C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\20110121115044.wpd

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

AN ACT

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_____________________

To establish statutory purposes and policies for the procurement of goods, services and

construction in the District of Columbia; to authorize supplementary general principles

of applicable law; to require an obligation of good faith; to establish the statutory

applicability of the delineated procurement requirements; to authorize severability of

statutory provisions; to establish the Office of Contracting and Procurement; to establish

criteria for review by the Council of multiyear contracts and contracts in excess of $1

million; to establish and authorize a Chief Procurement Officer of the Office of

Contracting and Procurement; to establish the duties of the Chief Procurement Officer;

to clarify the regulatory powers and authority of the Chief Procurement Officer; to

authorize the establishment of a procurement training institute; to delineate the source

selection methods; to establish the requirements for competitive sealed bids; to establish

the requirements for competitive sealed proposals; to regulate the use of sole source

procurements; to authorize emergency procurements; to authorize human care

agreements; to establish the requirements for small purchase procurements; to authorize

special procurements; to provide for and authorize exemptions for competition

requirements in District procurements; to establish requirements for the cancellation of

solicitations; to regulate and prohibit collusive bidding; to prohibit contingency contracts

and the improper disclosure of confidential or proprietary proposal or bid information; to

authorize the termination of improper contracts and establish what costs are payable and

what should be refunded; to establish the rights of the District to audit contract records

and data or to inspect the premises of District contractors; to authorize the contracting

officer to require a contractor to substantiate an offered price; to establish the types of

contracts authorized and prohibited in the District; to prohibit cost-plus-a-percentage-of-

cost contracts; to prohibit cost-reimbursement contracts, unless duly authorized in

accordance with the act; to authorize the use of other contract types; to regulate

multiyear contracts; to establish delivery methods for the procurement of infrastructure

facilities and services; to establish and require source selection methods for

infrastructure facilities and services project delivery methods; to establish additional

procedures and require their application to certain project delivery methods; to establish

requirements for the procurement of architectural and engineering services; to establish

Codification

District of

Columbia

Official Code

2001 Edition

2011 Summer

Supp.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

the requirements for bonds and other forms of security in District procurements; to

require bid security for construction contracts in excess of $100,000 in an amount at

least equal to 5% of the bid price; to establish the requirements for performance and

payment bonds in construction contracts in excess of $100,000; to establish the forms of

bonds and how copies can be obtained; to authorize other forms of security; to establish

the fiscal responsibility requirements of contract modifications, change orders or

contract price adjustments in construction contracts; to establish the rules and

requirements for the management of District supplies; to authorize the donation of

surplus goods; to authorize the creation and establishment of the District of Columbia

Surplus Property Sales Revolving Fund and how the funds contained therein may be

retained and utilized; to prohibit the use of sovereign immunity defense, unless

otherwise authorized; to prohibit the liability for punitive damages for actions based on

written contracts; to authorize District claims against contractors; to establish debarment

and suspension requirements; to regulate and establish processes for claims by

contractors against the District under or relating to a contract; to establish when rates on

claims are payable and how they will be calculated; to establish and authorize the

creation of a Contract Appeals Board; to establish the terms and qualifications for

Contract Appeals Board members; to establish the jurisdiction of the Contract Appeals

Board; to authorize a contractor to appeal contracting officer decisions and the procedure

for doing so; to authorize appeals of Contract Appeals Board decisions; to authorize

Contract Appeals Board members to administer oaths, authorize deposition and

discovery procedures, and issue subpoenas; to establish the finality of Contract Appeals

Board decisions in the event of subsequent judicial review; to establish protest

procedures for the contest of a solicitation or award of a contract; to require that District

employees involved in procurements be subject to the District of Columbia

Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978; to authorize electronic transactions for

procurement solicitations or auctions or procurement systems; to authorize issuance of

electronic solicitations and responses; to establish a procurement transparency Internet

site; to provide for the purchase of environmental preferable products and services to the

maximum extent practicable; to authorize the usage of reverse and standard auctions; to

authorize the participation, sponsoring or administering of cooperative purchasing

agreements; to establish the District of Columbia Supply Schedule, under which

contracts may be awarded to certified business enterprises; to authorize the payment of

stipends by the Chief Procurement Officer to defray bid or proposal development costs;

to establish the District of Columbia Supply Schedule, Purchase Card, and Training

Fund; to establish procedures and requirements relating to contract privatization; to

provide rulemaking authority; to amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices

Act of 1985 to repeal provisions which are superseded by this act; to repeal the

Excellence in Local Business Contract Grading act of 2008; and to provide for transition

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

and continuation regarding existing rules, contracts, and other actions taken under

current law.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this

act may be cited as the “Procurement Practices Reform Act of 2010”.

TITLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

Sec. 101. Purposes and policies.

(a) This act shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes

and policies.

(b) In enacting this act, the Council supports the following statutory purposes:

(1) To simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing the procurement of

goods, services, and construction items by the District government;

(2) To foster effective and equitably broad-based competition in the District by

supporting the free enterprise system and the certified business enterprise program as set forth in

the Small, Local, and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Development and Assistance Act of

2005, effective October 20, 2005 (D.C. Law 16-33; D.C. Official Code § 2-218.01 et seq.), and

its implementing rules;

(3) To obtain full and open competition by providing that contractors are given

adequate opportunities to bid;

(4) To ensure the fair and equitable treatment of all persons who deal with the

procurement system of the District government;

(5) To increase public confidence in the procedures followed in public

procurement;

(6) To promote efficiency and eliminate duplication in the District government

procurement organization and operation to reduce costs;

(7) To provide increased economy in procurement activities and maximize, to

the fullest extent practicable, the purchasing power of the District government;

(8) To permit the continued development of procurement laws, policies, and

practices;

(9) To provide for timely, effective, and efficient service to District agencies and

individuals doing business with the District government;

(10) To promote the development of uniform procurement procedures District

government-wide;

(11) To improve the understanding of procurement laws and policies within the

District government by organizations and individuals doing business with the District

government; and

(12) To promote, to the maximum extent feasible, the purchase of

environmentally preferable products and services.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 102. Supplementary general principles of law applicable.

Unless superseded by the particular provisions of this act, the principles of law and

equity, including Subtitle I of Title 28 of the District of Columbia Official Code, and laws

relative to capacity to contract, agency, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, or

bankruptcy, shall supplement the provisions of this act.

Sec. 103. Obligation of good faith.

Every contract or duty within this act imposes an obligation of good faith in its

performance or enforcement. For purposes of this act, the term “good faith” means honesty in

fact in the conduct or transaction concerned and the observance of reasonable commercial

standards of fair dealing.

Sec. 104. Definitions.

For the purposes of this act, the term:

(1) “Affiliate” means any business in which:

(A) A suspended or debarred person is an officer or has a substantial

financial interest and any business that has a substantial direct or indirect ownership interest in

the suspended or debarred business; or

(B) A suspended or debarred business has a substantial direct or indirect

ownership interest.

(2) “Agency” means any agency, employee, or instrumentality of the District

government.

(3) “Architectural and engineering services” means:

(A) Professional services of an architectural or engineering nature:

(i) Which are required to be performed or approved by a person

licensed, registered, or certified to provide the services as described in this paragraph; or

(ii) Performed by contract that are associated with research,

planning, development, design, construction, alteration, or repair of real property.

(B) Other professional services of an architectural or engineering nature,

or incidental services, which members of the architectural and engineering professions (and

individuals in their employ) may logically or justifiably perform, including studies,

investigations, surveying, mapping, tests, evaluations, consultations, comprehensive planning,

program management, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, value engineering,

construction phase services, soils engineering, drawing reviews, preparation of operating and

maintenance manuals, and other related services.

(4) “Bid bond” means a form of security assuring that the bidder will not

withdraw a bid within the period specified for acceptance and will execute a written contract

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

within the time specified in the bid.

(5) “Bid price” means the dollar value of a price offering submitted in response

to an Invitation for Bids.

(6) “Bidder” means any person who submits a price offering in response to an

Invitation for Bids.

(7) “Bond” means a written instrument executed by a contractor (principal) and

a second party (surety) to assure fulfillment of the contractor's obligations to a third party

(obligee or the District). If the principal's obligations are not met, the bond assures payment, to

the extent stipulated, of any loss sustained by the obligee.

(8) “Business” means any corporation, partnership, individual, sole

proprietorship, joint stock company, joint venture, or any other legal entity through which

business is conducted.

(9) “Change order” means a written order signed by the contracting officer,

directing the contractor to make changes which the changes clause of the contract authorizes the

contracting officer to order without the consent of the contractor.

(10) “Chief Financial Officer” or “CFO” means the Chief Financial Officer of

the District of Columbia.

(11) “Chief Procurement Officer” or “CPO” means the director of the Office of

Contracting and Procurement established by section 201.

(12) “Competitive sealed proposals” means a process which includes the

submission of written technical and price proposals from one or more offerors and a written

evaluation of each proposal in accordance with evaluation criteria which consider price, quality

of the items, performance, and other relevant factors.

(13) “Construction” means the process of building, altering, repairing,

improving, or demolishing any public infrastructure facility, including any public structure,

public building, or other public improvements of any kind to real property. The term

“construction” shall not include the routine operation, routine repair, or routine maintenance of

an existing public infrastructure facility, including structures, buildings, or real property.

(14) “Construction management at-risk” means a project delivery method in

which the purchasing agency awards a construction management services contract for a project

to a single firm, based on qualifications, and under which contract the construction manager

shall deliver the project within the GMP.

(15) “Contract modification” means any written alteration in the specifications,

delivery point, rate of delivery, contract period, price, quantity, or other contract provisions of

any existing contract, whether accomplished by unilateral action in accordance with a contract

provision, or by mutual action of the parties to the contract.

(16) “Contracting officer” means the Mayor, the CPO, or the CPO's designee

vested with the authority to execute contracts on behalf of the District or otherwise bind the

District in compliance with the provisions of this act.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(17) “Contractor” means a person that enters into a contract with the District.

(18) “Cooperative purchasing” means a procurement conducted by the District

government with, or on behalf of, any government or public entity, including a state, county, or

municipal jurisdiction or the Federal government.

(19) “Cost-plus incentive fee contract” means a type of contract that specifies a

target cost, a target fee, minimum and maximum fees, and a fee adjustment formula.

(20) “Cost-reimbursement contract” means a contract under which the District

reimburses the contractor for those contract costs, within a stated ceiling, which are recognized

as allowable and allocated in accordance with cost principles, and a fee, if any.

(21) “Default Environmental Preference Standard” shall mean materials,

supplies, services, or commodities that:

(A) Are available through the most current version of the GSA

Environmental Specialty Category; or

(B) Meet or exceed applicable performance standards or requirements of:

(i) The Federal Energy Management Program;

(ii) The Electronic Products Environmental Assessment Tool

Bronze rating;

(iii) The U.S. Department of Energy’s ENERGY STAR program;

(iv) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s

Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines; or

(v) Verification of a project under the Leadership in Energy and

Environmental Design green building rating systems designed by the United States Green

Building Council.

(22) “Definitive contract” means the contract executed pursuant to the letter

contract commitment.

(23) “Design-bid-build” means a project delivery method in which the

purchasing agency sequentially awards separate contracts, the 1

for architectural and

engineering services to design the project and the 2

for construction of the project according to

the design.

(24) “Design-build” means a project delivery method in which the purchasing

agency enters into a single contract for design and construction of an infrastructure facility.

(25) “Design-build-finance-operate-maintain” means a project delivery method

in which:

(A) The purchasing agency enters into a single contract for design,

construction, finance, maintenance, and operation of an infrastructure facility over a

contractually defined period; and

(B) No District funds are appropriated to pay for any part of the services

provided by the contractor during the contract period.

(26) “Design-build-operate-maintain” means a project delivery method in

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

which:

(A) The purchasing agency enters into a single contract for design,

construction, maintenance, and operation of an infrastructure facility over a contractually

defined period; and

(B) All or a portion of the funds required to pay for the services provided

by the contractor during the contract period are:

(i) Either appropriated by the District prior to award of the

contract; or

(ii) Generated by the District through fare, toll, or user charges.

(27)(A) “Design requirements” means the written description of the

infrastructure facility or service to be procured under this act, including:

(i) Required features, functions, characteristics, qualities, and

properties that are required by the District;

(ii) The anticipated schedule, including start, duration, and

completion; and

(iii) Estimated budgets (as applicable to the specific

procurement) for design, construction, operation and maintenance.

(B) The written description may, but need not, include drawings and

other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of the features, functions, and

characteristics of the infrastructure facility or service.

(28) “Determinations and findings” means a form of written approval and

detailed explanation as a prerequisite to taking certain contract actions, including the rationale

for the method of procurement, the selection of contract type, contractor selection, and the basis

for contract price.

(29) “District of Columbia Supply Schedule” or “DCSS” means the District of

Columbia's multiple award schedule or other procurement program under which contracts may

be awarded to certified business enterprises, as defined in section 2302(1B) of the Small, Local,

and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Development and Assistance Act of 2005, effective

October 20, 2005 (D.C. Law 16-33; D.C. Official Code § 2-218.02(1B)), providing goods,

services, or construction to District government agencies.

(30) “Environmentally Preferable Product or Service” or “EPPS” means a good

or service that is less harmful to human health and the environment when compared with

competing goods or services that serve the same purpose. The factors to be compared include

raw materials acquisition, production, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, reuse, operation,

maintenance, or disposal of the product.

(31) “Evaluated bid price” means the dollar amount of a bid after bid price

adjustments are made under objective measurable criteria, set forth in the Invitation for Bid,

which affect the economy and effectiveness in the operation or use of the product, including the

reliability, maintainability, useful life, and residual value.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(32) “Fixed-price contract” means a contract where the price is not subject to

any adjustment on the basis of the contractor’s cost experience in the performance of the

contract.

(33) “Fixed-price incentive contract” means a contract that:

(A) Provides for adjusting profit; and

(B) Subject to a ceiling, establishes the final contract price by a formula

based on the relationship of final negotiated price to total target cost.

(34) “Fully allocated cost” means the total direct and indirect costs of providing

a good, service, or function. The term “fully allocated cost” includes:

(A) Direct personal services costs, including wages, salaries, and fringe

benefits;

(B) Non-personal services costs including materials, goods, equipment,

maintenance and repairs, utilities, insurance, travel, and capital and equipment depreciation

cost; and

(35) “Goods” means all personal property, tangible or intangible.

(36) “Guaranteed Maximum Price” or “GMP” means an amount beyond which

the District government is not obligated to compensate a contractor.

(37) “Human care agreement” means a written agreement for the procurement of

education, special education, health, human, or social services, pursuant to section 406, to be

provided directly to individuals who have disabilities or are disadvantaged, displaced, elderly,

indigent, mentally ill, physically ill, unemployed, or minors in the custody of the District.

(38) “Invitation for Bids” means all documents, including documents attached or

incorporated by reference, used for soliciting bids pursuant to section 402.

(39) “Letter contract” means a written preliminary contractual instrument that

authorizes the contractor to begin immediately manufacturing or delivering goods or performing

services prior to the execution of a definitive contract.

(40) “Machine-readable and searchable” means electronic text that is stored as

strings of characters and that can be displayed in a variety of formats.

(41) “Negotiation” means discussions to determine the terms and conditions of a

contract or procurement.

(42) “OCP” means the Office of Contracting and Procurement established by

section 201.

(43) “Offeror” means any person who submits a technical and price proposal in

response to a Request For Proposals or a response to a Request For Qualifications.

(44) “Operations and maintenance” means a project delivery method whereby

the purchasing agency enters into a single contract for the routine operation, routine repair, and

routine maintenance of an infrastructure facility.

(45) “Payment bond” means a bond to assure payment to all persons supplying

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

labor or material in the performance of the work provided in the contract.

(46) “Performance bond” means a bond to secure performance and fulfillment of

the contractor’s obligations under the contract.

(47) “Privatization contract” means a contract by which the District government

enters into an agreement with a person who is not part of the District government to provide a

good or service to or on behalf of the District government that is being provided by a District

government agency or instrumentality.

(48) “Procurement” means buying, purchasing, renting, leasing, or otherwise

acquiring any goods, services, or construction.

(49) “Proposal development” means documents, drawings, and other design-

related documents that are sufficient to fix and describe the size and character of an

infrastructure facility as to architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical systems,

materials, and other elements as may be appropriate to the applicable project delivery method.

(50) “Public notice” means the distribution or dissemination of information to

interested parties using methods that are reasonably available. Methods may include publication

in newspapers, electronic or paper mailing lists, and websites designated by the District;

provided, that competitive sealed bids pursuant to section 402 and competitive sealed proposals

pursuant to section 403 for any solicitation in excess of $250,000 shall include publication in a

newspaper of general circulation and in trade publications considered to be appropriate by the

CPO to give adequate public notice.

(51) “Purchase Card Program” means the credit card program under which

agencies are authorized to make purchases for goods or services.

(52) “Request for Proposals” or “RFP” means all documents, whether attached

or incorporated by reference, used for soliciting proposals pursuant to section 403.

(53) “Request for Qualifications” or “RFQ” means a written document inviting

prospective contractors to submit a statement of their qualifications to provide certain goods or

services.

(54) “Reverse auction” means an online procurement method whereby pre-

qualified suppliers compete with one another to provide a good or service, typically

commodities, to a buyer or group of buyers.

(55) “Responsible” or “responsibility” means that a prospective contractor has

been determined, under section 302, to have the necessary capacity to perform in accordance

with the terms and conditions of the contract.

(56) “Responsive bidder or offeror” means a person who has submitted a bid or

offer which conforms in all material respects to the solicitation.

(57) “Sanitize” means the process of removing data from a media source before

the item is reused in an environment that does not provide an acceptable level of protection for

the data.

(58) “Services” means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a contractor not

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports which are merely incidental to

the required performance. The term “services” shall not include the furnishing of time, labor, or

effort pursuant to employment agreements or collective bargaining agreements.

(59) “Sole source” means that a single source in a competitive marketplace can

fulfill the specifications of a contract.

(60) “Source selection” means the process of soliciting a bidder or offeror for

the awarding of a contract and the subsequent evaluative process, based on established award

criteria, delineated in the solicitation document.

(61) “Special education services” means the services defined in 34 C.F.R.

§ 300.24.

(62) “Specification” means any description of physical or functional

characteristics or of the nature of a good, service, or construction item. The term “specification”

includes a description of any requirement for inspecting, testing, or preparing a good, service, or

construction item for delivery.

(63) “Statement of qualifications” means a written document, submitted to OCP

by a prospective contractor wishing to obtain a District government contract, which sets forth

the prospective contractor’s qualifications as requested by the CPO.

(64) “Surety” means a business legally liable for the debt, default, or failure of a

principal to satisfy a contractual obligation.

(65) “Surplus goods” means any goods no longer having any use to the District.

The term “surplus goods” includes obsolete goods, scrap materials, and nonexpendable goods

that have completed their useful life cycle.

(66) “Surplus Property Fund” means the District of Columbia Surplus Property

Sales Revolving Fund established by section 804.

(67) “Term contract” means a contract established for a period of time for bulk

purchase of goods commonly used by the District.

(68) “Voucher” means a written authorization to a human care agreement

service provider to provide the services authorized in the agreement to an individual identified

in the agreement.

(69) “Written” or “in writing” means the product of any method of forming

characters on paper, other materials, or viewable screens, which can be read, retrieved, and

reproduced, including information that is electronically transmitted and stored, other electronic

media, and digital files.

Sec. 105. Application; exemptions.

(a) Except as provided in this section, this act shall apply to all subordinate agencies,

instrumentalities, and employees of the District government, independent agencies, boards, and

commissions.

(b) Only sections 102, 103, 104, and titles III, IV, V, VII, IX, X, XI, and XII shall apply

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

to the Council. The duties of the CPO shall be exercised by the Council for the purposes of the

application of those sections and titles to the Council. Notwithstanding section 201, the Mayor

or the CPO shall not have the authority to monitor, review, or establish standards, procedures,

regulations, or rules for contracts or procurements of the Council, unless authorized by the

Council.

(1) The acquisition, disposition, or transfer of a real property asset or interest in

a real property asset by lease, purchase, sale, or other method;

(2) A transaction pursuant to the District of Columbia Public Space Rental Act,

approved October 17, 1968 (82 Stat. 1156; D.C. Official Code § 10-1101.01 et seq.);

(3) The District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency;

(4) The District of Columbia courts;

(5) The District Public Defender Service;

(6) The District of Columbia Advisory Neighborhood Commissions;

(7) The District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority;

(8) The Office of Public Education Facilities Modernization;

(9) The Washington Convention and Sports Authority;

(10) The District of Columbia Auditor;

(11) The Not-for-Profit Hospital Corporation; and

(12) A contract or agreement receiving or making grants or loans or for federal

financial assistance.

TITLE II. PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATION.

Sec. 201. Office of Contracting and Procurement; authority.

(a)(1) There is established as an independent agency the Office of Contracting and

Procurement, which shall be administered by the Chief Procurement Officer. Except as

otherwise provided in this act, OCP, through the CPO, shall have the exclusive authority to

administer the provisions of this act.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, until October 1, 2013, the

Police and Firefighter’s Retirement and Relief Board, through its chief procurement officers,

shall exercise the duties of the CPO.

(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, until October 1, 2015, the

following agencies, through their chief procurement officers, shall exercise the duties of the

CPO for their respective agencies:

(A) The Department of Disability Services; and

(B) The Department of Mental Health, if a court order no longer requires

the agency to be exempt from the CPO’s authority.

(4) The CPO may delegate contracting authority to employees of an agency,

including OCP, or another instrumentality.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(5) Agencies and instrumentalities subject to this act shall determine their

requirements for goods and services and administering awarded contracts.

(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the following agencies shall not be

subject to the authority of the CPO, but shall conduct procurements in accordance with the

provisions of this act:

(1) The Office of the Chief Financial Officer;

(2) The University of the District of Columbia;

(3) The District of Columbia Housing Authority;

(4) The District of Columbia Public Library;

(5) The District of Columbia Public Schools;

(6) The Child and Family Services Agency, until such time as a court order no

longer requires the agency to be exempt from the CPO’s authority;

(7) The District of Columbia Retirement Board;

(8) The Public Service Commission;

(9) The Office of the People’s Counsel; and

(10) The Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.

services of accountants, lawyers, and other experts when they determine and state in writing that

good reason exists why the services should be procured independently of the Chief Procurement

Officer.

(d) Except regarding agencies exempted in sections 105(c) and 201(b) and roads and

bridges, the Department of Real Estate Services shall have procurement authority for

construction and related services under Title VI.

(e) Except as otherwise provided in section 105(b), the CPO may review and monitor

procurements by any agency, instrumentality, employee, or official exempt under this act or

authorized to procure independently of OCP.

(f) The CPO may conduct procurements and award contracts on behalf of any agency

exempt under this act or authorized to procure independently of OCP, when requested by the

agency to do so. In conducting procurements or awarding contracts, the CPO shall comply with

the requirements of this act.

Sec. 202. Criteria for Council review of multiyear contracts and contracts in excess of

$1 million.

(a) Pursuant to section 451 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved

December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 803; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.51), prior to the award of a

multiyear contract or a contract in excess of $1 million during a 12-month period, the Mayor or

executive independent agency or instrumentality shall submit the proposed contract to the

Council for review and approval in accordance with the criteria established in this section.

(b)(1) A proposed multiyear contract shall be deemed disapproved by the Council

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

unless, during the 45-calendar-day review period beginning on the 1

day (excluding Saturdays,

Sundays, and holidays) following its receipt by the Office of the Secretary to the Council, the

Council adopts a resolution to approve the proposed multiyear contract.

(2) A proposed contract in excess of $1 million during a 12-month period shall

be deemed approved by the Council if one of the following occurs:

(A) During the 10-day period beginning on the 1

day (excluding

Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) following its receipt by the Office of the Secretary to the

Council, no member of the Council introduces a resolution to approve or disapprove the

proposed contract; or

(B) If a resolution has been introduced in accordance with subparagraph

(A) of this paragraph, and the Council does not disapprove the contract during the 45-day

review period beginning on the 1

day (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) following

its receipt by the Office of the Secretary to the Council.

(3)(A) Council approval of contracts submitted pursuant to paragraph (2) of this

subsection shall expire 12 months after the award of the contract.

(B)(i) Council approval of a contract containing a provision that grants to

the District the option of continuing or amending the contract beyond the 12-month period of

Council approval shall not constitute Council approval of the exercise of the option contract.

(ii) To exercise an option that meets the criteria for Council

review pursuant to this section, the Mayor shall submit the option contract to the Council

pursuant to this section.

(iii) The exercise of an option that meets the criteria for Council

review under this subsection without Council review of the option contract is a violation of this

section and of section 451 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24,

1973 (87 Stat. 803; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.51).

electronically and shall contain a summary, including the following:

(1) The proposed contractor, contract amount, unit and method of compensation,

contract term, and type of contract;

(2) The goods or services to be provided, the methods of delivering goods or

services, and any significant program changes reflected in the proposed contract;

(3) The selection process, including the number of offerors, the evaluation

criteria, and the evaluation results, including price and technical components;

(4) The background and qualifications of the proposed contractor, including its

organization, financial stability, personnel, and prior performance on contracts with the District

government;

(5) Performance standards and expected outcomes of the proposed contract;

(6) A certification that the proposed contract is within the appropriated budget

authority for the agency for the fiscal year and is consistent with the financial plan and budget

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

adopted in accordance with D.C. Official Code §§ 47-392.01 and 47-392.02;

(7) A certification that the proposed contract is legally sufficient, including

whether the proposed contractor has any currently pending legal claims against the District;

(8) A certification that the proposed contractor is current with its District and

federal taxes or has worked out and is current with a payment schedule approved by the District

or federal government;

(9) The status of the proposed contractor as a certified local, small, or

disadvantaged business enterprise, as defined in the Small, Local, and Disadvantaged Business

Enterprise Development and Assistance Act of 2005, effective October 20, 2005 (D.C. Law 16-

33; D.C. Official Code § 2-218.01 et seq.);

(10) Other aspects of the proposed contract that the CPO considers significant;

(11) A statement indicating whether the proposed contractor is currently

debarred from providing services or goods to the District or federal government, the dates of the

debarment, and the reasons for debarment; and

(12) Where the contract, if executed, will be made available online.

(d) No proposed multiyear contract and no proposed contract in excess of $1 million for

a 12-month period shall be awarded until after the Council has reviewed and approved the

proposed contract as provided in this section.

(e) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, review and approval by the Council

of a definitive contract in excess of $1 million during a 12-month period shall constitute the

Council review and approval, required by section 451(b) of the District of Columbia Home Rule

Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 803; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.51(b)), of the

definitive contract and the merged letter contract contained therein.

(f) Any employee or agency head who shall knowingly or willfully enter into a proposed

multiyear contract or a proposed contract in excess of $1 million without prior Council review

and approval in accordance with this section shall be subject to suspension, dismissal, or other

disciplinary action under the procedures set forth in Title XVI-A of the District of Columbia

Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, effective June 10, 1998 (D.C. Law

12-124; D.C. Official Code § 1-616.51 et seq.).

(g)(1) No contractor who knowingly or willfully performs on a contract with the District

in excess of $1 million for a 12-month period without prior Council approval shall be paid more

than $1 million for the products or services provided.

(2) No contractor who knowingly or willfully performs on a multiyear contract

with the District without prior Council approval of the multiyear contract shall be paid in more

than one calendar year for the products or services provided.

(h) Review and approval by the Council of the annual capital program of federal

highway aid projects shall constitute the Council review and approval required by section

451(d)(3) of the Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 803; D.C. Official

Code § 1-204.51(d)(3)), of individual federal-aid highway contracts that make up the annual

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

program.

Sec. 203. Office of Contracting and Procurement.

(a) The agency head of the Office of Contracting and Procurement shall be the Chief

Procurement Officer.

(b) The CPO shall be appointed by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the

Council pursuant to the Confirmation Act of 1978, effective March 3, 1979 (D.C. Law 2-142;

D.C. Official Code § 1-523.01).

CPO. If the incumbent CPO is unable to serve as the CPO, until a new CPO is appointed by the

Mayor pursuant to the Confirmation Act of 1978, effective March 3, 1979 (D.C. Law 2-142;

D.C. Official Code § 1-523.01), the highest ranking employee of OCP shall serve as acting

CPO.

(d) The CPO shall have not less than 5 years of senior-level experience in procurement

and shall have demonstrated, through knowledge and experience, the ability to administer a

public procurement system of the size and complexity of the program established by this act.

(e) The CPO shall serve for one 5-year term and may be reappointed pursuant to

subsection (b) of this section.

(f) The CPO shall not be removed from office before the expiration of the 5-year term

except for cause, subject to the right of appeal as provided in Title VI of the District of

Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, effective March 3, 1979

(D.C. Law 2-139; D.C. Official Code § 1-606.01 et seq.).

Sec. 204. Duties of the Chief Procurement Officer.

(a) The Chief Procurement Officer shall be the chief procurement official of the

District.

(b) The CPO shall have the following authority and responsibility:

(1) To serve as the central procurement and contracting officer for the District;

(2) To identify gaps, omissions, or inconsistencies in procurement laws, rules,

and policies, or in laws, rules and policies affecting procurement-related activities, and to

recommend changes to laws, rules, and procedures;

(3) To provide overall leadership in the implementation of procurement rules,

coordinate all procurement activities of the District government in accordance with the

provisions of the act, and develop a system of unified and simplified procurement procedures

and forms.

(4) To prepare and issue standard specifications for goods, services, and

construction required by the District government;

(5) To establish a standardization program for goods and services when it is

determined to be in the best interests of the District;

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(6) To review, monitor, and audit the procurement activities of the District;

(7) To prepare, establish, and implement a periodic review process for the

evaluation of contractors who provide goods or services to the District;

(8) To identify and assess trends and developments in the field of government

contracting, including identifying best practices and innovation opportunities for the District;

(9) To operate and maintain an electronic procurement system;

(10) To sell, trade, or otherwise dispose of surplus goods belonging to the

District government;

(11) To establish procedures for the inspection, testing, and acceptance of goods,

services, and construction;

(12) To develop guidelines for the recruitment, training, career development,

and performance evaluation of all procurement personnel;

(13) To staff OCP with procurement professionals, including attorneys,

dedicated to the formation and administration of contracts on behalf of the entities covered by

this act;

(14) To create and maintain a transparent Internet site, accessible to the public,

providing information on solicitations, contracts, and related laws, rules, and policies;

(15) To promote to the purchase of environmentally preferable products and

services; and

(16) To establish certification requirements for contracting personnel.

Sec. 205. Privatization contracts and procedures requirements.

(a) Before issuing a solicitation for a privatization contract pursuant to this section, the

District government agency on whose behalf the solicitation will be issued shall prepare an

estimate of the fully allocated cost associated with providing the relevant goods or services

using District government employees. The agency shall transmit this estimate to the contract

specialist responsible for the solicitation, who shall retain the estimate as part of the official

contract file.

(b) A solicitation for a proposed privatization contract issued pursuant to this section

shall include information describing how current District government employees may exercise

the right to bid on the contracts.

Mayor, instrumentality, or independent agency head shall transmit to the Council a

determination and findings that:

(1) Compares the current fully allocated cost of providing the services using

District government employees, departments, or agencies, using the estimate described in

subsection (a) of this section, to the fully allocated costs associated with contracting for the

service;

(2) Demonstrates that the privatization contract will provide savings of at least

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

5% over the duration of the contract in terms of total cost or the unit cost of providing the goods

or services;

(3) Describes the expected impact of the privatization contract on the quality of

goods or services provided to or on behalf of the District government, including performance

targets and requirements for the contractor; and

(4) Includes a written confirmation of review by officials, including the Chief

Financial Officer, the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, and the CPO.

(d) A privatization contract, or any contracting policies and procedures relating to these

contracts, to provide goods and services to or on behalf of the District government, including a

contract resulting from a process of managed competition, shall provide that:

(1) The Mayor, instrumentality, or independent agency head shall complete the

determination and findings described in subsection (c) of this section and transmit the

determination and findings to the Council prior to the award of the contract;

(2) A contractor who is awarded a contract that displaces District government

employees shall offer to the displaced employee a right of first refusal to employment by the

contractor, in a comparable available position for which the employee is qualified, for at least a

6-month period during which the employee shall not be discharged without cause;

(3) Any District employee who is displaced as a result of a privatization

contract, and is hired by the contractor who was awarded the privatization contract, shall be

entitled to the benefits provided by the Service Contract Act of 1965, approved October 22,

1965 (79 Stat. 1034; 41 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.);

(4) If the employee's performance during the 6-month transitional employment

period described in paragraph (2) of this subsection is satisfactory, the contractor shall offer the

employee continued employment under terms and conditions established by the contractor;

(5) The privatization contract shall incorporate specific performance criteria and

the contractor shall submit reports, as required by the contract, to the District government

contracting officer and the Chief Financial Officer on the contractor's compliance with the

specific performance criteria; and

(6) The privatization contract may be canceled if the contractor fails to comply

with the performance criteria set out in the contract.

(e) If a privatization contract is awarded, the Mayor, instrumentality, or the independent

agency head shall make efforts to assist affected District government employees and to promote

employment opportunities for District residents with the contractor. These efforts shall include:

(1) Consulting with union representatives and District government employees

who would be affected by the privatization contract;

(2) Providing prior notification of at least 30 days of any adverse impact of a

privatization contract to District government employees who would be affected by the contract,

including notification to a labor organization certified as the exclusive representative of

employees affected by the contract;

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(3) Providing alternative employment in the District government to displaced

District government employees if there are unfilled positions for which those employees are

qualified; and

(4) Encouraging the contractor to offer employment to qualified District

residents before offering employment to qualified nonresidents.

(f) An agency shall not attempt to circumvent the requirements of this section by

eliminating the provision of goods or services by the agency before procuring substantially the

same goods or services from a person who is not part of the District government.

Sec. 206. Procurement training institute.

(a) The CPO shall establish and administer a procurement training institute to facilitate

a system of training, continuing education, and certification for District contracting personnel.

The procurement training institute may:

(1) Conduct or participate in procurement education and training programs for

District employees and others, including persons not employed by the District;

(2) Conduct, develop, or collaborate with established training or certification

programs for the express purpose of providing certifications of proficiency to all participants

who successfully complete the designated programs;

(3) Conduct research into existing and new methods of procurement;

(4) Establish and maintain a District procurement library; and

(5)(A) Establish a tiered core curriculum that sets forth the minimum

procurement-related training courses to be completed by District procurement personnel.

(B) The tiered core curriculum shall be designed to develop procurement

competency along with a uniform training approach for personnel ranging from entry level

contract specialist to contracting officer.

(b) The CPO may charge a fee for training conducted by the procurement training

institute in accordance with section 1103.

maintain a reasonable number of hours of continuing education to maintain their certification.

(d) The CPO may allow attendance at a recognized institute to satisfy the certification

requirement and the number of hours for continuing education.

TITLE III. CONTRACTOR STANDARDS.

Sec. 301. Contractor standards.

The CPO shall establish a process to certify, on a solicitation-by-solicitation basis, the

responsibility of prospective contractors. The process shall ensure that the prospective

contractor:

(1) Has adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

obtain those resources;

(2) Is able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance

schedule, based upon the bidder's or offeror’s existing commercial and government contract

commitments;

(3) Has a satisfactory performance record;

(4) Has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;

(5) Has a satisfactory record of compliance with the law, including labor and

civil rights laws and rules and the First Source Employment Agreement Act of 1984, effective

June 29, 1984 (D.C. Law 5-93; D.C. Official Code § 2-219.01 et seq.);

(6) Has, or has the ability to obtain, the necessary organization, experience,

accounting, operational control, and technical skills;

(7) Has, or has the ability to obtain, the necessary production, construction,

technical equipment, and facilities;

(8) Has not exhibited a pattern of overcharging the District;

(9) Does not have an outstanding debt with the District or the federal

government in a delinquent status; and

(10) Is otherwise qualified and is eligible to receive an award under applicable

laws and rules.

Sec. 302. Determination of contractor responsibility.

(a) Prior to awarding a contract, the District shall make a determination, in accordance

with the process established under section 301, that the prospective contractor has the necessary

capacity to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.

(b) For all contracts to exceed $100,000, a potential contractor shall complete and

submit with its bid or offer a certification developed by OCP to provide information needed to

determine if a prospective contractor is responsible. The certification shall be signed under the

penalty of perjury.

information, the District may terminate the contract. The contractor shall update its responses in

the certification during the term of the contract within 60 days of a material change in a

response to its prior questionnaire and prior to the exercise of an option year contract. The

District may consider failure of the contractor to update the certification with this information as

material breach of the contract and invoke remedies pursuant to the provisions of this act.

Information within the certification may be made available to the public, except to the extent

that any information is exempt from disclosure.

(d) A determination by the CPO that a prospective contractor is non-responsible shall be

final. The determination of non-responsibility shall not be overturned unless arbitrary or

capricious.

(e) Upon determining that a prospective contractor is non-responsible, the CPO shall

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

consider whether the contractor should be suspended or debarred pursuant to the procedure and

criteria of section 907.

(f) Contractors shall ensure that their subcontractors meet the criteria for responsibility

pursuant to section 301.

(g) Information about a prospective or current contractor relevant to a contractor’s

responsibility, or lack thereof, may be submitted for consideration to the CPO by a member of

the general public.

TITLE IV. SOURCE SELECTION AND CONTRACT FORMATION.

Sec. 401. Source selection methods.

(a)(1) Except as otherwise authorized by law, all District government contracts shall be

awarded by:

(A) Competitive sealed bidding pursuant to section 402;

(B) Competitive sealed proposals pursuant to section 403;

(D) Emergency procurements pursuant to section 405;

(E) Human care procurements pursuant to section 406;

(F) Small purchase procurements pursuant to section 407;

(G) Special pilot procurements pursuant to section 408;

(H) Reverse auctions pursuant to section 409;

(I) Procurements through a General Services Administration schedule

pursuant to section 410;

(J) Cooperative agreements pursuant to section 411;

(K) Procurements through the DCSS pursuant to section 412; or

(L) Infrastructure facilities and services pursuant to Title VI.

(2) The CPO shall publish annually on the Internet a report on the number of and

dollar value of contracts executed under each source selection method.

(b)(1) Except for members of a technical advisory group, a District employee or official

shall not attempt to influence a procurement professional with respect to source selection;

provided, that an employee or official may attempt to prevent a procurement professional from

violating law or rules.

(2) Any employee or official who violates this section shall be subject to

suspension, dismissal, or other disciplinary action under the procedures pursuant to Title XVI-A

of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, approved

June 10, 1998 (D.C. Law 12-124; D.C. Official Code § 1-616.51 et seq.).

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 402. Competitive sealed bids.

(a) Contracts exceeding $100,000 shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding

unless the CPO issues a determination and findings that use of competitive sealed bidding is not

practicable or not in the best interests of the District.

(b) Bids shall be solicited through an Invitation for Bids.

bidders are properly qualified to perform the work.

(d) The Invitation for Bids shall state whether an award shall be made on the basis of

the lowest bid price or the lowest evaluated bid price. If the lowest evaluated bid price basis is

used, the objective measurable criteria to be utilized shall be set forth in the Invitation for Bids.

(e)(1) The CPO shall provide public notice of the Invitation for Bids of not less than 14

days for contracts, unless the CPO issues a determination and findings that it is appropriate to

shorten the notice period to a period of not less than 3 days. In making the determination and

findings, the CPO shall consider factors including the complexity of the procurement, the type

of goods or services being purchased, and the impact of a shortened notice period on

competition.

(2)(A) The CPO shall maintain an Internet site that provides prospective

contractors with public notice of opportunities to bid, notice of contract awards, and other

relevant information about District procurements.

(B) Public notice of an Invitation for Bids may include publication in

newspapers or trade publications considered to be appropriate by the CPO to give adequate

public notice.

(f) Bids shall be opened publicly at the time and place designated in the Invitation for

Bids; provided, that the opening may be conducted in a publicly accessible electronic forum.

Each bid, with the name of the bidder and price offering contained therein, shall be recorded and

be open to public inspection.

(g) The contract shall be awarded after completion of evaluation procedures for

competitive sealed bids.

(h) Correction or withdrawal of bids shall be allowed only to the extent permitted by

rules issued pursuant to this act.

Sec. 403. Competitive sealed proposals.

(a) A contract may be entered into by competitive sealed proposal when the use of

competitive sealed bidding is not practicable or not advantageous to the District.

(b) Proposals shall be solicited from the maximum number of qualified sources and in a

manner consistent with the nature of, and the need for, the goods, services, or construction being

acquired.

public notice of the RFP of not less than 21 days, unless the CPO issues a determination and

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

findings that it is appropriate to shorten the notice period to a period of not less than 14 days. In

making the determination and findings, the CPO shall consider factors including the complexity

of the procurement, the type of goods or services being purchased, and the impact of a shortened

notice period on competition.

(d)(1) An RFP shall set forth each evaluation factor and indicate the relative importance

of each evaluation factor. Price shall be included as an evaluation factor.

(2) Each RFP shall include a statement of work or other description of

the District's specific needs, which shall be used as a basis for the evaluation of proposals.

(e) The contract shall be awarded by written notice to the responsive and responsible

bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the District.

(f)(1) The contracting officer may issue an RFQ before an RFP if the CPO makes a

determination and findings that proceeding with an RFQ process would be advantageous to the

District and that establishes a reasonable price range for the procurement.

(2) The RFQ shall include a description of the statement of work to be solicited

by the RFP, the deadline for submission of information, and how prospective offerors may

apply for consideration. The RFQ shall require information only on the prospective contractor’s

qualifications, experience, and ability to perform the requirements of the contract.

(3) After receiving the responses to the RFQ from prospective contractors, the

contracting officer shall determine in writing the ranking of the prospective contractors from the

most qualified to the least qualified on the basis of the information provided. The contracting

officer shall then issue an RFP to at least the 3 highest-ranked prospective contractors. The

determination regarding how many proposals to solicit shall not be subject to review.

(g) Upon receiving the responses to an RFP, the contracting officer shall:

(1) Evaluate the proposals received using only the criteria stated in the RFP and

in accordance with weightings that have been provided in the RFP; and

(2) Rank the prospective contractors from most advantageous to least

advantageous to the District.

(h)(1) After ranking the prospective contractors, the contracting officer may elect to

proceed with negotiations in accordance with paragraph (2) of this subsection. The contracting

officer’s decision shall not be subject to review.

(2) If the contracting officer elects to proceed with negotiations, the contracting

officer shall negotiate with the highest-ranked prospective contractor on price or matters

affecting the scope of the contract, so long as the terms of the final contract are within the scope

of the request for proposals. If a satisfactory contract cannot be negotiated with the highest-

ranked prospective contractor, the contracting officer may negotiate the terms of the contract

with the 2

most qualified prospective contractor or lower-ranked prospective contractors in

order of ranking until a satisfactory contract can be awarded.

(3) The contracting officer may reopen negotiations with any prospective

contractor with whom negotiations were terminated.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(4) The contracting officer may make changes within the general scope of the

RFP but shall then provide all offerors an opportunity to submit their best and final offers.

Sec. 404. Sole source procurements.

(a) A contract may be awarded through noncompetitive negotiations when there is only

one source for the required good or service.

(b) The CPO shall make a determination and findings justifying the sole source

procurement.

least 10 days prior to award. The notice shall include:

(1) The determination and findings required by subsection (b) of this section;

(2) A description of the item to be procured; and

(3) The intended sole source contractor.

(d) The contract shall be made available online within 7 days of the contract award.

Sec. 405. Emergency procurements.

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, a contract may be awarded through

an emergency procurement as defined by rules:

(1) When there is an imminent threat to the public health, welfare, property, or

safety; or

(2) To prevent or minimize serious disruption in agency operations.

(b) Emergency procurements shall be made with as much competition as is practicable

under the circumstances, based on the judgment and determination of the contracting officer.

provide services or goods to the District; provided, that the directive shall be reduced to writing

within 3 business days after issuance and funding for the services or goods provided shall be

certified by the appropriate fiscal official.

(d) Emergency procurement procedures shall not be used for contracts exceeding 90

days; provided, that if the development time for the good or service exceeds 90 days, the

contract shall not exceed 120 days.

(e) The CPO shall make a determination and findings justifying the emergency

procurement.

(f) Notice of all emergency procurements shall be made available on the Internet no

more than 7 days after the contract is awarded. The notice shall include:

(1) The determination and findings required by subsection (e) of this section;

(2) A description of the item to be procured;

(3) The designated contractor; and

(4) A copy of the contract.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 406. Human care procurements.

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, the CPO may award a human care

agreement for a human care service if the human care service to be provided is:

(1) Negotiated on a fee for service or unit-rate basis using benchmarks

and quantifiable measurements that shall be uniformly applied to providers of the same service;

(2) Purchased at rates adopted by rule; or

(3) One that an agency typically purchases as needs arise, but for which the

quantity, rate of utilization, delivery areas, or specific beneficiaries of the service cannot be

accurately estimated at the outset of the procurement process.

(b) If a human care agreement for a human care service is to be awarded, the CPO shall

publish a request for qualifications that:

(1) States the general requirements for the service; and

(2) Requests interested service providers to respond in writing with a statement

of their qualifications to perform the service on a form prescribed by the CPO.

(d) The CPO may conduct negotiations for a human care agreement with any

responsible service provider who has submitted a statement of qualifications, without any

additional public notice or solicitation required, to satisfy all or part of the District's anticipated

requirements for a particular human care service.

(e) Before conducting negotiations with a service provider, the CPO shall issue a

determination and findings that the service provider is responsible in accordance with Title III.

(f) The CPO may authorize the use of vouchers to authorize the delivery of service

provided by service providers who enter into human care agreements.

(g) The CPO shall provide public notice of the award of a human care agreement

pursuant to this section on the Internet.

(h) The human care agreement shall identify the services to be rendered during the term

of the agreement and shall set forth the terms and conditions of any purchases issued pursuant to

the agreement. The contracting officer shall include in each human care agreement the

following information:

(1) A statement that the human care agreement is not a commitment to purchase

any quantity of a particular good or service covered under the agreement; and

(2) A statement that the District is obligated only to the extent that authorized

purchases are made pursuant to the human care agreement.

Sec. 407. Small purchase procurements.

(a) The CPO may establish a streamlined process for entering into contracts for goods

and services not exceeding $100,000. The process shall set forth:

(1) Requirements for basic competition, including solicitation of contracts or

orders from multiple vendors;

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(2) A noncompetitive process for entering into contracts under a dollar threshold

established by the CPO not to exceed $10,000; and

(3) Requirements that purchases be made transparent.

(b) Procurement requirements shall not be parceled, split, divided, or purchased over a

period of time to avoid the $100,000 limitation of subsection (a) of this section.

compliance with applicable laws, rules, and policies.

Sec. 408. Special pilot procurements.

(a) The CPO may, with prior public notice and in accordance with rules issued pursuant

to this act, award a contract without competitive sealed bidding or competitive sealed proposals

if it is determined that an unusual or unique situation exists that makes the application of all

requirements of competitive sealed bidding or competitive sealed proposals not in the public

interest.

(b) A special pilot procurement under this section shall be made with as much

competition as is practicable under the circumstances.

findings setting forth the reasons warranting the special procurement and for the selection of the

particular contractor.

(d) The CPO shall post the notice of award and the determination and findings on the

Internet within 7 days after the execution and approval of a special pilot procurement.

(e) An unusual or unique situation justifying a special pilot procurement under this

section shall include a contract made to:

(1) Satisfy a new and unique District requirement; or

(2) Obtain a new technology.

Sec. 409. Auctions.

(a)(1) The CPO may procure goods or services through reverse auction via the Internet

when it is determined that the reverse auction bidding method is the most effective method for

the District.

(2) The CPO may place any requirement for a good or service on an established

Internet reverse auction exchange that would allow any bidder to competitively bid down the

price of that good or service over a set period of time established by the CPO.

(3) The CPO may establish an online auction for the purposes of executing

reverse auction transactions on behalf of the District.

(b)(1) The CPO may dispose of or sell surplus goods through standard auction via the

Internet.

(2) The CPO may place any surplus goods on an established standard auction

exchange on the Internet that would allow any person, excluding any employee of the disposing

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

District agency, to competitively acquire surplus personal property or goods from the District.

(3) The CPO may establish a standard auction exchange on the Internet for the

purpose of executing standard auction transactions on behalf of the District government.

Sec. 410. General Services Administration schedules.

(a) The CPO may procure goods or services through a General Services Administration

schedule pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 502(a)(3) and 40 U.S.C. § 602(c).

(b) The CPO shall ensure that the price of any contract entered into under subsection (a)

of this section is reasonable.

Sec. 411. Cooperative purchasing.

(a) The CPO may, and is encouraged to, participate in, sponsor, conduct, or administer

cooperative purchasing agreements for the procurement of goods, services, or construction.

(b) Cooperative purchasing agreements entered into by the District government shall be

in accordance with, to the extent practicable, all laws and rules of the District government with

respect to contracting, and shall be consistent with laws and rules of the United States

government that apply specifically to the District.

unless that participation is authorized by the CPO or a designee pursuant to the delegated

contracting authority in section 201.

(d) The CPO may charge and collect an administrative fee for serving as the lead

jurisdiction on a cooperative agreement and may receive any rebates or other fees for

participating in a cooperative agreement. The CPO shall deposit such fees in the District of

Columbia Supply Schedule, Purchase Card, and Training Fund established in section 1103.

Sec. 412. District of Columbia Supply Schedule.

(a) There is established a District of Columbia Supply Schedule program under which

contracts may be awarded to certified business enterprises. The DCSS program may consist of

multiple award schedules or other procurement programs established by the CPO.

(b) A DCSS contract may be awarded by:

(1) Any source selection method authorized by Title IV;

(2) A contract with a contractor who maintains a price agreement or schedule

with any federal agency so long as the contract does not authorize a price higher than is

contained in the contract between the federal agency and the contractor; or

(3) A contract with a contractor who agrees to adopt the same pricing schedule

for the same goods or services as that of a contractor who maintains a price agreement or

schedule with any federal agency if the contract does not authorize a price higher than is

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

contained in the contract between the federal agency and the contractor.

Small, Local, and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Development and Assistance Act of 2005,

effective October 20, 2005 (D.C. Law 16-33; D.C. Official Code § 2-218.01 et seq.), and may

thereafter issue the contract or procurement in the open market if the agency determines in

writing that the bids for the contract or procurement set aside for a small business enterprise are

believed to be 12% or more above the likely price on the open market.

Sec. 413. Competition exemptions.

Contracts for the following procurements shall be exempt from the competition

requirements established by this act:

(1) Artistic services or works of art;

(2) Commodities or contractual services if federal or District law prescribes with

whom the District must contract;

(3) Legal services or negotiation services in connection with proceedings before

administrative agencies or state or federal courts, including experts, attorneys, and mediators;

(4) Copyrighted or patented materials, including technical pamphlets, published

books, maps, and testing or instructional materials; provided, that the materials are purchased

directly from the owner of the copyright or patent;

(5) Memberships in trade or professional organizations;

(6) Entertainers;

(7) Job-related seminars and training for District employees;

(8) Maintenance and support of existing software and technology to the extent

that the creator of the intellectual property is still protected and is the only source of the

maintenance and support of the existing software and technology;

(9) Public transit farecards, passes, and tokens;

(10) Personal property or services provided by another public entity, agency, or

authority;

(11) Postage;

(12) Purchases of advertising in all media, including electronic, print, radio, and

television; provided, that they are purchased directly from the media outlet;

(13) Trade and career fairs for District employees;

(14) Special event venues and related services as dictated by the establishment;

(15) Subscriptions for periodicals and newspapers;

(16) Ticket purchases for special events, tourist attractions, and amusement

parks; and

(17) Professional development training which supports principal, teacher, and

student achievement pursuant to the District of Columbia Public Schools Master Education

Plan.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 414. Cancellation of solicitations.

An Invitation for Bid, a Request for Proposals, or other solicitation may be cancelled if it

is determined in writing by the CPO that the action is taken in the best interests of the District

government.

Sec. 415. Collusion.

(a) A person who enters into a contract with the District after engaging in collusion with

another person for the purpose of defrauding the District shall be liable for damages equal to 3

times the value of the loss to the District attributable to the collusion.

(b) If there is a reasonable basis for believing that collusion has occurred among any

individuals or entities for the purpose of defrauding the District, the CPO shall send a written

notice of this belief to the Attorney General and to the Mayor.

retained until the Attorney General gives notice that they may be destroyed. All documents shall

be made available to the Attorney General.

Sec. 416. Contingent fees.

(a) A contractor shall not offer to pay any fee or other consideration that is contingent

on the making of a contract.

(b) Every contract shall contain the following prohibition against contingent fees: “The

contractor warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or

secure the contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage,

brokerage fee, or contingent fee, except bona fide employees or bona fide established

commercial or selling agencies maintained by the contractor for the purpose of securing

business. For a breach or violation of this warranty, the District shall have the right to terminate

the contract without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or

consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of the commission, percentage, brokerage,

or contingent fee.

for which the employee is paid or is to be paid any fee or other consideration contingent on the

making of the contract between the employee and any other person.

Sec. 417. Confidentiality.

The CPO shall review information which has been designated as confidential or

proprietary by a person and which has been submitted in response to an Invitation for Bids or

Request for Proposals. If the CPO determines that the designation is proper, the information

shall be treated by the CPO, and any other District employee, in a confidential manner, shall be

disclosed only to District employees for use in the procurement process, and shall not be

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

disclosed to other persons or parties without the prior written consent of the person, except as

provided by the Freedom of Information Act of 1976, effective March 25, 1977 (D.C. Law 1-96;

D.C. Official Code § 2-531 et seq.).

Sec. 418. Right to audit records; right to inspect.

(a) The District may, at reasonable times and places, audit the books and records of any

person who has submitted data to substantiate offered prices pursuant to section 419 to the

extent that the books and records relate to that data. A person who receives a contract, change

order, or contract modification for which the data is required, shall maintain books and records

that relate to the cost or pricing data for 3 years from the date of final payment under the

contract, unless a shorter period is otherwise authorized in writing.

(b) The Inspector General, District of Columbia Auditor, or District shall be entitled to

audit the books and records of a contractor or any subcontractor under any negotiated contract

or subcontract, other than a firm fixed-price contract, to the extent that the books and records

relate to the performance of the contract or subcontract. Books and records shall be maintained

by the contractor for a period of 3 years from the date of final payment under the prime contract

and by the subcontractor for a period of 3 years from the date of final payment under the

subcontract, unless a shorter period is otherwise authorized in writing.

times, inspect the part of the place of business of a contractor or any subcontractor which is

related to the performance of any contract awarded or to be awarded by the District.

Sec. 419. Reasonable prices.

(a) A contracting officer may request factual information reasonably available to the

contractor or prospective contractor to substantiate that the price or cost offered, or some

portion of it, is reasonable.

(b) The CPO shall establish a process for determining the reasonableness of prices.

Sec. 420. Prequalification.

(a) The CPO may establish a prequalification process to certify the financial and

professional qualifications of prospective bidders and offerors for District government contracts.

The CPO may limit participation in certain procurements to prospective contractors who have

been prequalified under the process.

(b) The use of the prequalification process under this section shall not nullify the

requirement for a determination of contractor responsibility under Title III.

prequalification criteria may be submitted by a member of the general public to the CPO for

consideration in determining or verifying the contractor’s prequalified status.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

TITLE V. TYPES OF CONTRACTS.

Sec. 501. Cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost contract prohibited.

An agency shall not enter into a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost contract.

Sec. 502. Cost-reimbursement contracts.

(a) A cost-reimbursement contract shall not be awarded pursuant to section 402, section

403, or section 404 unless there is a determination and findings that:

(1) The contract is likely to be less costly to the District than any other type of

contract; or

(2) It is impracticable to obtain goods or services of the kind or quality required

except under a cost-reimbursement contract.

(b) All cost-reimbursement contracts shall contain a provision that only costs

determined in writing to be reimbursable by the contracting officer, in accordance with cost

principles set forth in rules issued pursuant to this act, shall be reimbursable.

Sec. 503. Use of other types of contracts.

Subject to the limitations of this act and this title, any type of contract which will

promote the best interests of the District may be used.

Sec. 504. Multiyear contracts.

(a) Unless otherwise provided in an appropriations act, or approved pursuant to section

451 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 803;

D.C. Official Code § 1-204.51), a contract for goods or services shall not be entered into for

periods which extend beyond 12 months.

(b) Before entering into a multiyear contract, the CPO shall determine in writing that:

(1) Estimated requirements cover the period of the contract and are reasonably

firm and continuing; and

(2) The contract would serve the best interests of the District, encourage

effective competition, or otherwise promote economies in District procurement.

performance in a subsequent year of a multiyear contract, the contract for the subsequent year

shall be terminated, either automatically or in accordance with the termination clause of the

contract, if any. Unless otherwise provided for in the contract, the effect of termination shall be

to discharge both the District and the contractor from future performance of the contract, but not

from their existing obligations. The contractor shall be reimbursed for the reasonable value of

any nonrecurring costs incurred but not amortized in the price of the goods or services delivered

under the contract.

TITLE VI. PROCUREMENT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND RELATED

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

SERVICES.

Sec. 601. Project delivery methods authorized.

(a) This title shall govern procurements for construction projects and related

management services in the District.

(b) The following project delivery methods are authorized for procurements within the

scope of this title:

(1) Architectural and engineering services;

(2) Construction management;

(3) Construction management at risk;

(4) Design-bid-build;

(5) Design-build;

(6) Design-build-finance-operate-maintain;

(7) Design-build-operate-maintain; and

(8) Operations and maintenance.

design requirements for a project shall not disqualify a firm from participating as a member of a

proposing team in a design-build, design-build-operate-maintain, or design-build-finance-

operate-maintain procurement unless the participation would provide the firm with a substantial

competitive advantage.

Sec. 602. Source selection methods assigned to project delivery methods.

(a) This section specifies the source selection methods applicable to procurements for

the project delivery methods identified in section 601, except as provided in sections 404, 405,

407, 408, 411, and 412.

(b)(1) The qualifications-based selection process set forth in section 604 shall be used to

procure architectural and engineering services in design-bid-build procurements.

(2) Competitive sealed bidding, as set forth in section 402, shall be used to

procure construction in design-bid-build procurements, except where rules authorize the use of

competitive sealed proposals, as set forth in section 403, for contracts for construction

management at-risk.

401.

(d) Contracts for design-build shall be procured by competitive sealed proposals, as set

forth in section 403.

(e) Contracts for design-build-operate-maintain shall be procured by competitive sealed

proposals, as set forth in section 403.

(f) Contracts for design-build-finance-operate-maintain shall be procured by

competitive sealed proposals, as set forth in section 403.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 603. Prequalification process for construction.

(a) Except for architectural and engineering services, prospective contractors for

procurements under this title may be selected through a prequalification process as set forth in

this section.

(b) The prequalification process shall provide for the annual publication of a list

describing specific types of solicitations for which the agency will seek prequalified contractors.

Solicitations may be added to the list at any time; provided, that the addition of a solicitation to

the list shall be published for not less than 30 days before the solicitation is released.

(1) Experience and expertise of personnel;

(2) Prior completion of similar work;

(3) Receipt of favorable references from prior work;

(4) A certified letter indicating a surety’s willingness to provide bonding to the

contractor for 100% of the proposed bid price;

(5) Availability to complete the desired work;

(6) Confirmation that the vendor is responsible;

(7) Acceptable subcontracting plans; and

(8) Any other criteria identified by the agency as relevant to evaluation of the

prospective contractor.

(d) After an agency has prequalified prospective contractors, it may exclude from

competition for the ensuing solicitation any person that has not been prequalified.

(e) The use of the prequalification process under this section shall not nullify the

requirement for a determination of contractor responsibility under Title III.

Sec. 604. Architectural and engineering services.

(a) The District shall announce all requirements for architectural and engineering

services and negotiate contracts for these services on the basis of demonstrated competence and

qualification and at fair and reasonable prices.

(b) In the procurement of architectural and engineering services, the CPO shall:

(1) Provide notice to firms to submit annually a statement of qualifications and

performance data;

(2) Appoint one or more permanent or ad hoc architect-engineer evaluation

boards, comprised of members with experience in architecture, engineering, construction, and

District and related procurement matters.

and may include private practitioners of architecture, engineering, or related professions. The

members of a permanent or an ad hoc evaluation board shall be known as the architect-engineer

selection committee.

(d) For each architectural and engineering services contract over $100,000, the CPO

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

shall appoint an architect-engineer selection committee. The selection committee for

architectural and engineering services contracts under this amount shall be established in

accordance with rules promulgated by the CPO. The selection committee shall evaluate current

statements of qualifications and performance data on file with the District and those that may be

submitted by other firms regarding the proposed contract. The selection committee shall

conduct discussions with no less than 3 firms regarding the contract and the relative utility of

alternative methods of approach for furnishing the required services, and then shall select

therefrom, in order of preference, based upon criteria established and published by the selection

committee, no less than 3 of the firms considered to be the most highly qualified to provide the

services required.

(e) The contracting officer shall negotiate a contract with the highest qualified firm for

architectural and engineering services at compensation which the contracting officer determines

in writing to be fair and reasonable to the District. The contracting officer shall take into

account the estimated value, the scope, the complexity, and the professional nature of the

services to be rendered. A contracting officer shall proceed as follows:

(1) If the contracting officer is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with

the

firm considered to be the most qualified, negotiations with that firm shall be terminated and the

contracting officer shall then undertake negotiations with the 2

most qualified firm.

(2) If the contracting officer is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with

the

firm considered to be the 2

most qualified firm, the contracting officer shall terminate

negotiations and shall undertake negotiations with the 3

most qualified firm.

(3) If the contracting officer is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with

the

firm considered to be the 3

most qualified firm, the contracting officer shall terminate

negotiations.

(4) If the contracting officer is unable to negotiate a contract with any of the

selected firms, the contracting officer may select additional firms in order of their competence

and qualifications and shall continue negotiations in accordance with this section until an

agreement is reached.

TITLE VII. BONDS AND OTHER FORMS OF SECURITY.

Sec. 701. Bid security in construction contracts.

(a) Bid security shall be required for all competitive sealed bidding and competitive

sealed proposals for construction contracts when the price is estimated by the contracting officer

to exceed $100,000. Bid security shall be a bond provided by a surety company authorized to

do business in the District or the equivalent in cash, or otherwise supplied in a form satisfactory

to the District. This section shall not prevent the requirement of such bonds on such contracts

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

under $100,000 or bid or proposal bonds on any other contracts when the circumstances

warrant.

(b) Bid security shall be in an amount equal to at least 5% of the amount of the bid.

provided, a bidder that does not comply shall be rejected unless, pursuant to rule, it is

determined that the bid or offer fails to comply in a nonsubstantial manner with the security

requirements.

(d) After bids are opened, they shall be irrevocable for the period specified in the

Invitation for Bids. If a bidder is permitted to withdraw its bid or proposal before award, or is

excluded from the competition before award, no action shall be had against the bidder or the bid

security.

Sec. 702. Contract performance and payment bonds in construction contracts.

(a)(1) When a construction contract is awarded in excess of $100,000, the following

bonds or security shall be delivered to the District and shall become binding on the parties upon

the execution of the contract:

(A) A performance bond satisfactory to the District, executed by a surety

company authorized to do business in the District or otherwise secured in a manner satisfactory

to the District, in an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the contract price that does not

include the cost of operation, maintenance, and finance; and

(B) A payment bond satisfactory to the District, executed by a surety

company authorized to do business in the District or otherwise secured in a manner satisfactory

to the District, for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material to the contractor or

its subcontractors for the performance of the construction work provided for in the contract.

(2) The payment bond required by paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection shall be in

an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the contract price that does not include the cost of

operation, maintenance, and finance.

(b) Pursuant to rules promulgated under this act, the CPO may reduce the amount of

performance and payment bonds to 50% of the amounts established in subsection (a) of this

section.

bond or other security in addition to such bonds or in circumstances other than specified in

subsection (a) of this section.

(d)(1) A person who has furnished labor or material to the contractor or its

subcontractors for the work provided in the construction contract, in respect of which a payment

bond is furnished under this section, and who has not been paid in full before the expiration of a

period of 90 days after the day on which the last of the labor was done or performed by such

person or material was furnished or supplied by such person for which claim is made, shall have

a right of action on the payment bond for the amount unpaid at the time of institution of the

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

action and to prosecute the action for the amount due to the person.

(2) Any person having a direct contractual relationship with a subcontractor of

the contractor, but no contractual relationship express or implied with the contractor furnishing

the payment bond, shall have a right of action upon the payment bond upon giving written

notice to the contractor within 90 days after the date on which the person did or performed the

last of the labor or furnished or supplied the last of the material upon which the claim is made,

stating with substantial accuracy the amount claimed and the name of the party to whom the

material was furnished or supplied or for whom the labor was done or performed. The notice

shall be personally served or served by other form of receipted transmittal that confirms actual

delivery to the contractor at any place the contractor maintains an office or conducts its business

or at the contractor’s residence.

(e) An action instituted upon a payment bond shall be brought in a court of competent

jurisdiction within the District, but an action suit shall not be commenced after the expiration of

one year after the day on which the last of the labor was performed or material was supplied by

the person bringing the action. The obligee named in the bond need not be joined as a party in

the action.

(f) An action instituted under this section shall not be commenced after one year from

the date that the final labor was performed or the material was supplied.

Sec. 703. Bond forms and copies.

(a) The CPO shall prescribe the form of the bonds required by this act.

(b) Any person may request and obtain from the District a certified copy of a bond upon

payment of the cost of reproduction of the bond and postage, if any. A certified copy of a bond

shall be prima facie evidence of the contents, execution, and delivery of the original.

Sec. 704. Other forms of security.

Pursuant to rules promulgated under this act, the CPO may require a solicitation to

include one or more of the following forms of security to assure the timely, faithful, and

uninterrupted provision of operations and maintenance services, procured separately or as one

element of design-build-operate-maintain or design-build-finance-operate-maintain services:

(1) Operations period surety bonds that secure the performance of the

contractor’s operations and maintenance obligations under the project delivery methods set forth

in section 601;

(2) Letters of credit in an amount appropriate to cover the cost to the District of

preventing infrastructure service interruptions for a period up to 12 months under the project

delivery methods set forth in section 601; or

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(3) Appropriate written guarantees from the contractor (or depending upon the

circumstances, from parent corporations) to secure the recovery of procurement costs to the

District in the event of a default in performance by the contractor.

Sec. 705. Authority to require bonds.

Pursuant to rules promulgated under this act, the CPO may require a bond for any

solicitation if the CPO determines that it would be in the best interests of the District.

Sec. 706. Fiscal responsibility.

(a) Every contract modification, change order, or contract price adjustment under a

contract with the District shall be subject to prior written certification by the fiscal officer of the

entity responsible for funding the project or the contract, or other official responsible for

monitoring and reporting upon the status of the costs of the total project budget or contract

budget, as to the effect of the contract modification, change order, or adjustment in contract

price on the total project budget or the total contract budget.

(b) If the certification of the fiscal officer or other responsible official discloses a

resulting increase in the total project budget or the total contract budget, the contracting officer

shall not execute or make the contract modification, change order, or adjustment in contract

price unless:

(1) Sufficient funds are available therefor; or

(2) The scope of the project or contract is adjusted so as to permit the degree of

completion that is feasible within the total project budget or total contract budget as it existed

prior to the contract modification, change order, or adjustment in contract price under

consideration.

TITLE VIII. SUPPLY MANAGEMENT.

Sec. 801. Supply management rules.

The CPO shall issue rules governing:

(1) The management of goods during their entire life cycle;

(2) The sale, lease, disposal, or transfer of surplus goods by public auction,

competitive sealed bidding, competitive electronic sales, or other appropriate method designated

by rule; provided, that no employee of the disposing agency shall be entitled to purchase any

surplus goods.

Sec. 802. Disposition of surplus goods.

(a) The CPO may transfer District surplus goods to an organization qualified as tax-

exempt under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, approved August 16, 1954

(68A Stat. 163; 26 U.S.C. § 501), or state, county, or municipal jurisdictions after an attempt

has been made to:

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(1) Transfer property within an agency;

(2) Transfer property between agencies; and

(3) Auction the property for sale.

(b) To qualify for the receipt of surplus goods, a tax-exempt organization shall:

(1) Demonstrate that it meets any approval, accreditation, or licensing

requirements for operation of its program;

(2) Certify and provide evidence that it is a nonprofit and tax-exempt

organization under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, approved August 16,

1954 (68A Stat. 163; 26 U.S.C. § 501);

(3) Certify that it is not debarred, suspended, or excluded from any federal or

District program, including procurement programs; and

(4) Operate in compliance with applicable Federal nondiscrimination law.

(c)(1) Prior to sale, lease, transfer, or disposal of surplus computer and other

information technology assets, the Chief Technology Officer shall certify that the equipment is

sanitized of any confidential data or personal indentifying information.

(2) The CPO shall ensure that all policies for the transfer of computers or other

information technology goods are consistent with data and information security policies

developed by the Chief Technology Officer.

(d) The CPO may abandon, recycle, sell for scrap, or destroy undistributed surplus

goods upon making a written finding that the goods have no commercial value or the estimated

cost of their continued care and handling would exceed the estimated proceeds from their sale.

(e) The CPO shall publish on the Internet all forms used for the purpose of disposing of

surplus goods. The CPO may receive completed forms electronically.

(f) OCP shall publish records of all transfers of surplus goods on the Internet.

(g) OCP shall develop written policies and procedures for advertisement of auctions to

ensure adequate public notice.

Sec. 803. Electronic Inventory Control System.

The CPO shall establish an Electronic Inventory Control System to monitor surplus

goods. The Electronic Inventory Control System shall contain the following information:

(1) The date of receipt of goods;

(2) The agency from which goods were received;

(3) A description of the property, including quantity and condition;

(4) A photograph of the property; and

(5) The estimated value of the property.

Sec. 804. District of Columbia Surplus Property Sales Revolving Fund.

(a) There is established as a nonlapsing fund the District of Columbia Surplus Property

Sales Revolving Fund (“Surplus Property Fund”), which shall be used to pay the costs of

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

conducting surplus property sales and operating and maintaining the Surplus Property Division

of OCP. This section shall not prohibit or limit the allocation of funds from the revenues of the

District for the purposes designated in this subsection.

(b) The CPO may collect and deposit in the Surplus Property Fund the proceeds from

the sale of surplus goods.

funds, shall not revert to the unrestricted fund balance of the General Fund of the District of

Columbia at the end of a fiscal year, or at any other time, but shall be continually available for

the uses and purposes set forth in subsection (a) of this section without regard to fiscal year

limitation, subject to authorization by Congress.

(d) All funds in the District of Columbia Surplus Property Sales Operating Fund shall

be transferred to the Surplus Property Fund.

TITLE IX. PROHIBITED ACTIONS; REMEDIES.

Sec. 901. Oral agreements.

(a) A District employee shall not enter into an oral agreement with a contractor to

provide goods or services to the District government without a valid written contract. A

violation of this paragraph shall be cause for termination of employment of the District

employee.

(b) A District employee shall not authorize payment for the value of goods or services

received without a valid written contract. This subsection shall not apply to a payment required

by court order, a final decision of the Contract Appeals Board, a settlement, or an approval by

the CPO in accordance with subsection (d) of this section.

into an oral agreement with a District employee to provide goods or services to the District

government without a valid written contract shall not be paid. If the oral agreement was entered

into by a District employee at the direction of a supervisor, the supervisor shall be terminated.

(d)(1) The CPO shall review, verify, and either approve or disapprove a request

submitted by an agency director for authorization for payment for goods or services received

without a valid written contract. A request shall not be approved without written notification of

the disciplinary action taken by the relevant personnel authority against the responsible

employee.

(2) If the employee who authorized payment or delivery of goods or services

without a valid written contract is the CPO, the matter shall be referred to the Mayor for

appropriate disciplinary action and the Mayor shall state in writing the disciplinary action taken

before the CPO may approve or disapprove the request.

(3) The disciplinary action prescribed by this paragraph shall be in accordance

with Title XVI-A of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

of 1978, approved June 10, 1998 (D.C. Law 12-124; D.C. Official Code § 1-616.51 et seq.).

Sec. 902. Improper contracts.

(a) A contract entered into in violation of this act or the rules issued pursuant to this act

shall be void.

(b) A contract entered into in violation of this act or the rules issued pursuant to this act

shall not be void if:

(1) It is determined in a proceeding pursuant to this act or subsequent judicial

review that good faith has been shown by all parties; and

(2) The violation of the provisions of this act and the rules issued pursuant to

this act was de minimis.

contractor who has entered into the contract in good faith, without directly contributing to a

violation and without knowledge of any violation of the act or rules issued pursuant to this act

prior to the awarding of the contract, shall be compensated for costs actually incurred until the

date that the contract was determined to be void.

Sec. 903. Termination of contracts.

(a) The CPO may terminate, without liability, any contract if:

(1) The contractor has been convicted of a crime arising out of or in connection

with the procurement of any work to be done or any payment to be made under the contract; or

(2) There has been a violation of this act.

(b) If a contract is terminated pursuant to this section, the contractor shall:

(1) Be paid only the actual costs of the work performed to the date of

termination, plus termination costs, if any;

(2) Refund, and the CPO shall recover, all profits or fixed fees realized under

the contract; and

(3) Refund, and the CPO shall recover, any other fee, commission, percentage,

gift, compensation, or similar consideration paid, including contingent fees and brokerage fees.

remedy provided by law and the exercise of any of them shall not constitute a waiver of any

other right or remedy provided by law.

Sec. 904. Sovereign immunity defense not available.

Unless otherwise specifically provided by law of the District, the District government

and every officer, department, agency, or other unit of the District government shall not raise the

defense of sovereign immunity in the courts of the District in an action based upon a written

procurement contract executed on behalf of the District government.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 905. District government not liable for punitive damages.

In an action in contract based upon a written contract executed on behalf of the District

government, or by an official or employee acting within the scope of the official's or the

employee's authority, the District government, and its officers, departments, agencies, or other

units of government, shall not be liable for punitive damages.

Sec. 906. Claims by District government against contractors.

(a)(1) All claims by the District government against a contractor arising under or

relating to a contract shall be decided by the contracting officer, who shall issue a decision in

writing and furnish a copy of the decision to the contractor.

(2) The decision shall be supported by reasons and shall inform the contractor of

his or her rights as provided in this Title. Specific findings of fact shall not be required, but, if

made, shall not be binding in any subsequent proceeding.

(3) This subsection shall not apply to a claim or dispute for penalties or

forfeitures prescribed by a law or rule which another District government agency is specifically

authorized to administer, settle, or determine.

(4) This subsection shall not authorize the contracting officer to settle,

compromise, pay, or otherwise adjust any claim involving fraud.

(b) The decision of the contracting officer shall be final and not subject to review unless

an administrative appeal or action for judicial review is timely commenced as authorized by

section 1004.

government contracts requiring that pending final decision of an appeal, action, or final

settlement, a contractor shall proceed diligently with performance of the contract in accordance

with the decision of the contracting officer.

Sec. 907. Debarment and suspension.

(a)(1) After reasonable notice to a person, and reasonable opportunity to be heard:

(A) The CPO shall debar a person from consideration for award of

contracts or subcontracts for any conviction under subsection (c)(1) through (3) of this section,

for a judicial determination of a violation under subsection (c)(4) of this section, or for a CPO

determination of a violation under subsection (c)(5) through (7) of this section, unless the CPO

makes a finding in writing that it would be contrary to the best interests of the District to do so

or the present responsibility of the person is such that a debarment would not be warranted; and

(B) The CPO may debar a person from consideration for award of

contracts or subcontracts if one or more of the causes listed in subsection (b) of this section

exist.

(2) The debarment shall not be for a period of more than 5 years.

(b)(1) The CPO shall suspend a person from consideration for award of contracts or

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

subcontracts for any conviction listed in subsection (c)(1) through (3) of this section, for a

judicial determination of a violation under subsection (c)(4) or (5) of this section, or for a CPO

determination of a violation under subsection (c)(5) through (7) of this section, unless the CPO

makes a finding in writing that it would be contrary to the best interests of the District to do so.

(2) The CPO may suspend a person from consideration for award of contracts or

subcontracts if the person is charged with the commission of any offense described in

subsection (c) of this section and if the CPO makes a finding in writing that such suspension

would be in the best interests of the District unless the present responsibility of the person is

such that a suspension would not be warranted.

(1) Conviction for the commission of a criminal offense incident to obtaining, or

attempting to obtain, a public or private contract or subcontract or in the performance of the

contract or subcontract;

(2) Conviction under this act or under any other District, federal, or state law for

fraud, embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving

stolen property, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity which currently

affects the contractor’s responsibility as a District government contractor;

(3) Conviction under District, federal, or state antitrust laws arising out of the

submission of bids or proposals;

(4) A violation under sections 813 through 821 of the District of Columbia

Procurement Practices Act of 1985, effective February 21, 1986 (D.C. Law 12-104; D.C.

Official Code §§ 2-308.13 through 2-308.21);

(5) A false assertion of certified business enterprise status or eligibility as

defined in the Small, Local, and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Development and

Assistance Act of 2005, effective October 20, 2005 (D.C. Law 16-33; D.C. Official Code § 2-

218.01 et seq.); or

(6) A violation of contract provisions, as set forth below, of a character which is

regarded by the CPO to be sufficiently serious to justify debarment action:

(A) Willful failure, without good cause, to perform in accordance with

the specifications or within the time limit provided in the contract; or

(B) A recent record of failure to perform or of unsatisfactory

performance in accordance with the terms or conditions of one or more contracts; provided, that

failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance caused by acts beyond the control of the

contractor shall not be considered to be bases for debarment; or

(7) Any other cause the CPO determines to be sufficiently serious and

compelling to affect responsibility as a District government contractor, including debarment by

another governmental entity for any cause listed in rules.

(d)(1) After reasonable notice to a person and reasonable opportunity to be heard, the

CPO may debar the person from consideration for award of any contract or subcontract if the

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

CPO receives written notification from the Chairman of the Council or the chairperson of a

Council committee that the person has willfully failed to cooperate in a Council or Council

committee investigation conducted pursuant to section 413 of the District of Columbia Home

Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 774; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.13).

(2) The debarment shall be for a period of 5 years, unless the CPO receives

written notification during the 5-year period from the Chairman of the Council or the

chairperson of a Council committee that the debarred business has cooperated in the

investigation referred to in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(3) For purpose of this subsection, the term “willfully failed to cooperate”

means:

(A) Intentionally failed to attend and give testimony at a public hearing

convened in accordance with the Rules of Organization and Procedure for the Council; and

(B) Intentionally failed to provide documents, books, papers, or other

information upon request of the Council or a Council committee.

(e) The CPO shall issue a written decision to debar or suspend a person. The decision

shall:

(1) State the relevant facts and the reasons for the action taken;

(2) Describe the present responsibility of the person;

(3) Describe whether the debarment is in the best interests of the District; and

(4) Inform the debarred or suspended person of the right to judicial or

administrative review as provided in this act.

(f) A copy of the decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section shall be final and

conclusive unless fraudulent or unless the debarred or suspended person appeals to the Contract

Appeals Board within 60 days of receipt of the CPO’s decision by the person.

(g) The filing of an action pursuant to subsection (f) of this section shall not stay the

CPO’s decision.

(h)(1) Unless otherwise indicated in the debarment or suspension decision, the

debarment or suspension of a person shall be effective for all District government agencies.

(2) Unless otherwise indicated in the debarment or suspension decision, the

debarment or suspension of a person shall constitute a debarment or suspension of any affiliate

of that person.

(i) If a person is charged with or convicted of committing any offense listed in

subsection (c)(1) through (5) of this section, the Office of the Attorney General for the District

of Columbia or the United States Attorney, whoever is responsible for prosecuting the charge,

shall immediately notify the CPO of the charge or conviction and shall provide such information

to the CPO as may otherwise be permitted by law to enable the CPO to take any action

authorized by this section. The CPO, in turn, shall immediately notify both the Office of the

Attorney General for the District of Columbia and the United States Attorney of any action

taken or finding made under this section.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Sec. 908. Claims by contractors against the District government.

(a) All claims by a contractor against the District government arising under or relating

to a contract shall be in writing and shall be submitted to the contracting officer for a decision.

(b) Within 120 days after receipt of a claim, the contracting officer shall issue a

decision, whenever possible taking into account factors such as the size and complexity of the

claim and the adequacy of the information in support of the claim provided by the contractor.

the required time period shall be deemed to be a denial of the claim and shall authorize the

commencement of an appeal on the claim as otherwise provided in this title.

(d)(1) If a contractor is unable to support any part of his or her claim and it is

determined that the inability is attributable to a material misrepresentation of fact or fraud on the

part of the contractor, the contractor shall be liable to the District government for an amount

equal to the unsupported part of the claim in addition to all costs to the District government

attributable to the cost of reviewing that part of the contractor's claim.

(2) Liability under this section shall be determined within 6 years of the

commission of the misrepresentation of fact or fraud.

Sec. 909. Interest.

Interest on amounts found due to a contractor on claims shall be payable at a rate set in

D.C. Official Code § 28-3302(b) applicable to judgments against the District government from

the date the contracting officer receives the claim until payment of the claim. Interest on

amounts found due to the District from a contractor on claims shall be payable at the rate set in

D.C. Official Code § 28-3302(b) applicable to judgments against the District government from

the date the contractor receives a contracting officer's written decision asserting the claim on

behalf of the District until payment of the claim.

Sec. 910. Employees subject to employee conduct standards of Merit Personnel Act.

(a) Except for those District government employees employed by agencies not subject

to the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, approved

March 3, 1979 (D.C. Law 2-139; D.C. Official Code § 1-601.01 et seq.), District government

employees who participate in the procurement process shall be subject to the provisions of Title

XVIII of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978,

approved March 3, 1979 (D.C. Law 2-139; D.C. Official Code § 1-618.01 et seq.).

(b) Participation in the procurement process shall include involvement, either directly or

indirectly, in:

(1) The decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, or preparation of any

part of a purchase request;

(2) Influencing the content of any specification or purchase standard;

(3) Rendering of advice;

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(4) An investigation or audit; or

(5) Any other advisory capacity pertaining to any contract, subcontract,

solicitation, or proposal.

TITLE X. CONTRACT APPEALS BOARD.

Sec. 1001. Creation of Contract Appeals Board.

(a)(1) There is established in the executive branch of the District government a Contract

Appeals Board (“Board”) to be composed of a chairperson and 2 other members.

(2) The members shall be appointed as administrative judges in the Career

Service and shall not be removed except for cause.

(3) The chairperson and members of the Board shall be appointed by the Mayor

with the advice and consent of the Council, and shall serve full-time.

(b) The Board shall adopt operational procedures, not inconsistent with this act,

necessary to execute the Board's functions. The chairperson's authority may be delegated to the

Board's members and employees, but only members of the Board may hear appeals and issue

decisions on the appeals. The attendance of at least 2 members of the Board shall constitute a

quorum.

(c)(1) The Office of the Attorney General may provide for the Board those goods,

materials, and administrative services that the chairperson requests, on a basis, reimbursable or

otherwise, agreed upon between the Office of the Attorney General and the chairperson.

(2) All costs of hearings before the Board, including witness fees and costs of

transcripts, shall be borne by the agency from which the appeal originated through direct billing.

(3) The Board shall use any fees received pursuant to section 1003 at the

discretion of the Chairperson to improve the Board's services and programs, including the

option to provide incentive awards to Board personnel consistent with Title XIX of the District

of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, approved March 3,

1979 (D.C. Law 2-139; D.C. Official Code § 1-619.01 et seq.).

Sec. 1002. Terms and qualifications of members.

(a)(1) The term of office of the chairperson and other full-time members of the Board

shall be 4 years, except that in making the initial appointment, the Mayor shall appoint one

members for a term of one year, one member for a term of 2 years, and the chairperson for a

term of 3 years. The terms of the chairperson and members first appointed shall begin on the

date that a majority of the first members are sworn in, which shall become the anniversary date

for all subsequent appointments. Thereafter, their successors shall be appointed for terms of 4

years, or for the balance of any unexpired term, but members may continue to serve beyond

their terms until their successors take office.

(2) The Mayor shall endeavor to nominate persons for appointment to the Board

at least 30 days before the expiration of a member's term.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(3) Members may be reappointed for succeeding terms.

(4) If there is no chairperson, or if the chairperson is absent or unable to serve,

the member senior in length of service shall be acting chairperson.

(b) The chairperson and members of the Board shall be attorneys licensed to practice

law in the District who shall have no less than 5 years experience in public contract law. All

members of the Board shall have experience in the areas of procurement and contract law.

Appeals Board, appointed pursuant to the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of

1985, effective February 21, 1986 (D.C. Law 6-85; D.C. Official Code § 2-301.01 et seq.),

serving on the effective date of this act, shall be considered qualified and may continue to serve

as members of the Board.

Sec. 1003. Jurisdiction of Board.

(a) The Board shall be the exclusive hearing tribunal for, and shall review and

determine de novo:

(1) Any protest of a solicitation or award of a contract addressed to the Board by

any actual or prospective bidder, offeror, or the contractor who is aggrieved in connection with

the solicitation or award of a contract;

(2) Any appeal by a contractor from a final decision by the contracting officer on

a claim by a contractor, when the claim arises under or relates to a contract; and

(3) Any claim by the District against a contractor, when such claim arises under

or relates to a contract.

(b) Jurisdiction of the Board shall be consistent with the coverage of this act as set forth

in section 105, except that the Board may enter into fee-for-service agreements with agencies,

departments, boards, commissions, and instrumentalities of the District or other public entities

that are not subject to the Board's jurisdiction. The agreements shall provide for the Board to

resolve contract disputes, including appeals and protests of those agencies, departments, boards,

commissions, and instrumentalities. With agreements of the parties, the Board may provide

alternate dispute resolution services.

Sec. 1004. Contractor's right of appeal to Board.

(a) Except as provided in section 908, within 90 days after the date of receipt of a

decision of the contracting officer, the contractor may appeal the decision to the Board by filing

a complaint.

(b) The Board shall provide, to the fullest extent practicable, informal, expeditious, and

inexpensive resolution of disputes, shall issue a decision in writing, or take other appropriate

action on each appeal submitted, and shall mail or otherwise furnish a copy of the decision to

the contractor and the Mayor. All decisions which constitute a final adjudication of appeal on

the merits shall be published in the District of Columbia Register.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(c)(1) The rules of the Board shall include a procedure for the accelerated disposition of

any appeal from a decision of the contracting officer if the amount in dispute is $50,000 or less.

(2) The procedure shall be applicable at the sole election of the contractor.

(3) Appeals under the accelerated procedure shall be resolved within 180 days

from the date the contractor elects to utilize the procedure.

(d)(1) The rules of the Board shall include a small claims procedure for the expedited

disposition of any appeal from a decision of the contracting officer if the amount in dispute is

$10,000 or less. The procedure shall be applicable at the sole election of the contractor.

(2) The small claims procedure shall provide for simplified rules of procedure to

facilitate the decision of any appeal. The appeals may be decided by a single member of the

Board with any concurrences required by rule.

(3) Appeals under the small claims procedure shall be resolved, whenever

possible, within 90 days from the date on which the contractor files an appeal.

(4) A decision against the District government or the contractor reached under

the small claims procedure shall be final and conclusive and shall not be set aside except in

cases of fraud.

(5) Administrative determinations and final decisions under the small claims

procedure shall have no value as precedent for future cases under this title.

Sec. 1005. Appeal of Board decisions.

(a) A contractor may appeal a Board decision to the District of Columbia Court of

Appeals within 120 days after the date of receipt of a copy of the decision.

(b) If the CPO determines that an appeal should be taken, the CPO, with the prior

approval of the Office of the Attorney General, may appeal the Board's decision to the District

of Columbia Court of Appeals for judicial review within 120 days from the date of the receipt of

the Board's decision.

Sec. 1006. Oaths, discovery, and subpoena power.

(a) A member of the Board may administer oaths to witnesses, authorize depositions

and discovery proceedings, and require by subpoena the attendance of witnesses and production

of books and papers for the taking of testimony or evidence by deposition or in the hearing of an

appeal by the Board.

(b) If any witness, having been personally served with a subpoena, shall neglect or

refuse to obey the subpoena issued, on written application, the Board may report the fact of the

neglect or refusal to a judge of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia who may compel

obedience to the subpoena.

Sec. 1007. Actions in court; judicial review of Board decisions.

In the event of an appeal by a contractor or the CPO from a decision of the Board

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

pursuant to section 1005, notwithstanding any contract provision, rule, or rule of law to the

contrary, the decision of the Board on questions of fact shall be final and conclusive and shall

not be set aside unless the decision is fraudulent, arbitrary, capricious, or so grossly erroneous as

to necessarily imply bad faith, or if the decision is not supported by substantial evidence.

Sec. 1008. Protest procedures.

(a) This section shall apply to a protest of a solicitation or award of a contract addressed

to the Board by any actual or prospective bidder, offeror, or contractor who is aggrieved in

connection with the solicitation or award of a contract.

(b)(1) A protest based upon alleged improprieties in a solicitation which are apparent

prior to bid opening or the time set for receipt of initial proposals shall be filed prior to bid

opening or the time set for receipt of initial proposals. In procurements where proposals are

requested, alleged improprieties which do not exist in the initial solicitation, but which are

subsequently incorporated into the solicitation, shall be protested not later than the next closing

time for receipt of proposals following the incorporation.

(2) In cases other than those covered in paragraph (1) of this subsection, protests

shall be filed not later than 10 business days after the basis of protest is known or should have

been known, whichever is earlier.

(c)(1) Within one business day of receipt of the protest, the Board shall notify the

contracting officer that the protest has been filed. Except as provided in this section, no contract

shall be awarded in any procurement after the contracting officer has received the notice and

while the protest is pending. If an award has already been made but the contracting officer

receives notice within 11 business days after the date of award, the contracting officer shall

immediately direct the awardee to cease performance under the contract and to suspend any

related activities that may result in additional obligations being incurred by the District under

the contract. Except as provided in this section, performance and related activities suspended

pursuant to this section shall not be resumed while the protest is pending.

(2) Performance under a protested procurement may proceed, or award may be

made, while a protest is pending only if the CPO makes a written determination, supported by

substantial evidence, that urgent and compelling circumstances that significantly affect interests

of the District will not permit waiting for the decision of the Board concerning the protest. A

copy of the determination shall be provided within one business day of issuance to both the

Board and the protester.

(d) On any direct protest pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Board shall

decide whether the solicitation or award was in accordance with the applicable law, rules, and

terms and conditions of the solicitation. The proceeding shall be de novo and the decision of

the Board shall be issued within 60 business days from the date on which the protest is filed.

Any prior determinations by administrative officials shall not be final or conclusive. If the

Board determines that a contract is void pursuant to section 902, the Board shall direct that the

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

contract be cancelled and cause a determination to be made pursuant to section 902.

(e) A determination of an issue of fact by the Board under subsection (d) of this section

shall be final and conclusive unless arbitrary, capricious, fraudulent, or clearly erroneous.

(f)(1) In addition to other relief, the Board may order, when a protest is sustained, that

the contract awarded under the solicitation be terminated for the convenience of the District;

provided, that the Board shall not direct the award of a contract to a particular person. A

determination in this regard shall be based on considerations such as:

(A) Best interests of the District government;

(B) Seriousness of the procurement deficiency;

(D) Maintaining the integrity of the procurement system;

(E) Good faith of District government officials and other parties;

(F) Extent of contract performance; or

(G) Impact of termination on the agency's activities and mission.

(2) The Board may, when requested, award reasonable bid or proposal

preparation costs and costs of pursuing the protest, not including legal fees, if it finds that the

District government's actions toward the protester or claimant were arbitrary or capricious.

(g)(1) The Board may dismiss, at any stage of the proceedings, any protest, or portion of

a protest, it considers frivolous.

(2) In addition, the Board may require the protester to pay reasonable attorneys’

fees, for time counsel spent representing the agency in defending the frivolous protest or its

frivolous part. If the entire protest is dismissed on frivolous grounds, it may also assess the

protester additional damages for each day the contract was suspended equal to the amount of

liquidated damages specified in the contract for late completion of the contract.

(3) The Board shall not determine damages if liquidated damages are not

specified.

(4) In addition, counsel for the protester may be suspended or barred from

practicing before the Board.

(h) The Board shall adopt rules for exercising its authority under this section.

TITLE XI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

Sec. 1101. Green procurement.

(a) Except for emergency procurements, before entering into any contract in excess of

$100,000, the District shall issue an environmental certification to demonstrate, to the

maximum extent practicable, the purchase of an EPPS.

(b) An environmental certification shall not be required for procurements that conform

to an applicable Default Environmental Preference Standard.

that a contractor provide an EPPS.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

(d) Within one year after the effective date of this act, and annually thereafter, OCP

shall prepare and submit to the Council a report detailing the progress of this policy, including

the following elements:

(1) Total contracting amount, and percentage of contracting amount, spent on

EPPS;

(2) Successes and challenges to implementing the policy; and

(3) Changes to policies or standards.

Sec. 1102. Payment of stipends authorized.

(a) The contracting officer may pay a stipend to cover a portion of bid or proposal

development costs to an unsuccessful responsible offeror that submits a responsive proposal to a

solicitation to generate meaningful competition and to ensure that small businesses are not

competitively disadvantaged.

(b) The contracting officer shall determine the number and amount of the stipends, if

any.

information contained in the proposals in connection with any contract awarded for the project,

or in connection with a subsequent procurement, without any obligation to pay any additional

compensation to the unsuccessful offerors.

(d)(1) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, an unsuccessful offeror may

elect to waive the stipend.

(2) If an unsuccessful offeror elects to waive the stipend, the District shall not

use ideas and information contained in the offeror's proposal; provided, that this restriction shall

not prevent the District from using any idea or information if the idea or information is also

included in a proposal of an offeror that accepts the stipend.

Sec. 1103. District of Columbia Supply Schedule, Purchase Card, and Training Fund.

(a) The CPO may charge and collect a fee, in an amount to be determined by rule, on all

sales, purchase orders, delivery orders, task orders, and purchase card transactions made under

contracts awarded to contractors under the DCSS.

(b) The CPO may charge a fee for training conducted by the procurement training

institute established pursuant to section 206.

Officer regarding adherence to the applicable requirements of federal grants, loans, or other

extensions of credit to the District, the Chief Procurement Officer shall collect any rebates

issued to the District by the purchase card issuers under the Purchase Card Program.

(d)(1) There is established as a nonlapsing fund the District of Columbia Supply

Schedule, Purchase Card, and Training Fund (“Fund”), which shall be used to pay the costs

associated with operating and maintaining the DCSS, the Purchase Card Program, cooperative

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

purchasing agreements, the procurement training institute, or any other revenue, rebates, or fees

generated by programs administered by OCP. All fees and amounts collected pursuant to

subsections (a) through (c) of this section shall be deposited in the Fund.

(2) All funds deposited in the Fund, and any interest earned on those funds, shall

not revert to the unrestricted fund balance of the General Fund of the District of Columbia at the

end of a fiscal year, or at any other time, but shall be continually available for the uses and

purposed set forth in paragraph (1) of this section without regard to fiscal year limitation,

subject to authorization by Congress.

Sec. 1104. Transparency in contracting.

(a) The CPO shall establish and maintain on the Internet publicly-available information

regarding District procurement. The information shall be made available in machine-readable

and searchable format and shall include the following:

(1) The legal authority and rules that govern procurement for all District

agencies and instrumentalities, including those exempt from the authority of the CPO;

(2) The names of all personnel with delegated contracting authority; and

(3) For contracts in excess of $100,000, a copy of the contract and any

determinations and findings, contract modifications, change orders, solicitations, or

amendments associated with the contract, including those made by District agencies exempt

from the authority of the CPO; provided, that the information required by this paragraph shall be

made available on the Internet for at least the duration of the underlying contract or 5 years,

whichever is longer.

(b) Agencies not subject to the authority of the CPO shall transmit the information

required by this section to the CPO for posting on the Internet.

Sec. 1105. Acquisition planning.

(a) The CPO shall develop and implement a process by which each agency subject to

the CPO’s procurement authority shall prepare and submit to the CPO an acquisition plan

identifying the size and nature of the anticipated procurement workload for the following fiscal

year.

(b) Each agency shall submit its acquisition plan for the following fiscal year to the

Council no later than March 20 of each year.

Sec. 1106. Rules.

(a)(1) The CPO, pursuant to Title 1 of the District of Columbia Administrative

Procedures Act, approved October 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1204; D.C. Official Code § 2-501 et seq.),

shall issue rules to implement the provisions of this act, except Title VI.

(2) The Department of Real Estate Services, pursuant to Title 1 of the District of

Columbia Administrative Procedures Act, approved October 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1204; D.C.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Official Code § 2-501 et seq.), shall issue rules to implement the provisions of Title VI.

(b) The existing procurement rules, to the degree that they are consistent with this act,

shall remain in effect until they are superseded by rules issued in accordance with subsection (a)

of this section.

act shall not change in any way a contractual commitment by the District government or of a

contractor to the District government which was in existence on the effective date of the rule or

regulation.

TITLE XII. REPEALED PROVISIONS; TRANSFERS AND CONTINUATION.

Sec. 1201. Repealer.

(a) Title I, sections 201 through 207, Titles III through VII, sections 801 though 812,

and Titles IX through XI of the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985,

effective February 21, 1986 (D.C. Law 6-85; D.C. Official Code § 2-301.01 passim), are

repealed. Sections 208 and 813 through 821 shall continue in effect.

(b) The Excellence in Local Business Contract Grading Act of 2008, effective February

5, 2008 (D.C. Law 17-137; D.C. Official Code § 2-325.04 et seq.), is repealed.

Sec. 1202. Transfers and continuation.

All rules, orders, obligations, determinations, grants, contracts, licenses, and agreements

shall continue in effect according to their terms until lawfully amended, repealed, or modified.

Sec. 1203. Applicability.

Sections 206, 803, and 1101 shall apply upon the inclusion of their fiscal effect in an

approved budget and financial plan.

Sec. 1204. Fiscal impact statement.

The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal

impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act,

approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).

Sec. 1205. Effective date.

This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the

Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as

provided in section 602(c) (1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December

24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of

Columbia Register.

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

Codification District of Columbia Official Code, 2001 Edition West Publisher, 1-800-328-9378.

Chairman

Council of the District of Columbia

Mayor

District of Columbia