number of non-motorized fatalities, targets were based on FARS state
data and ARF data.
Targets were adjusted for factors that could have a detrimental impact on safety performance, such as
availability of medical marijuana, the opioid epidemic, increase in number of drugged drivers, increase in speed
limit on freeways/expressways, average vehicle speeds, shortage of law officers, distracted driving, increase in
the number of crashes captured in database due to rollout of eCrash statewide and increased reporting (26%
increase in fatalities from 2019 to 2021). Increasing gas prices and other factors such as vehicle safety features
and road safety infrastructure improvements that could have a positive effect on safety performance.
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 31
Method Used to Establish Performance Targets
Projections for the FY24-26 triennial performance measures were evaluated using several methods. The first was to
calculate the average percent change in the most recent 3 years of FARS data in relation to a 5-year average baseline that
precedes each of the 3 years. The second was to use Excel to build a forecast model for the most recent 5-year rolling
averages. Third the performance measure was evaluated by considering the 2021 FARS fatalities in each area and the
preliminary state data for 2022 and calculating what maximum number of fatalities could be for 2023-2026 to achieve the
2022-2026 average goal. The preliminary state data on fatalities for January through April of 2023 indicates a trend that is
similar to 2021’s fatalities based on the NSC data.
Data Used to Establish Performance Measure Goals
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
520.8 525.2 533.4 553.6 580.0 542.6
0.84% 1.56% 3.79% 4.77% 2.74%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Average Trend
525 520 511 651 693 580
-0.95% -1.73% 27.40% 6.45% 7.79%
Change
527.8 2019 511
520.8
2020
651
525.2
2021
693
Current
Level
2017-2021
580.0 580.0 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
644 564 564 564 564
Percent Change
Percent Change
Baseline
Recent Year
5-Year Moving Average
Ye ar
5-Year Moving Average
Ye ar
Fatality
2013-2017 avg
25.00%
2014-2018 avg
31.95%
Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data
Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Yearly Values
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
%Change
2012-2016 avg -3.18%
17.92%
520.8
525.2
533.4
553.6
580.0
542.6
580.0
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Avg - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
520.8 525.2 533.4 553.6 580.0
Forecast
580.0 590.1 605.3 620.6 635.9 651.2
Lower Confidence Bound
580.0 572.8 586.0 599.5 613.0 626.7
Upper Confidence Bound
580.0 607.3 624.6 641.8 658.7 675.6
500
525
550
575
600
625
650
675
700
5-Year Average Fatalities Linear Trend
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 32
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Ave rage Trend
2,991.2 2,832.4 2,679.4 2,618.2 2,556.0 2,735.4
-5.31% -5.40% -2.28% -2.38% -3.84%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
2816 2272 2389 2582 2721
2556
-19.32% 5.15% 8.08% 5.38% -0.18%
Change
3,073.2 2019 2,389
2,991.2
2020
2,582
2,832.4
2021
2,721
Current
Level
2017-2021
2,556.0 2,479.3 -3.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
2694 2,426 2,426 2,426 2,426
Year
5-Ye ar Moving Average
Yearly Values
Year
2014-2018 avg
-3.93%
Serious Injury
Percent Change
Percent Change
Baseline
Recent Year
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
Serious Injury
2026 Target
Reduce Serious Injuries 2,479.3 (2022-2026) from the current safety level of
2,556.0 (2017-2021) by 3% by 2026. Based on preliminary state data this
will require lowering serious injuries for 2023-26 to an average of 2,426 per
year.
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
%Change
2012-2016 avg -22.26%
-13.29%
2013-2017 avg
-13.68%
2,991.2
2,832.4
2,679.4
2,618.2
2,556.0
2,735.4
2,479.3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Avg - Serious Injury
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
2,991.2 2,832.4 2,679.4 2,618.2 2,556.0
Forecast
2,556.0 2,427.6 2,322.4 2,217.2 2,112.0 2,006.8
Lower Confidence Bound
2,556.0 2,337.1 2,221.2 2,106.3 1,992.1 1,878.6
Upper Confidence Bound
2,556.0 2,518.1 2,423.6 2,328.1 2,231.9 2,135.1
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
2,600
2,800
3,000
3,200
5-Year Average Serious Injury Linear Trend
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
1.491 1.477 1.477 1.545 1.592 1.517
-0.93% -0.05% 4.65% 3.03% 1.68%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
1.443 1.418 1.377 1.919 1.803 1.592
36,389 36,675 37,099 33,919 38,427
Change
1.537 2019 1.377
1.491
2020
1.919
1.477
2021
1.803
Current
Level
2017-2021
1.592 1.592 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
1.677476492 1.571 1.571 1.571 1.571
Fatality Rate
VMT (Millions)
Percent Change
Baseline Recent Year %Change
2014-2018 avg
5-Year Moving Average
Ye ar
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
Ye ar
22.07%
13.47%
2013-2017 avg
28.71%
Fatality Rate
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
2012-2016 avg -10.37%
1.491
1.477
1.477
1.545
1.592
1.517
1.592
1.400
1.420
1.440
1.460
1.480
1.500
1.520
1.540
1.560
1.580
1.600
1.620
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Avg - Fatality Rate
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
1.491 1.477 1.477 1.545 1.592
Forecast
1.592 1.609 1.638 1.667 1.696 1.725
Lower Confidence Bound
1.592 1.545 1.567 1.589 1.612 1.635
Upper Confidence Bound
1.592 1.673 1.709 1.745 1.781 1.816
1.45
1.50
1.55
1.60
1.65
1.70
1.75
1.80
1.85
5-Year Average Fatality Rates Linear Trend
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 33
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
183.0 183.2 183.0 184.6 191.0 185.0
0.11% -0.11% 0.87% 3.47% 1.09%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
180 177 166 204 228 191.0
-1.67% -6.21% 22.89% 11.76% 6.69%
Change
192.4 2019 166
183.0 2020 204
183.2
2021
228
Current
Level
2017-2021
191.0 191.0 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
183 193 193 193 193
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Year
5-Year Moving Average
Yearly Values
11.48%
2014-2018 avg
24.45%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Unrestrained Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year
%Change
2012-2016 avg -13.72%
7.40%
2013-2017 avg
183
183
183
185
191
185.0
191.0
170
175
180
185
190
195
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
183.0 183.2 183.0 184.6 191.0
Forecast
191.0 191.1 193.0 194.9 196.8 198.7
Lower Confidence Bound
191.0 186.5 188.2 190.0 191.7 193.5
Upper Confidence Bound
191.0 195.7 197.8 199.8 201.9 203.9
180.0
185.0
190.0
195.0
200.0
205.0
5-Year Average Unrestrained Fatalities Linear Trend
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Tre nd
138.4 141.2 140.2 141.6 152.6 142.8
2.02% -0.71% 1.00% 7.77% 2.52%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
146 135 131 166 185 152.6
-7.53% -2.96% 26.72% 11.45% 6.92%
Change
138.0 2019 131
138.4 2020 166
141.2
2021
185
Current
Level
2017-2021
152.6 152.6 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
165 150 150 150 150
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Ye ar
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
19.94%
2014-2018 avg
31.02%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Impaired Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg -5.07%
15.30%
2013-2017 avg
138
141
140
142
153
142.8
152.6
130
135
140
145
150
155
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
138.4 141.2 140.2 141.6 152.6
Forecast
152.6 153.1 156.2 159.3 162.4 165.5
Lower Confidence Bound
152.6 146.3 149.3 152.4 155.5 158.5
Upper Confidence Bound
152.6 159.8 163.0 166.1 169.3 172.5
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
5-Year Average Impaired Fatalities Linear Trend
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 34
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
92.6 104.4 119.6 134.0 140.0 118.1
12.74% 14.56% 12.04% 4.48% 10.96%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
124 132 132 164 148 140.0
6.45% 0.00% 24.24% -9.76% 5.23%
Change
83.0 2019 132
92.6 2020 164
104.4
2021
148
Current
Level
2017-2021
140.0 140.0 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
135 141 141 141 141
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Year
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
77.11%
2014-2018 avg
41.76%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Speeding Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg 59.04%
59.30%
2013-2017 avg
93
104
120
134
140
118.1
140.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
92.6 104.4 119.6 134.0 140.0
Forecast
140.0 154.0 166.3 178.6 190.9 203.2
Lower Confidence Bound
140.0 149.2 161.5 173.8 186.1 198.4
Upper Confidence Bound
140.0 158.8 171.1 183.4 195.7 208.0
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
5-Year Average Speed Related Fatalities Linear Trend
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
71.0 71.6 72.6 72.6 75.4 72.6
0.85% 1.40% 0.00% 3.86% 1.52%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
69 66 66 80 96 75.4
-4.35% 0.00% 21.21% 20.00% 9.22%
Change
71.6 2019 66
71.0 2020 80
71.6
2021
96
Current
Level
2017-2021
75.4 75.4 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
84 73 73 73 73
Year
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Percent Change
Baseline Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg -7.82%
12.98%
MotorCylce Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
2013-2017 avg 12.68%
2014-2018 avg
34.08%
5-Year Moving Average
71
72
73 73
75
72.6
75.4
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
71.0 71.6 72.6 72.6 75.4
Forecast
75.4 75.9 76.9 77.9 78.9 79.9
Lower Confidence Bound
75.4 74.5 75.5 76.5 77.5 78.5
Upper Confidence Bound
75.4 77.2 78.3 79.3 80.3 81.3
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
5-Year Average Motorcycle Fatalities Linear Trend
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 35
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
43.8 44.8 44.4 42.6 41.4 43.4
2.28% -0.89% -4.05% -2.82% -1.37%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
36 45 34 39 53 41.4
25.00% -24.44% 14.71% 35.90% 12.79%
Change
45.0 2019 34
43.8 2020 39
44.8
2021
53
Current
Level
2017-2021
41.4 40.2 -3.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
51 37 37 37 37
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Year
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
-10.96%
2014-2018 avg
18.30%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
MotorCycle Fatalities Unhelmeted
2026 Target
Reduce Motorcycle Unhelmeted fatalities to 40.2 (2022-2026) from the
current safety level of 41.4 (2017-2021) by 3% by 2026. Based on
preliminary state data this will require lowering fatalities for 2023-26 to an
average of 37 per year.
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg -24.44%
-5.70%
2013-2017 avg
44
45
44
43
41
43.4
40.2
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
43.8 44.8 44.4 42.6 41.4
Forecast
41.4 41.0 40.2 39.5 38.7 38.0
Lower Confidence Bound
41.4 39.0 38.0 37.0 36.1 35.1
Upper Confidence Bound
41.4 43.0 42.5 41.9 41.4 40.8
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
5-Year Average Unhelmeted Motorcycle Fatalities Linear Trend
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Trend
61.4 60.8 61.8 64.4 64.0 62.5
-0.98% 1.64% 4.21% -0.62% 1.06%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
48 60 62 78 72 64.0
25.00% 3.33% 25.81% -7.69% 11.61%
Change
65.6 2019 62
61.4 2020 78
60.8
2021
72
Current
Level
2017-2021
64.0 64.0 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
78 61 61 61 61
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Year
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
27.04%
2014-2018 avg
18.42%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Fatalities Under 21
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg -5.49%
13.32%
2013-2017 avg
61
61
62
64
64
62.5
64.0
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
61.4 60.8 61.8 64.4 64.0
Forecast
64.0 65.9 67.7 68.4 70.1 70.8
Lower Confidence Bound
64.0 63.5 65.1 65.8 67.4 68.1
Upper Confidence Bound
64.0 68.4 70.2 71.0 72.8 73.5
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
5-Year Average Under 21 Fatalities Linear Trend
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 36
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Tre nd
44.6 47.8 52.8 60.2 66.2 54.3
7.17% 10.46% 14.02% 9.97% 10.40%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
47 62 62 81 79 66.2
31.91% 0.00% 30.65% -2.47% 15.02%
Change
44.6 2019 62
44.6 2020 81
47.8
2021
79
Current
Level
2017-2021
66.2 66.2 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
71 65 65 65 65
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Ye ar
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
81.61%
2014-2018 avg
65.27%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Pedestrian Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg 39.01%
61.97%
2013-2017 avg
45
48
53
60
66
54.3
66.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
44.6 47.8 52.8 60.2 66.2
Forecast
66.2 71.4 77.1 82.7 88.4 94.0
Lower Confidence Bound
66.2 68.6 73.9 79.2 84.6 89.9
Upper Confidence Bound
66.2 74.3 80.3 86.2 92.2 98.1
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5-Year Average Pedestrian Fatalities Linear Trend
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021 Average Tre nd
4.2 4.2 3.4 4.0 5.4 4.2
0.00% -19.05% 17.65% 35.00% 8.40%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
4 4 3 6 10 5.4
0.00% -25.00% 100.00% 66.67% 35.42%
Change
4.6 2019 3
4.2 2020 6
4.2
2021
10
Current
Level
2017-2021
5.4 5.4 0.00%
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 6 6 6 6
Percent Change
Baseline
Analysis of Average Percent Change in 3 Most Recent Years vs. 5-Year Average Baseline
5-Year Moving Average
Ye ar
5-Ye ar Moving Ave rage
Yearly Values
42.86%
2014-2018 avg
138.10%
Year
Fatality
Percent Change
Bike Fatalities
2026 Target
All available information indicates rising fatalities trend, however due to
regulations we are setting the adjustment % to zero
Preliminary
State Data Maximum amount to still make target.
Benchmarks to Achieve 2022-2026 Average Goal
Adjusted
Target
Percent
Change
2026 TARGET=
Recent Year %Change
2012-2016 avg -34.78%
48.72%
2013-2017 avg
4 4
3
4
5
4.2
5.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020 2017-2021
5-Year Rolling Average - Fatalities
Rolling Average Overall Average Target Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5 Year Rolling Average
4.2 4.2 3.4 4.0 5.4
Forecast
5.4 5.2 5.5 5.7 6.0 6.3
Lower Confidence Bound
5.4 3.8 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.7
Upper Confidence Bound
5.4 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.9
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
5-Year Average Bycycle Fatalities Linear Trend
Section 3.1 - FY24-26 Performance Measures/Targets
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 37
Target Justification
C
-
1 Traffic Fatalities
C
-
7 Motorcyclist Fatalities
C
-
3 Fatalities/100M VMT
C
-
9 Drivers Age
20 or Younger Involved in Fatal Crashes
C-4 Unrestrained Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities,
All Seat Positions
C-10 Pedestrian Fatalities
C
-
5 Alcohol
-
Impaired Driving Fatalities
C
-
11 Bicyclist Fatalities
C
-
6 Speeding
-
Related Fatalities
Target Metric Type
5
-
Year Average
All the methods indicated trends that indicate a significant increase in fatalities by 2026; however, due to Federal regulations
(BIL) the AHSO is not allowed to set performance measure goals higher than the current safety level based on 2017-2021
FARS dat
a. Therefore, AHSO is setting a goal to maintain the 5
-
year average (2022
-
2026) of fatalities in these categories.
C
-
2 Serious Injuries in Traffic Crashes
Target Metric Type
5
-
Year Average
The trends indicated with the average percent change in the 3 most recent years versus the 5-year baseline and the linear
trend forecast chart indicate a downward trend in serious injuries; based on that downward trend and an evaluation of the
most current trend in fatalities comparing 2019 through 2021 data with preliminary state data for 2022 and the trend of 2023
injuries through April the AHSO setting a performance target to lower 5-year average (2022-2026) of serious injuries by
3% by December 31, 2026
.
C
-
8 Unhelmeted Motorcyclist Fatalities
Target Metric Type
5
-
Year Average
The trends indicated with the average percent change in the 3 most recent years versus the 5-year baseline and the linear
trend forecast chart indicate a downward trend in fatalities; based on that downward trend and an evaluation of the most
current trend in fatalities comparing 2020 and 2021 data with preliminary state data for 2022 and the trend of 2023 fatalities
through April the AHSO setting a performance target to lower 5-year average (2022-2026) of unhelmeted motorcyclist by
3% by December 31, 2026.
Section 3.2 - Performance Plan Chart
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 38
Base Years (Historical Data)
GHSA/NHTSA
Recommended/Optional
PERFORMANCE PLAN CHART
FY24
-
26 Highway Safety Plan
1
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2
C-1
Traffic Fatalities
FARS
Annual
525 516 511 653 695 644
Maintain total fatalities at 580.8 (2022-
2026) from a current safety level of
580.8 (2017-2022).
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
520.8 525.2 533.4 553.6 580.0 603.8
C-2
Serious Injuries in Traffic Crashes State 2816 2272 2389 2582 2720 2694
Reduce serious traffic injuries to
2,479.3 (2022-2026) from a current
safety level of 2,556.0 (2017-2021) by
3% by December 31,2026.
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
2,991.2 2,832.4 2,679.4 2,618.2 2,556.0 2,531.6
C-3
Fatalities/100M VMT
FARS
Annual
1.443 1.418 1.377 1.925 1.813 1.677
Maintain fatality rate at 1.592 (2022-
2026) from a current safety level of
1.595 (2017-2021)
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
1.491 1.477 1.477 1.545 1.592 1.639
C-4
Unrestrained Passenger Vehicle
Occupant Fatalities, All Seat Positions
3
FARS
Annual
180 177 166 204 256 183
Maintain unrestrained passenger
vehicle occupant fatalities, all seat
positions at 191.0 (2022-2026) from a
current safety level of 191.0 (2017-
2021) by December 31, 2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
183.0 183.2 183.0 184.6 191.0 191.6
C-5
Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities
FARS
Annual
146 135 131 166 130 165
Maintain alcohol-impaired driving
fatalities at 152.6 (2022-2026) from a
current safety level of 152.6 (2017-
2021) by December 31, 2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
138.4 141.2 140.2 141.6 152.6 156.4
1
States have the flexibility to establish a target covering the triennial period (i.e., 2024-2026) for each
measure or states may opt to set annual targets for each year covering the triennial HSP period (i.e., 2024,
2025 and 2026).
2
States can opt to provide 2022 state level data as available.
Section 3.2 - Performance Plan Chart
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 39
Base Years (Historical Data)
GHSA/NHTSA
Recommended/Optional
PERFORMANCE PLAN CHART
FY24
-
26 Highway Safety Plan
1
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2
C-6
Speeding-Related Fatalities
FARS
Annual
124 132 132 164 148 135
Maintain speeding-related fatalities at
140.0 (2022-2026) from a current
safety level of 140.0 (2017-2021) by
December 31, 2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
92.6 104.4 119.6 134.0 140.0 142.2
C-7
Motorcyclist Fatalities
FARS
Annual
69 66 66 80 96 84
Maintain motorcyclist fatalities at 75.4
(2022-2026) from a current safety
level of 75.4 (2017-2021) by
December 31, 2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
71.0 71.6 72.6 72.6 75.4 78.4
C-8
Unhelmeted Motorcyclist Fatalities
FARS
Annual
36 45 34 39 53 51
Reduce serious traffic injuries to 40.2
(2022-2026) from a current safety
level of 41.4 (2017-2021) by 3% by
December 31,2026.
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
43.8 44.8 44.4 42.6 41.4 44.4
C-9
Drivers Age 20 or Younger involved in
Fatal Crashes
FARS
Annual
48 60 62 78 72 78
Maintain drivers age 20 and younger
involved in fatal crashes at 64.0 (2022-
2026) from a current safety level of
64.0 (2017-2021) by December 31,
2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
61.4 60.8 61.8 64.4 64.0 70.0
C-10
Pedestrian Fatalities
FARS
Annual
47 62 62 81 79 71
Maintain pedestrian fatalities at 66.2
(2022-2026) from a current safety
level of 66.2 (2017-2021) by
December 31, 2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
44.6 47.8 52.8 60.2 66.2 71.0
C-11
Bicyclist Fatalities
FARS
Annual
4 4 3 6 10 5
Maintain bicyclist fatalities at 5.4
(2022-2026) from a current safety
level of 5.4 (2017-2021) by December
31, 2026
5-Year
Rolling
Avg.
4.2 4.2 3.4 4.0 5.4 5.6
Section 3.2 - Performance Plan Chart
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 40
Base Years (Historical Data)
GHSA/NHTSA
Recommended/Optional
PERFORMANCE PLAN CHART
FY24
-
26 Highway Safety Plan
1
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2
B-1
Observed Seat Belt Use for Passenger
Vehicles, Front Seat Outboard
Occupants (State
Survey)
State
Annual
81.0 78.0 81.9 81.9 84.2 79.1
Increase observed seat belt use for
passenger vehicles, front seat outboard
occupants to 85.0% from a current
safety level of 79.1% by 5.9% by
December 31, 2026
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 41
Annual fatalities over the past 5 years have ranged from 520 in 2018 to 693 in 2021. In 2017, there were 374
passenger vehicle occupant fatalities. Of these fatalities, 180 or 48.1% were unrestrained. The use rate rose to
84.2% in 2021 with unrestrained fatalities of 228 or 50.9% of total fatalities. The 2022 Seat Belt Survey had a
decrease in seat belt usage to 79.1%; however, the preliminary data from the 2023 survey shows some
improvement in the use rate, but Arkansas is still a long way from the 2022 NHTSA National Occupant
Protection use rate (NOPUS) of 91.6%.
Fatalities in rural areas account for 60% of Arkansas fatalities.
SB use rates in Urban areas 84% while Rural areas are 74%.
AR 2021 rural fatality rate per 100,000 residents at 40 while urban is 18.
AR unrestrained fatality rates are highest among black occupants at 8.1 per 100,000 residents.
Fatality rates for White 7.1 and Hispanic 3.6 per 100,000 residents.
56% fatalities ages 0-19 unrestrained and 66% of fatalities ages 25-34 unrestrained.
Arkansas’ conducted an OP Assessment in 2018. The AHSO has been working to utilize the information gained
from this Assessment to identify problem areas, improve current programs, and implement new ones. Below
are some of the recommendations along with progress made and plans for FY24 through FY26.
Utilize state data to ID more specific populations and high-risk times to implement media campaigns: The
implementation of the eCrash “Advance” system and creation of the ACAT (Arkansas Crash Analytics Tool)
by ARDOT (Arkansas Department of Transportation) has greatly increased access to data critical to creating
targeted media campaigns and enforcement efforts. Better communication between the agencies, has resulted
in a more complete and accurate crash data system and resulted in increased cooperation between the various
agencies in the state. The AHSO continues to work with both the Arkansas Sheriff’s Association and the
Arkansas Association of Counties to encourage information sharing and training. The recent “AR Data Deep
Dive” conducted by the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement provided a timely analysis of the state’s
highway safety problems along with locations and underserved and overrepresented populations. This analysis
will also serve as a resource for targeting media campaigns.
Reinvigorate law enforcement grantees to actively enforce OP laws and increase citations: The implementation
of eCite and eCrash has streamlined data entry for law enforcement and reduced the time involved in writing
citations and crash reports. Identification and access to data in high crash areas and road segments through
eCrash and ACAT is facilitating more effective enforcement efforts.
Implement a strong Law Enforcement Liaison Program: The AHSO brought the LEL program in-house in
2019. This Program was very successful in expanding the number of agencies participating in the Mini-STEP
programs and recruiting new STEPs. The AHSO LEL retired in October of 2021 but due to reorganization and
changes in state government the AHSO was unable to secure approval for another position. The AHSO finally
obtained approval for a full-time LEL position in June 2023. The AHSO is working to fill this position as soon
as possible. Based on data analysis from the Data Deep Dive, the AHSO will utilize the new LEL position to
work with the jurisdictions in Arkansas identified as low seat belt use areas. These areas will be top priority
for OP programming to include outreach, information, and education, as well as enforcement efforts.
Information on underserved and overrepresented populations in these areas and others will also be reviewed
with emphasis on setting up “community conversations” to involve residents in helping frame effective,
appropriate programming efforts that can bring about the desired increase in belt use and reduction in the
fatalities and injuries associated with non-use.
Problem Identification
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 42
The AHSO “High Five” demonstration project in partnership with ARDOT targeted the rural counties of Cross,
Fulton, Monroe, White and Calhoun with a goal of increasing seat belt usage. This demonstration project ends
in July of 2023. The AHSO is awaiting results from Preusser Research Group (PRG), the consulting firm
conducting the evaluation, and feedback from the communities and agencies involved and plans to adjust this
project as indicated. Five additional rural counties will be identified utilizing data from the recent AR Data
Deep Dive to expand the project. The goal will be to increase seat belt use rates in these counties. The AHSO
partnership with ARDOT on this project will be continued and road assessments will be conducted to identify
infrastructure issues in these areas as well.
Develop a strategic communications plan for each priority program area: The AHSO is working with the
advertising firm “CJRW” to effectively utilize the data and information gained through eCrash, ACAT and the
“AR Data Deep Dive” for targeted communication plans in each program area.
Develop and maintain standalone Arkansas Highway Safety Office website and expand the site to include all
state traffic safety programs and activities; During the past year the state of Arkansas initiated an effort to
consolidate and downsize government departments and agencies. The Arkansas State Police and AHSO now
fall under the umbrella of the Department of Public Safety. The implementation of eGrant has assisted with
making funding information available online. The existing TZD (Toward Zero Deaths) website has been
updated to promote AHSO programs and activities. An AHSO newsletter, tentatively called “SafARoads” is
under development. Plans are to include it on the website as well as distribute it at community outreach events,
make it available to local groups and coalitions and via email to sub-grantees and stakeholders.
The strategies of projects to be funded in the Occupant Protection Program are to annually:
Achieve two to three vehicle stops per hour during seat belt enforcement periods.
Conduct two waves of high visibility enforcement emphasizing occupant restraint laws.
Mobilize communities to develop strategies & implement activities to increase SB use
Conduct PI&E activities as a component of all enforcement projects.
Conduct a minimum of eight child safety seat technician and instructor training courses.
Conduct three half-day child safety seat training for law enforcement officers.
Obtain a minimum of $300,000 public service airtime for traffic safety messages.
Conduct statewide public information (PI&E) and education and enforcement campaigns (such
as CIOT) to emphasize occupant restraint laws.
Provide statewide child passenger safety education to healthcare, childcare & LE professionals.
Employ LEL to recruit agencies & encourage enforcement of OP laws statewide.
Conduct statewide survey of seat belt use and child restraints.
Utilize information from OP Assessment and data analyses to identify problem areas, improve
current programming and implement new programming.
Activity Reports filled out by project personnel in eGrant will provide data for the above objectives. This
information will be used to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the AHSO efforts.
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 43
Public Participation & Engagement
Through consistent engagement, the AHSO will improve its understanding of factors contributing to rural
fatalities. The AHSO will conduct detailed data analyses to understand which areas and groups are most
affected and engage groups and organizations in identified communities and areas for discussion and feedback.
AHSO Staff and projects will work with these communities to develop appropriate safety countermeasure
strategies and implement projects to reduce this trend. The AHSO will leverage its current High Five program
to expand engagement with affected communities and adjust that project or develop new ones based on
community feedback.
Affected Communities
Rural counties (See Section 1.1 page 7)
Prominent racial and ethnic demographics in historically underserved areas (areas listed in
comprehensive section)
o Unrestrained fatalities highest among black occupants
56% of fatalities ages 0-19 unrestrained and 66% ages 25-34
Engagement Events Conducted:
Meetings and community events in rural counties for High Five Projects
Philander Smith College Meetings and Career Day
Discussions with HBCU’s University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Shorter College & Arkansas Baptist.
Teen Events
Accessibility Measures Implemented:
ADA compliance
Accessible locations, times
Attendees:
85% of attendees (adults and teens) lived within targeted areas.
15% of attendee (adults and students) lived outside area but commuted on same roads to get to the
school or event.
Rural and urban residents mixed ages.
Issues Covered:
OP Educational materials distributed.
Attendees engaged in discussions on SB use.
Surveys/Questionnaires distributed where feasible.
How Affected communities’ comments and views have been or will be incorporated into the development
of the THSP.
New or expanded partnerships (ongoing engagement)
Pilot new projects
Program adjustments
Providing citizens stopped for Distracted Driving violations with handout on AR Distracted Driving
laws.
STEP and Mini STEP
Utilizing data from the AR data deep dive and other sources, priority areas will continue to be identified and
efforts made to recruit LE agencies to implement additional enforcement.
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 44
AHSO contracts with projects to provide selective overtime enforcement efforts in the areas of impaired driving,
speed, distracted driving, and occupant protection. Funding assistance will be awarded to law enforcement
agencies statewide with a special focus on priority areas identified through analysis. Projects also target priority
areas with public information and education for specific dates and times of enforcement efforts. Additional
agencies are recruited to participate in Federal and statewide mobilizations and crackdowns.
Agencies were surveyed on successes, failures and community feedback. These survey results are included in
Section 6.
High Five
Part of the AR High Five program, which targets rural counties with increased enforcement to raise seat belt
use rates, included developing and providing a pamphlet for patrol officers to hand out during public
engagement and when they issue warnings and citations with the goal of educating the public about the
importance of seat belt use during their contact. According to officers the initial feedback from the public on
the fliers has been positive.
All the High five Board Meetings and Zoom calls were attended by AHSO staff. Staff also participated in
numerous calls to monitor project progress and attended different events in several of the counties including
Monroe, Cross, White and Fulton County.
During a separate conversation with a STEP agency, officers said they were doing Distracted Driving
enforcement in a spot where they could observe drivers going through construction zones and effectively
enforce speed, seat belt use and distracted driving laws. The sharp increase in distracted driving citations
created some angry citizens because they were not aware of the distracted driving laws in Arkansas. To combat
this “anger” the department started providing copies of the statute to educate the public about distracted driving
laws in Arkansas whenever they stopped them. The department reported that providing citizens with
information on AR distracted driving laws calmed the uproar down.
Building off these 2 experiences the AHSO will develop handout materials to be used by its STEP and Mini-
STEP agencies while working traffic enforcement. These materials will be used to educate the public on
relevant laws and regulations and stress the importance of traffic safety.
Agencies were surveyed on successes, failures of project and community feedback. These survey results are
included in Section 6.
Child Passenger Safety (CPS)
Based on data analysis from the Data Deep Dive the AHSO will utilize its existing CPS project to work with
the following areas in Arkansas identified as priority areas for expanding CPS services. These areas will be
top priority for recruiting technicians, establishing CPS outposts, training, and check stations. Outreach,
information, and education, as well as enforcement efforts will also be a part of this effort. Information on
underserved and overrepresented populations in these areas and others will be reviewed with emphasis on
setting up “community conversations” to involve these residents in helping to frame effective, appropriate
programming efforts that will increase Child Safety Seat use and reduce the fatalities and injuries associated
with non-use. An additional position CPS position will the added for the Injury Prevention Center. This request
came out of the SWOT meeting based on data which identified a need for program efforts targeting counties in
Southern Arkansas.
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 45
The Arkansas Children’s Hospital (ACH) – CPS program is working on a survey that parents can complete at
car seat events on highway safety topics regarding seat belt use and distracted driving. These surveys will also
address how babies/children learn behaviors by observing actions of those who drive them around. Surveys
will also be distributed to parents and caregivers. They will also be provided on the AHSO website.
Future
Starting in FY24 the AHSO and ACH-CPS program will work with the Little Rock Air Force Base personnel
and military family support organizations to establish child safety training, check stations, and car seat events
geared to help military families stationed at the Air Force Base. The AHSO will also work to establish
partnerships with Veterans of Foreign Wars and the Arkansas Department of Veteran Affairs to coordinate car
seat events around the state targeting the veteran community.
AHSO is working with the ACH-CPS program to identify counties with overrepresented and underserved
communities based on the preliminary Data Deep Dive conducted with ACHI and NHTSA and compare that
to where the CPS technicians are in the state and where there are car seat check stations in the state. With the
addition of another CPS staff member the ACH-CPS staff will be able to identify and work with new coalitions
and partners to expand the pool of CPS technicians and check stations in those communities. Ten percent of
402 funds will be dedicated to expanding the CPS program into these communities. AHSO will also work with
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 46
ACH-CPS to expand their current program to educate the public regarding the risks of leaving a child or
unattended passenger in a vehicle after the vehicle motor is deactivated by the operator at all Child Safety Seat
Checkpoints, Satellite Stations, and events. The AHSO will also develop media ads and other materials
designed to raise awareness about the dangers of leaving children unattended in vehicles to start being used
with the Click It or Ticket campaign and throughout the summer months.
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 1
Countermeasure
Strategy
Child Restraint System Inspection Station(s)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Unintended injury is the leading cause of death for children ages 1-15 in Arkansas and
motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of unintentional injury death for ages 5-15.
The 2021 statewide child restraint use rate was observed to be 82.08%, which is a
decrease from the 88.2% rate in 2019. For children in the “birth to 6 years” age group,
the proportion in restraints was 91.8% (was 93.9% in 2019). For children in the “6 to
15 years” age group, the restrained rate was 72.6% (was 86.4% in 2019). Thus the data
showed that children under the age of six in both the front and rear seats were restrained
at a higher rate than those children from the 6 to 15 years old (91.8% vs. 72.6%). There
is not a statistical significance to the decrease in numbers. The total number of child
observations recorded during the child seat/child restraint part of the survey was 418.
The non-use and misuse of child passenger restraints continues to be a concern.
Specific problems to be addressed include:
Parents and caregivers need to be educated about current child passenger
restraint laws in AR.
Parents and caregivers need to be educated on proper installation of child
safety seats and correct seats for children.
Countermeasure
Justification
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 4.1 Strengthening Child/Youth Laws *****
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 6.1 Strategies for Older Children ****
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 6.2 Strategies for Child Restraint and Booster
Seat Use ***
•
SB and Child Restraints CTW
-
7.2 Inspection Stations ***
Target (link to strategy Decina et al. (2010) found that the most effective approaches for enforcing booster seat
laws depend on having resources to support dedicated booster seat law enforcement
programs, and enforcement methods that are dedicated to booster seat and other child
restraint laws. These elements are in addition to other aspects that have typically been
used to maximize the results of child restrain enforcement efforts (NHTSA, 1990)
Specifically, effective program components that have worked over time include, media
and television, training of law enforcement officers in the benefits of child passenger
protection and methods of effective law enforcement; information activities aimed at
target audiences; information activities coinciding with community events; a network
of child restraint inspection stations; child restraint distribution programs, public
service announcements and other media coverage.
Arkansas proposes to increase child passenger safety resources with special focus on
at-risk families by increasing the existing pool of technicians and instructors and
providing inspection stations while also providing a focus on "Tweens" to address lack
of restraint use and front passenger seating among ages 8 to 14. In FY24, 120
technicians will be trained, and 8 classes will be provided Information on inspection
stations and coverage in Arkansas is shown below. Projected impacts of the proposed
projects include increased use rates and reduced injuries and fatalities for this age
group. Similar objectives will be set for FY25 and FY26 during the annual grant
applications.
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 47
Activities to be funded include:
Statewide child Passenger Protection Education Project
Existing efforts for the UAMS Child Passenger Safety Education Program (CPSE)
are aimed to increase child passenger safety resources around the state to realize
an increase in child restraint use for children ages birth to fifteen.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$676,250 $710,063 $745,566 $2,131,878
Strategy to project
considerations
The Child Restraint System Inspection Stations offers a comprehensive and effective
countermeasure to enhance child passenger safety. By addressing the common issues
related to child safety seat misuse and providing personalized education and guidance,
these stations contribute to reducing the risk of injuries and fatalities among child
passengers. Moreover, they foster community engagement, partnerships, and data-
driven evaluation, ensuring a sustained and impactful approach to highway safety.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
08
Statewide Child Passenger Protection Project
OP
-
2024
-
13
Occupant Protection Program Management
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 2
Countermeasure
Strategy
Communication Campaign (OP)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Arkansas has one of the highest unrestrained fatality rates in Region 7. In 2021 228 or
50.1% of passenger vehicle occupant fatalities involved unrestrained occupants. The
percentage of unrestrained fatalities compared to total passenger vehicle fatalities has
remained comparatively flat 47% to 50% over the last few years. When Arkansas’s
safety belt law went into effect in July 2009, approximately 70% of drivers were
recorded as wearing a safety belt. With a compliance rate in FY22 of 79.1%, Arkansas
has a usage rate well below the national average of 91.6% (2022) and is considered a
“low rate” state for Section 405 b funding qualification.
Although Arkansas’s use rate is low, the primary seat belt law and active enforcement
can be credited for increasing compliance rates since 2009. Because data reveals that
low use rates are a major contributing factor regarding fatalities and serious injuries,
Arkansas has been and will continue to work hard to improve this rate and emphasize
safety belt usage education through communication campaigns, high visibility
enforcement and other educational efforts. Media ads and other materials will be
developed to raise awareness about the dangers of leaving children unattended in
vehicles to start being used with the Click It or Ticket campaign and throughout the
summer months.
Countermeasure
Justification
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 1.1 State Primary Enforcement
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 2.1 Short Term, HVE Seat Belt Law
Enforcement *****
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 3.1 Supporting Enforcement *****
•
SB and Child Restraints CTW
–
3.2 Strategies for Low
-
belt
-
Use Groups ****
Target (link to strategy Effective, high visibility communications and outreach are an essential part of
successful seat belt law high visibility enforcement programs. Paid advertising can be
a critical part of media strategy. The projected impacts of this countermeasure are an
increased use rate and lower fatalities.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$851,250
$893,813
$938,503
$2,683,566
Strategy to project
considerations
The May 2002 Click It or Ticket campaign evaluation demonstrated the effect of
different media strategies. Belt use increased by 8.6 percentage points across 10 states
that used paid advertising extensively in their campaigns. Belt use increased by 2.7
percentage points across 4 states that used limited paid advertising and increased by
only .5 percentage points across 4 states that used no paid advertising. Solomon et al.,
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 48
(2002) Milano et al (2004) Effective, high visibility communications and outreach are
an essential part of successful seat belt law high visibility enforcement programs. Paid
advertising can be a critical part of media strategy.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
05
Statewide Public Information and Education (PI&E)
OP-2024-06 Traffic Safety Non-Commercial Sustaining Announcement
Eval Program
OP
-
2024
-
13
Occupant Protection Program Management
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 3
Countermeasure
Strategy
High Visibility Enforcement (Seat Belt)
Problem (link to
strategy)
The most recent observational safety belt survey (2022) Project the FY22 Arkansas
Safety Belt usage rate at 79.1%. This is well below the national average of 91.6%
(NHTSA 2022). Arkansas is considered a “low rate” state for Section 405 b funding
qualification.
Activities supporting the countermeasure strategies include the following:
Utilize 402 OP and 405 b funding to support overtime to approximately 36 agencies for
overtime sustained enforcement efforts.
Utilize 402 OP and 405 b funding to support overtime for sustained statewide
enforcement efforts by the Arkansas State Police.
Utilize 402 OP and 405 b funding to support approximately 50 mini-STEP projects that
will focus on statewide and national mobilizations.
Utilize 402 OP and 405 b funding to support pilot of the "High Five" Project.
Utilize 402 OP and 405 b funding for LEL to promote non-STEP law enforcement
agencies to participate in National safety mobilizations (CIOT)
Utilize 402 OP and 405 b funding to support educational activities by Alliance in rural
counties.
Countermeasure
Justification
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 1.1 State Primary Enforcement
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 2.1 Short Term, HVE Seat Belt Law
Enforcement *****
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 3.1 Supporting Enforcement *****
•
SB and Child Restraints CTW
–
3.2 Strategies for Low
-
belt
-
Use Groups ****
Target (link to strategy It is obvious from the statewide problem analysis that a reduction in fatalities and
injuries, attributed to motor vehicle crashes, could be achieved by a significantly
increased occupant protection use rate. The AHSO will continue to be on creating
aggressive, innovative, and well publicized enforcement with increased focus on
citations and arrests. Sustained STEPs along with mini-STEP and other agencies will
participate in Federal and statewide mobilizations, crackdowns, and other special
enforcement events. The FY 24 OP program area currently includes the following:
• State/National November Seat Belt Mobilization
• National Memorial Day Seat Belt Mobilization
The Arkansas Highway Safety Office anticipates issuing sub-grants to approximately
85 different agencies statewide to conduct enforcement. These agencies include state,
county and municipal law enforcement agencies in both urban and rural locations with
a goal of reducing fatalities and injuries attributed to motor vehicle crashes. An LEL
program will be utilized to encourage and promote non-STEP law enforcement
agencies to participate in the national safety belt mobilization (CIOT). Approximately
180 age
ncies participated in the FY22 CIOT Mobilizations
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$2,720,750 $2,856,788 $2,999,627 $8,577,164
Strategy to project
considerations
The most common high visibility belt law enforcement method consists of short
intense, highly publicized periods of increased belt law enforcement using
checkpoints,
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 49
saturation patrols or enforcement zones. Most states currently conduct short-term high
visibility belt law enforcement programs in May of each year as part of national seat
belt mobilizations. States also conduct seat belt mobilizations in November, NHTSA
has supported these campaigns. CDC's systematic review of 15 short term high
visibility enforcement programs showed increased belt use with greater gains when pre-
program belt use was lower. CDC's systematic review observed that short-term high
visibility enforcement campaigns increased belt use more among traditionally lower
belt use groups, including young drivers, rural drivers, males, African Americans, and
Hispanics. The following activities will be funded.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
02
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEPs)
OP
-
2024
-
03
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP)
OP
-
2024
-
04
Mini Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (M
-
STEPs)
OP
-
2024
-
07
Statewide Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL)
OP
-
2024
-
10
Rural High Five Project
OP
-
2024
-
13
Occupant Protection Program Management
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 28
Countermeasure
Strategy
Seat Belt Use Survey
Problem (link to
strategy)
Data Collection: Seat belt use surveys provide valuable data on seat belt usage rates
among drivers and passengers. They help identify trends, patterns, and variations in
seat belt use across the state. This data is crucial for understanding the current level of
seat belt compliance and identifying areas that require improvement.
Evaluation of Effectiveness: The seat belt use survey allows the AHSO to assess the
effectiveness of seat belt enforcement programs, public awareness campaigns, and
other interventions aimed at promoting seat belt usage. By comparing survey results
over time, AHSO can determine whether their efforts are making a positive impact or
if additional
counter
measures are needed.
Countermeasure
Justification
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 1.1 State Primary Enforcement
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 3.1 Supporting Enforcement *****
•
SB and Child Restraints CTW
–
3.2 Strategies for Low
-
belt
-
Use Groups ****
Target (link to strategy Seat belt use surveys help prioritize and target countermeasures in areas where seat belt
usage rates are low or specific populations exhibit lower compliance. By identifying
high-risk groups or regions, the AHSO can design targeted campaigns, enforcement
efforts, or educational programs to increase seat belt usage in those areas.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$150,000
$157,500
$165,375
$472,875
Strategy to project
considerations
Overall, seat belt use surveys play a vital role in gathering data, evaluating
interventions, understanding attitudes, and developing targeted strategies to improve
seat belt compliance. They contribute to the overall goal of reducing injuries and
fatalities on the roads and promoting safer driving habits.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
12
State Observation Seat Belt Survey
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 31
Countermeasure
Strategy
Highway Safety Office Program Management (OP)
Problem (link to
strategy)
The most recent observational safety belt survey results for 2022 shows usage at 79.1%
down from 84.2% in 2021. With a compliance rate of 79.1% Arkansas’ use rate is well
still below the national average of 91.6% (NHTSA 2022).
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 50
Target (link to strategy Occupant Protection Program Management: Funding will provide for necessary staff
time and travel and training expenses directly related to the planning, programming,
monitoring, evaluation, and coordination of the Occupant Protection Program. Funding
will also provide for training to maintain an effective, efficient Occupant Protection
Program that will direct and support strategies to effectively address traffic Arkansas' low
seat belt use rate.
AHSO eGrant System Provides funding for development, upgrading and implementation
of a state grants management system to facilitate the electronic submission of proposals
by subcontractors, development of contract agreements and other forms related to
planning, programming,
monitoring, and evaluating projects.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$76,250
$80,063
$84,066
$240,378
Strategy to project
considerations
Experienced and knowledgeable staff are critical to identify and address state traffic
problems and to implement effective programming that will accomplish the targets set for
the Occupant Protection Area. Funding is also critical to facilitate the electronic
submission of proposals, contract agreements, and reporting by project subcontractors to
plan, monitor and e
valuate projects.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
13
Occupant Protection Program Management
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 32
Countermeasure
Strategy
New Grants Based on Community Outreach (OP)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Expand current public participation and engagement efforts to reach overrepresented and
underserved communities by working to develop new partnerships and projects in
conjunction with coalitions and community leaders. Information from those efforts will
drive the continued evolution of the problem identification in all areas of highway safety.
Based on the Data Deep Dive AHSO is setting aside funds to be able to develop projects
for the program areas that were identified in the SWOT analysis: Occupant Protection.
AHSO will amend those planned activities based upon ongoing and future community
outreach efforts.
Target (link to strategy Promoting Awareness: Community outreach plays a crucial role in raising awareness
about highway safety. By allocating funds to support projects based on current and future
outreach efforts, AHSO can communicate with community members about the
importance of safe driving practices, potential risks, and available resources. This can
help create a safer driving culture and encourage responsible behavior on the roads.
Behavioral Change: Effective community outreach programs can lead to behavioral
changes among community members. Engaging with the public and communicating with
them on topics such as distracted driving, impaired driving, pedestrian and bicycle safety
and seat belt usage, can influence people's attitudes and actions. This, in turn, can lead to
reduced instances of unsafe driving behaviors and contribute to improved highway safety.
Tailored Programming: Community outreach allows for targeted programming that
address specific safety concerns within a given community. By understanding the unique
characteristics, needs, and challenges of AR communities, AHSO can design initiatives
that directly address those issues. This personalized approach can lead to more effective
outcomes and a higher likelihood of behavior change among community members.
Long-Term Benefits: While immediate infrastructure improvements and enforcement
measures are essential for highway safety, investing in community outreach can yield
long-term benefits. Education and awareness can instill a safety-conscious mindset
within the community, which can have lasting effects beyond the initial implementation
of the highway safety plan. Continued outreach efforts can reinforce positive behaviors,
sustain community engagement, and contribute to an enduring culture of safety on the
ro
ads.
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
Section 4.1 - Occupant Protection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 51
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
These funds will be used for potential projects based on current and future community
outreach efforts to be able to achieve targeted education, behavior change, collaboration,
tailored interventions, and long-term benefits. By acting on the results of the community
outreach the AHSO will be able to empower the community, and work towards creating
safer roads in Arkansas.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
14
Highway Safety Projects Based on Community Outreach (OP)
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 52
Problem Identification
For the period from 2018 through 2022 the percentage of impaired driving fatalities, as a percentage of the total
were at 26 percent. In previous years alcohol related fatalities decreased from 146 in 2017 to 135 in 2018 but
increased in 2020 to 166. Fatalities are at 185 for 2021 and 165 for 2022. For FY23, Arkansas was classified
as a Mid-Range state with an Alcohol Impaired Driving Fatality Rate of .43 per 100 million VMT.
Over the past several years arrest numbers have been trending downward. Current efforts include an emphasis
on increasing enforcement and arrest numbers inside and outside of STEP. The AHSO will work with the
court systems to implement additional DWI courts that have been shown to be effective in rehabilitating DWI
offenders and reducing recidivism and contracted with Speak up About Drugs (SAD) to implement court
monitoring projects in counties with the largest number of DWI fatalities that will follow DWI/DUI cases
through the court process to identify gaps in prosecutorial, judicial, and law enforcement training which
contribute to declining enforcement numbers and loopholes in the judicial implementation of Arkansas’s
ignition interlock law. The projected impact of this strategy is increased awareness in the courts and reductions
in the number of impaired drivers and fatalities. Court Monitoring produces higher conviction rates and stiffer
sentences than unmonitored cases and has been shown to increase DWI arrests, decrease plea agreements and
increase guilty pleas. Educational efforts and community outreach will solicit feedback and ideas for more
effective programming. The AHSO will also work to appoint a State Judicial Outreach Liaison (JOL) to recruit
new DWI courts as well as consult existing DWI courts.
In addition to observing and monitoring court proceedings for DUI, AHSO’s Court Monitoring project with
SAD will work with offenders to identify opportunities for them to participate in wholesome activities
designed to reduce recidivism. SAD will solicit feedback from families, victims, and community organizations
for suggestions to improve Impaired Driving Prevention efforts and opportunities.
In 2021, the Arkansas Crime Information Center (ACIC) reported 5,212 driving while intoxicated arrests and
ASP reported 3,199 for a total of 8,411. Over the past several years arrest numbers have trended downward.
Efforts continue to include an emphasis on increasing enforcement and arrest numbers both inside and outside
of STEP.
DWI/DUI ACIC and ASP NUMBERS
DWI/DUI ACIC and ASP Numbers
YEAR ACIC ASP TOTAL
2013
8,010
6,052
14,062
2014
7,204
5,147
12,351
2015
7,134
4,821
11,955
2016
6,839
4,160
10,999
2017
6,094
4,717
10,811
2018
6,370
3,174
9,544
2019
6,537
3,314
9,851
2020
5,285
3,361
8,646
2021
5,212
3,199
8,411
In addition to the DWI alcohol problem, the drug threat to the state of Arkansas covers the full spectrum of all
types of drugs. According to the 2024 Arkansas Drug Threat Assessment by the Gulf Coast High Intensity Drug
Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Methamphetamine and Marijuana continues to be the most significant drug threat
throughout Arkansas followed by prescription drugs/opioids, heroin, fentanyl and cocaine.
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 53
Arkansas Drug Threat Assessment
According to the 2024 Arkansas Drug Threat Assessment by the Gulf Coast High Intensity Drug Trafficking
Area (HIDTA) Methamphetamine and Marijuana continue to be the most significant drug threats throughout
Arkansas.
Arkansas Primary Drug Threats
DRUG IMPACT
Methamphetamine
Most significant threat. Leading threat in association with
violent crime and property crime. Identified as the primary
consumer of law enforcement resources.
Fentanyl and other Opioids
Fentanyl continues to become more available in the state and
was identified as the second most significant threat and as
the second primary consumer of law enforcement resources.
Marijuana
Highly abused; widely available throughout the state.
Identified as the second most significant threat in association
with
violent crime in the state.
Controlled Prescription Drugs
Continued increase; significant threat; emerging initial drug
of abuse.
Heroin
Heroin abuse continues to increase in the state of Arkansas;
though it remains a low threat compared to
methamphetamine. The continued growth appears to be a
direct result of the abuse of pharmaceutical drugs, as users
often transition to heroin due to th
e lower price and greater
availability when pharmaceuticals are not available.
Cocaine / Crack Cocaine
Highly abused and readily available throughout the state.
Other Dangerous Drugs (ODDs)/ New Psychoactive Substances
Low availability of ODDs; moderate availability of MDMA
Moderate and increasing threat of synthetic designer drugs;
cannabinoids and cathinones.
Source: 2024 Gulf Coast High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Law Enforcement and Treatment/Prevention Survey
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 54
2024 Priorities
▪ 30 AR counties with largest number of Impaired Driving Fatalities identified.
Activities Conducted:
Enforcement/ media campaign Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas on September 2, 2022
Community Support Networking Events (Supporting DWI Court Participants)
Bike Racing Fundraisers (Independence County)
Community sponsored donations of bikes to participants for transportation to work (Independence,
Garland)
Alcohol/Substance Abuse Recovery Groups
Multi-disciplinary DWI Teams - review individual cases/mentor participants
County 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Grand
Total
Pulaski 10 19 20 25 34 26 134
Benton 3 7 9 5 12 11 47
Washington 8 6 8 6 7 11 46
Craighead 5 7 3 4 12 5 36
Garland 8 3 7 7 3 7 35
Independence 3 2 3 3 9 10 30
Faulkner 2 4 7 2 5 7 27
Miller 3 5 4 3 4 7 26
Sebastian 4 3 7 2 3 7 26
White 7 5 2 3 3 4 24
Jefferson 0 2 4 6 6 5 23
Crittenden 3 6 5 4 3 1 22
Saline 2 1 2 1 5 10 21
Pope 1 4 2 6 2 5 20
Carroll 5 7 2 0 4 1 19
Crawford 3 4 5 2 2 3 19
Lonoke 3 4 1 4 1 5 18
Union 2 1 3 4 4 3 17
Mississippi 2 4 1 2 4 3 16
Yell 3 6 1 1 1 4 16
Cleburne 1 2 0 5 6 1 15
Baxter 0 1 5 1 3 4 14
Clark 1 0 4 6 1 2 14
Hot Spring 3 1 1 5 0 4 14
Ouachita 0 3 3 4 1 3 14
Columbia 0 3 1 2 3 3 12
Jackson 4 3 1 0 4 0 12
Boone 2 4 2 1 0 2 11
Greene 1 1 1 1 4 3 11
Poinsett 1 1 4 0 3 2 11
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 55
Attendees:
Residents/citizens who have received DWIs in targeted areas.
Rural and urban community residents mixed ages.
Issues Covered:
Views on substance abuse problems and social determinants
Community role in programs and policies addressing substance abuse prevention.
Discussions of local needs and cultural practices
How participant’s comments/views have been or will be incorporated into the development of THSP.
DWI Court Monitoring – In addition to observing and monitoring court proceedings, AHSO’s Court
Monitoring project with SADD solicits feedback from families, victims, and community organizations to
offer input and suggestions to improve Impaired Driving Prevention efforts and opportunities. They also
provide offenders assistance with their rehabilitation efforts and opportunities to participate in wholesome
activities designed to reduce recidivism.
DWI Courts -- specialized courts dedicated to changing the behavior of DWI offenders though intensive
supervision and treatment. Arkansas now has 14 courts. These courts provide a systematic and coordinated
approach to prosecuting, sentencing, monitoring, and treating and providing recovery support to DWI
offenders, The underlying goal is to change offenders' behavior by identifying and treating alcohol problems
while holding offenders accountable for their actions thereby rehabilitating offenders, taking impaired
drivers off the road, and reducing death and injuries on the streets and highways of Arkansas.
National Park Service -- The Arkansas Highway Safety Office (HSO) partnered with the National Park
Service (NPS) and NHTSA Region 7 Office and to kick-off the Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over
enforcement and media campaign in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas on September 2, 2022. Arkansas
State police gave remarks on how important the partnership is between NHTSA, NPS, law enforcement
and the HSO in bringing awareness to the communities about the dangers of impaired driving in and around
National Parks. The media event had two Drug Recognition Experts speak, Trooper Justin Parker and Park
Ranger Peter Malionek who discussed their role in identifying drivers who are under the influence of drugs
and provided support in the Breath Alcohol Testing Mobile Unit that helped remove drug impaired drivers
off the roads.
DUI education at Marijuana Dispensaries-- The AHSO is looking at the possibility of surveying current
dispensaries about DUI awareness of medical permits to use marijuana not being a license to drive while
under the influence. The AHSO will use that information to work with dispensaries to develop education
materials they can distribute to their clientele or display in and around their facility. AHSO will work to
identify other means of reaching those users with education materials that will focus on using medical
marijuana responsibly.
ACHI has access to redacted data and plans to conduct research on traffic issues in AR such as traffic
violations (tickets/accidents/fatalities and injuries) before medical marijuana permits were issued as
compared to after the permits were received. AHSO hopes to utilize this data along with the feedback from
outreach efforts to create more awareness of the potential dangers this creates on AR roadways.
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 56
In the event Recreational Use Marijuana laws ever pass in Arkansas the AHSO would be ahead of the curve
in having identified the issues and talking points to educate users about responsible use, mirroring the
messaging of drinking responsibly and ahead of the curve on developing a working relationship with the
dispensaries. The AHSO will have already worked out strategies to get the information to the target
audience.
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 4
Countermeasure
Strategy
Publicized Sobriety Checkpoints
Problem (link to
strategy)
Over the past several years impaired driving arrest numbers have trended downward.
Current efforts include an emphasis on increasing enforcement and arrest numbers both
inside and outside of STEP.
For the period from 2017 through 2021 the percentage of impaired driving fatalities, as
a percentage of the total were at 26 percent. The availability of medical marijuana and
increased drug issues could contribute to additional alcohol and drug related fatalities.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.1 ALR/ALS *****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.2 Open Container ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.4 BAC Test Refusal ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.1 Publicized Sobriety
Checkpoints *****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.3 Breath Test Devices ****
•
Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving
–
CTW 2.5 Integrated Enforcement ***
Target (link to strategy The mobile Breath Alcohol Testing (BAT) & Sobriety Checkpoint, support and training
project with the Black River Technical College, Law Enforcement Training Academy
in Pocahontas, AR will be a low manpower & multi-agency sobriety checkpoint
training and support.
This project will supplement the DWI/SFST/DRE program with the Criminal Justice
Institute by providing a mobile platform during DRE evaluations that are part of the
DRE certification process. Local and Statewide Selective Enforcement Projects will
conduct checkpoints as part of their contracts. The In-Car Camera and Video Project
will provide necessary equipment to assist Statewide Selective Enforcement.
Checkpoints will be conducted statewide with emphasis in areas where alcohol related
fatalities are highest. Officers will stop vehicles at predetermined locations to check
whether the driver is impaired. The purpose is to deter driving after drinking and
reduce the number of alcohol and drug related fatalities statewide and in counties with
a high number of alcohol & drug related fatalities. Anticipated impacts include reduced
alcohol-related crashes and decreased alcohol-related fatalities as well as fewer drivers
with positive BACs in roadside surveys.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,290,050
$1,354,553
$1,422,280
$4,066,883
Strategy to project
considerations
CDC's systematic review of 15 high quality studies has shown checkpoints to reduce
alcohol-related fatal crashes by 9%. Another analysis found that checkpoints reduce
alcohol-related crashes by 17% and all crashes by 10 to 15%. In recent years NHTSA
has supported several efforts to reduce alcohol-impaired driving using publicized
sobriety checkpoint programs. Evaluations of statewide campaigns found decreases in
alcohol-related fatalities as well as fewer drivers with positive BACs in roadside
surveys.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
06
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEPs)
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 57
AL
-
2024
-
07
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement Project (STEP)
AL-2024-10 Law Enforcement Training Academy BAT Sobriety
Checkpoint Mobile Training
AL
-
2024
-
14
Statewide In
-
Car Camera and Video Storage System
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 5
Countermeasure
Strategy
DWI Courts
Problem (link to
strategy)
Although drunk driving fatalities in the United States have been significantly reduced
since the early 1980s, thanks to harsher penalties for DUI’s and the work of awareness
groups, alcohol-impaired driving remains a serious problem on America’s roadways.
In 2021 there were 693 total fatalities and 185 alcohol impaired fatalities. Twenty-six
per-cent (26%) of vehicle fatalities were the result of alcohol impairment, where an
operator of a vehicle involved in the crash had a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or
greater.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving -CTW 3.1 DWI Courts ****
•
Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving
–
CTW 3.4 Sanctions **
Target (link to strategy DWI Courts are specialized courts dedicated to changing the behavior of DWI
offenders though intensive supervision and treatment. Arkansas now has 13 courts.
These courts provide a systematic and coordinated approach to prosecuting, sentencing,
monitoring, and treating DWI offenders, Prosecutors and judges in DWI courts
specialize in DWI cases. The underlying goal is to change offenders' behavior by
identifying and treating alcohol problems and holding offenders accountable for their
actions thereby rehabilitating offenders, taking impaired drivers off the road, and
reducing death and injuries on the streets and highways of Arkansas.
The AHSO works with court jurisdictions statewide and their in-house teams to
improve adjudication of traffic laws related to impaired driving. Activities include
soliciting and generating interest statewide for the development and implementation of
additional DWI Courts. Arkansas has 3 pilot DWI courts. An additional 6 courts
completed training in 2011 and implemented their DWI courts in 2012. A 10th court
completed training mid-2012, an 11th court in the summer of 2014 and a 12th court in
December 2015. One additional court was trained in 2017 and a 14
th
court completed
training in FY2021. This Task provides funding to maintain operations for three pilot
DWI courts and assist with training costs for new courts. AHSO will provide funding
for initial and enhanced DWI Court Trainings offered through NHTSA/NDCI. Federal
funds provide for salaries, fringe benefits, in and out-of-state travel, meeting expenses,
maintenance and operations, printing and administration. State/local funds provide
additional administrative costs.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$400,000
$420,000
$441,000
$1,261,000
Strategy to project
considerations
DWI Courts are listed as a 4-star countermeasure in NHTSA's Countermeasures that
Work. A systematic review found that DWI courts appear to be effective in reducing
recidivism. Numerous studies suggest DWI Courts reduce recidivism among DWI
offenders by approximately 50% compared to traditional court programs. One
Michigan study found that DWI court participants were 19 times less likely to be
rearrested for a DWI within two years than a comparison group of offenders who were
in traditional probation. Another study of three DWI Courts in Georgia found that
offenders who graduated from the court program had a 9% recidivism rate within the
next 4 years compared to a 24% recidivism rate for the comparison group in traditional
courts. Evaluations have shown that close monitoring and individualized sanctions
for DWI offenders reduce recidivism.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
13
DWI Courts
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 58
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 36
Countermeasure
Strategy
Judicial Outreach Liaison (JOL)
Problem (link to
strategy)
DWI courts focus on individuals who have been arrested or convicted for driving under
the influence of alcohol or drugs. This targeted approach aims to intervene with high-
risk offenders to prevent them from repeating their dangerous behavior, reducing the
likelihood of future accidents caused by impaired driving.
DWI courts emphasize rehabilitation and treatment for offenders rather than solely
focusing on punitive measures. This approach helps address the root causes of impaired
driving and aims to reduce the likelihood of reoffending. By offering specialized
treatment and support, DWI courts have been shown to reduce recidivism rates among
impaired drivers.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving -CTW 3.1 DWI Courts ****
•
Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving
–
CTW 3.4 Sanctions **
Target (link to strategy The JOL serves as an ambassador, educating judges, court personnel, and the legal
community about DWI Courts, how they operate, and the positive outcomes they can
achieve. Implementing DWI Courts requires collaboration and cooperation from
judges and other key stakeholders within the judicial system. The JOL will help build
trust and credibility, addressing any concerns or skepticism, and garnering support from
judges for the program's establishment and continuation.
The JOL will assist judges that have questions about the legal and practical aspects of
DWI Courts by providing relevant information, research, and resources to help judges
make informed decisions about adopting and operating DWI Courts.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$
1
00,000
$105,000
$110,250
$315,250
Strategy to project
considerations
DWI Courts are listed as a 4-star countermeasure in NHTSA's Countermeasures that
Work. A JOL is instrumental in promoting DWI Courts by increasing awareness,
gaining support from judges and stakeholders, navigating administrative processes,
providing information and resources, and facilitating collaboration, ultimately leading
to more effective and successful DWI Court programs.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
18
Judicial Outreach Liaison (JOL)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 6
Countermeasure
Strategy
SFST training for Law Enforcement Officers
Problem (link to
strategy)
For the period from 2017 through 2021 the percentage of impaired driving fatalities,
as a percentage of the total were at 26 percent.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving -CTW 2.2 High-Visibility Enforcement
****
Target (link to strategy Well trained officers to conduct SFST (one-Leg Stand, Walk and Turn, and Horizontal
Gaze Nystagmus) used by law enforcement to estimate whether a driver is at or above
the illegal limit of .08 BAC) is a benefit not only in recognizing impaired drivers but
also in obtaining convictions. DWI arrests and convictions result in increased public
awareness of the dangers of impaired driving and lower fatalities and injuries.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$320,000
$336,000
$352,800
$1,008,800
Strategy to project
considerations
The rationale for this countermeasure strategy is to expand specialized impaired driving
training for law enforcement officers to assist in identification and apprehension of
impaired drivers.
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 59
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL-2024-02 Traffic Safety/ Law Enforcement Training Project - this project
satisfies two countermeasures DRE Training and SFST
Training)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 7
Countermeasure
Strategy
Judicial Education
Problem (link to
strategy)
In 2021, the Arkansas Crime Information Center (ACIC) reported 5,212 driving while
intoxicated (DWI)/ driving under the influence (DUI) arrests. The 2020 data showed
8,646 DWI/DUI arrests. Over the past several years arrest numbers have trended
downward. Current efforts include an emphasis on increasing enforcement and arrest
numbers both inside and outside of STEP.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.1 ALR/ALS *****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.2 Open Container ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.4 BAC Test Refusal ***
•
Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving
-
CTW
3.3
Court Monitoring
***
Target (link to strategy As members of the criminal justice system, judges are impartial administrators of the
law. Judges who preside over impaired driving cases need to be equipped with specific
information about the challenges faced by the judiciary as an impaired driver moves
through the criminal justice system. The revolving door, as it is called, refers to the
continued exploitation of the legal system by repeat offenders. A top priority for the
AHSO is to provide information needed by judges to close legal loopholes exploited
by attorneys representing impaired drivers, while still protecting the rights of the
accused. Providing information and education will make Arkansas' streets and
highways safer by insuring Judges have up to date information to implement
appropriate measures, sentences etc. to keep impaired drivers off roads and prevent the
fatalities and injuries caused by them.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$150,000
$157,500
$165,375
$472,875
Strategy to project
considerations
The rationale for this countermeasure strategy is to expand specialized impaired driving
training for law enforcement officers to assist in identification and apprehension of
impaired drivers.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
01
Judicial Training
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 8
Countermeasure
Strategy
Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) Training
Problem (link to
strategy)
Methamphetamine use continues to be the most significant concern for law
enforcement and public health personnel in Arkansas. In fact, Arkansas leads the nation
in the number of people testing positive for methamphetamine, according to a study by
Millennium Health.
Marijuana is the most widely abused and commonly available drug within the state.
AFMC indicates marijuana as the primary gateway drug for more than 6,200 people in
Arkansas per year. The abuse of marijuana traverses all ages, races, and economic
boundaries. In 2016, Arkansas voters passed a ballot measure to legalize medical
marijuana. In February 2018, this law was enacted through the opening of numerous
manufacturing and distribution facilities in the state. If a recently filed constitutional
amendment proposal makes the ballot and is approved by voters next year, Arkansas
adults will be able to legally purchase marijuana for recreational use by February 2023.
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 60
The importation/transportation, distribution, and abuse of pharmaceuticals is
dramatically increasing in Arkansas. New, young abusers continue to experiment with
pharmaceuticals before transitioning to other illicit drugs such as cocaine, heroin, and
methamphetamine. In 2018, the most frequently dispensed controlled prescription drug
type in Arkansas filled by Arkansas residents was opioids. Arkansas is second in the
nation in the rate of opioid prescriptions – an average of 86.3 prescriptions for every
100 people, compared to the national average of 46.7 opioid prescriptions for every
100 people.
Since the COVID 19 public health emergency began in March of 2020, Arkansas
overdoses have increased. According to the Arkansas Department of Health Vital
Statistics Section, provisional data based on death certificates indicate that there were
547 fatal drug overdoses in 2020. This number is an increase from 352 overdose deaths
in 2019. According to the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement (ACHI) analysis,
overdose deaths soared in Arkansas and nationally in 2020, a development widely
attributed to the psychological toll of the COVID 19 pandemic and the proliferation
fentanyl in the nation’s illegal drug trade. An alarming trend in the U.S. and Arkansas
is for prescription opioid abusers to transition to heroin/fentanyl as it mimics the effects
of opioid pharmaceuticals and is, in many instances, less costly. During the outbreak
of COVID 19, heroin became more available throughout the state, and becomes more
in demand as opioid prescription regulations increase.
Crack and powder cocaine are another significant and long-term problem in the state,
especially in inner cities. The ready availability of cocaine and the movement of street
gangs beyond traditional areas of operation have led to the spread of crack in many
suburban and rural areas. Crack’s dominance can be attributed to the drug’s
availability, simplicity of conversion from powdered cocaine and its addictive
properties.
Several drugs referred to as club drugs, which include MDMA (Ecstasy) are prevalent
and popular in Arkansas. MDMA (Ecstasy) and Molly are reported as moderately
available with increasing popularity and abuse through much of the state, especially
among young drug users in college towns. “Molly” which is marketed and identified
by users/distributors as "pure" MDMA to make it appear safer than MDMA, is in most
cases a synthetic drug.
Synthetic drugs, including cannabinoids and cathinones, have become a major problem
in the state of Arkansas. These drugs present a unique problem for law enforcement as
they are constantly changing the chemical formulation to avoid laws as they are
established, thereby ensuring a constant flow of these unregulated substances to citizens
of Arkansas.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving -CTW 7.1 Enforcement of Drug-Impaired
Driving
***
Target (link to strategy To provide law enforcement with training, tools and a structured approach to assist in
the prosecution and conviction of Drug Impaired Drivers and to prevent these
individuals from continuing to drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The
projected impact is a reduction in the number of injuries and deaths caused by drug
impaired drivers on Arkansas roads/highways as the result of an increased number of
certified DRE enforcement officers in the field.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$320,000
$336,000
$352,800
$1,008,800
Strategy to project
considerations
The Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) program was established with support of NHTSA
in 1988. It is a structured program that involves assessment of suspected impaired
drivers and systematically collects and documents symptoms of drug and impairment
to provide a framework for the interpretation of evidence that indicates the class or
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 61
classes of drugs most likely to be present. It establishes the necessary probable cause
for collection of a biological sample for toxicological testing, completing the major
elements needed for a DUID prosecution. The DRE program is the most effective tool
available to law enforcement officers for the documentation of behavior and
impairment in drug-impaired drivers. By incorporating DRE training along with other
activities in the Impaired Driving Program Area, Arkansas will have more trained and
informed officers in the field to apprehend, identify and effectively prosecute impaired
drivers. The objective being to reduce deaths and injuries associated with impaired
drivers.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
02
Traffic Safety/ Law Enforcement Training Project
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 9
Countermeasure
Strategy
Communication Campaign (Impaired Driving)
Problem (link to
strategy)
For the period from 2017 through 2021 the percentage of impaired driving fatalities, as
a percentage of the total were at 26 percent. Fatalities for 2017 were at 525 rising to
693 in 2021. Alcohol related fatalities increased from 146 in 2017 to 185 in 2021
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.1 ALR/ALS *****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.2 Open Container ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.4 BAC Test Refusal ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.1 Publicized Sobriety Checkpoints
*****
•
Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving
-
CTW 5.2
Mass
-
Media Campaigns
***
Target (link to strategy
Increased awareness of impaired driving issues
Reduction of unsafe driving behaviors.
Reduction of fatalities and injuries associated with impaired driving.
Utilize public service announcements (PSAs) to increase awareness of impaired
driving issues.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,325,000
$1,391,250
$1,460,813
$4,177,063
Strategy to project
considerations
Communications and outreach strategies attempt to inform the public of the dangers of
driving while impaired by Alcohol and to promote positive social norms of not driving
while impaired. As with prevention and intervention, education through various
communications and outreach strategies is important. Education will be conducted
through the media, paid advertisements, and a variety of other communication channels
such as posters, billboards, web banners and social media outlets.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL-2024-03 Traffic Safety Non-Commercial Sustaining Announcement
Eval Program
AL
-
2024
-
05
Statewide Public Information and Education
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 10
Countermeasure
Strategy
High Visibility Enforcement (Impaired)
Performance Target
Addressed
Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities: Maintain alcohol-impaired driving fatalities at
152.6 (2022
-
2026) from a current level of 152.6 (2017
-
2021) by December 31, 2026
Problem (link to
strategy)
In addition to Alcohol, the legalization of medical marijuana along with increased other
drug issues may contribute to higher fatalities.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.1 ALR/ALS *****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.2 Open Container ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 1.4 BAC Test Refusal ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.1 Publicized Sobriety Checkpoints
*****
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 62
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.2 Saturation Patrols ****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.3 Breath Test Devices ****
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 2.5 Integrated Enforcement ***
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving – CTW 6.1 Minimum Drinking Age 21 Law
*****
Target (link to strategy0 High visibility enforcement campaigns are a strategy within the Impaired Driving
(Drug and Alcohol Section). Funding will support STEP and mobilization overtime
enforcement efforts throughout the state. High visibility enforcement will increase the
presence of law enforcement to discourage impaired driving (alcohol and drug). The
projected impact is a reduction in the deaths and injuries associated with them.
The primary emphasis will be sustained year-round DWI/DUI enforcement.
Participating agencies will also conduct checkpoints and saturation patrols at least four
nights during National and State impaired driving campaigns. A media blitz associated
with the mobilizations and frequent PSA’s will remind motorists of the increased
potential of being stopped, ticketed, and arrested. Vehicles stopped will be monitored
for both occupant restraint and impaired driving (alcohol and drug) violations.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,740,050
$1,827,053
$1,918,405
$5,485,508
Strategy to project
considerations
Studies have demonstrated high-visibility enforcement (HVE) to be effective in curbing
alcohol
-
impaired driving and it appears that it is working.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
06
Local Selective Traffic
Enforcement Projects (STEPs)
AL
-
2024
-
07
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEP)
AL
-
2024
-
08
Mini Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (M
-
STEPs)
AL
-
2024
-
11
Statewide Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL)
AL
-
2024
-
14
Statewide In
-
Car
Camera and Video Storage System
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 27
Countermeasure
Strategy
DWI Court Monitoring
Problem (link to
strategy)
Accountability: DWI court monitoring helps ensure that DWI offenders are held
accountable for their actions and that appropriate penalties are imposed. By
monitoring the court process, the AHSO can verify that the legal system is effectively
addressing impaired driving cases and that offenders are complying with court-
mandated sanctions.
Identifying Systemic Issues: Monitoring DWI court proceedings allows highway
safety offices to identify any systemic issues or gaps in the legal process related to
DWI cases. This could include issues such as inconsistent enforcement, inadequate
prosecution, or lenient sentencing. By identifying these problems, the AHSO can
work with the appropriate stakeholders to address and improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of the court system in handling DWI cases.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving -CTW 3.3 Court Monitoring ***
Target (link to strategy Data Collection and Analysis: Monitoring DWI court cases provides valuable data on
the outcomes of impaired driving prosecutions. This data can help assess the overall
effectiveness of the legal system in deterring impaired driving, as well as inform the
development and evaluation of prevention and intervention strategies. By analyzing
trends and patterns in DWI court cases, the AHSO can identify areas for improvement
and track progress over time.
Evaluation of Programs and Policies: DWI court monitoring allows the AHSO to
evaluate the impact of their programs and policies related to impaired driving. By
monitoring court outcomes, they can assess whether specific initiatives, such as
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 63
enhanced enforcement efforts or public awareness campaigns, are resulting in desired
changes in behavior and reductions in DWI incidents.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$150,000
$157,500
$165,375
$472,875
Strategy to project
considerations
DWI court monitoring provides a mechanism for the AHSO to actively engage with the
legal system and ensure that impaired driving cases are being handled effectively. It
helps promote accountability, identify areas for improvement, and facilitate data-driven
decision
-
making in the pursuit of enhanced highway safety.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
1
2
Court Monitoring
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 22
Countermeasure
Strategy
Laboratory Drug Testing Equipment
Problem (link to
strategy)
According to the 2023 Drug Enforcement Administration’s Drug Threat Assessment
for Arkansas, other than Alcohol marijuana is the most widely abused and commonly
available drug within the state. AFMC indicates marijuana as the primary gateway drug
for more than 6,200 people in Arkansas per year. In 2016, Arkansas voters passed a
ballot measure to legalize medical marijuana. In February 2018, this law was enacted
through the opening of numerous manufacturing and distribution facilities in the state.
If a recently filed constitutional amendment proposal makes the ballot and is approved
by voters next year, Arkansas adults will be able to legally purchase marijuana for
recreational use by February 2023. Methamphetamine is another significant threat,
followed by the diversion and abuse of pharmaceuticals. Heroin use continues to
increase and appears to be a direct result of the abuse of pharmaceutical drugs as
abusers’ transition to heroin when pharmaceuticals are not available. Crack Cocaine is
also highly abused.
Countermeasure
Justification
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 1 – Traffic Records System Information Components
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 2 – Traffic Records System Information Quality
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No.18 (Motor
Vehicle Crash Investigation and Incident Reporting
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No.8
(Impaired Driving)
Target (link to strategy Arkansas State Crime Lab and the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH) will provide
testing for alcohol and other drugs. Testing results will provide for problem analysis
and data for prosecution. Funding will also provide for the Office of Alcohol Testing
staff to attend Conferences and trainings including Association of Ignition Interlock
Program Administrators, Lifesavers National Conference on Highway Safety Priorities,
and Intoximeter Users Group Meeting and the purchase of testing supplies and
equipment costing less than $5,000 apiece.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$777,300 $816,165 $856,973 $2,450,438
Strategy to project
considerations
Testing for substances in addition to alcohol is necessary to provide data on Arkansas'
drug problems and information to direct programming efforts to deter impaired driving,
reduce the number of Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving Fatalities and the number of
overall fatalities in Arkansas. Results from testing will also provide evidence for
prosecution.
Planned Activities Unique
Identifier:
Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
09
BAC Intoximeter and Blood Testing Project
AL
-
2024
-
15
Motor Vehicle Crash Toxicology Testing
Section 4.2 - Impaired Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 64
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 30
Countermeasure
Strategy
Highway Safety Office Program Management (AL)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Alcohol/Impaired Driving Program Management will provide for the administration of
the Impaired Driving Program, necessary staff time travel and training expenses related
to the planning, programming, monitoring, evaluation, and coordination of the Impaired
Driving Program and facilitate continued development of the AHSO eGrant System.
Target (link to strategy Provide necessary personnel and training for administration of the Impaired Driving
Program Area. Funding provides for necessary staff time travel and training expenses
directly related to planning, programming, monitoring, evaluation, and coordination of
the Traffic Records Program. Funding will also provide training to maintain an effective,
efficient Impaired Driving Program to direct and support strategies to effectively address
traffic Arkansas' traffic Impaired Driving problems. It will include expenses directly
related to the AHSO grants management system developed, operated and maintained
through a contractor (AGATE)
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$305,000
$320,250
$336,263
$961,513
Strategy to project
considerations
Funding provides for necessary staff time, travel and training expenses related to the
planning, programming, and development of an effective, efficient Impaired Driving
Program and AHSO grants management system.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
AL
-
2024
-
17
Alcohol and Other Drug Countermeasures Program Management
Section 4.3 - Speed
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 65
Problem Identification
Between 2019 and 2022 the number of speeding citations issued by AR State Police for 100+ miles per hour
increased from 987 to 2,333. Speeding citations for 16+ miles per hour over the limit increase from 5,158 in
2018 to 7,316 in 2020 but have trended downward since then to 4,923 in 2022.
AR 2021 rural fatality rate per 100k AR 2021 urban fatality rate per 100K
8 18
SPEED DATA
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Average
2017-2021
Speed related Crashes
4,807
5,507
5,174
6,669
5,554 5,542
Speed related Serious Injury
353
341
350
466
402 382
Speed related Fatalities
124
132
132
164
148 140
Over the last five years (2018 – 2022) 711 fatalities or 24% of total fatalities and 19% of serious injuries in
Arkansas involved speeding and aggressive driving. In 2021 speed fatalities were at 148 putting them at 21%
of total fatalities. Preliminary data shows it remained at 21% in 2022.
During the COVID Pandemic speeding fatalities increased along with a concerning rise in the number of
citations issued for speeds more than 100 miles per hour. This issue combined with Arkansas’s raising the
interstate speed limit to 75 mph makes speeding one of the AHSO’s top priorities. The AHSO has been
providing STEP and mini-STEP law enforcement agencies with crash data and training these sub-grantees to
utilize crash data dashboards such as eCrash and ARDOT’s Arkansas Crash Analytics Tool (ACAT) to assist
them with targeted enforcement efforts. The AHSO will work to expand enforcement efforts in problem areas
identified in the AR Data Deep Dive and to recruit agencies that are not currently participating in STEP or
Mini-STEP programs.
Arkansas will conduct an extended period of Speed enforcement during July to coincide with the state Speed
mobilization. Enforcement efforts will be complemented by the implementation of “No Tolerance” speed zones.
State and local law enforcement agencies will work together to conduct speed enforcement throughout this
Section 4.3 - Speed
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 66
period. The AHSO will work in conjunction with ASP and ARDOT to look at the possibility of putting up “No
Tolerance” speed signage along identified speed enforcement corridors.
The AHSO will continue to conduct data analyses to understand which areas and groups are most affected. By
further understanding the factors contributing to this problem, AHSO will work with communities to develop
appropriate countermeasure strategies and implement projects to reduce this trend. AHSO will leverage current
HVE programs and work with other Law enforcement agencies to implement “No Tolerance” speed corridors
and expand its engagement with communities on this issue.
2024 Priorities
o U.S. 70 to I-30 (Saline, Garland, and Glenwood)
o U.S. 65 (Harrison/Conway), U.S. 63 (Hoxie, Walnut Ridge, Rowe)
o AR 18 (Blytheville), and 5 lanes Super 2 (Manila & Monet in Mississippi Co).
Activities Conducted:
SWOT Analysis (25 attendees)
SHSP Steering Committee (50+ attendees)
Surveys distributed to STEP/Mini-STEP agencies.
Community feedback via website/phone calls
Attendees:
Groups and Organizations Statewide with vested interest in Highway Safety.
Individual citizens voicing concerns via website or phone calls.
Issues Covered:
Increase in Speeding citations 100+ miles.
Citizen reports of speed issues on specific roads/highways
Shortage of police officers to work … recruiting new officers.
Possible Speed Corridors
“No Tolerance” signage in problem areas
How participants comments and views have been or will be incorporated into the development of the
THSP.
o The AHSO has identified the following speed corridors with plans to implement “No
Tolerance” enforcement efforts: U.S. 70 to I-30 (Saline, Garland, and Glenwood), U.S. 65
(Harrison/Conway), U.S. 63 (Hoxie, Walnut Ridge, Rowe), AR 18 (Blytheville), and 5 lane
Super 2 (Manila & Monet in Mississippi Co).
o U.S. 70 to I-30 (Saline, Garland, and Glenwood) has been designated as the pilot site.
o “Black Cat” radars to be purchased by ASP and utilized by participating law enforcement
agencies to monitor speed on that section of highway.
o A special campaign focusing on “Speed” is planned in addition to the regular Speed
Mobilization in July.
o “No Tolerance” speed limit signage
o Possibility projects can “partner up” to share equipment like speed wagons.
Countermeasures
Section 4.3 - Speed
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 67
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 11
Countermeasure
Strategy
Identification of Priority Speed Enforcement Areas and Times
Problem (link to
strategy)
See fatality data below for 2018 – 2021 based on FARS and 2022 eCrash data for the
state. The 2022 speed related crashes and serious injuries are from the e-Crash database
which is subject to change.
Countermeasure(s) • Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 1.1 Speed Limits *****
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 2.2 HVE **
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 2.3 Other Enforcement Methods **
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 4.1 Communications and Outreach
Supporting Enforcement ***
Target (link to strategy Effective high visibility enforcement efforts are an essential part of successful speeding
deterrent. The Highway Safety Office will provide funding for Law Enforcement
agencies to purchase Black Cat II Radar Traffic Recorders to be utilized to determine
areas where speeding is a problem and the times of day that these problems are
occurring. This information will be utilized to deploy enforcement patrols accordingly.
These devices have been highly effective in Clarksville PD. They can deploy the radar
traffic recorders where they have reports of speeding issues, the data from the system
tells them if they have an issue and what are the most effective times to patrol in order
to deter speeding. The results have been efficient use of resources while getting
maximum results. The devices are left out after the high visibility enforcement patrols
and have shown decreased speeding in those areas. The device then is deployed at
another location.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,073,350 $1,127,018 $1,183,368 $3,383,736
Strategy to project
considerations
Black Cat II Radar Traffic Recorders will be used to determine areas where speeding
is a problem and at what times. This will allow agencies to effectively target
enforcement patrols to address speeding violations and reduce the fatalities and injuries
that result from it. The AHSO is working to identify areas where agencies could partner
and share equipment to identify issues and focus enforcement efforts.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier:
Planned Activity Names:
SC-2024-01 Local Selective Traffic Enforcement
Projects (STEP)
SC-2024-02 Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement
Projects (STEPs)
SC-2024-03 Mini-Selective Traffic Enforcement
Projects (M
-
STEPs)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 12
Countermeasure
Strategy
High Visibility Enforcement (Speed)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Between 2011 and 2014 Arkansas saw a decline in the number of speed-related
fatalities (86 to 56) but in 2015 fatalities rose to 92 and in 2020 to 164. In 2022 speed
fatalities were at 135 putting them at 21% of total fatalities. The state is working with
local and state law enforcement new options to address and enforce speed limits are in
place such as a “14 days of Speed” campaign and “No Tolerance” speed zones. Black
Cat Radars will be utilized to monitor speed issues and target enforcement efforts.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 1.1 Speed Limits *****
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 2.2 HVE **
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 2.3 Other Enforcement Methods **
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 4.1 Communications and Outreach
Supporting Enforcement ***
Target (link to strategy It is obvious from the statewide problem analysis that a reduction in fatalities and
injuries, attributed to motor vehicle crashes, could be achieved by significantly
increased enforcement efforts. The AHSO focus will be on creating aggressive,
innovative and well publicized enforcement with an increased emphasis on citations
Section 4.3 - Speed
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 68
and arrests. Sustained STEPs along with mini-STEP and other agencies will participate
in Federal, regional and statewide mobilizations, crackdowns, and other special
enforcement events. A statewide 14 days of Speed Mobilization will be conducted July
17, 2024, through July 31, 2024.
The Arkansas Highway Safety Office will issue sub-grants to approximately 85
agencies statewide to conduct enforcement. These agencies include state, county, and
municipal law enforcement agencies in both urban and rural locations with a goal of
reducing fatalities and injuries attributed to motor vehicle crashes. The AHSO will
advertise the LEL position left vacant by its former LEL and hopes to utilize that
position to encourage and promote non-
STEP law enforcement agencies to participate.
In 2024 non-STEP agencies will be solicited to apply for mini-STEP grants. These
grants will provide funds to pay overtime for agencies to conduct enforcement during
mobilizations.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,073,350 $1,127,018 $1,183,368 $3,383,736
Strategy to project
considerations
The most common high visibility speed enforcement consists of short intense, highly
publicized periods of increased law enforcement. NHTSA has supported these
campaigns. CDC's systematic review of short-term high visibility enforcement
programs shows in
creased adherence to speed limits.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
SC
-
2024
-
01
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEPs)
SC
-
2024
-
02
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEP)
SC
-
2024
-
03
Mini
Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (M
-
STEPs)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 29
Countermeasure
Strategy
Communication Campaign (Speed)
Problem (link to
strategy)
The communication campaign helps raise public awareness about the importance of speed
control and its impact on highway safety. Many drivers may not fully grasp the risks
associated with speeding, so the campaign provides education and information to
encourage safer driving behavior.
An effective communication campaign influences driver behavior by promoting the
adoption of safer driving practices. By highlighting the potential consequences of
speeding, such as accidents, injuries, and fatalities, the campaign aims to motivate drivers
to adhere to speed limits and drive within safe parameters. It also reinforces the existing
traffic laws and regulations related to speed limits. By reminding drivers of their legal
responsibilities and the potential penalties for speeding, the campaign encourages
compliance and discourages reckless driving habits.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 1.1 Speed Limits *****
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 2.2 HVE **
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 2.3 Other Enforcement Methods **
• Speeding and Speed Management – CTW 4.1 Communications and Outreach
Supporting Enforcement ***
Target (link to
strategy
Statewide public information and education to promote adherence to speed limits with
particular focus on the national “Obey the Sign or Pay the Fine” enforcement mobilization
during the summer season.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$
3
00,000
$
315
,000
$
330
,
75
0
$
945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
The communication campaign for speed control is vital to the AHSO as it helps raise
awareness, influence behavior, promote compliance, target specific audiences, foster
collaborations, and sustain efforts. By combining these elements, the campaign
contributes significantly to reducing speeding-related accidents and improving overall
road
safety.
Planned Activities
Unique Identifier
Planned Activity Name
Section 4.3 - Speed
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 69
SC
-
2024
-
04
Statewide Public Information and Education (PI&E)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 34
Countermeasure
Strategy
New Grants Based on Community Outreach (SC)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Expand current efforts by working to develop new partnerships and projects. Information
from those efforts will drive the continued evolution of the problem identification in all
areas of highway safety. Based on the Data Deep Dive AHSO is setting aside funds to
develop projects for the program areas that were identified in the SWOT analysis: Speed
Control. AHSO will amend planned activities based
upon further
data analysis.
Target (link to strategy Promoting Awareness: Community outreach plays a crucial role in raising awareness
about highway safety. By allocating funds to support projects based on current and future
outreach efforts, AHSO can communicate with community members about the
importance of safe driving practices, potential risks, and available resources. This can
help create a safer driving culture and encourage responsible behavior on the roads.
Behavioral Change: Effective community outreach programs can lead to behavioral
changes among community members. Engaging with the public and communicating with
them on topics such as distracted driving, impaired driving, pedestrian and bicycle safety
and seat belt usage, can influence people's attitudes and actions. This, in turn, can lead to
reduced instances of unsafe driving behaviors and contribute to improved highway safety.
Tailored Programming: Community outreach allows for targeted programming that
address specific safety concerns within a given community. By understanding the unique
characteristics, needs, and challenges of AR communities, AHSO can design initiatives
that directly address those issues. This personalized approach can lead to more effective
outcomes and a higher likelihood of behavior change among community members.
Long-Term Benefits: While immediate infrastructure improvements and enforcement
measures are essential for highway safety, investing in community outreach can yield
long-term benefits. Education and awareness can instill a safety-conscious mindset
within the community, which can have lasting effects beyond the initial implementation
of the highway safety plan. Continued outreach efforts can reinforce positive behaviors,
sustain community engagement, and contribute to an enduring culture of safety on the
ro
ads.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
These funds will be used for potential projects based on current and future community
outreach efforts to be able to achieve targeted education, behavior change, collaboration,
tailored interventions, and long-term benefits. By acting on the results of the community
outreach the AHSO will be able to empower the community, and work towards creating
safer roads in Arkansas.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
SC
-
2024
-
05
Highway Safety Projects Based on Community Outreach (SC)
Section 4.4 - Distracted Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 70
Problem Identification
More and more fatalities in Arkansas are being attributed to the issue of distracted driving. Recent data analysis
showed the proportion of crashes involving distracted driving in AR is highest among ages 14-17 at 7.4% with
ages 18-24 second at 6.1%. Distracted Driving data is limited in Arkansas. The AHSO will continue to work
with law enforcement to assist with resources and training to develop a more accurate database. The AHSO
will continue to conduct data analyses and engage groups and organizations within identified communities for
discussion and feedback. The AHSO will leverage current programming to expand engagement with AR
communities and adjust programming based on their feedback to develop appropriate safety countermeasure
strategies and implement projects to reduce this problem.
Distracted driving includes any action that a driver engages in that takes their attention off the road, such as
operating a cellphone, talking, eating, reaching for something, etc. One of the most prevalent distracted driving
tendencies is using a cell phone while driving, which creates enormous potential for deaths and injuries on AR
roadways. The last distracted driving awareness survey conducted by the University of Arkansas - Little Rock
Survey Research Center was done in 2018, before the university discontinued the department that was
conducting the survey. The survey tracked attitudes, self-reported driving behavior, and awareness of traffic
safety enforcement and activities. The survey also assessed knowledge and opinions regarding laws and
behavior related to cell phone use. The AHSO has contracted with the University of Arkansas - Fayetteville
to conduct annual awareness surveys beginning once again in 2023.
Distracted Driving Crash Data 2018 2019 2020
2021
Manually operated electronic communication device
399
359
354
408
Talking on hands
-
free electronic device
25
34
46
52
Talking on hand
-
held electronic device
92
91
87
124
Other activity with an electronic device
428
384
353
415
The 2018 survey conducted by UALR showed the following results:
65% of respondents support a state law banning all talk on handheld phones while driving.
71% of respondents believed there was not a texting ban while.
43% of respondents believe Arkansas has a law banning handheld cell phones while driving (
42% of respondents indicated that they “Always” or “Almost Always” answer their cell phone while driving
with another 29% responding they “sometimes” answered.
44% of respondents indicated they make calls while driving.
Further education and public awareness are needed to inform Arkansans that texting and driving is illegal in the
state. Although there has not been another study done more recently in Arkansas, people are still concerned
with the dangers of distracted driving. They frequently admit to engaging in such behaviors behind the wheel
and the problem continues to escalate. One major difficulty in determining the role of distraction in crashes is
that pre-crash distractions often leave no evidence for law enforcement officers or crash investigators to
observe, and drivers are reluctant to admit to having been distracted during a crash. With a lack of conclusive
evidence of the distraction being used at the time of the crash and no admittance of use by the driver, there is a
deficiency in the amount of distracted driving that is being recorded, as well as being a factor in traffic crashes.
Section 4.4 - Distracted Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 71
The following data is from NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts concerning distracted driving in 2021 from the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Eight percent of fatal crashes, 14 percent of injury crashes, and 13 percent of all police-reported motor
vehicle traffic crashes in 2021 were reported as distraction affected crashes.
In 2021 there were 3,522 people killed and an estimated additional 362,415 people injured in motor
vehicle traffic crashes involving distracted drivers.
Five percent of all drivers involved in fatal traffic crashes in 2021 were reported as distracted at the
time of the crashes. Seven percent of drivers 15 to 20 years old involved in fatal crashes were reported
as distracted. This age group has the largest proportion of drivers who were distracted at the time of the
fatal
crashes.
In 2021 there were 644 nonoccupants (pedestrians, pedal-cyclists, and others) killed in distraction-
affected traffic crashes.
The NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts on Distracted Driving in 2021 from the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration also states that in 2021 there were 3,211 fatal motor vehicle traffic crashes that involved
distraction (8% of 39,508 fatal crashes) nationwide. Of these crashes, 3,346 involved distracted drivers, as more
than one distracted driver could be present at the time of the crash. The data also shows that five percent (3,346
of 60,904) of drivers involved in fatal crashes were distracted. Additionally, within distraction-affected crashes,
3,522 fatalities (8% of 42,939 fatalities) occurred. Further, comparing the percentages of drivers of each age
group involved in fatal crashes to the percentages involved in distraction-affected fatal crashes points to
overrepresentation of distraction in drivers under 35 as demonstrated in the following data from the statistical
facts referenced above.
Drivers in the 15-to-20 age group made up 8 percent of drivers in fatal crashes but were 11 percent of
all distracted drivers and 16 percent of drivers distracted by cell phones in fatal crashes.
Drivers in the 21-to-24 age group made up 9 percent of drivers in fatal crashes but were 11 percent of
all distracted drivers and 15 percent of drivers distracted by cell phones in fatal crashes.
Drivers in the 25-to-34 age group made up 22 percent of drivers in fatal crashes but were 25 percent of
all distracted drivers and 30 percent of drivers distracted by cell phones in fatal crashes.
In addition to this data, the National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) of the National Highway Traffic
Safety ministration conducts the National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), which provides the only
nationwide probability-based observed data on driver electronic device use in the United States. NOPUS
observes three types of driver electronic device use while driving: “holding phones to their ears,” “speaking
with visible headsets on,” and “visibly manipulating handheld devices.” The most recent data found that the
percentage of passenger vehicle drivers talking on handheld phones decreased from 2.6 percent in 2020 to 2.5
percent in 2021. The percentage of drivers speaking with visible headsets while driving remained unchanged
from the previous year’s level of 0.4 percent. Drivers’ visible manipulation of handheld devices stood at 3.4
percent in 2021. Note: In 2021 data collected for drivers visibly manipulating handheld devices while traveling
included manipulating infotainment systems.
NHTSA’s Traffic Safety Facts Distracted Driving in 2021 also reports that distracted driving was involved in
over 804,928 crashes in 2021, in which 8% of those (64,910) involved the use of a cell phone. Texting while
driving statistics reveal that this habit increases the likelihood of an accident almost 6 times more than drunk
driving.
Section 4.4 - Distracted Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 72
The Arkansas Highway Safety Office is working with several projects to address Distracted Driving in
Arkansas. These include educational components in the schools through the teen program at Arkansas
Children’s Hospital (ACH), officer and judge’s training through the Black River Training Academy and
Administrative Office of the Courts, and awareness and outreach programs for public education through
ARDOT and CJRW. Plans include “Distracted Driving” outreach and education at football, basketball, and
baseball games, tailgate parties and other sports events in Arkansas, connecting especially with the target
audience of those under 35 who are statistically known to engage in distracted driving. At present, the AHSO
is focused on improving data collection efforts for this area through providing law enforcement with additional
resources and training to create a more accurate database for distracted driving in Arkansas. The AHSO is also
looking into the possibility of working with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to utilize
“Accucensus” to obtain data on the extent of distracted driving and lack of SB use in Arkansas. Information
from Accucensus could be effective in addressing these problems by providing accurate data to inform Arkansas
citizens and lawmakers on how pervasive these problems are and how they contribute to the deaths and injuries
on AR roadways.
Sources:
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813443
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813357
2024 Priorities
AR has limited data on distracted driving.
Data analysis on the number of licensed drivers by age groups for AR counties will be used to determine
priorities for future outreach efforts and programming.
Activities Conducted:
Training sessions for community groups and organizations (ACH/AHSO)
Informational booths at state high school championship games (ACH/Alliance)
Educational components in identified schools through ACH Teen Program
Distracted Driving outreach and education conducted by Alliance at football, basketball, and baseball
games, tailgate parties and other sports events in Arkansas, connecting with target audience of those under
35 who are statistically known to engage in distracted driving.
Black River Training Academy & Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)-Officer and Judge’s Training
Attendees:
Students, parents, school personnel
Residents/citizens living within targeted areas.
Citizens living in communities close to target areas.
Arkansas Judges and LE Officers
Issues Covered:
On campus Safety Campaigns (UCA and ASU)
Information distributed/surveys collected.
Overview of motor vehicle safety evidence for teens approaching licensing or newly licensed drivers
How participants’ comments and views have been or will be incorporated into the development of
the THSP.
Section 4.4 - Distracted Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 73
ACH /Alliance Distracted Driving Education - Through the AHSO’s contract with Alliance, a partnership was
forged with ACH. These two agencies have teamed up to enhance community engagement efforts for distracted
driving. Alliance and ACH set up booths at state high school championship games. These booths deliver
education and information and engage attendees in discussions about distracted driving. The information
provided by attendees is captured and used to assist in framing future programming efforts.
ARDOT Buckle Up/Phone Down - Awareness/Outreach Campaign provides statewide public information and
education to promote adherence to texting and cell phone laws. Components educational materials such as
brochures, posters, presentations, public service announcements and paid advertising.
CJRW mass media “Distracted Driving” campaign.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville will conduct annual Awareness Survey starting in 2023.
FUTURE
The AHSO is exploring the possibility of working with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to utilize
“Accucensus” to obtain data on the extent of distracted driving and lack of SB use in Arkansas. Information
from “Accucensus” could be effective in addressing these problems by providing accurate data to inform
Arkansas citizens and lawmakers on how pervasive these problems are and how they contribute to the deaths
and injuries on AR roadways.
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 13
Countermeasure
Strategy
Communication Campaign DD
Problem (link to
strategy)
The 2018 Awareness Survey conducted by the University of Arkansas at Little Rock
(UALR) provided the following information:
• 65% of respondents support a state law banning all talk on handheld phones while
driving.
• 71% of respondents believed there was not a texting ban while driving.
• 43% of respondents believe Arkansas has a law banning handheld cell phones while
driving.
• 42% of respondents indicated that they “Always” or “Almost Always” answer their
cell phone while driving with another 29% responding they “sometimes” answered.
• 44% of respondents indicated they make calls while driving.
A Statewide distracted driving public awareness campaign will be conducted as part of
the National Distracted Driving Mobilization efforts. In Arkansas, the fines for using a
wireless device to transmit text-based communications are currently a minimum of $25
up to a maximum of $250 for the first offense with subsequent violations subject to a fine
of not less than $50 or more than $500.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Distracted Driving – CTW 1.1 GDL Requirements for Beginning Drivers *****
• Distracted Driving – CTW 1.2 Cell Phone and Text Messaging Laws **
• Distracted Driving – CTW 1.3 HVE Cell Phone and Text Messaging Enforcement
****
• Distracted Driving – CTW 2.1 Communication and Outreach in Distracted Driving
*
Target (link to
strategy
Increased awareness of the dangers of distracted driving to deter the use of cell phones
and the practice of texting to reduce associated deaths and injuries.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,900,000
$1,995,000
$2,094,750
$5,989,750
Section 4.4 - Distracted Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 74
Strategy to project
considerations
More and more fatalities in Arkansas are being attributed to the emerging issue of
distracted driving. Communication and outreach are a critical part of deterrence and
prevention. Education will be conducted through news media, paid advertisements, and
a variety of other communications channels such as community prevention projects at
schools and colleges, posters, billboards, web banners and social media outlets.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier
Planned Activity Name
DD
-
2024
-
01
Statewide
Public Information and Education (PI&E)
DD
-
2024
-
05
Teen Distracted Driving Awareness
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 14
Countermeasure
Strategy
High Visibility Enforcement (Cellphone/Text Messaging)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Between 2016-2020 five percent of traffic fatalities and 12% of serious
injuries in Arkansas involved distracted drivers.
On average, 7 people died or were seriously injured in distracted driving
related crashes in Arkansas each week.
Although enforcement is still hampered by the lack of a hands-free law in Arkansas as
well as the difficulty of proving violations without obtaining a phone record, which is
expensive, officers recognize the seriousness of the problem, and data availability for
this area is improving as more crashes are being attributed to this issue.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Distracted Driving – CTW 1.1 GDL Requirements for Beginning Drivers *****
• Distracted Driving – CTW 1.2 Cell Phone and Text Messaging Laws **
• Distracted Driving – CTW 1.3 HVE Cell Phone and Text Messaging
Enforcement ****
• Distracted Driving – CTW 2.1 Communication and Outreach in Distracted
Driving *
Target (link to strategy The AHSO will utilize High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) to deter cell phone use by
increasing enforcement efforts in this area and the perceived risk of a ticket. Paid and
earned media will support distracted driving enforcement activities These activities are
designed to stimulate increased awareness of distracted driving dangers and deter use
of cell phones and the practice of texting. The objective is to reduce the associated
deaths and injuries.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,800,000
$1,890,000
$1,984,500
$5,674,500
Strategy to project
considerations
NHTSA has examined whether the HVE model could be effective in reducing hand-
held cell phone use and texting among drivers. Like sobriety checkpoints, the objective
is to deter cell phone use by increasing the perceived risk of a ticket. The HVE model
will
combine enforcement with paid and earned media.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
DD
-
2024
-
02
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEPs)
DD
-
2024
-
03
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (STEP)
DD
-
2024
-
04
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects (Mini
-
STEPs)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 25
Countermeasure
Strategy
New Grants Based on Community Outreach (DD)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Expand current efforts by working to develop new partnerships and projects. Information
from those efforts will drive the continued evolution of the problem identification in all
areas of highway safety. Based on the Data Deep Dive AHSO is setting aside funds to
develop projects for the program areas that were identified in the
SWOT analysis:
Section 4.4 - Distracted Driving
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 75
Distracted Driving. AHSO will amend planned activities based upon further data
analysis.
Target (link to strategy Promoting Awareness: Community outreach plays a crucial role in raising awareness
about highway safety. By allocating funds to support projects based on current and future
outreach efforts, AHSO can communicate with community members about the
importance of safe driving practices, potential risks, and available resources. This can
help create a safer driving culture and encourage responsible behavior on the roads.
Behavioral Change: Effective community outreach programs can lead to behavioral
changes among community members. Engaging with the public and communicating with
them on topics such as distracted driving, impaired driving, pedestrian and bicycle safety
and seat belt usage, can influence people's attitudes and actions. This, in turn, can lead to
reduced instances of unsafe driving behaviors and contribute to improved highway safety.
Tailored Programming: Community outreach allows for targeted programming that
address specific safety concerns within a given community. By understanding the unique
characteristics, needs, and challenges of AR communities, AHSO can design initiatives
that directly address those issues. This personalized approach can lead to more effective
outcomes and a higher likelihood of behavior change among community members.
Long-Term Benefits: While immediate infrastructure improvements and enforcement
measures are essential for highway safety, investing in community outreach can yield
long-term benefits. Education and awareness can instill a safety-conscious mindset
within the community, which can have lasting effects beyond the initial implementation
of the highway safety plan. Continued outreach efforts can reinforce positive behaviors,
sustain community engagement, and contribute to an enduring culture of safety on the
ro
ads.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
These funds will be used for potential projects based on current and future community
outreach efforts to be able to achieve targeted education, behavior change, collaboration,
tailored interventions, and long-term benefits. By acting on the results of the community
outreach the AHSO will be able to empower the community, and work towards creating
safer roads in Arkansas.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
DD
-
2024
-
06
Highway Safety Projects Based on Community Outreach (DD)
Section 4.5 – Motorcycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 76
Problem Identification
Arkansas reported 66 motorcycle related fatalities in 2018 rising to 84 in 2022 and account for approximately
13 percent of Arkansas’ total traffic fatalities. Arkansas repealed the helmet law in 1999, and only requires
helmets for motorcyclists aged 21 or younger. In 2022, 51 of the 84 motorcycle fatalities or 61 percent, were
not helmeted. Motorcycle data is provided in the chart below. The chart shows the number of motorcycle
crashes for 2022 and the crashes involving an impaired driver.
The Arkansas Highway Safety Office (AHSO) will conduct a statewide motorcycle safety program to increase
motorist’s awareness, support rider education and outreach, and utilize enforcement and PI&E efforts to reduce
the number of motorcycle fatalities and injuries. The AHSO will purchase advertising for the “Look Twice for
County or
Political
Subdivision
Number of
registered
motorcycles
Number of
motorcycle
crashes
# of MCC
involving
another
motor vehicle
# of MCC
involving an
impaired
operator
County or
Political
Subdivision
Number of
registered
motorcycles
Number of
motorcycle
crashes
# of MCC
involving
another
motor vehicle
# of MCC
involving an
impaired
operator
Arkansas 1,483 5 3 0 Lee 206 1 1 0
Ashley 786 3 2 0 Lincoln 409 3 1 0
Baxter 4,126 31 9 1 Little River 606 5 1 0
Benton 18,424 98 54 3 Logan 2,063 10 4 0
Boone 3,038 15 6 0 Lonoke 5,126 34 20 2
Bradley 396 2 2 0 Madison 1,112 28 7 2
Calhoun 200 2 0 0 Marion 1,575 10 0 0
Carroll 2,317 26 11 1 Miller 2,034 25 14 1
Chicot 281 0 0 0 Mississippi 1,375 13 6 0
Clark 744 6 3 0 Monroe 246 0 0 0
Clay 670 1 1 0 Montgomery 624 7 3 0
Cleburne 2,101 23 8 0 Nevada 353 3 2 0
Cleveland 326 2 1 0 Newton 587 23 3 0
Columbia 973 6 3 0 Ouachita 1,088 2 2 0
Conway 1,260 11 7 0 Perry 611 7 2 0
Craighead 4,172 43 28 1 Phillips 475 2 2 0
Crawford 4,331 35 17 1 Pike 557 3 2 1
Crittenden 1,650 12 9 0 Poinsett 1,013 5 3 1
Cross 630 2 1 0 Polk 1,566 11 4 0
Dallas 250 2 0 0 Pope 3,471 30 14 1
Desha 307 1 1 0 Prairie 303 1 1 0
Drew 580 4 0 0 Pulaski 13,285 183 128 2
Faulkner 6,360 53 29 0 Randolph 938 8 3 0
Franklin 1,137 20 2 0 St. Francis 607 46 29 0
Fulton 858 6 2 0 Saline 6,957 2 1 1
Garland 6,761 52 37 0 Scott 611 4 0 0
Grant 1,088 3 1 0 Searcy 474 77 46 0
Greene 2,235 16 12 1 Sebastian 7,801 2 1 4
Hempstead 758 8 4 0 Sevier 609 4 0 0
Hot Spring 2,012 15 5 0 Sharp 1,172 7 2 0
Howard 457 0 0 0 Stone 1,078 10 1 0
Independence 1,819 18 10 2 Union 1,755 7 4 0
Izard 1,039 5 2 1 Van Buren 1,202 7 3 2
Jackson 601 2 0 0 Washington 12,378 98 54 2
Jefferson 2,312 20 16 1 White 4,445 39 16 1
Johnson 1,598 10 3 0 Woodruff 241 0 0 0
Lafayette 321 1 1 0 Yell 1,206 13 3 0
Lawrence 861 8 3 1 Total 159,421 1,297 676 33
Section 4.5 – Motorcycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 77
Motorcycles” and “Take 2 for Arkansas” campaigns to include broadcast, cable, radio, and online advertising
in most counties with a focus on counties that have the majorities of crashes and fatalities.
Arkansas will utilize statewide television and radio spots to promote awareness of motorcycle safety and the
dangers associated with the impaired operation of motorcycles. Efforts to deter impaired motorcyclists will be
made during the National Winter DWI Mobilization (DSOGPO); the National Labor Day DWI Mobilization
(DSOGPO); and the July 4th holiday DSOGPO campaign. The AHSO will purchase advertising to include
broadcast, cable, radio, and online advertising directed at a majority of counties with the highest number of
crashes and fatalities with an emphasis on the top five counties to provide information and create awareness of
motorcycle safety and dangers of impaired riding.
Planned activities: Motorist Awareness Campaign and Motorcycle Outreach Program
Provides funding to promote motorcycle safety activities. Items that may be produced and purchased are
educational pamphlets, posters, costs associated with producing and airing radio and television ads and other
items as appropriate. A motorcyclist outreach program has been subcontracted to Alliance Sport Marketing
through CJRW. This project will involve a coordinated presence at motorcycle rallies AND EVENTS
throughout the state. The project was initiated in May FY21 and has already drawn positive attention and
response from various motorcycle groups. In FY24, the project has been expanded Alliance will attend a
minimum of 20 days of motorcycle rallies, or 10 different rally events. Alliance will also distribute an updated
public opinion survey at motorcycle rallies to determine the most critical traffic safety issues, from the
perspective of the community, that the AHSO needs to address. Other planned efforts for FY 24 include working
with the Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration to distribute motorcycle endorsement envelope
stuffers, a project which began in FY 23, to provide information on registration, licensing, and training
opportunities. The AHSO will continue to work with ABATE and motorcycle dealerships to identify an MSF
trainer for Arkansas as well as to conduct additional education and outreach.
2024 Priorities
Pulaski, Benton, Washington, Searcy, and Garland have highest number of MC crashes involving
another motor vehicle.
Central and Northwest AR are primary areas to target.
Activities Conducted:
20 Motorcycle rallies/events across AR
Attendees:
Attendees living within AR
Attendees from outside of AR
Attendance average at each event between 250-500 MC riders
Issues Covered:
Honda Safe Motorcyclist Awareness & Recognition Trainer, MC
MC Driver/Rider Simulator, Fatal Vison Goggles, Photo Station
Educational Information distributed/collected on MC Safety issues.
Participants engaged in discussions about experiences and MC safety.
Brief Surveys collected on MC Safety utilizing tablets.
How participants’ comments and views will be incorporated into the development of the THSP.
Section 4.5 – Motorcycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 78
Utilize feedback from Surveys to adjust current program and develop new ones.
New or expanded partnerships (ongoing engagement efforts)
Pilot new projects
Alliance Motorcycle Education/Outreach
The AHSO has a contract with Alliance Sports Marketing to provide community outreach for education/
awareness at motorcycle rallies across the state. Alliance personnel set up informational booths to discuss
motorcycle safety and participants test their riding/driving skills on a simulator provided by AHSO. Alliance
staff engage attendees in discussions about motorcycle safety and ask them to complete a survey. The
conversations and surveys provide information about why Motorcyclists do or do not use helmets, AR road
safety issues, and what they believe would make AR roads safer for motorcyclists. Using this information, the
AHSO will continue to work to develop new partnerships and targeted campaigns/projects that can effectively
reduce the fatalities and injuries associated with motorcycle crashes in Arkansas.
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 15
Countermeasure
Strategy
Communication Campaign (MC)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Arkansas reported 69 motorcycle related fatalities in 2017 rising to 96 in 2021 and
account for approximately 14 percent of Arkansas’ total traffic fatalities. Arkansas
repealed the helmet law in 1999, and only requires helmets for motorcyclists aged 21
or younger. In 2021, 53 of the 96 fatalities or 55 percent, were not helmeted.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Motorcycle Safety CTW – 1.2 MC Helmet Use Promotion Program *
• Motorcycle Safety CTW – 2.2 Alcohol-Impaired MC: Communication and
Outreach *
• Motorcycle Safety CTW – 4.2 Communication and Outreach: Motorist
Awareness of MC *
Target (link to strategy The objective of Arkansas' Communication Campaign for Motorcycle awareness is to
provide information concerning the safe operation of motorcycles and persuade riders
and drivers of the benefits associated with drivers and motorcycle operators taking the
time to be more aware of their surroundings, be safe and courteous and not drink while
operating or riding a vehicle or motorcycle. The projected impact would be increased
awareness and safer behaviors on the part of drivers and motorcycle operators resulting
in fewer fatalities and injuries.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
Effective, high visibility communications and outreach are important in changing
attitudes and behavior of both riders and drivers. The objective of Arkansas'
Communication Campaign for Motorcycle awareness is to provide information
concerning the safe operation of motorcycles and persuade riders and drivers of the
benefits associated with drivers and motorcycle operators taking the time to be more
aware of their surroundings, be safe and courteous and not drink while operating or
riding a vehicle or motorcycle.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
MC
-
2024
-
01
Motorist Awareness Campaign
MC
-
2024
-
02
Motorcyclist Awareness/Outreach Program
Section 4.6 - Young Drivers
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 79
Problem Identification
Arkansas is in the top 10 states with the highest motor fatality rate for teens. The total crash rate per mile driven
for 16 and 17-year-olds is about 3 times the rate for drivers 20 and older—Not using a seatbelt and distracted
driving two of the top contributors to the number of motor fatalities among the teen driving population.
AR Motor Fatalities among teens AR Motor fatality rate per 100,000 teens
49 31
Section 4.6 - Young Drivers
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 80
2024 Priorities
Novice drivers ages 15-18 are overrepresented in AR traffic fatalities.
High crash rates for drivers in this age range
Prominent racial and ethnic demographics in historically underserved areas may be impacted.
Activities Conducted:
Informational sessions for parents/students
Student led Safety Campaigns in Schools
Educational Booths at high school Championship games
CDC Leadership Conference
CPS Safety Events-seat checks in communities.
Attendees:
Students/parents from targeted area Schools
Citizens who lived both inside and outside area and commute on same roads to get school/event.
Parents/caregivers of babies/children in targeted areas for seat checks
Issues Covered:
Seat Belt and Distracted Driving Safety education
Student led Safety Campaigns and Surveys
Leadership Skills
Car Seat Laws and correct installation/use
How participants’ comments and views have been or will be incorporated into the development of the
THSP.
Arkansas Children’s Hospital Teen Project
ACH was already working with equity/inclusion and engaging targeted counties/communities. This will
continue going forward. An additional teen driving position will be added for the Injury Prevention Center
(IPC). This request came out of the SWOT meeting based on data which identified a need for program efforts
targeting additional counties. Additional counties in FY24 include Grant, Howard, Izard, Green, Calhoun,
Cross, and Fulton. Counties targeting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) will also be added in FY24. These
include Phillips, Lee, Jefferson, Pulaski, Chicot, St. Francis, and Crittenden.
The ACH TEEN program currently surveys participants on the effectiveness of their programs, Additional
surveys are under development for teens to complete during the program year on what highway safety issues
they see as most important and the best way(s) to convey the importance of safe driving to teens. Educational
events targeting underserved and overrepresented populations will also be scheduled for families and
communities to promote safe driving.
The AR Challenge Leadership Conference (CLC) has been expanded to target high school students across the
state with emphasis on underserved and overrepresented populations. ACH and Alliance are collaborating to
enhance the CLC by providing presenters with impactful stories that focus on key aspects of teen driving safety.
Participating students’ network, engage with educational booths and work as a team to use what they learn.
(Survey results from conference page 104-105)
Countermeasures
Section 4.6 - Young Drivers
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 81
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 16
Countermeasure
Strategy
School Programs
Problem (link to
strategy)
Arkansas recorded 695 (FARS) fatalities in 2021. In 2022 preliminary state data shows
this number decreased to 644. With a Safety Belt compliance rate in FY22 of 79.1%,
Arkansas’ use rate is well below the national average of 91.6% and is considered a “low
rate” state for Section 405b funding qualification.
In 2021, 76 drivers under the age of 21 were victims of fatal crashes in Arkansas. Motor
vehicles crashes are the #1 cause of unintentional injury and death among teenagers
(NHTSA). The goal for this countermeasure is to reduce total fatalities and injuries to
those under age 21. The upward trend in fatalities for this age group from 48 (2017) to
78 (2020) and 76 in (2021) together with factors such as the increase in the interstate
speed limit and distracted driving occurrences are concerning.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Young Drivers CTW – 1.1 GDL *****
• Young Drivers CTW – 1.2 Learner’s Permit Length/ Supervised Hours*****
• Young Drivers CTW – 1.3 Nighttime Restrictions *****
• Young Drivers CTW – 1.4 Passenger Restrictions *****
• Young Drivers CTW – 1.5 Cellphone Restrictions **
• Young Drivers CTW – 1.6 Belt Use Requirements **
•
Young Drivers CTW
–
3.1 Parent Roles in Teaching Young Drivers**
Target (link to strategy UAMS/Arkansas Children’s Hospital has implemented and conducted a seatbelt
project for 12 years in collaboration with the AHSO and Allstate Foundation Teen
Driving program. The program fosters equity and ethnic inclusion and serves many
schools in underserved minority and rural communities. The project also has minority
program staff, allowing for a diverse atmosphere within the overall program. The
project educates teens and parents and involves direct interaction and engagement to
change parents’ behaviors and ultimately reduce teen driver crashes. A central feature
of the program is a written agreement that limits teens’ driving in high-risk situations
such as driving at night or with other teens in the car. The project activities will be
implemented in local public schools which are part of a local city or county political
subdivision. Participating schools have an active voice in the implementation of the
project and benefit from the project activities.
UAMS/ACH will also promote awareness of Arkansas’ Graduated Driver Licensing
(GDL) law. The GDL law addresses teen driving issues by helping new drivers gain
experience in lower-risk conditions. In other states, comprehensive GDL programs
have been a proven success by reducing teen fatalities and injuries by up to 38%.
Arkansas GDL emphasizes use of safety belts for all seating positions especially during
learning and intermediate stages. This project will promote peer to peer influence of
seat belt use, GDL principles for young drivers and passengers. It will also educate
teens and parents on the dangers of distracted driving and emphasize the importance of
pedestrian and bike safety.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$350,000 $367,500 $385,875 $1,103,375
Strategy to project
considerations
Schools provide well-defined and somewhat controlled audiences for seat belt use
programs. Evaluations of school programs that have been conducted have shown an
increase in belt use.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
11
Teen Drive
r
Safety Project
Section 4.7 - Pedestrian / Bicycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 82
Problem Identification
Arkansas pedestrian fatalities rose from 47 in 2012 to a high of 82 in 2021. In 2021, the rate of fatalities among
Black pedestrians was more than double that of White or Hispanic pedestrians. Most fatalities (74%) occur
between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. Little Rock and Northwest Arkansas are key areas to target for interventions to
reduce pedestrian fatalities.
AR population percentage (Black) 2016-2021 AR percentage of fatalities (Black)
15.1% 30.7%
Over the last five years, pedestrian fatalities averaged around 71 with a low of 37 in 2014 and a high of 81 in
2020. The updated statistics from 2020 through 2022 reveal that an average of 77 pedestrians were fatally
injured in Arkansas over the past three years. Bicycle fatalities have averaged around 6 with a low of 3 and
high of 10 in year 2021. Pedestrian and Bicyclist fatalities represent almost 12% of all motor vehicle fatalities
in Arkansas for 2022. Information on pedestrian and bicycle safety will be a part of the “Toward Zero Deaths”
Campaign and other injury prevention projects including PI&E projects. Countermeasures conducted in
Arkansas will include both enforcement and education/awareness efforts, focusing on increased communication
and pedestrian outreach programs.
The drastic increase in fatalities and injuries for pedestrians and bicyclists underscores the importance of
developing an effective Highway Safety Plan for this area. The objective will be to provide information and
education through careful framing and highlighting of expected safety benefits and educating more citizens on
traffic related legislation.
Arkansas’ improved crash data reporting requirements can now identify locations where pedestrian and bicycle
injuries and fatalities are occurring. In FY24 the AHSO will work with LE agencies in identified problem areas
and encourage them to be more proactive in pedestrian and bicyclist enforcement. The AHSO will involve
local coalitions and community groups to identify appropriate countermeasures and develop innovative
programming that can save the lives of pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and more.
Black River Law Enforcement Training Academy will provide additional officer training on laws and
enforcement for this area. The AHSO is also collaborating with the City of Little Rock’s pedestrian bicyclist
project and coalition to coordinate activities and options for a statewide initiative. The
AHSO will continue to network with ARDOT’s “Share the Road” project which started out as a small sub-grant
through the Highway Safety Program until 2022 when funding became available through ARDOT. AHSO will
continue to partner with ARDOT to expand and complement ped/bike projects moving forward. ARDOT is
currently undergoing a major reorganization and plans for their pedestrian/bicycle program are in flux.
Tentative plans include the purchase of safety materials such as white and red lights for the front and back of
bicycles and reflectors for pedestrians along with printed educational materials. Efforts will primarily target
elementary, middle, and high school students but include reaching out to the Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPO’s) to target areas statewide and working with the LR Marathon Expo to distribute
educational information and safety materials in known problem areas.
In FY22 the AHSO added a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety component to an existing project conducted by
Arkansas Children’s Hospital. The program dedicated the last two quarters of FY 22 to piloting the initiative
in four counties where highly populated high schools and college campuses exist, based on 2021 data
(Craighead, Pope, Faulkner, Pulaski, and Washington). The project will continue to target additional college
campuses and schools in Arkansas counties where the majority of pedestrian/bicyclist injuries and fatalities in
Arkansas are occurring after visiting three highly populated campuses (which ones?) in FY 23. The project is
Section 4.7 - Pedestrian / Bicycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 83
also seeking to conduct walkability assessments and engage with the community through focus groups in FY
24.
In FY 24 the AHSO will also expand its partnership with Alliance to utilize their marketing tactics to include
safety messages aimed at informing the public about the presence of pedestrians and bicyclists on the roadways
as well as safety precautions. Ideas are underway for education and awareness events that would include a
presence at running and hiking events in the state in addition to others.
In addition to press-related activities, enforcement and educational efforts planned for FY24, AHSO will
continue to work with the advertising firm CJRW to ensure that media messages for this area are included in
Arkansas’s media plan to bring community awareness to pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Public Participation & Engagement
FARS data shows that between 2018-2022 there were 355 pedestrian fatalities, and 28 persons lost their lives
in bicycle crashes. These fatalities represented 13% of all motor vehicle fatalities for that period. Preliminary
data shows 71 pedestrian fatalities and 5 bicyclist fatalities at 12% of total fatalities for 2022. Through
consistent engagement, AHSO will improve its understanding of risk factors contributing to pedestrian
fatalities.
Detailed data analyses will be conducted to better understand which areas and groups are most affected. The
AHSO will engage groups and organizations in the identified communities and areas for discussion and
feedback. By understanding the factors contributing to this increase, AHSO will develop appropriate safety
countermeasure strategies and implement projects to help reduce this trend. The AHSO will leverage current
pedestrian/bicyclists’ programs to expand engagement with affected communities and adjust them based on
their feedback.
Affected Communities
In 2021, the rate of fatalities among Black pedestrians was more than double that of White or Hispanic
pedestrians.
Little Rock and Northwest Arkansas are key areas to target for interventions.
Most fatalities (74%) occur between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m.
Engagement Events Conducted:
Visits to high schools and Universities
Training and pilots of NHTSA’s Bike ology program at high schools and bicycle/pedestrian initiatives
on college campuses
Informational booths at state high school championship games
Helmets and educational Materials provided Bike trail openings.
Accessibility Measures Implemented:
ADA compliance
Accessible locations, times
Attendees:
Residents/citizens living within area.
Citizens living in communities close to target areas.
Issues Covered:
Section 4.7 - Pedestrian / Bicycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 84
On campus Ped/ Bike Safety Campaigns (UCA and ASU)
Educational materials and safety equipment distributed.
Walkability Assessments
Information distributed/collected on distracted driving/walking/biking.
How Affected communities’ comments and views have been or will be incorporated into the development
of the THSP.
New or expanded partnerships (ongoing engagement)
Develop and pilot new projects.
ACH Pedestrian/Bicyclist Project
Alliance Distracted Driving Education
In FY22 a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety component was added to an existing project conducted by Arkansas
Children’s Hospital. The program dedicated the last two quarters of FY 22 to piloting the initiative in four
counties (Craighead, Pope, Faulkner, Pulaski, Washington) where highly populated high schools and college
campuses exist. Visits to high schools and universities were conducted to recruit students and organizations
for pilots of NHTSA’s Bike-ology program at high schools and bicycle/pedestrian initiatives on college
campuses. Meetings were held with the U of A Fayetteville, UCA Conway, and AR State Jonesboro (ASU). A
Bike/Peds campaign and training was conducted for volunteers and staff on the UCA and ASU campuses. UCA
conducted their campaign in October 2023 and ASU conducted their campaign "Watch for Red Wolves" March.
Over 200 college pedestrians were observed in crosswalks for safe crossing. This model will be used in FY24
for additional AR college campuses. Helmets and educational materials were also delivered to Clarksville
(Johnson County) for the grand opening of their bike trail and Monticello (Drew County) has reached out for
ACH to do the same when they are ready. Additional walkability assessments and focus groups are planned
for FY24. Ideas are underway for education and awareness events that would include a presence at running
and hiking events in the state.
Through the AHSO’s contract with Alliance, a partnership was forged with ACH. These two agencies have
teamed up to enhance community engagement efforts for distracted driving. Alliance and ACH man booths at
state high school championship games. These booths delivered education and information and engage attendees
in discussions about distracted driving. The information provided by attendees is captured and used to assist in
framing future programming efforts.
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 17
Countermeasure
Strategy
School and Community Awareness Programs
Problem (link to
strategy)
Communications and outreach are a critical part of deterrence and prevention. School
and community projects will include information on distracted driving and pedestrian
and bicycle safety
Countermeasure
Justification
• Pedestrian Safety CTW – 4.7 University Education Program *
• Bicycle Safety CTW – 1.2 Safe Routes to School ***
• Bicycle Safety CTW – 1.3 Bicycle Safety Education for Children **
• Bicycle Safety CTW – 1.4 Bike Rodeo *
•
Bicycle Safety CTW
–
4.2 Share the Road Awareness Program **
Target (link to strategy Impacts of these activities are projected to increase awareness of the dangers associated
with distracted driving, using cell phones and to emphasize pedestrian and bike safety.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$700,000
$735,000
$771,750
$2,206,750
Section 4.7 - Pedestrian / Bicycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 85
Strategy to project
considerations
As with prevention and intervention, education through various communications and
outreach strategies is especially important. Education will be conducted through
community projects in communities, schools, and colleges.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
OP
-
2024
-
11
Teen Drive Safety Project
PS
-
2024
-
01
Statewide Public Information and Education (PI&E)
PS
-
2024
-
02
Pedestrian/Bicycle Public Awareness Campaign
PS
-
2024
-
03
Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Project
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 18
Countermeasure
Strategy
Communication Campaign (Ped/Bike)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Campaigns will focus on equity and ethnic inclusion, in the development of ads,
billboards and spots for TV and radio. Media will be developed in appropriate
languages and targeted to underserved minority and rural communities utilizing
demographics and scheduling. The project has minority program staff, allowing for a
diverse approach to content.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Pedestrian Safety CTW – 3.1 Communications and Outreach **
• Bicycle Safety CTW – 1.2 Safe Routes to School ***
• Bicycle Safety CTW – 1.3 Bicycle Safety Education for Children **
•
Bicycle Safety CTW
–
4.2 Share the Road Awareness Program **
Target (link to strategy
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
Communications and outreach strategies inform the public of the dangers for
pedestrians and bicyclists. As with prevention and intervention, education through
various communications and outreach strategies is especially important. Education
will be conducted through news media, paid advertisements, and a wide variety of other
communications channels such as posters, billboards, web banners and social media
outlets. The success of paid advertising in seat belt campaigns suggests that
communications and outreach programs urging the public to be aware and implement
safety precautions to avoid injuries and death are worth considering for pedestrian and
bicyclist issues.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
PS
-
202
4
-
01
Statewide Public Information and Education (PI&E)
PS
-
202
4
-
02
Pedestrian/Bicycle Public
Awareness Campaign
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 33
Countermeasure
Strategy
New Grants Based on Community Outreach (PS)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Expand current public participation and engagement efforts to reach overrepresented and
underserved communities by working to develop new partnerships and projects in
conjunction with coalitions and community leaders. Information from those efforts will
drive the continued evolution of the problem identification in all areas of highway safety.
Based on the Data Deep Dive AHSO is setting aside funds to be able to develop projects
for the program areas that were identified in the SWOT analysis: Pedestrian Safety.
AHSO will amend those planned activities based upon ongoing and future community
outreach efforts.
Target (link to strategy Promoting Awareness: Community outreach plays a crucial role in raising awareness
about highway safety. By allocating funds to support projects based on current and future
outreach efforts, AHSO can communicate with community members about the
importance of safe driving practices, potential risks, and available resources. This can
help create a safer driving culture and encourage responsible behavior on the roads.
Section 4.7 - Pedestrian / Bicycle
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 86
Behavioral Change: Effective community outreach programs can lead to behavioral
changes among community members. Engaging with the public and communicating with
them on topics such as distracted driving, impaired driving, pedestrian and bicycle safety
and seat belt usage, can influence people's attitudes and actions. This, in turn, can lead to
reduced instances of unsafe driving behaviors and contribute to improved highway safety.
Tailored Programming: Community outreach allows for targeted programming that
address specific safety concerns within a given community. By understanding the unique
characteristics, needs, and challenges of AR communities, AHSO can design initiatives
that directly address those issues. This personalized approach can lead to more effective
outcomes and a higher likelihood of behavior change among community members.
Long-Term Benefits: While immediate infrastructure improvements and enforcement
measures are essential for highway safety, investing in community outreach can yield
long-term benefits. Education and awareness can instill a safety-conscious mindset
within the community, which can have lasting effects beyond the initial implementation
of the highway safety plan. Continued outreach efforts can reinforce positive behaviors,
sustain community engagement, and contribute to an enduring culture of safety on the
ro
ads.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
These funds will be used for potential projects based on current and future community
outreach efforts to be able to achieve targeted education, behavior change, collaboration,
tailored interventions, and long-term benefits. By acting on the results of the community
outreach the AHSO will be able to empower the community, and work towards creating
safer roads in Arkansas.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
PS
-
2024
-
04
Highway Safety Projects Based on Community Outreach (PS)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 35
Countermeasure
Strategy
Non-Motorized Traffic Safety Education (PS)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Expand current public education and information campaigns to emphasize Arkansas
traffic laws pertaining to nonmotorized road user safety including the responsibility of
motorists and the importance of nonmotorized road user safety equipment including
lighting, mirrors, conspicuity equipment, helmets and other safety equipment.
Target (link to strategy Educating nonmotorized road users helps foster mutual understanding and respect
between different road user groups. By raising awareness of each other's needs,
challenges, and responsibilities, both nonmotorized road users and motorists can develop
a more cooperative and respectful approach to sharing the road, reducing conflicts and
improving overall safety. Addressing the needs of all road users, regardless of their mode
of transportation, safety measures become more inclusive and effective, reducing the
overall number of accidents, injuries, and fatalities on the road.
Nonmotorized road user safety education is crucial as it enhances the awareness,
knowledge, and behavior of nonmotorized road users, reduces risks, fosters mutual
understanding, and contributes to a comprehensive approach to road safety.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$300,000
$315,000
$330,750
$945,750
Strategy to project
considerations
These funds will be used for developing public education materials related to non-
motorized traffic safety and
conducting education campaigns.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
PS
-
2024
-
0
5
Non
-
Motorized Traffic Safety Education (PS)
Section 4.8 - Traffic Records
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 87
Problem Identification
Issues with a previous contractor created a backlog of crash report data that needed to be entered into eCrash,
the online system used by the Arkansas State Police (ASP) and most agencies in the state. Through a heavy
push by AHSO data entry personnel and the University of Arkansas contract personnel, the AHSO managed to
eliminate the backlog in FY21. The system is now current.
Efforts have been made to identify every law enforcement department in the state and begin discussions with
them about moving to eCrash. Currently approximately 97% of AR agencies participating statewide, either
online with in-car units or a desktop system in the office. These crashes are for the most part current within a
couple of days of the occurrence of the crash. The remaining small city departments send in copies of their
crashes either or paper or online for entry by the office staff. Three larger agencies use a different electronic
system but have created a tie in to eCrash which allows their crashes to be input in the system within a few
hours of approval by their supervisor.
eCite is a program that allows officers to immediately forward a citation to the court clerk and have the citation
information integrated with the crash report. It requires an agency to be fully involved in the eCrash/eCite
program with computer units installed in the patrol car. Because of the cost involved and the relatively small
size of most of the agencies, the eCite program is moving along at a much slower rate than eCrash which allows
officers to input the information into a desktop computer at the office. Changes are forthcoming with the
Administrative Office of the Courts. A new court management system is being implemented which will add
the smaller courts to that system and this is generating more interest and buy in among the other law enforcement
agencies across the state.
We are in the process of updating the system from MMUCC 3
rd
edition to MMUCC 5
th
edition compliance.
This will require all officers statewide to be retrained in the use of the system so there is overall statewide
compliance.
An agency-wide effort to align ARDOT’s roadway elements and reporting systems with the Federal Highway
Administration’s Model Inventory Roadway Elements (MIRE) initiative was undertaken last year. Complete
adoption of MIRE will allow state and local transportation agencies to link safety data to non-safety data,
making it easier to collect, store, link, and use all data elements.
The goals of projects funded in the Traffic Records Program are:
Increase the number of agencies using eCrash
Implement new automated court system to extend access to eCite information to all courts statewide
Reduce average crash record entry time using the eCrash system
Decrease time to court disposition of cases
The AHSO has encountered several obstacles with the development of the new Arkansas TR Strategic Plan.
Initially the AHSO long time Traffic Records Coordinator retired. A replacement was hired but left that position
after a relatively short time and the Highway Safety Manager assumed those responsibilities. Due to staff
shortages and changes related to development of the new THSP the ASHO was unable to finalize a new TR
plan in FY23. The AHSO has been working with the Region 7 Traffic Records Program Manager and plans
to submit the new plan with the FY24 Grant Applications.
Section 4.8 - Traffic Records
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 88
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 19
Countermeasure
Strategy
Highway Safety Office Program Management TR
Problem (link to
strategy)
The last Traffic Records Assessment by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration’s assessment team was conducted for the State of Arkansas between
February and May 2021. In conjunction with the strategic plan, the goals of the Traffic
Records Program are to improve the accuracy of the data.
The program will continue efforts to improve the accuracy of data by continuing to
expand the input of crash through the paperless system by using a computer image of
the crash report for review and data entry.
This countermeasure will provide funding for the necessary personnel and training for
the administration of the Traffic Records Program and support for other program areas
(administration of computer system hardware and eGrant). Funding will also provide
for the necessary staff time travel and training expenses directly related to the planning,
programming, monitoring, evaluation and coordination of the Traffic Records Program
and for continued training in the administration of computer systems software and
eGrants operations to maintain an effective, efficient Traffic Records Program.
A new Traffic Records Assessment was officially concluded on June 2, 2021, and new
goals and a new five-year plan are under development now. That plan is expected to be
completed by the end of FY22.
Countermeasure
Justification
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 1 – Traffic Records System Information Components
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 2 – Traffic Records System Information Quality
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No.18 (Motor
Vehicle Crash Investigation and Incident Reporting
Target (link to strategy Provides for the administration of the Traffic Records Program and provides support
for other program areas. Funding will provide for the necessary staff time, travel and
training expenses directly related to the planning, programming, monitoring, evaluation
and coordination of the Traffic Records Program. Funding will also provide for
continued training in the administration of computer systems software and
improvements to the AHSO eGrants system to facilitate electronic submission of
proposals by subcontractors, development of contract agreements and other forms
related to planning, programming, and monitoring and evaluating projects.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$427,000
$448,350
$470,768
$1,346,118
Strategy to project
considerations
This countermeasure is necessary to maintain an effective, efficient Traffic Records
Program that will provide timely, accurate information and data to direct and support
strategies to effectively address traffic Arkansas' traffic safety problems. Funding will
provide staff and training for the administration of the Program as well as support for
relevant program areas. Funds will also provide for travel and training expenses and
programming, monitoring, evaluation and coordination of the Traffic Records
Program.
Planned Activities Unique
Identifier:
Planned Activity Names:
TR
-
2024
-
06
Traffic Records Professional Development & Crash Reconstruction
TR
-
2024
-
07
Traffic Records Program Management
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 20
Countermeasure
Strategy
Improves timeliness of a core highway safety database
Section 4.8 - Traffic Records
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 89
Problem (link to
strategy)
Increase the number of Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA’s) using the eCrash system
to report crashes rather than submitting paper reports.
There are approximately 441 Law Enforcement Agency’s in Arkansas - counting
Arkansas State Police as one. Currently 279 are submitting their reports through eCrash
with an additional 13 agencies in training.
Countermeasure
Justification
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 1 – Traffic Records System Information Components
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 2
–
Traffic Records System Information Quality
Target (link to strategy This countermeasure is necessary to maintain an effective, efficient Traffic Records
Program that will provide timely, accurate information and data to direct and support
strategies to effectively address traffic Arkansas' traffic safety problems. Funding will
provide staff and training for the administration of the Program as well as support for
relevant program areas. Funds will also provide for travel and training expenses and
programming, monitoring, evaluation and coordination of the Traffic Records Program.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$2,217,750
$2,328,638
$2,445,069
$6,991,457
Strategy to project
considerations
The findings and recommendations of the last Traffic Records Assessment team,
together with input from the TRCC are the basis for Arkansas’ 2023 Traffic Records
Strategic Plan. In conjunction with the strategic plan, the goals of the Traffic Records
Program are to maintain and reduce the backlog of crash report data to be entered into
eCrash and improve the accuracy of data.
This program will continue efforts to reduce the backlog and improve the accuracy and
timeliness of crash data. The transition to the eCrash system has streamlined the entry
of crashes and is already providing more accurate and timely information.
Planned Activities Unique
Identifier:
Planned Activity Names:
TR
-
2024
-
01
eCrash Program Operations
TR
-
2024
-
02
eCrash
Training
TR
-
2024
-
03
Electronic Traffic Crash Record Entry System Project (eCrash)
TR
-
2024
-
05
Electronic Citation System (eCite)
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 21
Countermeasure
Strategy
Improves integration between one or more core highway safety databases
Problem (link to
strategy)
The transition from the TraCS system to the eCrash system has streamlined the entry
of Crashes by ASP with 279 local agencies using eCrash currently and another 15
trained.
eCrash – eCrash is a data collection and reporting tool to streamline and automate the
capture and transmission of critical traffic safety related data. eCrash is an initiative by
the Arkansas State Police (ASP) in collaboration with University of Alabama to collect
data from law enforcement at the scene of a motor vehicle crash and send that data
electronically to ASP who serves as the repository for crash data. eCrash is partially
funded through Section 405c. Features include electronic forms, data validation, case
management, document workflow, data transmission, peripheral compatibility, and
eCrash Web. Currently 279 of approximately 400 Arkansas law enforcement agencies
submit their data electronically through eCrash. It is anticipated this number will
increase in 2023. Data Collection and Analysis is also a primary emphasis area in the
SHSP and includes eCrash as well as other data collection methods and tools.
Crash Report Form – On July 15, 2015, the ASP released a revised uniform crash form
electronically to the ASP troopers provided it to local law enforcement agencies
throughout the state since that date. Additional fields were added to the form, thus
Section 4.8 - Traffic Records
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 90
allowing additional data to be collected which can then be analyzed to support traffic
safety improvements.
Crash Data – The ASP continues to work with law enforcement partners on the
importance of crash data with a goal to lower the number of crash reports containing
“unknown” for various data elements.
Reports by ASP – The ASP Highway Patrol uses data to implement enforcement, write
reports and proposals, design presentations, or increase traffic safety awareness. Traffic
safety stakeholders are encouraged to utilize services provided by ASP. For law
enforcement, reports specific to their jurisdiction help identify evidence-based problem
areas in which to focus overtime efforts. Integration of the eCite, eCrash, Contexte, and
other relevant databases has assisted in producing more timely and accurate data
.
Countermeasure
Justification
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 1 – Traffic Records System Information Components
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No. 10
(Traffic Records), Section 2 – Traffic Records System Information Quality
• NHTSA – Uniform Guideline for State Highway Safety Programs, No.11
(Emergency Medical Services)
Target (link to strategy In conjunction with the strategic plan, goals of Traffic Records are to integrate relevant
databases and improve accuracy/ timeliness of data.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$1,817,750
$1,908,638
$2,004,069
$5,730,457
Strategy to project
considerations
This countermeasure will provide funding for necessary personnel, training and
equipment for administration of computer systems to improve integration of relevant
databases to maintain an effective, efficient Traffic Records Program to improve the
timeline
ss and accuracy of data.
Planned Activities Unique
Identifier:
Planned Activity Names:
TR
-
2024
-
03
Electronic Traffic Crash Record Entry System Project (eCrash)
TR
-
2024
-
04
EMS Data Injury Surveillance Continuation Project
TR
-
2024
-
05
Electronic Citation System (eCite)
Section 4.9 Roadway Safety
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 91
Problem Identification
The AHSO works in partnership with the ARDOT to identify and implement innovative infrastructure
improvements and hazard elimination strategies to aid in reduction of motor vehicle fatalities and serious
injuries on Arkansas Roadways. Funding for this area assures that ARDOT personnel are properly trained and
have access to current information and innovations.
ARDOT promotes educational opportunities by sending personnel to conferences. Due to limited funds and
travel restrictions, adequate funds are not always available to send personnel to critical conferences. To continue
to identify strategies and facilitate collaboration and coordination between the Arkansas Department of
Transportation, Arkansas Highway Safety Office and stakeholders, funds will be provided to accomplish the
following:
Reduce the number of fatal and serious injury crashes in Arkansas.
Keep traffic safety advocates abreast of ongoing changes.
Provide educational opportunities offered at traffic safety conferences, workshops, and forums to
include training on crash data, railroad crossing safety, and current traffic safety programs.
The use of 402 funds will provide ARDOT with funding for travel and training to appropriate conferences.
The AHSO also works to promote roadside safety to prevent fatalities and injuries in vehicles that are stopped
on the side of the road by law enforcement, involved in a crash, medical emergency, mechanical issues or any
other problem that would cause a vehicle to be stopped roadside. Arkansas code 27-51-310 requires that
vehicles move over when able or if it is unsafe to pull over to reduce speed appropriate to the street, road or
highway and the conditions through the area.
Roadside Crash Data by Year
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Fatalities 2
2
4
4
4
Serious Injuries 7
7
5
14
5
According to Arkansas eCrash data the 5-year rolling average for roadside crash fatalities for 2017-2021 is 3.2
and the 5-year rolling average for serious injuries is 7.6. AHSO will maintain current safety levels by December
31, 2026.
The goals of the projects funded in the Roadway Safety Program are:
Reduce the number of fatal and serious injury in roadside crashes.
Raise awareness of Move Over Laws and the understanding of their importance
The use of 405(h) funds will be used to develop paid media with television, radio and digital advertising,
brochures, posters and other educational materials. The ASHO will also work with law enforcement partners
to develop materials and projects that will increase awareness of the Move Over Law.
Countermeasures
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 23
Countermeasure
Strategy
Training for Traffic Safety Advocates
Problem (link to
strategy)
Innovative infrastructure improvements and hazard elimination strategies aid in the reduction
of motor vehicle fatalities and serious injuries on Arkansas roadways. This countermeasure
assists in this area by
assuring that ARDOT personnel are properly trained and have access
Section 4.9 Roadway Safety
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 92
to current information and innovations. The following Goals were established by ARDOT
in the SHSP which will impact the AHSO performance targets for reduction of total fatalities,
injuries, and fatalities per VMT.
Countermeasure
Justification
Safe System – Builds upon the 4 Es: Enforcement, Education, Engineering and Emergency
Response / EMS. A Safe System approach adds the additional Es of Equity and Evaluation.
As recommended by The National Roadway Safety Strategy (NRSS) to reverse the rise in
traffic fatalities and serious injuries on the nation’s highways.
Target (link to strategy The AHSO works in partnership with the ARDOT to identify and implement innovative
infrastructure improvements and hazard elimination strategies to aid in the reduction of
motor vehicle fatalities and serious injuries on Arkansas Roadways. This countermeasure
assists in this area by assuring that ARDOT personnel are properly trained and have access
to current information and innovations. The impact of training for highway safety
professionals on railway and highway hazard elimination strategies will be to enable them to
develop and implement projects that will reduce the severity of traffic crashes on sections of
Arkansas highways with high crash rates and the number of fatalities and injuries associated
with them.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$20,000
$21,000
$22,050
$63,050
Strategy to project
considerations
The AHSO works in partnership with the ARDOT to identify and implement innovative
infrastructure improvements and hazard elimination strategies to aid in the reduction of
motor vehicle fatalities and serious injuries on Arkansas roadways. The countermeasure and
planned activity will provide ARDOT personnel with critical training on new information
and innovations.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
RS
-
2024
-
01
Professional Development ARDOT
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 26
Countermeasure
Strategy
Move Over Law (PI&E)
Problem (link to
strategy)
Statewide public information and education campaign to educate the public regarding the
safety of vehicles and individuals stopped at the roadside in the State. The campaign will
promote roadside safety and particularly focus on the Move Over law, Arkansas code 27-
51-310. This task will provide for statewide public information and education to promote
Move Over Law education through paid media. Components of this task may include, but
are not limited to, educational materials such as brochures, posters, paid television, radio
and digital ads and public service announcements (PSAs). This task will provide funds to
secure the services of a qualified full-service advertising agency to create and develop a
traffic roadside safety public information campaign. The advertising agency will develop
the methodology to document and report audience reach. This task will also aid with PI&E
efforts in specific community projects such as selective traffic enforcement projects
(STEPs), and with diversity outreach and press events. Federal funding may provide for
paid ad and PSA creation and production, PI&E materials creation and production,
educational items, and meeting and press event expenses. This task will also provide for
the placement of traffic safety messages relating to Move Over Law public information
campaigns in the media. Media placements may include television, radio, cinema,
internet, and print. At a minimum, an assessment to measure audience exposure will be
documented and included in the cost of media placements. Public awareness surveys will
be conducted to track driver attitudes and awareness of enforcement and communication
activities and driving behavior. Federal funds will be allocated for the paid media and
associated costs
Target (link to strategy Raising Awareness: Many drivers are unaware of the Move Over Laws or do not fully
understand their importance. Public education initiatives will help raise awareness about
these laws, ensuring that more people are knowledgeable about their existence and
purpose.
Section 4.9 Roadway Safety
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 93
Enhancing Road Safety: Move Over Laws are designed to protect first responders,
roadside workers, and stranded motorists. By educating the public about these laws,
drivers can become more vigilant and cautious when encountering first responder vehicles
or workers on the side of the road, reducing the risk of crashes, fatalities and injuries.
Behavior Modification: Education and information campaigns have been effective to
change driver behavior positively. By emphasizing the importance of moving over or
slowing down when approaching first responder vehicles and stranded motorist, these
initiatives can encourage drivers to adopt safer practices and promote a culture of road
safety.
Advocacy for Law Enforcement and Emergency Responders: Public education initiatives
can also serve as a platform for advocating on behalf of law enforcement officers,
paramedics, and other emergency responders who put their lives at risk to help others. By
raising awareness about Move Over Laws, these campaigns can garner public support and
understanding for the importance of protecting those who serve the community.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$400,000
$420,000
$441,000
$1,261,000
Strategy to project
considerations
These funds will be used for public education and information campaigns for Move Over
Laws that will promote road safety, protect emergency responders, and encourage
responsible driver behavior. These initiatives help create a culture of awareness,
compliance, and support, ultimately reducing the number of crashes, fatalities and injuries
on the road.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
RS
-
2024
-
02
Preventing Roadside Deaths and Injuries (PI&E)
Section 4.10 - Planning and Administration
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 94
Description of Highway Safety Problems
The overall program management of the Highway Safety Program is the responsibility of the Highway Safety
Office (AHSO) of the Arkansas State Police (ASP). The management and fiscal staff will build on and maintain
their expertise in all aspects of the program by attending available training sessions. Staff will attend meetings
and other sessions in the performance of their normally assigned functions. The costs associated with the overall
management and operation of the Highway Safety Program under Planning and Administration are itemized as
follows:
Salaries and Benefits
The entire salaries and benefits for 4 full-time positions fulfilling management, fiscal, and clerical support
functions are paid from federal funds.
Travel and Subsistence
This component provides for travel and subsistence costs for management and fiscal support personnel.
Operating Expenses
Operating
This component provides operating expenses directly related to the overall operation of the Highway Safety
Program including expenses for continued development and implementation of an AHSO state grants
management system (eGrant). Continued development, operation, and maintenance of the eGrant system and
upgrade to the IGX system will be provided through a contractor (AGATE). Implementation of a statewide
awareness survey to monitor awareness of traffic laws and PI&E efforts.
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 24
Countermeasure
Strategy
Highway Safety Office Planning & Administration
Problem (link to
strategy)
The overall program management of the Highway Safety Program is the responsibility of
the Highway Safety Office (AHSO) of the Arkansas State Police (ASP). The management
and fiscal staff will build on and maintain their expertise in all aspects of the program by
attending available training sessions. The staff will attend meetings and other sessions in
the performance of their normally assigned functions.
The most recent observational safety belt survey results for 2022 shows usage at 79.1%
down from 84.2% in 2021. With a compliance rate of 79.1% Arkansas’ use rate is well
still below the national average of 91.6% (NHTSA 2022).
Staff, Training, Travel expense etc. are necessary for the effective management of the
Highway Safety Office. Planning and Administration provides funding for the overall
management and operation of the Highway Safety Program
Target (link to strategy Planning and Administration: The entire salaries and benefits for 4 full-time positions
fulfilling management, fiscal, and clerical support functions are paid from federal funds.
Operating: This component provides operating expenses directly related to the overall
operation of the Highway Safety Program including expenses for continued development
and implementation of an AHSO state grants management system (eGrant). Continued
development, operation, and maintenance of the eGrant system and upgrade to the IGX
system will be provided through a contractor (AGATE). Implementation of a statewide
awareness survey to monitor awareness of traffic laws and PI&E efforts.
Strategic Planning & Public Participation & Engagement : Plans are in place to host an
Arkansas Traffic Safety conference starting in May 2024. The conference will be
designed to incorporate discussions on innovations around the country. Emphasis will be
Section 4.10 - Planning and Administration
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 95
placed on community input and involvement to increase the effectiveness of Arkansas’
Highway Safety program efforts.
Estimated 3-year
funding allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$838,000 $879,900 $923,895 $2,641,795
Strategy to project
considerations
Experienced and knowledgeable staff are critical to identify and address state traffic
problems and to implement effective programming that will accomplish the targets set for
the overall program area. Funding is also critical to facilitate the electronic submission
of proposals, contract agreements, and reporting by project subcontractors to plan,
monitor and evaluate projects. Funding provides for necessary staff time, travel and
training expenses related to the planning, programming, and development of an effective,
efficient AHSO and associated grants management system and awareness survey.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
PA
-
2024
-
01
Planning and Administration
Countermeasure Strategy – Table 37
Countermeasure
Strategy
Arkansas Traffic Safety Conference
Problem (link to strategy) The conference will serve as a platform for stakeholders, experts, and policymakers to
exchange ideas, research findings, and share best practices in traffic safety. By sharing
knowledge about successful strategies, interventions, and technological advancements,
attendees can develop informed strategies to improve highway safety.
Countermeasure
Justification
• Alcohol & Drug Impaired Driving CTW – 5. Prevention, Intervention,
Communications and Outreach
• SB and Child Restraints CTW – 3. Communication and Outreach
• Speeding CTW – 4.1 Communication and Outreach
• Distracted Driving CTW – 2. Communication and Outreach
•
Motorcycle Safety CTW
–
4. Communication and Outreach
Target (link to strategy) The conference will include sessions that delve into the analysis of crash data, emerging
trends, and risk factors. This information will be crucial in formulating targeted
strategies addressing specific issues such as speeding, seat belt use, distracted driving,
impaired driving, pedestrian and bike safety, young drivers, etc. The conference will
facilitate networking among stakeholders, including government agencies, law
enforcement, researchers, NGOs, and industry representatives. Building collaborations
fosters the development of comprehensive strategies that leverage diverse expertise and
resources. The conference will feature discussions on behavioral psychology,
communication strategies, and education campaigns to promote safer driving habits.
Estimated 3-year funding
allocation
FY24 FY25 FY26 Total
$
100
,
000
$105,000
$110,300
$315,300
Strategy to project
considerations
The Annual Traffic Safety Conference will be integral in the strategic planning process,
offering a platform for knowledge sharing, policy development, data analysis,
collaboration, innovation, behavior change, and ongoing evaluation aimed at improving
highway safety.
Planned Activities Unique Identifier: Planned Activity Names:
CP
-
2024
-
01
Arkansas Traffic Safety Conference
Section 5.1 - Grant Program Activity Reporting
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 96
Number of Seat Belt Citations issued during grant funded enforcement activities.
Number of Impaired Driving Arrests made during grant funded enforcement activities.
Number of Speeding Citations issued during grant funded enforcement activities.
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Seat Belt Citations
23,401 23,514 10,474 10,154 5,606
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Seat Belt Citations
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
DUI Citations
826 821 1,074 1,181 1,001
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
DUI Citations
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Speeding Citations
17,922 19,396 21,854 19,331 16,824
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Speeding Citations
Section 5.2 - Target Progress from Previous Year
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 97
Progress towards meeting State performance targets from the previous fiscal year's HSP
2023 HSP
Performance
Measure:
Target
Period
Target
Year(s)
Target Value
FY23 HSP
Data Source*/
FY23 Progress
Results
On Track to
Meet FY23
Target
YES/NO/In-
Progress
(Must be
Accompanied
by
Narrative**)
C-1) Total Traffic Fatalities
5 year 2019-2023 699.5 2017-2021
FARS
580.8
YES
Narrative: In spite of increased fatalities, the AHSO is on track to meet this goal - with a 5-year moving average of 580.8
for 2021 and 604.6 for 2022.
C-2) Serious Injuries in
Traffic Crashes
5 year 2019-2023 2,775.7 2017-2021
ARDOT
2,556.0
YES
Narrative: The AHSO is on track to meet this goal thanks primarily to new safety features in cars resulting in less serious
injuries.
C-3) Fatalities/VMT
5 year 2019-2023 1.858 2017-2021
FARS
1.595
YES
Narrative: In spite of reduced VMT in 2020 and more fatalities this appears to be holding. VMT and gas prices are rising
so that may change but for now looks good.
Note: For each of the Performance Measures C-4 through C-11, the State should indicate the Target Period which they
used in the FY23 HSP.
C-4) Unrestrained Passenger
Vehicle Occupant Fatalities,
All Seat Positions
5 year 2019-2023 251.2 2017-2021
FARS
191.0
YES
Narrative: AR Seat Belt law does not require all passengers to wear a seatbelt. AHSO implemented a new “High-Five”
project to target rural counties and hope
s
this will help encourage more people to buckle up.
C-5) Alcohol-Impaired
Driving Fatalities
5 year 2019-2023 143.4 2017-2021
FARS
152.6
NO
Narrative: AHSO is on track to meet this goal. Our focus on this area with enforcement, sobriety checks, DWI Courts and
education seems to be working.
C-6) Speeding-Related
Fatalities
5 year 2019-2023 147.3 2017-2021
FARS
140.0
YES
Narrative: Speed fatalities increased dramatically during COVID-as a result of less enforcement and a decline in the number
of LE officers. AHSO is adding speed corridors in FY24 to help address this issue.
C-7) Motorcyclist Fatalities
5 year 2019-2023 86.8 2017-2021
FARS
75.4
YES
Narrative: With gas prices increasing we do not see fatalities decreasing in this area.
Section 5.2 - Target Progress from Previous Year
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 98
C-8) Unhelmeted
Motorcyclist Fatalities
5 year 2019-2023 52.6 2017-2021
FARS
41.4
YES
Narrative: AR helmet law only applies to riders under 18 and does not mandate rider training. AHSO has added to FY24
programming in this area. We hope to get a certified MSF trainer in AR & more riders wearing helmets.
C-9) Drivers Aged 20 or
Younger Involved in Fatal
Crashes
5 year 2019-2023 78.3 2017-2021
FARS
64.0
YES
Narrative: Arkansas’s has no Drivers Ed in schools and GDL laws are difficult to enforce. The laws does not monitor
training or /supervised driving. AHSO has a project that will work in schools to provide education in this area for teens
and parents.
C-10) Pedestrian Fatalities
5 year 2019-2023 87.2 2017-2021
FARS
66.2
YES
Narrative: Infrastructure in AR is not conducive to pedestrian and biker safety. Emphasis is being placed on increasing
awareness of AR laws and safety precautions. Plans to conduct walkability assessments for selected schools, colleges and
communities are in the works along with increased community outreach efforts.
C-11) Bicyclist Fatalities
See Above
5 year 2019-2023 9.5 2017-2021
FARS
5.4
YES
Narrative: Same as
Pedestrian above
B-1) Observed Seat Belt Use
for Passenger Vehicles, Front
Seat Outboard Occupants
(State Survey)
Annual 2023 85.0 2022 State
Survey
79.1
NO
Narrative: AR continues to struggle to increase belt use. Several new rural counties were added to the FY22 SB survey.
The use rates in those counties were unexpectedly low. The AHSO plans
to work to increase use rates in those areas.
AHSO has implemented “High Five” programs in 5 rural AR counties and plan to add 5 more in FY24. These programs
will combine education,
engineering,
and enforcement to increase seat belt use.
Section 6.1 – Estimated 3-Year Funding Allocation by Planned Activity
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 99
Unique ID Planned Activity Name FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Unique ID Planned Activity Name FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
AL-2024-01 Judicial Training
150,000 157,500 165,375
OP-2024-06
Traffic Safety Non-Commercial Sustaining
Announcement Eval Program
75,000 78,750 82,688
AL-2024-02
Traffic Safety/ Law Enforcement Training
Project
640,000 672,000 705,600
OP-2024-07 Statewide Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL)
50,000 52,500 55,125
AL-2024-03
Traffic Safety Non-Commercial Sustaining
Announcement Eval Program
75,000 78,750 82,688
OP-2024-08 Statewide Child Passenger Protetion Project
600,000 630,000 661,500
AL-2024-05 Statewide Public Information and Education
1,250,000 1,312,500 1,378,125
OP-2024-10 Rural High Five Project
250,000 262,500 275,625
AL-2024-06
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(STEP)
980,100 1,029,105 1,080,560
OP-2024-11 Teen Drive Safety Project
400,000 420,000 441,000
AL-2024-07
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement
Projects (STEP)
600,000 630,000 661,500
OP-2024-12 State Observation Seat Belt Survey
150,000 157,500 165,375
AL-2024-08
Mini-Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(M-STEP)
700,000 735,000 771,750
OP-2024-13 Occupant Protection Program Management
305,000 320,250 336,263
AL-2024-09 BAC Intoximeter and Blood Testing Project
400,000 420,000 441,000
OP-2024-14
New
Highway Safety Projects Based on
Community Outreach & Engagement -
TBD
300,000 315,000 330,750
AL-2024-10
Law Enforcement Training Academy BAT
Sobriety Checkpoint Mobile Training
300,000 315,000 330,750
PA-2024-01 Planning and Administration
838,000 879,900 923,895
AL-2024-11 Statewide Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL)
50,000 52,500 55,125
PS-2024-01
Statewide Public Information and Education
(PI&E)
300,000 315,000 330,750
AL-2024-12 Court Monitoring
150,000 157,500 165,375
PS-2024-02
Pedestrian/Bicycle Public Awareness
Campaign
300,000 315,000 330,750
AL-2024-13 DWI Courts
400,000 420,000 441,000
PS-2024-03 Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Project
200,000 210,000 220,500
AL-2024-14
Statewide In-Car Camera and Video Storage
System
400,000 420,000 441,000
PS-2024-04
New
Highway Safety Projects Based on
Community Outreach & Engagement -
TBD
300,000 315,000 330,750
AL-2024-15 Motor Vehicle Crash Toxicology Testing
377,300 396,165 415,973
PS-2024-05 Non-Motorized Traffic Safety Education (PS)
300,000 315,000 330,750
AL-2024-17
Alcohol and Other Drug Countermeasures
Program Management
305,000 320,250 336,263
RS-2024-01 Professional Development ARDOT
20,000 21,000 22,050
AL-2024-18 Judicial Outreach Liaison (JOL)
100,000 105,000 110,250
RS-2024-02
Public Information and Education on
Preventing Roadside Deaths and Injuries
400,000 420,000 441,000
CP-2024-01 Arkansas Traffic Safety Conference
100,000 105,000 110,250
SC-2024-01
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(STEP)
900,200 945,210 992,471
DD-2024-01
Statewide Public Information and Education
(PI&E)
1,900,000 1,995,000 2,094,750
SC-2024-02
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement
Projects (STEP)
746,500 783,825 823,016
DD-2024-02
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(STEP)
800,000 840,000 882,000
SC-2024-03
Mini-Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(M-STEP)
500,000 525,000 551,250
DD-2024-03
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement
Projects (STEP)
400,000 420,000 441,000
SC-2024-04
Statewide Public Information and Education
(PI&E)
300,000 315,000 330,750
DD-2024-04
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(Mini-STEP)
600,000 630,000 661,500
SC-2024-05
New
Highway Safety Projects Based on
Community Outreach & Engagement -
TBD
300,000 315,000 330,750
DD-2024-05 Teen Distracted Driving
150,000 157,500 165,375
TR-2024-01 eCrash Program Operations
200,000 210,000 220,500
DD-2024-06
New
Highway Safety Projects Based on
Community Outreach & Engagement -
TBD
300,000 315,000 330,750
TR-2024-02 eCrash Training
300,000 315,000 330,750
MC-2024-01 Motorist Awareness Campaign
100,000 105,000 110,250
TR-2024-03
Electronic Traffic Crash Record Entry
System Project (eCrash)
2,835,500 2,977,275 3,126,139
MC-2024-02 Motorcyclist Awareness/Outreach Program
200,000 210,000 220,500
TR-2024-04
EMS Data Injury Surveillance Continuation
Project
100,000 105,000 110,250
OP-2024-02
Local Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(STEP)
1,144,500 1,201,725 1,261,811
TR-2024-05 Electronic Citation System (eCite)
600,000 630,000 661,500
OP-2024-03
Statewide Selective Traffic Enforcement
Project (STEP)
500,000 525,000 551,250
TR-2024-06
Traffic Records Professional Development &
Crash Reconstruction
250,000 262,500 275,625
OP-2024-04
Mini-Selective Traffic Enforcement Projects
(M-STEP)
700,000 735,000 771,750
TR-2024-07 Traffic Records Program Management
177,000 185,850 195,143
OP-2024-05
Statewide Public Information and Education
(PI&E)
700,000 735,000 771,750 26,469,100 27,792,555 29,182,183
Summary Table Esimated 3-Year Funding Allocation by Planned Activity
Total
Section 6.2 – High Five Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 100
1. In your High Five Project, what do you see as the success or failures?
Calhoun County: We noticed a great increase in seat belt usage.
White County: Success would be getting the message out and failure would be that our county is so big.
Monroe County: More drivers wearing seat belts.
2. What is the most significant traffic safety problem and/or violation in your area?
Calhoun County: Distractive driving.
White County: Speed.
Monroe County: Speeding.
3. Are there any concerns regarding the current High Five Project that we can do differently to improve
traffic safety in your experience?
Calhoun County: I believe we had great results, and our officers enjoyed the program.
White County: Not sure that White Co. qualifies because we are so big. Better suited for smaller populations.
Monroe County: No, very good program.
4. What, if any, feedback has your organization received from the public based on the High Five Project
activities?
Calhoun County: Positive and negative feedback. Some do not believe seat belts are important and others believed
it was making a difference.
White County: Positive comments from Facebook.
Monroe County: A lot of people think it’s the Click It or Ticket program but are very pleased.
5. What is the public perception of the High Five Project in the community? How has it impacted the
effectiveness of the High Five Project?
Calhoun County: Most believed it was a good program and responded well to our social media outreach.
White County: N/A
Monroe County: Not much feedback.
6. What could be done differently, either by your organization or the Highway Safety Office to make the High
Five Project more successful?
Calhoun County: I believe it was a great success. We could have worked more hours, but staffing issues were a
major factor for our organization.
White County: We should have made the pay separate from our regular pay, to get more participation.
Monroe County: More promoting with ads and maybe radio.
7. What do you feel is the goal of the High Five Project and enforcement mobilizations?
Calhoun County: To make our streets safer and to keep people aware of the importance of seat belts.
White County: To get safety compliance and to show that we are invested in this.
Monroe County: To raise the awareness of seatbelt safety.
8. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for your High Five Project that could improve your community
or help address a significant traffic safety issue in your area?
Calhoun County: We would like to work a distractive driving program to further help our community.
White County: Money should go towards road improvements.
Monroe County: Maybe more promotion of High Five.
9. Has the public offered any additional ideas or suggestions that they would like to see implemented?
Calhoun County: Distracted driving.
White County: No.
Monroe County: Very little feedback from the public.
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 101
1. In your STEP grant, what do you see as the success or failures?
Lowell PD: Success in the number of collisions, speeding, reduced.
Decatur PD: The success of our program is evident due to the diminished infractions that we saw at the beginning
of the STEP Program. It makes it more difficult on my men trying to meet the recommended stops per hour.
Cross Co. SO: The success is the availability of the program managers and their knowledge.
Hot Springs PD: We have been working this Grant for decades and we have seen a significant amount of our DWI
arrest go down in numbers drastically.
Hope PD: The success of the STEP Grant has definitely minimized the amount of traffic violations committed by
our citizens.
NLR PD: It is an opportunity to get more officers involved with traffic enforcement and improve seatbelt usage
and deter DWI's.
Fort Smith PD: I consider the opportunity to offer our officers a chance at earning more money at their overtime
rate while being given time to focus strictly on those traffic violations within our community that are causing
property damage, injury, and unfortunately the loss of life at times. This program can also be utilized as a
recruiting and retention tool as there are several departments abroad that do not allow or try to severely limit
overtime for officers. Anytime we can focus on enforcement efforts involving those violations that are hurting
my community and our officers are fairly compensated for such efforts, it's a success in my book. The only failure
that comes to mind is the lack of cooperation. I believe we have so many young officers that they simply don't
know what the STEP grant is and how simple it is to take part in. The failure rests on us supervisors for not
making this program more known and educating our newer officers on the benefits of this program both for them
personally and our community members. I would like to see more involvement.
ASP-Troop J: I believe success in the STEP program helps reduce accidents, injuries, and fatalities.
ASP-Troop B: Success; Increased presence on the roadways. In the past, activity requirement caused us to write
some citations we should have but that has gotten better with some of the revisions.
ASP-Troop H: Success--The grant helps make our roads safer and gives troopers extra money. Failure--the
paperwork and all the rules associated with it can be a deterrent to working it.
ASP-Troop D: Success - Uninterrupted time to stop violators and boost the financial standing for troopers.
Bryant PD: With the grant we have been fortunate to be able to purchase new equipment that helps with our day-
to-day operations. Our DWI arrests have really flourished over the past few years, and I believe this is directly
related to the DWI STEP Grant.
Marion PD: The program is successful.
ASP-Troop E: Force multiplier for increased enforcement efforts with low manpower.
ASP-Troop F: A reduction in no seatbelt violations in our area, but distracted driving violations are hard to
observe in a marked patrol unit. Not being able to document criminal violations on ASP- 11 and distracted
driving tickets.
ASP-Troop K: I feel like anytime additional funding is provided for extra patrol is always a success. I feel
sometimes that Troopers lock down on specific violations that particular overtimes target, that some hazardous
violations are missed.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: Successes are keeping the county safe by arresting/ticketing DWI's, speeders etc. If
I had to list failures, it’s just the constant push of working the program and I am constantly trying to get new guys
to join.
ASP-Troop C: I see more people are wearing seat belts than before.
Benton PD: Well, I'm having a hard time getting these younger officers to work STEP.
ASP-Grants Coord: Failure to utilize e-Cite to benefit those in the field.
Harrison PD: Success: raising the local seat belt usage rate through enforcement. Failures: number of hours
worked annually by officers, specifically in the DWI enforcement.
Sheridan PD: Our greatest success has been having more officers out on the street at one time to help be a visual
deterrence. When the public sees more officers out, they are less likely to commit traffic infractions. Due to their
being a reduction in traffic violations we have seen a reduction in major traffic accidents.
Mtn. Home PD: Success, awareness of seat belt safety and distracted driving.
Jonesboro PD: I believe we have had success with Speed and Distracted Driving Enforcement. Using to add
additional officers in high crash areas to help reduce crashes.
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 102
Springdale PD: The usage of seatbelts and the car seat program.
2. What is the most significant traffic safety problem and/or violation in your area?
Lowell PD: Speeding
Decatur PD: Distracted driving, speeding, and seat belts are the most worked in our city. Although we have seen
an improvement over this last year during the STEP Program.
Cross Co. SO: Speeding
Hot Springs PD: YTD we currently have 980 property damage only accidents.
Hope PD: Speeding has always been our biggest safety problem within our community.
NLR PD: We have seen an increase in people not using their safety belts.
Fort Smith PD: The most common violations that we see are traffic control device violations which have been an
issue for the past two years or so. Ever since the end of the pandemic, we've noticed an increase in these violations
and speeding.
ASP-Troop J: Speed is a major issue in our area with Interstate 40 running through our Troop.
ASP-Troop B: Distracted driving, followed by seat belt use and speed.
ASP-Troop H: Texting and Construction zones--unsafe lane changes and other driving behaviors
ASP-Troop D: Criminal Activity and Impaired Driving. Speed Overtime is the most worked overtime in our area.
Bryant PD: Speeding, Distracted Driving, and DWI's.
Marion PD: Speeding.
ASP-Troop E: Speeding, reckless driving, and distracted driving especially on I-530.
ASP-Troop F: Speeding and driver's not being completely focused on their driving, to many distractions either a
physical item or mental focus.
ASP-Troop K: The combination of speed and distracted driving. Also traffic light infractions, following too
close, and impeding traffic.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: Stats show speed, but we also arrest a lot of DWI's. I see an alarming number of no
insurance citations.
ASP-Troop C: I believe speeding and cell phone usage (distracted) are the most common safety problem.
Benton PD: Drugged driving I believe is the most safety problem we have.
ASP-Grants Coord: Speeding, reckless driving, and drivers on their phones.
Harrison PD: Speeding and failure to yield.
Sheridan PD: If you look at our eCite entries it will show you that speeding is our #1 violation by a long shot.
However, if you sit and watch traffic, I believe that distracted driving is our most severe and prominent traffic
violation.
Mtn. Home PD: Speeding and seat belt violations.
Jonesboro PD: Speeding
Springdale PD: In our city, it is speeding, having no driver's license, and disobeying red lights.
3. Are there any concerns regarding the current STEP grant that we can do differently to improve traffic
safety in your experience?
Lowell PD: No
Decatur PD: The program is doing what it was designed to accomplish, and the men overseeing the different
agencies have been great at answering questions and helping where needed.
Cross Co. SO: No.
Hot Springs PD: We have been very successful with what we have given, and it seems to be working.
Hope PD: I believe the STEP Grant has greatly improved our traffic conditions in our great city. It seems to be
working really well.
NLR PD: No.
Fort Smith PD: One of the most common issues our officers run into is hearing priority calls dispatched over the
radio near their current location but feeling that they can't respond to said call due to the fact that they're operating
on STEP time. It would be nice that so long as the officer's project goals are met within the time frame scheduled,
there would be no issue for them to respond to other calls for service called in by citizens should one of priority
be dispatched near that officer's area. As we do it now, the officer must document when they respond to that call
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 103
and when they leave the call. They then have to document the time they spent on that call and turn in a separate
overtime form and document the exact times they were on the STEP program. It can be complicated for officers
at times. What this should NOT turn into are officers responding to calls for services from citizens on the dime
of the STEP grant program. It would only be high priority calls such as domestic violence, active fights/assaults,
officers in need of assistance, in progress calls, etc., and the officer would know not to clear the call as the primary
so they could return to their STEP duties as quickly as possible.
ASP-Troop J: More speed enforcement and no time restrictions on working it.
ASP-Troop B: None.
ASP-Troop H: less paperwork and rules associated.
ASP-Troop D: Unrestricted times for all forms of overtime. Some areas need worked more than the allowed times.
Bryant PD: Finding more incentives for Officers to work STEP. They can make more money working off duty
than they can working STEP.
Marion PD: Remove the hour restrictions for when types of enforcement can be worked.
ASP-Troop E: I think greater emphasis on speed enforcement.
ASP-Troop F: Providing access to totally unmarked or "ghost car" to blend in better with traffic for those that
would be interested in using it just for STEP enforcement.
ASP-Troop K: I feel like if we need to focus on all hazardous violations. Also adding other hazardous violations
in activity log
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: We are very pleased with the program and proud to be a part of it. No concerns
ASP-Troop C: I believe it would be beneficial to use aircraft and possibly more low-profile vehicles.
Benton PD: Not that I can think of.
ASP-Grants Coord: N/A
Harrison PD: None that I can think of.
Sheridan PD: We are a very small town of only 5,000 people. Most days it is not a problem to meet our contact
requirements but every now and then we fail to meet the requirement. I just hope that the days we do not meet
the required contacts per hour are not held against us due to not having a large population or geographical
jurisdiction to work with.
Mtn. Home PD: None.
Jonesboro PD: There are no concerns with the STEP grant.
Springdale PD: No concerns
4. What, if any, feedback has your organization received from the public based on the STEP grant activities?
Lowell PD: The public has commented on the visibility.
Decatur PD: Because my men are very active and proactively stopping violations, I get many complaints of why
we are worried about seat belt infractions, or speeding infractions instead of chasing bad people. We have been
recognized by some of the public to make sure you don’t violate any of the laws in Decatur or they will stop you.
So, the program works, whether they like it or not.
Cross Co. SO: The increased visibility and presence of law enforcement.
Hot Springs PD: It has been very positive especially when we can target areas of complaints outside of the normal
working hours.
Hope PD: Some citizens like the idea of more traffic enforcement, as they understand the need for safety, while
others prefer less.
NLR PD: None.
Fort Smith PD: I don't believe the general public is very aware of the STEP grant program itself, but we have
received countless thanks from community members when they see us in our problematic areas with concern to
traffic. They may not know that the officer is working the STEP program, but they are thankful nonetheless for
the enforcement efforts.
ASP-Troop J: When we conduct step enforcement, people compliment us thanking us for doing the extra work.
ASP-Troop B: None.
ASP-Troop H: N/A
ASP-Troop D: The public in our area loves seeing troopers working in their community. Criminal activity is high.
Bryant PD: When posted on social media the response is mostly positive. There are a few negative responses.
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 104
Marion PD: We have not received any feedback that I am aware of.
ASP-Troop E: I haven't heard of any. I'm not sure most people know it's something we do.
ASP-Troop F: Complaints about drivers speeding and being distracted by some type of handheld device.
ASP-Troop K: I have not received any feedback from the public.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: Citizens see us more on the roadways arresting/ticketing violators and are
appreciative.
ASP-Troop C: The conversations I have heard say that they are glad that we get out and actively enforce left lane
violations and cell phone violations.
Benton PD: Just about every time I work Seatbelt, there's usually someone that complains and makes some sort
of comment about having better things to do than issues seatbelt tickets.
ASP-Grants Coord: The public don’t know what STEP is, they just get the end product...a ticket or warning.
Harrison PD: Positive feedback on the issuing of child safety seats and clinics.
Sheridan PD: Our community is not very supportive of the Seat Belt Enforcement, but they are extremely
supportive of the Distracted Driving, Speed, and DWI Enforcements that we do. Our Facebook post get lots of
positive feedback and we get lots of feedback when we do DWI checkpoints. Our local’s want us to do more, we
have to explain we only have so much funding to do the added enforcement, however.
Mtn. Home PD: Positive Feedback.
Jonesboro PD: None
Springdale PD: We received positive feedback from the community when we directed STEP enforcement.
5. What is the public perception of the STEP grant in the community? How has impacted the effectiveness of
the STEP?
Lowell PD: The public has been made aware of the program and support it.
Decatur PD: Most of our citizens appreciate the extra officers on the street working because they recognize that
even if we are not dealing with everyone doing wrong, there is no telling how many wrongful persons decided to
go somewhere else due to the officers being seen on duty.
Cross Co. SO: Welcoming for the most part. Their perception has helped increase officer effectiveness.
Hot Springs PD: They understand the importance of traffic safety and having a constant reminder of risk factors
has made them more aware. With that being said DWI and Seat belts which were very easy to get are now being
more difficult to locate.
Hope PD: The public has noticed and most realize the importance of safety enforcement. I believe our citizens
are aware that our Officers are out and about thus minimizing the amount of traffic violations.
NLR PD: When we have manpower and can get out and effectively conduct traffic enforcement, we typically see
seatbelt usage increase.
Fort Smith PD: As mentioned above, our enforcement efforts are received positively by the community whether
they know that the officer is operating under the STEP grant program or not. With regards to the second question,
anytime the community supports their police department or a particular program they're participating in, it's a
positive thing and proves effectiveness.
ASP-Troop J: We get positive feedback, and we are often told they appreciate the effort we put into it.
ASP-Troop B: I'm not sure they even realize it is there although it has been discussed.
ASP-Troop H: They see more troopers working than if it wasn't available.
ASP-Troop D: The public likes seeing the troopers in their area. STEP allows time for the troopers to work their
area.
Bryant PD: Bryant PD has always been known for their aggressive traffic enforcement. Residents favor it.
Marion PD: Often the public seems to feel that the police need to be worried more about crime and less about
traffic.
ASP-Troop E: Again, I don't think many people in our area know what it is.
ASP-Troop F: They like to complain about troopers writing too many tickets, but "writing too many tickets" has
reduced the number of no seatbelt violations in our area.
ASP-Troop K: The public in general are not aware of the STEP grant.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: The public has seen an impact on the reduction of crime when STEP units are making
stops.
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 105
ASP-Troop C: The public that I have spoken with are glad we are actively pulling vehicles over for cell phone
violations.
Benton PD: Some think it is a waste of time and we should have better things to do.
ASP-Grants Coord: Unknown.
Harrison PD: Generally, well perceived, allows officers to conduct their enforcement patrols with less negative
feedback.
Sheridan PD: Like I mentioned above, our community likes all of the enforcement operations with the exception
of the Seat Belt Enforcement. I think having the community support has encouraged our officers to get out and
be more proactive.
Mtn. Home PD: Positive feedback, DWI Checkpoints.
Jonesboro PD: They public really seems to like the DWI Mobilizations because of the high visibility of Officers.
Springdale PD: Its good especially in the areas that request extra traffic enforcement.
6. What could be done differently, either by your organization or the Highway Safety Office, to make the
STEP grant more successful?
Lowell PD: Possibly DUI check points.
Decatur PD: I believe more advertisements throughout the state, advising that the STEP program is active and
what we are looking for at the time.
Cross Co. SO: Our agency needs to have more officers involved in working the program.
Hot Springs PD: Make it easier to communicate with our coordinators. The website itself is not user friendly and
can become difficult to navigate.
Hope PD: More effort on our part to work traffic safety.
NLR PD: The only way that we could make the STEP Grant more successful is to have adequate staffing so
officers can actually work Step versus covering numerous shifts.
Fort Smith PD: SEE QUESTION #3
ASP-Troop J: More speed overtime, more lpv's, less hour restrictions.
ASP-Troop B: No suggestions.
ASP-Troop H: Already discussed.
ASP-Troop D: Easier forms and data collection. Entering each stop on two forms takes time away from the trooper
working.
Bryant PD: More incentives to work it. In the past I recommended paying "Double time and a half".
Marion PD: I am not sure.
ASP-Troop E: With the changes coming in OT, it would be good for STEP and the regular OT to be available.
ASP-Troop F: Possibly bringing back the "saturation" or adding a "criminal activity" category that way those
units working together could focus on criminal activity in their community. This could be a tool used to reduce
the amount criminal activity in our local communities.
ASP-Troop K: Expanding target violations to include all hazardous violations.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: I think the program is going well and getting equipment yearly is very appreciated.
ASP-Troop C: I believe more unmarked vehicles or low-profile vehicles would be something that could be done.
Benton PD: Not real sure.
ASP-Grants Coord: If an officer is on e-Cite he should be allowed to pull his activity from the system weekly and
submit it with his time sheet rather than having to individually list his stops. This saves time and allows him to
focus more on enforcement, rather than paperwork. This information is already in the database.
Harrison PD: I cannot think of anything.
Sheridan PD: I think if there were a way to add more violations on the daily worksheet that counted towards our
numbers that would help. One thing we could do locally is more closely monitor our officers who work STEP
overtime. The officers who have issues meeting hourly contact requirements might have some of their allotted
hours pulled and given to an officer who exceeds their hourly contact requirements.
Mtn. Home PD: Have more officers working it.
Jonesboro PD: Nothing at this time.
Springdale PD: To engage the community more with the program.
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 106
7. What do you feel is the goal of the STEP grant and enforcement mobilizations?
Lowell PD: Enhance Traffic Safety in communities by visibility, education, and citations.
Decatur PD: The goal is to make the city street safer for everyone, drivers, and passengers even pedestrians.
Cross Co. SO: Increased safety of motorist and our community.
Hot Springs PD: To remind the public of the risk factors that are associated with the violations and that we are
actively teaching and enforcing about those laws.
Hope PD: To promote safety and security to our citizens.
NLR PD: The purpose is to deter actions (DWI/Speeding/Distracted Driving and lack of seatbelt usage that leads
to more traffic collisions.
Fort Smith PD: To increase the safety of all of those that travel on our roadways and thoroughfares and to
hopefully see a year where no person loses their life to a traffic violation.
ASP-Troop J: To reduce accidents, reduce injuries and fatalities in traffic accidents.
ASP-Troop B: To increase the safety of our roads.
ASP-Troop H: Make the roadways safer for the public via more visibility and enforcement.
ASP-Troop D: To increase traffic safety in our areas and reduce fatal collisions.
Bryant PD: To keep the public constantly aware of safe driving habits and drive responsibly.
Marion PD: To increase safe driving and reduce accidents.
ASP-Troop E: Force multiplier and targeted enforcement while allowing troopers to earn extra income.
ASP-Troop F: Reducing the number of fatal and serious injury crashes that result from drivers being impaired,
distracted, not properly restrained or speeding.
ASP-Troop K: I feel like the goal is to increase enforcement to provide the citizens safer travels through the state.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: To make our street safer by arresting DWI's and slowing motorist for speed and
stopping the distracted driving in our area.
ASP-Troop C: I feel the goal is to get violators to buckle up and put their phones down while operating a vehicle.
Benton PD: To lower the traffic violation for whatever mobilization that is going on.
ASP-Grants Coord: To add more visibility of law enforcement officers on the road and to backup national traffic
campaigns.
Harrison PD: To improve highway safety and to enable more children to be properly restrained in approved child
safety seats.
Sheridan PD: I feel like the goal is to promote traffic safety which will in turn reduce not only major traffic
accidents but all traffic accidents.
Mtn. Home PD: Bring awareness to DWI, S/B and Distracted/Texting While Driving.
Jonesboro PD: To promote education and awareness to the community of the dangers of driving a certain way.
Springdale PD: To help reduce traffic issues in the city and raise awareness about the issues.
8. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for your STEP grant that could improve your community or
help address a significant traffic safety issue in your area?
Lowell PD: DUI check points, unlicensed driver check points.
Decatur PD: We strive to complete our mission which is to patrol and deter people from making decisions that
will make it dangerous for themselves or others. We do this as politely and efficiently as possible.
Cross Co. SO: No.
Hot Springs PD: Again, just with the website and the navigation.
Hope PD: I believe if we were able to work more traffic areas, the amount of accidents would be reduced.
NLR PD: No.
Fort Smith PD: No.
ASP-Troop J: We need more public awareness on the dangers of distractive driving. It's bad but hard to prove.
ASP-Troop B: None.
ASP-Troop H: Construction zone and distracted driving overtime.
ASP-Troop D: Possibly time to focus on criminal activity. The communities can benefit allowing time for the
troopers to work on criminal activity.
Bryant PD: Just continued support of the program and the extra funds to purchase expensive equipment that
couldn’t be purchased without the funds provided by the STEP Grant.
Section 6.3 – STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 107
Marion PD: No.
ASP-Troop E: Maybe encourage STEP overtime to be worked as part of saturations, especially for DD.
ASP-Troop F: Providing a column to document distracted driving tickets and criminal charge tickets on the ASP
-11.
ASP-Troop K: A lot of the general public’s complaints are disregarding traffic signals and stop signs. Also
impeding the flow of traffic. I feel like we need to broaden the activity to address all hazardous violations.
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: The community letting us know where they are seeing an increase on traffic issues.
ASP-Troop C: I believe more unmarked vehicles would be a great idea or gather more officers and saturate
problem areas.
Benton PD: Not really
ASP-Grants Coord: I’m always being asked if we have promotional items for school presentations. We have
gotten away from educating the youth of our state.
Harrison PD: None.
Sheridan PD: One thing I would like to see is more community awareness materials pushed out. We received a
Seat Belt Enforcement banner to hang but we do not have a banner for the other 3 mobilizations. I think our
community likes to see what we are working on plus it is another reminder to the community of the laws we are
working extra to enforce. Possibly create a handout that has the supreme court case giving us the authority to
conduct sobriety checkpoints to hand out to the 2-3 people that claim we are violating their rights.
Mtn. Home PD: No.
Jonesboro PD: None
Springdale PD: No
9. Has the public offered any additional ideas or suggestions that they would like to see implemented?
Lowell PD: No.
Decatur PD: Nothing that would be acceptable. Example (quit stopping people for no seatbelts).
Cross Co. SO: Continued presence which ultimately results in a safer community.
Hot Springs PD: None have come forward to us with any suggestions.
Hope PD: Not to my knowledge, but I believe most are empathetic to the Officers and try to abide with our traffic
regulations.
NLR PD: No.
Fort Smith PD: Not to my knowledge.
ASP-Troop J: The public complains a lot about speeders and distractive drivers. They want more enforcement.
ASP-Troop B: No.
ASP-Troop H: N/A
ASP-Troop D: Time spent more on criminal activity.
Bryant PD: Most Bryant residents want more traffic control in their areas and neighborhoods. Their suggestions
are always to hire more Officers and pay Officers more.
Marion PD: No.
ASP-Troop E: No.
ASP-Troop F: None, other than giving us permission to park in their driveways to reduce the number of drivers
speeding.
ASP-Troop K: No
Garland Co. Sheriff’s Dept: None that I am aware of.
ASP-Troop C: The public that I have spoken with want more left lane violators stopped.
Benton PD: No
ASP-Grants Coord: No.
Harrison PD: No.
Sheridan PD: We have not had any suggestions from the public, just praises on what we are doing. They tell us
to keep up the good work.
Mtn. Home PD: None that I’m aware of.
Jonesboro PD: No.
Springdale PD: No it is generally request for more enforcement in their area.
Section 6.4 – Mini-STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 108
1. In your Mini-STEP grant, what do you see as the success or failures?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: I see the Mini-STEP Program as a success, it shows the public that we are concerned
with their safety to have officers out looking out for their welfare.
Barling PD: The participation in our officers
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: It allows our officers to take more action on traffic enforcement.
Monticello PD: The success of the grant has made our community more aware of safe driving. The safer they
drive, the less of being pulled over, receiving citations, and having accidents.
Prairie Grove PD: I see the information sharing and notifications to the public as a success and educational. Many
people know the laws, but seeing additional enforcement and community engagement is more of a success.
Mtn. View Police: I think officer visibility is a success. I see discussion on our social media of it.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Successes are increased visibility and enhanced safety. Also, the ability for my
deputies to work overtime, which I haven't identified any failures other than the paperwork is difficult.
Clarksville PD: Success: Officers increase their visibility which makes the roadways safer during certain periods.
Forrest City PD: We have had great success with getting seatbelt, no drivers license, and speeders to slow down.
Pine Bluff PD: Some of the failures are due to larger and smaller law enforcement agencies not working together
to saturate communities in need of traffic enforcement. I believe the success of the Mini-STEP grant is the fact
that it reduces the number of fatal collisions occurring each year. It also reduces the number of repeat offenders
and enhances traffic safety.
Goshen PD: The success is our grant is the speed portion, we make the stops for the others, but they generally
obey traffic safety laws.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: We have had success in our mini step grant. We have an increase in safety
belt usage.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: We are fortunate enough, as a county, to have the money to pay our Deputies as they
work - Unfortunately smaller counties in our area can not pay their Deputies until they receive their money from
the grant, which can be 2 or 3 months behind.
Alexander PD: I believe it has all been a success with the exception of the DWI Mini-Steps. It is difficult to
motivate.
Hazen PD: I see that it allows agencies that couldn’t afford overtime to some officers that it makes it available to
them.
2. What is the most significant traffic safety problem and/or violation in your area?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: Driving while intoxicated is our most prominent issue, and distracted driving.
Barling PD: Speeding
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: Speeding
Monticello PD: Our main problem would be speeding in our area,
Prairie Grove PD: Speeding driver's is by far the most significant and most complained about from citizens.
Mtn. View Police: inattentive driving, paying attention to cell phones, music, whatever is in the back seat.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Motorcycle accidents
Clarksville PD: Speeding
Forrest City PD: Speeding.
Pine Bluff PD: Within the city limits of Pine Bluff Arkansas, we have speeding problems.
Goshen PD: Speed is the most significant traffic safety issue in the Goshen area.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: We see safety belt usage as an issue however, it does increase for a period of
time after the step.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: DWI & Distracted Driving & Speeding
Alexander PD: Seat belt and speeding.
Hazen PD: I would say speeding and lack of requirements of having to have a police officer during road
construction. That’s where most of your accidents come from the back up.
3. Are there any concerns regarding the current Mini-STEP grant that we can do differently to improve
traffic safety in your experience?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: not that I can think of
Section 6.4 – Mini-STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 109
Barling PD: None at this time
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Monticello PD: No, we are very satisfied.
Prairie Grove PD: We have no concerns, maybe just more speed mobilizations as that is our biggest complaint.
Mtn. View Police: no, I think this helps, we put it out in public through social media and visibility.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Not that I have identified.
Clarksville PD: No concerns
Forrest City PD: Not at this time.
Pine Bluff PD: The Pine Bluff Police Department has major traffic enforcement concerns. Due to manpower
shortage, we have temporarily disbanded our Traffic Division, with high hopes of bringing the division back soon.
We would like assistance from the Arkansas State Police during our speed and DWI enforcement.
Goshen PD: No concerns
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: No
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Alexander PD: I think another speeding enforcement should be added.
Hazen PD: During road construction in the agencies area make it available for the officers to provide blue lights
and safety to the construction crews.
4. What, if any, feedback has your organization received from the public based on the Mini-STEP grant
activities?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: The public likes to see us out there helping with traffic issues, great feedback so far.
Barling PD: I believe it has positive feedback.
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Monticello PD: On our social media, we have very good response to our posts. People will like and share our
post.
Prairie Grove PD: We generally receive positive feedback from the public and even more request to do more
mobilizations.
Mtn. View Police: Mostly good, you always have those who get stopped that are against police activities.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Very little other than some social media comments about increased presence.
Overall, very supportive
Clarksville PD: The community has expressed that they like the high visibility enforcement for DWI's.
Forrest City PD: Well, for the most part positive, but there is always push back when your stopping multiple cars.
Pine Bluff PD: The community has embraced the much-needed traffic enforcement performed by our agency
during the Mini-STEP.
Goshen PD: Positive Feedback
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: The only thing we have had is people complaining about getting citations.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: Most people love seeing the extra patrol in the area.
Alexander PD: Lots of complaints over citation, but it is to be expected. We get a lot of praise for being proactive.
Hazen PD: None
5. What is the public perception of the Mini-STEP grant in the community? How has impacted the
effectiveness of the Mini-STEP?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: The majority of the public likes it, there is some opposition of the seatbelt law but
there is always going to be some criticism.
Barling PD: Unsure at this time
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: Overall, I believe the public perception has been positive.
Monticello PD: The community sees more law enforcement presence in our town and makes them more aware
and cautious of certain laws that are taken.
Prairie Grove PD: Most view it positively and like seeing additional enforcement out on the roadways.
Mtn. View Police: I think it's effective, we have been able to get DWI's before the accidents occur.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Very supportive
Section 6.4 – Mini-STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 110
Clarksville PD: Based on social media reactions, the majority perception is positive. Word of enforcement is
spread.
Forrest City PD: Great especially for neighborhoods with speeding.
Pine Bluff PD: The community wants to see more proactive police enforcement presence. The traffic violations
have reduced some, but extra enforcement is needed.
Goshen PD: The public is mixed, some believe we are fulfilling a quota, and others know the specifics.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: Most people like it and enjoy seeing our deputies out more.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Alexander PD: Most love the program. Those getting cited tend to complain in the office and on social media.
Hazen PD: They notice more officers out during the designated time.
6. What could be done differently, either by your organization or the Highway Safety Office, to make the
Mini-STEP grant more successful?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: I can't think of any.
Barling PD: Nothing at this time
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Monticello PD: We could always use more officers to work the overtime to be out on the streets making more
progress of safe driving.
Prairie Grove PD: I think that the continued advertisement and mobilizations will continue to make driver's more
aware and cautious while on the road.
Mtn. View Police: nothing I think it runs well.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Easier paperwork
Clarksville PD: HSO could offer more sole officer-based incentives.
Forrest City PD: Nothing at this time.
Pine Bluff PD: It would be beneficial for our agency to participate in the FULL-STEP, instead of the MINI-STEP,
due to the high volume of complaints from concerned citizens and traffic infractions being committed.
Goshen PD: Nothing.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: I am trying to get more employees involved in it.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: The people that we get in contact with are beyond helpful and kind; however, the
website itself is not user friendly. Also understand there is a lot of paperwork that goes into this grant, but the 2-
3 month wait to submit to get paid is excessive.
Alexander PD: N/A
Hazen PD: I think it’s running great.
7. What do you feel is the goal of the Mini-STEP grant and enforcement mobilizations?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: to reduce accidents/deaths/injuries of the public due to not paying attention while
operating a motor vehicle.
Barling PD: To make drivers more aware of how they operate a motor vehicle.
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: To increase officer visibility while conducting enforcement activities to reduce
traffic crashes.
Monticello PD: The goal for us is to enforce the law more and make our community feel safe.
Prairie Grove PD: To educate the public on current laws and to persuade drivers to drive more carefully and
lawfully.
Mtn. View Police: to help eliminate the traffic conditions and hazards that cause accidents and the loss of life.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: To improve safety on area roadways.
Clarksville PD: High Visibility Enforcement to deter certain types of safety violations or criminal activity.
Forrest City PD: I feel the goal is to make city safer and to ensure the citizens we’re trying to make them safe by.
Pine Bluff PD: The goal is to promote traffic safety while educating the community.
Goshen PD: The goal is to be seen enforcing traffic safety and remain safe while doing so.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: Making Arkansas roadways safer.
Section 6.4 – Mini-STEP Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 111
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: To bring awareness to the community during times where accidents and traffic
violations are the highest. We hope that us pushing the enforcement and bringing awareness will save someone’s
life.
Alexander PD: To improve traffic safety within the communities.
Hazen PD: Let’s law enforcement be more visible during the times.
8. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for your Mini-STEP grant that could improve your community
or help address a significant traffic safety issue in your area?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: None
Barling PD: None at this time
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Monticello PD: Speeding and reckless driving is our main concern, so we can always have more traffic safety
mobilizations as such.
Prairie Grove PD: Most responses are positive for the mobilizations and are requested more often. Maybe more
speed mobilizations.
Mtn. View Police: nope, news, social media, tv broadcasts and police visibility seems to work.
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: Make the paperwork easier.
Clarksville PD: Provide a list of equipment that has been approved in the past.
Forrest City PD: None at this time.
Pine Bluff PD: More speed enforcement is needed in our community.
Goshen PD: Another Speed STEP throughout the year, 1 is not enough.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: No.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Alexander PD: More speeding enforcement.
Hazen PD: Look into the road construction issues. I know the Highway Police is paid to do so but they are
shorthanded and maybe could be passed down to local agencies.
9. Has the public offered any additional ideas or suggestions that they would like to see implemented?
Stone Co. Sheriff’s Office: No.
Barling PD: None
Jackson Co. Sheriff’s Office: No.
Monticello PD: Neighborhood safety is an idea to implement more. Trespassing, stealing, and soliciting in the
neighborhoods is becoming more of a problem.
Prairie Grove PD: None that we are aware of other than having more mobilizations.
Mtn. View Police: nothing useful
Newton Co. Sheriff’s Office: No
Clarksville PD: No, not that we have been made aware of.
Forrest City PD: No.
Pine Bluff PD: The public has addressed concerns and they want to see enforcement of expired vehicle tags, no
vehicle tags and operating with no insurance.
Goshen PD: No input has been offered.
Independence Co Sheriff’s Office: No.
Boone Co. Sheriff’s Office: N/A
Alexander PD: N/A
Hazen PD: None
Section 6.5 – General Agreement Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 112
1. In the project or program area for your grant, what do you see as the success or failures?
ARDOT: We use it for professional development. This allows us to not only see new technology and how other
states do things, but it allows us to make connections and develop professional relationships with other Traffic.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: I only see successes with the grant. If our office did not receive
the funds, there is no way that we would have any travel to conferences and meetings.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: A success is a good, working partnership with the AHSO. We feel valued
and the work we do on behalf of the AHSO for the state doesn't go unnoticed and is recognized by our sponsor.
DPS, IT: Success is giving the ability to access applications to ensure accurate data quality and submission for
LEO 's throughout the State.
Black River Tech: Our promotion and enforcement activities in the BAT Mobile have proven effective in
reducing the number of impaired drivers in the areas we serve on a regular basis. The failure is our inability to
have the Sobriety Checkpoint Technician Course as mandatory training in all of the law enforcement academies
throughout the state.
Administrative Office of the Courts: Great success in terms of Arkansas District Judges receiving high-quality
education on traffic safety matters.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Success: number of classes and people trained. Failure: not sure
consider it a failure, just a continuing challenge and that is tweens.
2. What do you think is the most significant traffic safety problem and/or violation in Arkansas?
ARDOT: Distracted driving.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: DWI
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: Distracted, speeders, novice/teen drivers, and uninformed parents all
contribute to big safety problems in AR.
DPS, IT: Distracted driving and constructions zones.
Black River Tech: Speeding and distracted driving are equally problematic in the state.
Administrative Office of the Courts: This seems to vary and has evolved. Drunk driving is still a concern,
broadened to impaired driving and the impact of many drugs. Masking, and high-speed driving, along with
distracted driving are all in the mix.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Children not being properly restrained in motor vehicles.
3. Are there any concerns regarding your current project or program that we can do differently to improve
traffic safety in your experience?
ARDOT: No.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: No- I find this process very straight forward. Our coordinator is
a tremendous help at all times.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: I believe when we have asked for different things within our program, it
has been granted. For instance, in 2020, we asked for additional counties to address equity and inclusion in
counties with high minority populations and/or underserved, it was granted.
DPS, IT: Follow up with agencies to make sure they are utilizing the eCrash application correctly and work with
the agencies to fill in any knowledge gaps they may have to which is keeping them from utilizing the eCrash
application.
Black River Tech: Many smaller departments who would like to use our program on a regular basis are hindered
because they do not qualify for STEP grants due to having too few full-time officers.
Administrative Office of the Courts: No. We are very grateful to the ASP and NHTSA for broad and deep
collaboration. We appreciate ideas from Chip and the many people we work with.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Getting our law upgraded to 8 or 80 and having a rear-seat
requirement for all children under 13.
4. What is the public perception of your project or program in the community? Has this impacted the
effectiveness of the project or program?
ARDOT: N/A
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: I don't know the perception since we don't engage with the
community. I do know that the law enforcement agencies are very appreciative of the work we are able to perform
using the grant funds.
Section 6.5 – General Agreement Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 113
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: The perception of our program, within schools that participate, has been
welcoming, after we listen to them, engage in their communities, while clearly explaining our cause.
DPS, IT: From the feedback we have received from Local Agencies, the eCrash application has been a welcome
improvement to the crash reporting system. For the public / community they are provided a better legible report
in a timely manner for their needs.
Black River Tech: The public is very supportive of our program and the work we do. Most of the driving public
realize the danger that impaired driving poses to them and their family members.
Administrative Office of the Courts: Respecting the goal of public participation and engagement, most of our
Judicial Education is fairly discreet. If there are ways, we can assist with this, please let us know.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Public perception is that we are a car seat distribution program.
It has not impacted the effectiveness.
5. What could be done differently, either by your organization or the Highway Safety Office, to make your
project or program more successful?
ARDOT: Improve the eGrant tool. It is very hard to use.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: I wish that we could send more than 2 people to each training.
We are small office, and the training is applicable to everyone.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: The continued and timely support for each organization is needed.
DPS, IT: Highway Safety could take a more active role with the local agencies across the state to get more buy-
in in from the agencies and work to improve communication of the eCrash application.
Black River Tech: We feel that the Arkansas State Police Highway Safety Office has always been fully supportive
of our program and work diligently to assist the BAT Program.
Administrative Office of the Courts: We all need to keep evolving what we do and how we do it to ensure the
highest quality educational outcomes.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Allow us to hire more people.
6. What do you feel is the goal of your AHSO grant?
ARDOT: See question #1.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: To support our efforts and improving our program in regulating
DWI testing in AR.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: To make aware, educate, and increase seat belt use and overall motor
vehicle safety among teens and their families. While reducing distractions among those units.
DPS, IT: Develop and improve the eCrash application to help to increase quality of crash data submitted to state
of Arkansas.
Black River Tech: The goal of the BAT Program is to train law enforcement officers throughout the state in
Standardized Field Sobriety Testing, the safe and legal use of sobriety checkpoints and to reduce impaired driving
and reduce the number of vehicle collision and fatalities throughout the state.
Administrative Office of the Courts: The best possible education on Traffic Safety issues for our Arkansas District
Judges.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: To reduce death and injury for children from MVC through
education about car seats.
7. What is your current role regarding the project or program? Are the responsibilities and expectations of
your role reasonable given your time and resources? If not, why is that?
ARDOT: Manager in the Traffic Safety Section.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: I am the responsible for administration of the grant and I don't
feel that I spend too much time making sure we are in compliance with the rules.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: Community program supervisor. My roles consist of both the admin and
community work. Community work is where I thrive and enjoy the engagement.
DPS, IT: Program Manager. Yes
Black River Tech: Our program consists of BAT Program Coordinator and BAT Program Instructor. The
responsibilities and expectations are consistent with all of our program goals.
Section 6.5 – General Agreement Survey Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 114
Administrative Office of the Courts: As the Judicial Branch Education Director I work with our judges and
partners to set up the curriculum and administer the program. The responsibilities and expectations are reasonable
and appropriate. We receive a great deal of support from the Administrative Office of the Courts.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: I am the Program Coordinator. The responsibilities and
expectations are not reasonable due to lack of personnel. This program has grown and continues to grow to meet
the needs of the public with regards to education and assistance with car seats.
8. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions on your AHSO grant that could improve or help address a
significant traffic safety problem?
ARDOT: No.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: I do not.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: Not at this time, but we are always looking for programs to engage teens
and their interest. We also continue to seek outside partners/grants to support the interest of keeping teens safer
while driving/riding. This support helps us to provide incentives that teens like and encourage their participation.
DPS, IT: Nothing that can be thought of at the current time.
Black River Tech: The smaller law enforcement agencies need more grant funded support with traffic
enforcement. The addition of a law enforcement liaison to ASHO will be effective in assisting these agencies in
finding the appropriate resources to improve in their problem areas.
Administrative Office of the Courts: Not at this time. Again, we are grateful.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Not sure.
9. Has the public offered any additional ideas or suggestions that they would like to see implemented?
ARDOT: No.
AR Dept. of Health, Office of Alcohol Testing: The public has not offered anything.
AR Children’s Hospital, Teen Driving: Mandatory driver's ed and mandatory parent/teen education regarding
motor vehicle safety.
DPS, IT: Not to my Knowledge.
Black River Tech: The public is very helpful in notifying the law enforcement agencies with which we work of
the problem areas in their communities where the majority of impaired driving is taking place.
Administrative Office of the Courts: Not that we know of but we try and stay abreast of changes in the law and
society that impact judicial education in the area of traffic safety.
AR Children’s Hospital, Child Passenger Safety: Other than I am constantly asked how I do this with just me and
one other person, no.
Section 6.6 – 2022 Teen Leadership Conference Evaluation Summary
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 115
2b)
I
have
the
knowledge
to
be
a
leader
in
my
community.
(i_have_the_knowledge)
Total
Count
(N)
Missing*
Unique
101
0 (0.0%)
3
Counts/frequency:
Strongly Agree (64, 63.4%), Agree (35, 34.7%), Disagree (2, 2.0%), Strongly Disagree (0, 0.0%)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0 20 40 60 80
2c) I have the skills to be a leader in my community.
(i_have_the_skills_to)
Total
Count
(N)
Missing*
Unique
101
0 (0.0%)
2
Counts/frequency:
Strongly Agree (59, 58.4%), Agree (42, 41.6%), Disagree (0, 0.0%), Strongly Disagree (0, 0.0%)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0 15 30 45 60
5) How often do you wear your seatbelt when Riding in a Vehicle (School Buses do not
apply)
(how_often_do_you_wear_your)
Total
Count
(N)
Missing*
Unique
101
0 (0.0%)
3
Counts/frequency: All Time (87, 86.1%), Some of the Time (13, 12.9%), Not very often (1, 1.0%), Never (0, 0.0%)
All Time
Some of the Time
Not very often
Never
0 25 50 75 100
Section 6.7 – ACH – Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 116
Section 6.7 – ACH – Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory Results
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 117
Section 6.8 – Data Used for High Five Selection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 118
Top Five Rural and Mostly Rural* Arkansas Counties
with Highest Rate of Unrestrained Fatal and Serious Injuries** (2016-2020)
Completely Rural
Counties
(100% Rural)
Mostly Rural
Counties
(50%-99.9% Rural)
1. Prairie 3.56
1. Monroe 3.56
2. Montgomery 2.85
2. Howard 3.05
3. Madison 2.55
3.
Fulton 2.94
4. Searcy 2.32
4. Jackson 2.44
5. Cleveland 2.19
5. Franklin 2.43
Highlighted cells indicate the counties that are listed in the top five for both Unrestrained and Total fatal and severe injuries
*U.S. Census Bureau classification of Rural and Mostly Rural counties
https://mtgis-portal.geo.census.gov/arcgis/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=49cd4bc9c8eb444ab51218c1d5001ef6
**per 1000 population,
3.56
2.85
2.55
2.32
2.19
3.56
3.05
2.94
2.44
2.43
Section 6.8 – Data Used for High Five Selection
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 119
Top Five Rural and Mostly Rural* Arkansas Counties
with Highest Rate of Total Fatal and Serious Injuries** (2016-2020)
Completely Rural
Counties
(100% Rural)
Mostly Rural
Counties
(50%-99.9% Rural)
1. Madison 8.02
1. Fulton 8.90
2. Prairie 7.69
2. Jackson 8.17
3. Searcy 7.08
3. Grant 7.62
4. Montgomery 6.75
4. Lawrence 7.58
5. Izard 5.62
5.
Independence 7.48
Highlighted cells indicate the counties that are listed in the top five for both Unrestrained and All fatal and severe injuries
*U.S. Census Bureau classification of Rural and Mostly Rural counties
https://mtgis-portal.geo.census.gov/arcgis/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=49cd4bc9c8eb444ab51218c1d5001ef6
**per 1000 population
7.69
6.75
8.02
7.08
5.62
7.58
8.90
7.48
7.62
8.17
Section 6.9 – Overrepresented Population Data by County
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 120
County
Percent of
Total
Population
Percent of
Pedestrian
Fatalities
Percent of
Seat Belt
Fatalities
County
Percent of
Total
Population
Percent of
Pedestrian
Fatalities
Percent of
Seat Belt
Fatalities
ARKANSAS 25.12% 50.00% 16.67% LEE 55.49% 50.00% 100.00%
ASHLEY 24.74% 50.00% 50.00% LINCOLN 30.25% 100.00% 0.00%
BAXTER 0.19% 0.00% 0.00% LITTLE RIVER 19.30% 0.00% 20.00%
BENTON 1.50% 5.56% 0.00% LOGAN 1.48% 0.00% 0.00%
BOONE 0.21% 0.00% 16.67% LONOKE 5.46% 0.00% 8.33%
BRADLEY 27.49% 50.00% 0.00% MADISON 0.10% 0.00% 0.00%
CALHOUN 21.96% 50.00% 0.00% MARION 0.69% 0.00% 0.00%
CARROLL 0.25% 0.00% 0.00% MILLER 24.97% 61.54% 0.00%
CHICOT 53.72% 0.00% 33.33% MISSISSIPPI 34.93% 60.00% 41.67%
CLARK 24.17% 100.00% 20.00% MONROE 42.26% 0.00% 66.67%
CLAY 0.49% 0.00% 0.00% MONTGOMERY 0.31% 0.00% 0.00%
CLEBURNE 0.91% 0.00% 0.00% NEVADA 34.82% 50.00% 100.00%
CLEVELAND 13.48% 0.00% 0.00% NEWTON 0.04% 0.00% 0.00%
COLUMBIA 36.16% 0.00% 0.00% OUACHITA 42.20% 100.00% 0.00%
CONWAY 9.94% 0.00% 0.00% PERRY 2.56% 0.00% 0.00%
CRAIGHEAD 15.15% 41.18% 23.81% PHILLIPS 63.46% 66.67% 25.00%
CRAWFORD 1.52% 0.00% 0.00% PIKE 3.81% 0.00% 0.00%
CRITTENDEN 48.36% 50.00% 25.00% POINSETT 3.74% 0.00% 0.00%
CROSS 17.79% 0.00% 25.00% POLK 0.52% 0.00% 0.00%
DALLAS 43.01% 0.00% 0.00% POPE 2.57% 50.00% 7.69%
DESHA 47.42% 100.00% 66.67% PRAIRIE 11.62% 0.00% 0.00%
DREW 28.40% 50.00% 33.33% PULASKI 36.89% 39.34% 43.90%
FAULKNER 11.42% 0.00% 6.25% RANDOLPH 0.92% 0.00% 0.00%
FRANKLIN 0.97% 25.00% 0.00% SALINE 7.61% 0.00% 20.00%
FULTON 0.33% 0.00% 0.00% SCOTT 2.16% 0.00% 0.00%
GARLAND 8.34% 7.69% 5.00% SEARCY 0.52% 0.00% 0.00%
GRANT 2.51% 0.00% 0.00% SEBASTIAN 6.15% 26.67% 0.00%
GREENE 2.31% 66.67% 11.11% SEVIER 4.64% 0.00% 33.33%
HEMPSTEAD 29.98% 50.00% 25.00% SHARP 1.02% 0.00% 0.00%
HOT SPRING 11.24% 16.67% 7.69% ST. FRANCIS 52.71% 66.67% 45.45%
HOWARD 20.52% 0.00% 50.00% STONE 0.10% 0.00% 0.00%
INDEPENDENCE 1.80% 12.50% 0.00% UNION 32.95% 50.00% 33.33%
IZARD 1.04% 0.00% 0.00% VAN BUREN 0.39% 0.00% 0.00%
JACKSON 11.53% 40.00% 0.00% WASHINGTON 3.35% 2.86% 5.00%
JEFFERSON 55.77% 73.33% 37.50% WHITE 4.26% 11.11% 0.00%
JOHNSON 1.53% 0.00% 33.33% WOODRUFF 29.23% 0.00% 0.00%
LAFAYETTE 35.54% 0.00% 0.00% YELL 1.77% 0.00% 0.00%
LAWRENCE 1.41% 0.00% 0.00%
Black or African American Fatalities by County
Section 6.9 – Overrepresented Population Data by County
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 121
County
% of Total
Population
% of Total
Fatalities
County
% of Total
Population
% of Total
Fatalities
County
% of Total
Population
% of Total
Fatalities
Woodruff 0.23% 16.67% Fulton 0.63% 0.00% Columbia 2.75% 0.00%
Bradley 15.38% 28.57% Greene 2.89% 2.22% Polk 6.56% 3.70%
Clark 4.83% 13.95% Conway 4.04% 3.23% Lafayette 2.94% 0.00%
Cleveland 0.00% 6.67% White 4.44% 3.30% Jackson 2.96% 0.00%
Monroe 1.09% 7.69% Craighead 5.14% 3.64% Sebastian 14.41% 11.36%
Boone 2.56% 7.69% St. Francis 5.32% 3.70% Van Buren 3.25% 0.00%
Newton 0.93% 5.56% Lawrence 1.62% 0.00% Pulaski 6.16% 2.82%
Lincoln 4.09% 8.33% Dallas 1.64% 0.00% Arkansas 3.37% 0.00%
Miller 3.44% 6.85% Prairie 1.83% 0.00% Calhoun 4.19% 0.00%
Drew 3.58% 6.90% Stone 1.95% 0.00% Mississippi 4.36% 0.00%
Perry 3.07% 5.88% Faulkner 4.16% 2.11% Washington 16.89% 12.34%
Hot Spring 3.53% 6.15% Cross 2.06% 0.00% Pope 9.20% 3.64%
Cleburne 2.42% 4.55% Jefferson 2.18% 0.00% Ashley 5.61% 0.00%
Saline 4.97% 7.06% Randolph 2.20% 0.00% Chicot 5.74% 0.00%
Independence 6.62% 8.70% Clay 2.21% 0.00% Crawford 7.96% 1.67%
Franklin 3.19% 5.13% Madison 5.83% 3.57% Desha 6.36% 0.00%
Phillips 1.96% 3.85% Union 4.02% 1.72% Pike 6.52% 0.00%
Crittenden 2.71% 4.00% Marion 2.36% 0.00% Johnson 13.98% 6.90%
Lonoke 4.55% 5.80% Sharp 2.39% 0.00% Benton 16.76% 9.62%
Logan 3.06% 3.85% Izard 2.40% 0.00% Scott 7.87% 0.00%
Poinsett 3.21% 3.92% Ouachita 2.40% 0.00% Howard 12.66% 4.76%
Montgomery 4.31% 5.00% Baxter 2.42% 0.00% Hempstead 12.86% 0.00%
Little River 3.69% 4.35% Garland 5.75% 3.23% Carroll 15.10% 1.85%
Nevada 0.01% 0.00% Searcy 2.65% 0.00% Yell 20.52% 0.00%
Grant 2.88% 2.86% Lee 2.73% 0.00% Sevier 33.55% 7.41%
Hispanic Fatalities Sorted by % Over-Representation Compared to Population %
Section 6.10 – ACHI Analysis: AR Pedestrian Fatalities, By Race, 2016-2021
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 122
Section 6.11 – Natural Wonders Partnership Council July 28, 2023, Meeting Feedback
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 123
General Membership Meeting Feedback
Friday, July 28, 2023
8:00am – 9:00pm
Topic Speaker Notes
Welcome ShaRhonda Love,
AR Children’s
Introduction of Laura Taylor, Director of Community Impact
Introduction of
Speakers
Laura Taylor, AR Children’s
Introduction of Dean Scott
Introduction of Debra Hollis
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Dean Scott,
Regional Manager
Dean Scott – 816.516.5941. &
Presentation slides provided w/ these notes.
We started out as a region to see how we could bring people together.
We brought them together through a mechanism called S.W.O.T (Stress
Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats) Analysis. Started in Missouri –
brought traffic safety professionals to do the SWOT analysis. This
opened up to a Community Equity Summit. Organizations came together
from Churches to Bike organizations and they collaborated up with law
enforcement to speak about issues and come to agreements for education.
Next, a SWOT analysis done in Arkansas.
We were given more money through their Bipartisan infrastructure law
to expand programs and be a more equity based and to get to the
underserved communities.
34% of all unrestrained fatalities were Black or Latino.
Arkansas’s representation from ages 17-34 represented the majority of
the 70 fatalities in 2020.
We want to make sure we are using the resources to reach these
communities.
There not only needs to be an enforcement message, but an educational
message.
When looking at the 5 E’s, we want to make sure Equity is included.
(Enforcement, Engineering, Education, EMS, and EQUITY component
are all important).
20% of all speeding related fatalities are Black and Latino.
We need to build more community programs to provide education and
awareness that speeding is killing in Little Rock and Northeast AR,
specifically.
Arkansas does not have messaging to target Latino community or
pedestrians on how to make them safer.
Arkansas, we need to come together and build partnerships to lower
these fatalities.
40% of all Pedestrians fatalities are Black or Latino.
When looking at our underserved communities we need to ask:
o What do they need? How can we a resource? How can we
connect with partners to make resources available?
When bringing in our communities to the table we need to allow them to
vent. Communication must have feedback.
The ultimate goal is bring/create solutions.
Safe System Approach – ZERO is our goal. A Safe System is how we
get there. We cannot accept fatalities that can be prevented.
The biggest thing we can do right now is create partnerships and come
up with strategies that we can do initially at a low cost until there is a
bigger investment available.
AR State Police
Highway Safety
Office
Debra Hollis,
Highway Safety Manager
501.618.8190
[email protected]rkansas.gov
We need to get communities more involved, more focused on traffic
safety, especially the underserved/underrepresented.
As part of a highway safety plan, we are trying to involve individuals
and communities engaging in discussions. Getting them to participate in
finding strategies and solutions.
Deaths and Injuries can be prevented but people do not think about it
until something happens to them, family, and friends.
Highway Safety Offices across the nation have been trying to get people
not to drink and drive, speed, wear their seatbelt, among other
Section 6.11 – Natural Wonders Partnership Council July 28, 2023, Meeting Feedback
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 124
preventable measures. Now they are looking at pedestrians and biking
issues & many people are unaware of preventable measures like wearing
appropriate attire.
We have put many media, education, but the best way to accomplish a
goal to reduce tragedies is to get people involved. We need the people
that live in the communities, community leaders in the words/messaging
they will respond to.
When you look at the data and put it in perspective to really see what it
means because if they are 10% of the population but are 20% of the
fatality – that is a problem and know they are being underrepresented.
Hoping to be able to join community coalitions, organizations,
conversations and plan events like round tables to talk about what the
community knows, experiences, how they feel and look at the data to
create awareness of the severity.
The Highway Safety can help provide information, speakers, etc. needed
to create spaces/times to have these conversations.
A newsletter is being created to share events, grants, and other
information that will be available in Spanish and English on the Website
and E-mail.
We will be soliciting proposals to fund ideas, meetings, and events to
join this effort. It will be available and submitted through our grant
system. Reports will be shared from outcomes of these accepted
proposals.
Regarding proposals it would be like if your organization put together
where young teens learned seatbelt use, a safety-driving curriculum,
have speakers like law enforcement to discuss highway safety.
Questions & Chat Input
Back to school events with schools, all those people that are dropping
children off, the teens driving to school, teachers driving to school,
administration working at the schools. – Danielle Wright
Not even just driving, there are many that also walk at certain schools. –
Danielle Wright
Utilizing schoolteachers and school nurses in a campaign. Dr. Chris
Smith, UAMS
Junior Auxiliary, fraternity/sorority organizations, rotary. –Allie Staton,
PharmD
Church Organizations, Boys & Girls Clubs – Danielle Wright
(UAMS) We train our pediatric residents to include this conversation in
every health supervision. With pressures to be more efficient, this
message is sometimes dropped. Reminding all primary care providers
(AAP and AAFP) periodically would be helpful. – Dr. Chris Smith,
UAMS
There are numerous back to school events and festivals led by African
American and Latino community-based organizations in our area and
across our state. Partnerships have been established to work together.
Just a thought! – Diana Gonzalez Worthen
This seems SO similar to what we’ve tried to accomplish with vaccines.
I’d be glad to brainstorm on some things that have worked and haven’t
worked in my world of getting into the communities. –Allie Staton,
PharmD
How have you all been able to reach hearing impaired or even blind
families? – Danielle Wright
We need the info in Marshallese in Northwest AR. - Diana Gonzalez
Worthen
Second Dr. Smith, this conversation about safety occurs every day in
primary care offices! ARAAP is happy to share any resources. – Anna
Strong
Love it – keep us updated we all have lots of events coming up – Randy
Jumper
Which Countries have the highest fatalities in the historically
underserved communities? - LA
FAITH Network: www.arfaithnetwork.org/ and the ADH Office of Faith
Based Outreach:
www.healthy.arkansas.gov/programs
-
Section 6.11 – Natural Wonders Partnership Council July 28, 2023, Meeting Feedback
Arkansas FY24-26 Triennial Highway Safety Plan 125
services/topics/faith-based-outreach are great partners relating to
religious groups.
–
Shanetta Agnew
Announcements General Membership
Loretta Alexander, Health Policy Director for Children & Families,
announced her retirement & encourage everyone with kids covered
through Medicaid that their information is updated so they do not lose it.
Dr. Chad Rodgers announced about the partnership through UAMS &
AR Children’s received a $3M Mental Health HRSA Grant and are
beginning education with PCP and consultation with PCP. Also, will be
collaborating with schools and will be developing a strategy alongside
the Co-Ops in the state to help and supplement the mental health
programming and information provided.
Heather Mercer shared that August is immunization awareness month
and Voices for Vaccines put together a great toolkit for the month.
Immunization summit will be August 4
th
and registration closes Sunday,
July 30
th
. https://www.voicesforvaccines.org/niam-2023/
Lauren shared that AR Community Foundation is running a grant cycle
that will open August 1
st
and close August 31
st
it is in response to the
tornadoes that came through. It is specifically to do case management,
casework to help people navigate through social services or FEMA
insurance. (Mental Health AID, Legal AID, Shelter, Debris removal,
financial assistance, etc.) Grants will be up to $25,000.
https://www.arcf.org/give-smart-blog/tornado-recovery-information/
Dr. Chad Rodgers shared that the ACEs Summit: The Power of
Belonging is on Thursday, August 3
rd
at the Pulaski Tech. Email him or
sign up at (https://web.cvent.com/event/67e5568e-7008-4756-a677-
0849250bde2c/summary)
Anna Strong shared the AAAP Conference will focus on Adolescent
Health. You do not have to be a pediatrician to attend. It will be August
25 – 26
th
.
https://events.r20.constantcontact.com/register/eventReg?oeidk=a07ejq
sxgoy64dedec4&oseq=&c=&ch
Closing Remarks Laura Taylor,
AR Children’s
Next Meeting: Friday, October 27, 2023 @ 8am - 9am.
Members of the Natural Wonders Partnership Council according to the 2020-2022 Action Plan:
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families
Arkansas Hospital
Association
Arkansas Department of Education
Arkansas March of Dimes
The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Arkansas Minority Health Commission
The Arkansas Department of Health
Blue & You Foundation
The American Academy of
Pediatrics (Arkansas)
The Clinton Foundation
Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators
The Clinton School of Public Service
Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield
Community Health Centers of Arkansas
Arkansas Center for Health
Improvement
Delta Dental of Arkansas
Arkansas Community Foundation
The Arkansas Department of Human Services
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care
Just Communities of Arkansas
The Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance
Our House
Arkansas Out of
School Network
The Arkansas Campaign for Grade
-
Level Reading
Arkansas Pharmacist Association
The Pulaski County Juvenile Court
Arkansas Access to Justice
The University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension
Arkansas Asset Funders Network
The
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Arkansas Coalition for Obesity Prevention
The Urban League of Arkansas
Arkansas Foodbank
The Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation
