Microsoft Word - Manual of the Fifth Revision of the BEC- 15 June 2016.docx

ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/53/Rev.5

Department of Economic and Social Affairs

Statistics Division

Statistical Papers Series M No.53, Rev.5

Classification by

Broad Economic Categories

Rev.5

Defined in terms of the Harmonized Commodity Description and

Coding System (2012) and the Central Product Classification, 2.1

United Nations

New York, 2016

PREFACE

The Classification by Broad Economic Categories (BEC) is an international product

classification. Its main purpose is to provide a set of broad product categories for the analysis of

trade statistics.

Since its adoption in 1971, statistical offices around the world have used the BEC to report trade

statistics in a concise and meaningful way, and researchers have used BEC data for analyses.

This fifth revision of the BEC (BEC Rev.5) is the outcome of a review process that spanned

several years and involved contributions from many classifications experts and data users around

the world. This process resulted in a structure that is both more detailed and more logical than

the previous version. It responds to the need for more relevant economic categories, includes

services in addition to goods, and more clearly distinguishes the end-use of products. New broad

categories include “Mining and energy”, “Construction and housing”, “Textile and footwear”,

“Information and communication” and “Health and education”. The importance of the BEC for

the analysis of global value chains is also highlighted in this manual. In that regard, BEC Rev.5

distinguishes generic and specified intermediate products as a new dimension within the

processed intermediate end use category.

BEC Rev.5 was considered and endorsed for international use by the Statistical Commission at

its forty-seventh session, in March 2016.

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

In carrying out the revision of the BEC, the active participation of the Statistical Commission,

the Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications and its Technical

Subgroup were all vital.

Further inputs in this process were received from members of the UN Task Forces on

International Merchandise Trade Statistics and on Statistics of International Trade in Services, as

well as of the OECD Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Services Statistics.

The BEC Rev.5 process benefited from the coordination and support of the Chairman of the

Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications, Andrew Hancock of

Statistics New Zealand, as well as the Chair of the Technical Subgroup of the BEC Revision,

Norbert Rainer of Statistics Austria. Helpful comments were also provided by the following

members of the Subgroup: Ashish Kumar and Dr. Sinha (India), Ana Franco, Axel Behrens,

Michael Mietzner and Veijo-Ismo Ritola (Eurostat), Nadim Ahmad, Fabienne Fortanier, Bettina

Wistrom, Norihiko Yamano, Sebastien Miroudot and Colin Webb (OECD), Olga Memedovic

and Shyam Upadhyaya (UNIDO), Tom Beris (WCO), Joscelyn Magdeleine and Andreas Maurer

(WTO), Federico Dorin (UNECLAC), Karoly Kovacs, Markie Muryawan, Luis Gonzalez,

Matthias Reister and Ronald Jansen (UNSD) and Tim Sturgeon as consultant for UNSD.

Special thanks to Tim Sturgeon, who was active throughout the revision process and especially

during the final phases of editing. His work was executed in close cooperation with Ronald

Jansen of UNSD, who was directly responsible for the different stages of the revision process,

including the organization of meetings and consultation rounds.

SUPPORT FOR BEC USERS

The United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) is responsible for the development and

maintenance of BEC Rev.5 and its correspondence tables. Users of BEC are encouraged to

request clarification, share their experience and remarks with regard to the adequacy of the

classification, and provide ideas or proposals for enhancing its usefulness.

UNSD will use its website to provide further information on the rationale and possible

applications of the BEC and make the correspondence tables of BEC with HS, CPC, EBOPS and

ISIC available. Those tables will be subject to modification since the BEC classification is based

on actual trade practice and such practice may change over time. Again, users are encouraged to

report changes in trade practice regarding particular detailed HS commodities.

Updated information on BEC and its correspondence tables are available from the web site of the

United Nations Statistics Division at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade

International trade statistics in terms of BEC are available from the UN Comtrade website at

http://comtrade.un.org

Questions regarding BEC can be sent to [email protected]

Official communications regarding BEC should be addressed to the Director, United Nations

Statistics Division, by mail:

2 United Nations Plaza

Room DC2-1670

New York, NY 10017

United States of America

Table of Contents

PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................. II

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................... III

SUPPORT FOR BEC USERS ........................................................................................................................... IV

I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 6

A. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 6

B. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS...................................................................................................................................... 8

II. MOTIVATION TO REVISE THE BEC ............................................................................................. 9

A. DECISION TAKEN BY THE UNITED NATIONS STATISTICAL COMMISSION ..................................................... 9

B. WHO IS USING THE BEC AND FOR WHAT PURPOSES? ..................................................................................... 9

C. IMPROVING THE STRUCTURE OF THE BEC ..................................................................................................... 10

D. INCLUSION OF SERVICES IN BEC REV.5.......................................................................................................... 12

E. BEC AND GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 13

III. THE STRUCTURE OF BEC REV.5 ................................................................................................. 14

A. DIMENSION OF BROAD ECONOMIC CATEGORIES – TOP LEVEL .................................................................. 14

B. PRODUCT DIMENSION – SECOND LEVEL ......................................................................................................... 14

C. THE SNA END-USE DIMENSION – THIRD LEVEL ........................................................................................... 15

D. PROCESSING DIMENSION – FOURTH LEVEL .................................................................................................... 16

E. SPECIFICATION DIMENSION – FIFTH LEVEL ................................................................................................... 17

F. DURABILITY DIMENSION – SIXTH LEVEL ........................................................................................................ 18

G. SPECIFIC COMBINATIONS OF THE 6 DIMENSIONS .......................................................................................... 19

IV. THE COMPILATION OF THE BEC ................................................................................................ 19

A. CODING OF BEC REV.5 ...................................................................................................................................... 19

B. DISTRIBUTION OF THE CPC SERVICES AND HS GOODS CATEGORIES ACROSS BEC MAIN CATEGORIES 20

C. IDENTIFICATION OF THE END-USE CATEGORIES ............................................................................................ 20

V. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS ..................................................................... 21

A. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CENTRAL PRODUCT CLASSIFICATION .................................................................... 21

B. RELATIONSHIP TO THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 22

C. RELATIONSHIP TO THE STANDARD INTERNATIONAL TRADE CLASSIFICATION ....................................... 22

D. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER STANDARD CLASSIFICATIONS ............................................................................. 22

E. RELATIONSHIP TO EARLIER REVISIONS........................................................................................................... 23

ANNEX 1: STRUCTURE OF THE BEC REV.5 ........................................................................................... 24

I. INTRODUCTION

1. This manual describes and explains in detail the fifth revision of the Classification by

Broad Economic Categories (BEC Rev.5). The BEC is, essentially, a high-level aggregation of

existing product classifications. It provides an overview of international trade based on the

detailed commodity classifications in the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC), the

Harmonized Commodity and Coding System (HS) and the Central Product Classification (CPC).

Its comparative advantage has traditionally been the classification of goods by end-use category.

This facilitates a range of analytical applications, such as the relative integration of economies in

global value chains, and statistical applications, such as commodity flow approaches to

estimating GDP.

Historical background

2. At its thirteenth session, in 1965, the Statistical Commission recommended that data on

broad economic categories of commodities be compiled to supplement summary data of imports

and exports based the sections of the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC).

Categories included food, industrial supplies, capital equipment, and consumer durables and non-

durables.

3. In accordance with the Commission’s request, a revised draft of the BEC was prepared at

the fifteenth session. It was comprised of seven broad categories, including the original five

categories plus “fuels and lubricants” and “transport equipment” (see Table 1). Within the

categories of “capital goods” and “transport equipment” a further distinction was made between

finished equipment and “parts and accessories”. Within the categories of “food and beverages”,

“industrial supplies (non-food)” and “fuels and lubricants” a distinction was made between

primary commodities and processed commodities. Within the categories of “primary food and

beverages”, “processed food and beverages” and “transport equipment (other than passenger

motor vehicles)” a distinction was made between commodities for industry use and those for

household consumption. The Commission was of the opinion that the distinction between

industrial and household end use could not be made for “motor spirits” (gasoline) or “passenger

motor vehicles”. Finally, the Commission requested a better definition in the distinction between

durable and non-durable consumption goods, resulting in a “semi-durable” sub-category within

the “consumer goods not elsewhere specified” category.

4. A final list of product categories was submitted in the report

of the Secretary General at

the sixteenth session of the Commission in 1970. The resulting nineteen categories were a

response to the comments made by the Commission itself, by individual countries and by

international organizations, and were designed to enable users to obtain aggregates as

comparable as possible to the three basic end-use classes in the System of National Accounts

(SNA): capital goods, intermediate goods, and consumption goods. It was left to users to make

E/CN.3/408 (1970)

their own apportionment among SNA end-use classes for “motor spirits” (gasoline), and

“passenger motor vehicles.”

5. After being defined in terms of the basic headings of the SITC, the original BEC was

issued in 1971. Although its overall structure and coverage has remained unchanged since, it has

been revised four times:

1. The first revision, in 1976, conformed the BEC to the changes in SITC Revision 2.

2. The second revision, in 1984, conformed the BEC to SITC Revision 3.

3. The third revision, in 1986, corrected some oversights in the 1984 revision.

4. The fourth revision, in 2002, took into account the more detailed description of

commodities provided by the 2002 edition of the HS classification, and guidelines for

determining the main end-use (see third column of Table 1).

6. International commodity trade statistics are available on the UN Comtrade website

according to the BEC, as well as by various revisions of SITC (1-4) and HS (1992, 1996, 2002,

2007 and 2012). Although coverage varies by reporting economy, BEC statistics are generally

available in UN Comtrade for annual data referring to the years 1995 onwards. Data are

available for each of the three levels and all of the sub-categories in Table 1.

Table 1. BEC Rev.4, its unique categories, and its SNA classes

Classification of goods by Broad Economic Categories

Unique

categories

Basic classes in

SNA

1 Food and beverages

11 Primary

111 Mainly for industry

Intermediate

112 Mainly for household consumption

Consumption

–

Processed

121 Mainly for industry

Intermediate

122 Mainly for household consumption

Consumption

2 Industrial supplies not elsewhere specified

21 Primary

Intermediate

22 Processed

Intermediate

3 Fuels and lubricants

31 Primary

Intermediate

32 Processed

321 Motor spirit

Not classified

322 Other

Intermediate

4 Capital goods (except transport equipment), and

parts and accessories thereof

41 Capital goods (except transport equipment)

Capital

42 Parts and accessories

Intermediate

5 - Transport equipment and parts and accessories

thereof

51 Passenger motor

vehicle

Not classified

52 Other

521 Industrial

Capital

522 Non

industrial

Consumption

53 Parts and accessories

Intermediate

6 Consumer goods not elsewhere specified

61 Durable

Consumption

62 Semi

durable

Consumption

63 Non

durable

Consumption

7 - Goods not elsewhere specified 19 Not classified

Recent developments

7. The BEC was first proposed in 1965 and adopted by the UN Statistical Commission in

1971. Since then its structure and coverage have remained unchanged, despite four revisions to

conform to new and updated product classifications

, and despite the significant changes in

international trade, as well as changes in economic accounting standards

8. In addition to vast increases in the scale of international trade in recent decades, there

have been two important changes in its character. Firstly, services trade has become much more

important, including services embedded in products with high intellectual property content.

Secondly, businesses, especially large corporations, have organized their operations across a

number of countries within complex global value chains. Instead of intermediate and final

production taking place all within one exporting country, exports are more likely to embody

intermediate goods and services sourced from any number of countries. Thus, the value and

characteristics of exports do not fully reflect the production and technological capabilities of the

exporter. Because of global value chains, and well as increased flows of primary commodities,

total trade in intermediate products has risen faster than global GDP over the last two decades.

When value is added in multiple countries prior to final consumption, the value embodied in

intermediate goods and services can be counted more than once in export statistics

9. In response to these changes, the fifth revision of the BEC is more thorough than prior

revisions.

• It adds services and therefore refers to products rather than goods.

• It provides a new top level of broad economic categories, based on the main

outputs of corresponding industries, to facilitate broad analyses of trade and

production.

• It identifies SNA end-use as a separate dimension.

Namely, the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) and the Harmonized Commodity Description and

Coding System (HS)

The 2008 System of National Accounts and sixth edition of the Balance of Payments manual, for example,

recommended strict implementations of the changes of ownership rule, the introduction of a new category of

manufacturing services in services trade statistics, and the shift of merchanting from services to goods.

When the financial crisis in 2008-2009 caused a much larger collapse in terms of trade than in terms of GDP, the

discrepancy was partly attributed to such ‘double counting’ of trade in intermediate products.

• It adds a new variable (the specification dimension) to differentiate intermediates

that are generic, i.e. consumed across a wide range of industries, from those that are

specified, i.e. typically consumed only in certain industries.

10. The manual consists of five sections and two annexes. Section II discusses the motivation

for the current revision. Section III describes in detail the new dimensions of BEC Rev.5,

whereas section IV briefly provides information on its compilation and section V on its

relationship to other classifications. The annexes give the full structure and coding of BEC Rev.5

and its correspondence to the goods categories of the HS and the services categories of the CPC.

II. MOTIVATION TO REVISE THE BEC

Decision taken by the United Nations Statistical Commission

11. At its 43

session in 2012, the United Nations Statistical Commission agreed with the

proposals made by the Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications to revise the BEC

and establish a technical subgroup

tasked with the preparation of this fifth revision. The terms of

reference of the technical subgroup identified four areas for improvement:

(i) Re-defining BEC structure to better reflect current economic reality,

(ii) extending the BEC’s scope to include services as well as goods, while giving

extra attention to the definition of intermediate goods,

(iii) improving explanatory materials to help both compilers and users of data

disseminated according to BEC, and

(iv) providing updated correspondence tables to link BEC with other statistical

classifications.

12. At its 47

session in 2016, the Statistical Commission endorsed the fifth revision of the

Classification by Broad Economic Categories for use as an international statistical classification

under Decision 47/108

Who is using the BEC and for what purposes?

13. Effective revision of the BEC requires an understanding of its uses and limitations. In a

literature review

covering the period 1971 to 2015, more than 500 articles and reports made

reference to the BEC, with more than 80% occurring after 2000. While these citations appear in a

wide range of policy publications and academic journals

, the main focus has been on describing,

The members of the Technical Sub-group are given in the acknowledgement section

See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/47th-session/documents/Report-on-the-47th-session-of-the-statistical-

commission-E.pdf

An overview of these references is provided on the UNSD website at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/BEC/

See for example the Journal of International Economics, China Economic Review, Journal of Economic

Integration, Review of World Economics, Journal of Development Economics, Emerging Markets Finance and

Trade, Business and Economic History, Review of Income and Wealth, Review of World Economics, International

Journal of Development Planning Literature, The World Economy, Journal of African Economies, Economie

Internationale, China & World Economy, and The International Trade Journal.

assessing and explaining observed patterns in international trade, tariff effects, trade policy, and

development economics. One of the most important areas of research has been intra-industry

trade, which, by identifying a propensity for countries to trade similar products, challenged some

long-standing assumptions about comparative advantage and specialization in international trade.

While some of this research has depended on finer distinctions between otherwise homogeneous

products (trade in different brands of passenger vehicles, for example), coupled with other data

sources, the BEC has provided comparative insights into variations in horizontal and vertical

intra-industry trade (i.e. across industries and across the BEC classes).

14. In addition to its usefulness as a tool for the analysis of trade and trade policy, BEC has

also been widely used for analysis within the statistical system. Specifically, the end-use

categorization of imported goods provided by BEC has been useful in commodity flow analysis

used for the construction of national accounts estimates of GDP and in particular for the

construction of national Supply and Use Tables. This approach works on the assumption that

there is a unique relationship between each product and its end-use classification that allows it be

allocated within a Supply-Use framework as either intermediate consumption, gross fixed capital

formation, or other final consumption.

15. Of course it has been recognized that this assumption does not always hold, requiring

national accountants to check and adjust BEC end use classifications using supplemental data

sources. For example, even if a certain product is by its nature a consumer product, this does not

mean that 100% of total supply of that product is purchased by private households. Bananas are

certainly purchased by consumers, but a certain share of the total import of bananas may also be

used as intermediate consumption in the food and restaurant industry. This duality of use

naturally affects a number of product groups (in theory all) to varying degrees. Personal

computers, for example, are sold to households and business as fixed capital investments, but

could also be recorded as intermediate consumption when incorporated into larger industrial and

corporate IT systems that are thereafter sold to end users as final products. Indeed, it is because

of these dual-use ambiguities (in particular those where the use is not disproportionately in one

particular category), that earlier versions of the BEC did not allocate end-use categories to

passenger vehicles and motor spirits.

Improving the Structure of the BEC

16. The motivation to revise, and in the process improve the BEC reflects a number of factors.

Perhaps the most important is the need to introduce greater clarity and simplicity in the structure

of the BEC. This streamlining and simplification can be seen by comparing Figure 1, which

shows the confusing and complex relationships between categories in BEC Rev.4, to Figure 2,

which shows the clear, logical hierarchy in BEC Rev.5. Crucially, there is a full separation made

between economic and end-use categories. The revision also takes the opportunity to

introducing a new variable (specification dimension) to help in the analysis of global value

chains.

17. Because the new structure of BEC Rev.5 creates a clear separation of economic

categories, based on underlying products and end-use categories, it is easier to interpret. BEC 4

relies on a confusing hybrid approach that defines some broad economic categories on the basis

of the product characteristics (food and beverages, fuels and lubricants, and transport equipment),

with further links to their end-use categories, while others are defined on the basis of their end-

use and included as top-level broad categories (industrial supplies, capital goods, and consumer

goods). In other words, end-use appears in BEC Rev.4 as both top-level categories and as sub-

categories of other top-level economic categories.

18. The new structure of the BEC will make it possible to identify end-use within each of the

broad categories. For instance, users will be able to identify capital formation within economic

categories such as construction and ICT (capital formation was a single category in BEC Rev.4).

This is important because of significant differences in prices and depreciation in capital

equipment across economic categories. For example, ICT generally experiences declining prices

and high depreciation rates while construction typically experiences low depreciation rates and

rising prices in capital equipment.

19. By defining broad economic categories entirely on the basis of the underlying products

(instead of mixing it with end-use categories as was the case in previous revisions of the BEC),

BEC Rev.5 will provide greater international comparability, because the products included in a

given economic category will be in concordance with classifications agreed to by members of the

global statistical community: the Harmonized Commodity and Coding System (HS) for goods

the basic services categories of the Central Product Classification (CPC) for services.

Figure 1. BEC Rev.4 - Relationships

20. As already mentioned, the allocation of products to end-use categories comes with some

non-trivial challenges. For many products it is fairly clear which end-use category is relevant. In

such cases a simple correspondence table between HS (and CPC) and BEC will suffice to define

end-use. However, products for which the end-use is not so clear-cut will require national

accounts to determine end-use proportionality using established practices.

Figure 2.

BEC Rev.5 - Relationships

Inclusion of Services in BEC Rev.5

21. The growing importance of services has led to recognition of the need to include them

in the product dimension in BEC. Almost all of the defining features of services, namely that

they are non-tradable, non-storable, customized, and insensitive to price competition, are

changing in ways that enable and motivate international trade. Task fragmentation, codification,

monitoring, and trade in services are burgeoning, both domestically and internationally. Services

have become the focus of intense international competition and dynamic innovation, and are thus

of growing interest to policy-makers.

22. With standardization, commodification, and increasing scale, labor inputs to services

have become more sensitive to costs, providing enterprises with the motivation to take advantage

of the new domestic and international sourcing options for a wide range of services and business

functions, including software coding, “back office” administrative tasks, sales, customer service,

and even elements of research and development. Economies such as India and the Philippines

rely on services exports for economic growth and services comprise a larger share of the

production and consumption of goods. For these reasons, there is consensus that the time has

come to include services in the BEC classification.

BEC and Global Value Chain analysis

23. The rise of global value chains has made the analytical distinction between trade in

intermediates and trade in final goods more important

. Trade in terms of end use categories

highlights the bilateral relationships in the trade of intermediate and final products that are

crucial to understanding the dynamics of contemporary trends in international trade and

economic globalization. A more complete picture of such economic interconnectedness has been

the development of global input-output tables and indicators of Trade in Value-Added (TiVA),

such as the import content of exports.

24. However, researchers have found the definition of intermediates in BEC Rev.4 too broad

for examining global value chain participation

, even with the sub-classes of primary and

processed intermediates available in three broad categories (food and beverages, industrial

supplies, and fuels and lubricants). The usefulness of the “processed” intermediate goods

category in BEC Rev.4 as a proxy for global value chain related trade has been explicitly

investigated

. It was found that the processed intermediate goods category contained many

generic products with published reference prices (e.g., cotton bales, linseed oil) or commonly

sold at auction, as well as more differentiated, complex intermediate products intended for use in

specific industries and for specific final goods (e.g. auto parts made for a specific brand or model

of car). The “specific” processed intermediate goods category was therefore created for BEC

Rev.5 to better identify global value chain related trade (see section III- E for more detail).

25. Figure 3 shows how a general categorization of value added can be extracted from the

structure of BEC Rev. 5. This model begins with primary intermediates in the processing

dimension, followed by the increasing end-product specificity in the specification dimension

(generic and then specific processed intermediates), and end with final consumption goods and

services, as depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3. BEC Rev.5, Value Added Chain

In using the term global value chains we mean to refer to the broad swath of literature analyzing roughly similar

phenomena variously referred to as production sharing, vertical specialization, the fragmentation or disintegration of

production, offshore outsourcing, and trade in value added.

Miroudot et al (2009), OECD (2012), WTO (2011), and Escaith (2014) are examples of GVC-related research in

which the identification of intermediate goods plays a critical role.

See for example Hummels, Ishi and Yi (2001). “The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World

Trade” or Yeats (1998). “Just How Big is Global Production Sharing”

See Sturgeon, Timothy and Olga Memedovic (2010). “Mapping Global Value Chains: Intermediate Goods Trade

and Structural Change in the World Economy”. UNIDO Working Paper 05/2010

Primary Intermediate Goods

Generic Processed

Intermediate Goods

and Services

Specific Processed

Intermediate Goods

and Services

Final Consumption

Goods and Services

III. THE STRUCTURE OF BEC REV.5

Dimension of Broad Economic Categories – Top Level

26. As requested by the Statistical Commission, the broad economic categories should be

relevant for current economic reality. A basis for the construction of those main economic

classes can be the International Standard Industrial Classification of all Economic Activities

(ISIC), since ISIC reflects the economic structure of societies and since the definition of

economic activity in ISIC is based on the type of production carried out by economic units,

where these units can be grouped to form industries. Those industries typically produce certain

kinds of goods and services. In this way, the descriptions of the (top level) economic categories

of BEC Rev.5 are derived from the ISIC categories and their corresponding basic product

headings in HS (for goods) and CPC (for services). Whereas CPC also includes goods, the

correspondence of BEC with HS is preferred for the goods classification given the extra detail in

HS.

27. The UNSD website

created for the BEC shows in full detail the product codes of HS

and CPC included in the top-level BEC categories and their relationship to ISIC, Rev.4 codes.

This relationship with ISIC should be understood as a correspondence between economic sectors

(ISIC) and the goods and services (BEC) they typically produce. The full correspondence of HS

and CPC with all the six dimensions of the BEC is available and will be maintained on the

website of the UN Statistics Division. This maintenance refers to additional advice received from

industry experts on the end-use of certain HS commodity categories and refers to adapting to the

changes in the HS classification, as it will soon move to its 2017 edition.

Product dimension – Second Level

Two categories: (1) Goods and (2) Services; this distinction only applies to the end-use of

intermediate and final consumption; services do not apply to gross fixed capital formation.

28. The 2008 SNA refers to products

as goods, services and knowledge capturing products.

The second level of BEC only refers to goods and services, where services include the

knowledge capturing products. In other words, BEC Rev.5 follows the SNA definition of goods,

and defines services as the combination of the SNA definition of services together with the SNA

definition of knowledge capturing products. The SNA definitions are as follows.

29. The SNA defines goods as physical objects for which a demand exists, over which

ownership rights can be established and whose ownership can be transferred from one

institutional unit to another by engaging in transactions on markets. They are in demand because

they may be used to satisfy the needs or wants of households or the community or used to

produce other goods or services. The production and exchange of goods are quite separate

See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/BEC/

See 2008 SNA, Chapter 6, para 15-22

activities. Some goods may never be exchanged while others may be bought and sold numerous

times. The production of a good can always be separated from its subsequent sale or resale.

30. The SNA defines services as the result of a production activity that changes the

conditions of the consuming units, or facilitates the exchange of products or financial assets.

These types of services may be described as change effecting services and margin services

respectively. Change-effecting services are outputs produced to order and typically consist of

changes in the conditions of the consuming units realized by the activities of producers at the

demand of the consumers. Change-effecting services are not separate entities over which

ownership rights can be established. They cannot be traded separately from their production. By

the time their production is completed, they must have been provided to the consumers.

31. As mentioned, BEC Rev.5 includes knowledge-capturing products in its services

category. Knowledge-capturing products are defined in the 2008 SNA as those products that

involve provision, storage, communication and dissemination of information, advice and

entertainment in such a way that the consuming unit can access the knowledge repeatedly.

Knowledge-capturing products include news, consultancy reports, computer programs, movies,

music, etc. The outputs of these industries are often stored on physical objects (whether on paper

or on electronic media) that can be traded like ordinary goods. Ownership rights can be

established and they can be used repeatedly. Thus, knowledge-capturing products can sometimes

have many of the characteristics of goods. Whether they are embodied in goods or services,

knowledge-capturing products can be produced by one unit and supplied to another, creating a

division of labour and the driving the emergence of markets. When this division of labor is

international in scope, they become part of a GVC.

The SNA end-use dimension – Third Level

Three categories: (1) intermediate consumption; (2) gross fixed capital formation; and

(3) final consumption

32. The third level of the BEC is the distinction between end-use categories. As previously

mentioned, the proposed structure differs from earlier revisions of the BEC in that it

independently classifies end-use categories; no end-use category constitutes a broad economic

category, and each economic category is completely decomposable by end-use.

33. Consumption is an activity in which institutional units use up goods or services, but there

are two quite different kinds of consumption. Intermediate consumption consists of goods and

services used up in the course of production within the accounting period. Final consumption

consists of goods and services used by individual households or the community to satisfy their

individual or collective needs or wants. The activity of gross fixed capital formation, like

intermediate consumption, is restricted to institutional units in their capacity as producers. Fixed

assets are produced assets (such as machinery, equipment, buildings or other structures) that are

used repeatedly or continuously in production over several accounting periods (more than one

year). The distinction between intermediate consumption and gross capital formation depends on

whether the goods and services involved are completely used up in the accounting period or not.

If they are, the use of them is a current transaction recorded as intermediate consumption; if not

it is an accumulation transaction recorded in the capital account.

34. The general nature and purpose of the distinction between gross fixed capital formation

and consumption, whether intermediate or final, is clear. The distinction is fundamental for

economic analysis and policymaking. Nevertheless, the borderline between consumption and

gross fixed capital formation is not always easy to determine in practice. Certain activities

contain some elements that appear to be consumption and at the same time others that appear to

be capital formation.

Processing dimension – Fourth level

Two categories: (1) Primary and (2) Processed; this distinction only applies to goods

and only to intermediate and final consumption (no primary goods as gross fixed capital

formation)

35. At the fourth level of the BEC a distinction is made between primary goods and

processed goods. This distinction only applies to goods. The definition of primary versus

processed goods is taken from the original formulation

of the BEC. Primary goods are those

which characteristically are products of primary sectors of the economy – i.e., farming, forestry,

fishing, and the extractive industries. However, goods which characteristically are products of

other sectors, such as manufacturing, where the product underwent only a minor change, are still

classified as “primary” in cases where nearly all of the value of the product is contributed by one

of the primary sectors of the economy. For example, cotton undergoes physical transformation

when ginned, but as most of the value of the ginned cotton derives from the agricultural sector, it

is classified, in the BEC, as a primary good. Thus, a good is classified as primary if it is a

product of farm, forest and fishing, or of an extractive industry, to whose value transformation

has made only a minor contribution. Guidance in classifying goods as primary or processed can

further be sought in the description of and explanation associated with the HS sub-headings,

which uses wording such as “raw”, “in the rough”, “in primary form” or “combed but not

otherwise processed”. Waste and scrap materials are also classified as primary commodities in

the BEC.

36. Canned and prepared food, on the other hand, owe much of their value to the food-

processing industry and are generally classified as processed goods. In general, if a good is not

defined as a primary good, then it is classified as a processed good. The processing dimension of

BEC Rev.5 provides insights into the position of enterprises within global value chain.

Generally, producers of primary goods are higher upstream (at the beginning of the production

chain) in the value added chain than enterprises that consume primary goods for further

processing (see Figure 3).

See E/CN.3/408 (1970)

Specification dimension – Fifth level

Two categories: (1) Generic and (2) Specified; this distinction applies to services and

processed goods, applies mostly to intermediate consumption, and could apply in a few

cases as a distinction in processed goods for gross fixed capital formation

37. The specification dimension is new to the BEC. Its main purpose is to isolate trade in

primary commodities and generic intermediates from trade in highly specified intermediates.

This is useful because global value chains most prominently involve international transactions

with some level of explicit coordination,

rather than the arm’s-length transactions underpinning

more “traditional” trade. While researchers have developed ad-hoc lists of differentiated and

highly specified products in the past,

the specification dimension of BEC Rev.5 defines an

official, internationally agreed upon list.

38. On the goods side, specified processed intermediates are highly dependent on the

industry for which the goods are made, and are in some cases include parts and components

produced according to the specific requirements of one or a small number of buyers, with a

single or small number of downstream uses. For instance, most auto and aircraft parts and more

highly integrated electronic components can be characterized as specified intermediate products.

Even products made in large, standardized batches such as pharmaceuticals and in continuous

process production methods such as chemical and plastic stock can be considered specific if they

are protected by patents and produced according to a specified formula that others do not have

access to for legal or technical capability reasons. Generic processed intermediate goods

typically lie farther upstream in the value added chain (as depicted in Figure 3), have a wider

applicability across industries, and are therefore more indicative of arm’s length trade, rather

than the explicitly coordinated trade making up the most dynamic portions of global value chains.

39. The designation of generic or specified is undertaken on a case-by-case basis and based

on advice from industry experts, but also on lists of similar products in the literature. For

example, Rauch (1999)

identifies three product classes in SITC Rev.2: (i) homogeneous goods,

which are traded on an organized exchange, (ii) reference priced goods with published prices,

and (iii) differentiated goods without published prices. For the purposes of BEC Rev.5, generic

intermediates can be associated with homogeneous and referenced priced goods, and specified

intermediates with differentiated goods.

Further, the specific intermediates identified by

Sturgeon and Memedovic (2010) include many products but cover only three industry sectors

and are not meant to be comprehensive. Also, the list of “parts and components” provided by

See Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey, and Timothy Sturgeon. 2005. “The Governance of Global Value Chains.”

Review of International Political Economy 12 (1): 78–104

See, for example, Yeats, Alexander. 1998. “Just how big is global production sharing?” World Bank Policy

Research Working Paper 1871, January, as well as the literature cited below.

See Rauch, James E. (1999). "Networks Versus Markets in International Trade," Journal of International

Economics 48(1) (June 1999): 7-35

The specificity dimension is also similar to Harvard’s Center for International Development index of “product

complexity,” which is calculated using the average diversity of countries that make a specific product, and the

average ubiquity of the other products that these countries make (see atlas.cid.harvard.edu/about/glossary/).

Athukorala (2010)

with 525 six-digit HS commodities across a variety of industries can be a

useful starting point.

40. Whereas the processing dimension of BEC Rev.5 is not generally applicable to services,

the specification dimension does apply. Services can be usefully divided into specific

intermediate services which are tailored to one or a small number of buyers in a single industry,

and more generic intermediate services which might serve as intermediate inputs into any

number of different industries. For example, sewerage services and other utilities are generic

intermediate services while computer systems design services, software services, and

architectural services are typically specified intermediate services. Designation of generic or

specified services also needs to be undertaken on a case-by-case basis.

41. The distinction between imports and exports becomes important with the specification

dimension of BEC Rev.5, since exports of specified goods and services indicates a certain level

of dependent integration, whereas imports of specified goods and services indicates some level

of control over the activities carried out in the global value chain, and either control over or

proximity to innovation-related activities. Case study research suggests that enterprises that

control and orchestrate the activities of the global value chain, while retaining control over

product design, marketing branding, and retailing, earn much higher profits than most enterprises

that act as suppliers in global value chain, as indicated by Linden et al, (2011)

. Such

enterprises would tend to sit at the head of global value chains and import specified intermediate

goods and services.

Durability dimension – Sixth level

Two categories: (1) Non-durable and (2) Durable; only applies to goods and only to final

consumption; all goods for intermediate consumption are non-durable, and all goods for

gross fixed capital formation are durable

42. As defined in the 2008 SNA

, the distinction between durable and non-durable goods is

not based on physical durability as such. Instead, the distinction is based on whether the goods

can be used once only for purposes of production or consumption or whether they can be used

repeatedly or continuously. For example, coal is a highly durable good in a physical sense, but it

can be burnt only once. A durable good is one that may be used repeatedly or continuously over

a period of more than a year, assuming a normal or average rate of physical usage. A consumer

durable is a good that may be used for purposes of consumption repeatedly or continuously over

a period of a year or more.

See Athukorala, Prema-Chandra (2010). “Production Networks and Trade Patterns in East Asia: Regionalization

or Globalization?” Asian Development Bank, Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, #56, August

See Linden, Greg; Kraemer, Kenneth; and Dedrick, Jason (2011). “Innovation and Job Creation in a Global

Economy: The Case of Apple’s iPod” US Trade Commission. Proceedings of the Joint Symposium of U.S.-China

Advanced Technology Trade and Industrial Development. Journal of International Commerce and Economics. May,

pp. 223-240

See the 2008 SNA, Chapter 9, paragraph 42

43. A non-durable good would be better described as a single use good. For example, food

and drink are used once only to satisfy hunger or thirst. Heating oil, coal or ﬁrewood can be

burnt once only, but they are nevertheless extremely durable physically and can be stored

indeﬁnitely. Households may hold substantial stocks of so-called non-durables, such as many

foodstuﬀs and fuel.

Specific combinations of the 6 dimensions

44. Whereas many combinations of the six dimensions of BEC Rev.5 can be constructed, not

all of them will have any trade associated with them. For instance, the dimensions of processing

and durability typically only apply to goods, although services activities embodied in the form of

knowledge based capital, such as software, databases, research and development, artistic

originals and mineral exploration also satisfy the durable criterion. By definition there will be

only durable goods in fixed capital formation and all intermediate consumption will reflect non-

durables, which is why for these end-use categories there will be no need to differentiate between

durable and non-durable (as shown in Figure 2).

45. In summary, services do not apply to gross fixed capital formation. The processing

dimension only applies to goods and only to intermediate and final consumption. Primary goods

are not traded for end-use of gross fixed capital formation. The specification dimension applies

mostly to intermediate consumption, and could apply in a few cases as a distinction in processed

goods for gross fixed capital formation. Finally, the distinction of durable versus non-durable

only applies to goods and only to final consumption. By definition, all goods for intermediate

consumption are non-durable and all goods for gross fixed capital formation are durable.

46. Given that the six dimensions of BEC Rev.5 represent a fully revised classification, we

have to explore over time how many of the combinations will actually be used in international

trade. The annexes show the breakdown of BEC categories in terms of the corresponding classes

of CPC and HS.

IV. The COMPILATION of the BEC

Coding of BEC Rev.5

47. The coding system of BEC Rev.5 is hierarchical and purely decimal. The classification

consists of 6 levels as described in the previous section, namely the dimension of broad

economic categories (with 8 categories), the product dimension (with 2 categories), the SNA

end-use dimension (with 3 categories), the processing dimension (with 2 categories), the

specification dimension (with 2 categories ), and the durability dimension (with 2 categories).

The basic categories of BEC are expressed as 6-digit codes, where each digit indicates the

category at that dimension. Note that a 0 is used to indicate the non-applicability of that

dimension. For instance, 111110 stands for a product which belongs to the category of

“Agriculture, forestry, fishing, food, beverages, tobacco” and is a generic primary good for

intermediate consumption. The 0 is added on the durability dimension, since durability is not

applied as a distinction for intermediate products. Another example is 613102, which stands for a

processed durable good for final consumption belonging to the category of “ICT, media,

computers, business and financial services”. The specification dimension does not apply to final

consumption. Therefore, a 0 is entered in the fifth position of the BEC code.

48. For services, the dimensions of processing and durability do not apply and are therefore

always indicated by a 0. For instance, the code 621010 stands for a generic service for

intermediate consumption belonging to the category of “ICT, media, computers, business and

financial services”. The full tree of BEC Rev.5 is given in Annex 1.

Distribution of the CPC services and HS goods categories across

BEC main categories

Table 2. Breakdown of CPC and HS categories by top level BEC categories

BEC

–

Broad Economic

Categories

CPC

Services

Goods

Category

Agriculture, forestry, fishing, food, beverages, tobacco

178

Category

Mining, quarrying, refinery, fuels, chemicals, electricity,

water, waste treatment

Category

Construction, wood, glass, stone, basic metals,

housing, electrical appliances, furniture

224

Category

Textile, apparel, shoes, jewelry, leather

895

Category

Transport equipment and services, travel, postal

services

136

Category

ICT, media, computers, business and financial

services

289

Category

Health, pharmaceuticals, education, cultural, sport

126

Category

Government, military and other

168

Total

All products

1284

49. The distribution of the CPC services and HS goods categories by the broad economic

categories of BEC Rev.5 is such that the classes of “Food and agriculture”, “Energy and mining”,

“Construction and housing” and “Textile and footwear” contain (relatively) more goods than

services, whereas “Transport and travel”, “ICT and business” and “Health and education”

contain (relatively) more services than goods. “Government and other” contain the remaining

goods and services, including confidential and otherwise unallocated trade. Table 2 gives a first

indication of the distribution of the codes, which will be subject to revision as experiences in

implementing BEC evolve.

Identification of the end-use categories

50. As mentioned earlier, the broad economic categories are built from the existing

subheadings of the HS on the goods side, and the basic services categories of the CPC on the

services side. For many products it will also be relatively simple to identify the subsequent end-

use categories, as well as the additional dimensions (processing, specification and durability).

However, whilst guidance in this respect is welcome, national differences in the use of certain

(dual use) products dictate that an overly prescriptive concordance relationship should be

avoided. Instead countries are recommended, as far as is possible, and certainly for products that

are economically important, to adopt the allocation approaches used by national accountants in

constructing supply-use tables. Of course this presents additional challenges, as the product level

of detail in supply-use tables is significantly less than that available in HS and CPC product

classifications for trade statistics.

51. Two approaches can be used to bridge these differences. The first (bottom-up) is to build

BEC up from the individual HS/CPC product categories and allocate the end-use using

information gleaned from the national accounts. This may not fully align with the equivalent

allocations used in supply-use tables (which in any case follow the SNA in defining trade flows

thus forming a point of departure between BEC and SNA supply-use end-use allocations). The

second (top-down) is to work back from the end-use allocations seen in supply-use tables and

impose these on BEC breakdowns – but care should be taken to ensure that this does not distort

bilateral relationships.

V. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS

Relationship to the Central Product Classification

52. The Central Product Classification (CPC) is intended to be a standard classification of

products. Its main purpose is to provide a set of product categories that can be utilized for the

collection and presentation of statistics on production or trade of goods and services. CPC is a

general-purpose classification. It provides a basis for recompiling basic statistics from their

original classifications into a standard classification for analytical use. The CPC includes

products that are an output of economic activity including transportable goods, non-transportable

goods and services. The CPC in general follows the definitions of products within the SNA. It

was developed to assemble and tabulate all kinds of statistics, such as production, intermediate

and final consumption, capital formation, foreign trade and prices. They may refer to stocks,

flows or balances, and may be compiled in the context of I-O tables, BOP statistics or other

analytical presentations.

53. Given the fact that CPC products cover both goods and services, the broad economic

categories of the BEC can be seen as a specific re-arrangement of the basic CPC classes. The

BEC is in this sense is an alternative grouping of the CPC. The overall breakdown between

goods and services in BEC should coincide with the overall breakdown of goods and services in

the CPC. The UNSD website

provides a full overview of all CPC codes (goods and services)

with the BEC categories.

54. In practice, most countries use the extended balance of payments categories to classify

traded services. The EBOPS gives a breakdown of the 12 main services components of the BOP,

but is still not as detailed as the service categories of the CPC. The Task Force on International

Notably with respect to the treatment of goods for processing and merchanting,

See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/BEC/

Trade Statistics has established a correlation table between EBOPS and CPC, which is available

from its website

Relationship to the Harmonized System

55. The HS classification is maintained by the World Customs Organization. Its main

purpose is to classify goods crossing the border for import tariffs or for application of some non-

tariff measures for safety or health reasons. The HS classification is revised on a 5-year cycle

often introducing new commodity categories due to new technologies or splitting off of special

interest categories, and deleting those categories with relatively low levels of trade. The most

recent version of the HS took effect on 1 January 2012 and contains well over 5,000 subheadings.

The next revision is scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2017.

56. The broad economic categories of the BEC include all sub-headings of the HS

classification. Therefore, the total trade in terms of HS equals the total trade of the goods side of

the BEC. As stated earlier with respect to allocate HS sub-headings to a specific end-use class,

end-use is an empirical concept and should be further examined within the national context. The

economically important traded goods which have a dual use should be more closely screened for

correct application of the end-use category.

Relationship to the Standard International Trade Classification

57. The original SITC was designed in the 1950s as a tool for collection and dissemination of

international merchandise trade statistics, which would help in establishing internationally

comparable trade statistics. By its introduction in 1988, the HS took over as collection and

dissemination tool, and SITC was from hereon used mostly as an analytical tool with a structure

of sections, divisions and groups of commodities, that can clarify economic development. The

distribution of trade by the main sections of the SITC is still used as an alternative analytical

breakdown of trade in goods together with the breakdown by the main economic categories of

the BEC.

Relationship to other standard classifications

58. COICOP is primarily designed to classify transactions undertaken by households that

result in payables, that is to say, money paid or due for the acquisition of current and capital

goods or of labour and other services, for the acquisition of financial assets or for the extinction

of financial liabilities. More specifically, COICOP is used to classify only a single kind of outlay,

namely, the individual consumption expenditures of households. The structure and content of the

BEC is closely linked to the Classification of Expenditures according to Purpose, which consists

of four purpose classifications, namely COFOG, COPNI, COICOP and COPP.

See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/taskforce/methodology.asp

• COFOG and COPNI are used to classify a range of transactions involving

expenditures on final consumption, intermediate consumption, gross capital

formation and capital and current transfers by general government and NPISHs

respectively;

• COICOP is used to classify only a single kind of expenditure, namely, the

individual consumption expenditures of households, NPISHs and general

government

• COPP is used to classify intermediate consumption and capital expenditure of

mainly non-financial and financial corporate enterprises

Relationship to earlier revisions

59. The relation between BEC Rev.4 and BEC Rev.5 has extensively been discussed in the

section on historical background. It can be concluded that BEC Rev.5 differs significantly from

the earlier revisions, because the broad economic categories have been fully separated from the

end-use categories, services have been added to the product dimension and a new dimension on

specification was added. Due to these significant changes a direct conversion from the fourth

revision of the BEC to its fifth revision is not possible.

60. Based on the available (historical series of) statistics of trade in goods and services it

should, however, be possible to reconstruct a historical series in terms of BEC Rev.5. For longer

historical time series, a correlation table of BEC Rev.5 with earlier versions of the HS, CPC and

EBOPS would need to be established, which is not provided in this manual. Those

correspondence tables are provided on the website of UNSD. Because backwards correlations

among older versions of classifications are necessarily imperfect, this implies that more

estimates will need to be produced. Given the high aggregation level of the BEC, those estimates

could still have high quality, but explanatory notes are needed on the way the estimates were

created.

ANNEX 1: STRUCTURE OF THE BEC REV.5

Code

BEC

–

Broad Economic

Categories

Agriculture, forestry, fishing, food, beverages, tobacco

Goods

111

Intermediate Consumption

1111

Primary

1112

Processed

111210

Generic

111220

Specified

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

2010

Generic

2020

Specified

Final Consumption

Primary

101

Non

durable

102

Durable

Processed

201

Non

durable

202

Durable

Services

121

Intermediate Consumption

121010

Generic

121020

Specified

123

Final Consumption

Mining, quarrying, refinery, fuels, chemicals, electricity, water,

waste treatment

Goods

211

Intermediate Consumption

2111

Primary

2112

Processed

211210

Generic

211220

Specified

212

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

212010

Generic

212020

Specified

213

Final Consumption

2131

Primary

213101

Non

durable

213102

Durable

2132

Processed

213201

Non

durable

213202

Durable

Services

221

Intermediate Consumption

221010

Generic

221020

Specified

223

Final Consumption

Code

BEC

–

Broad Economic

Categories

Construction, wood, glass, stone, basic metals, housing,

electrical appliances, furniture

Goods

Intermediate Consumption

111

Primary

112

Processed

11210

Generic

11220

Specified

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

12010

Generic

12020

Specified

Final Consumption

131

Primary

13101

Non

durable

13102

Durable

132

Processed

13201

Non

durable

13202

Durable

Services

Intermediate

Consumption

21010

Generic

21020

Specified

Final Consumption

Textile, apparel, shoes

Goods

411

Intermediate Consumption

4111

Primary

4112

Processed

411210

Generic

411220

Specified

412

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

412010

Generic

412020

Specified

413

Final Consumption

4131

Primary

413101

Non

durable

413102

Durable

4132

Processed

413201

Non

durable

413202

Durable

Services

421

Intermediate Consumption

421010

Generic

421020

Specified

423

Final Consumption

Code

BEC

–

Broad Economic

Categories

Transport equipment and services, travel, postal services

Goods

511

Intermediate Consumption

5111

Primary

5112

Processed

511210

Generic

511220

Specified

512

Gross Fixed

Capital Formation

512010

Generic

512020

Specified

513

Final Consumption

5131

Primary

513101

Non

durable

513102

Durable

5132

Processed

513201

Non

durable

513202

Durable

Services

521

Intermediate Consumption

521010

Generic

521020

Specified

523

Final Consumption

ICT, media, computers, business and financial services

Goods

611

Intermediate Consumption

6111

Primary

6112

Processed

611210

Generic

611220

Specified

612

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

612010

Generic

612020

Specified

613

Final Consumption

6131

Primary

613101

Non

durable

613102

Durable

6132

Processed

613201

Non

durable

613202

Durable

Services

621

Intermediate Consumption

621010

Generic

621020

Specified

623

Final

Consumption

Code

BEC

–

Broad Economic

Categories

Health, pharmaceuticals, education, cultural, sport

Goods

711

Intermediate Consumption

7111

Primary

7112

Processed

711210

Generic

711220

Specified

712

Gross Fixed Capital

Formation

712010

Generic

712020

Specified

713

Final Consumption

7131

Primary

713101

Non

durable

713102

Durable

7132

Processed

713201

Non

durable

713202

Durable

Services

721

Intermediate Consumption

721010

Generic

721020

Specified

723

Final Consumption

Government, military and other

Goods

811

Intermediate Consumption

8111

Primary

8112

Processed

811210

Generic

811220

Specified

812

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

812010

Generic

812020

Specified

813

Final Consumption

8131

Primary

813101

Non

durable

813102

Durable

8132

Processed

813201

Non

durable

813202

Durable

Services

821

Intermediate Consumption

821010

Generic

821020

Specified

823

Final Consumption