DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES
POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND
CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS
Spanish policy on gender equality:
relevant current legislation and policies
NOTE
Abstract
This paper explores the main current Spanish legislation and policies relating to gender
equality. Spain has moved in approximately three decades from being a ‘latecomer’ to
being a ‘pioneer’ in gender equality policies. During this time Spain has consolidated its
institutional machinery on gender equality policies (section 1.1). It has developed a
strategy to promote gender equality based on equal opportunities, positive actions
(2.3), and gender mainstreaming (2.2), and has adopted both plans and laws as policy
instruments (2.1). It has approved a comprehensive law against gender violence that
frames it as a public matter of high political priority and an issue of Human Rights
(3.1), and an equality law that covers a broad range of issues, from paternity leave to a
more gender-balanced political representation (respectively in 3.2 and 3.3). It has
improved gender equality in politics, through a parity government and an increase in
women’s political representation (3.3). It has placed the issue of reconciliation of work
and family on the political agenda (3.2). The Spanish government is currently working
on new laws such as a law on sexual and reproductive health and an equal treatment
act covering different inequalities. Despite this progress, many challenges still lie ahead
for Spanish policy on gender equality, some of which will be tackled in this briefing
note.
PE 419.612 EN
This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Women's Rights
and Gender Equality.
AUTHOR
Dr Emanuela LOMBARDO
Ramón y Cajal Researcher at the Department of Political Science and Administration II of
Madrid Complutense University, Spain
; web: http://www.ucm.es/info/target/.
RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR
Ms Helene CALERS
Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
European Parliament
B-1047 Brussels
E-mail: poldep-citizens@europarl.europa.eu
LINGUISTIC VERSIONS
Original: EN
ABOUT THE EDITOR
To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: poldep-
Manuscript completed in October 2009
Brussels, © European Parliament, 2009.
This document is available on the Internet at:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies
DISCLAIMER
The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do
not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the
source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy.
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
3
CONTENTS
1. SPANISH INSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY AND POLITICAL CONTEXT
OF GENDER EQUALITY 4
1.1 The consolidation of the Spanish institutional machinery on gender equality 4
1.2 The political context of Spanish gender equality policies 5
2. POLICY INSTRUMENTS AND STRATEGIES FOR GENDER EQUALITY IN
SPAIN 5
2.1 Policy instruments: equality plans and laws 5
2.2 Policy strategies: gender mainstreaming 6
2.3 Policy strategies: positive actions 8
3. LEGISLATION AND POLICIES ON GENDER EQUALITY IN SPAIN: MAIN
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS 8
3.1 Violence against women: ‘a public matter’ 8
3.2 Reconciliation of work and family life and care issues 10
3.3 Women’s political representation: parity government and
the ‘40-60 share’ 12
CONCLUSIONS: SPAIN, FROM ‘LATECOMER’ TO ‘PIONEER’ IN GENDER
EQUALITY POLICIES 14
REFERENCES 15
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
4
1. SPANISH INSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY AND
POLITICAL CONTEXT OF GENDER EQUALITY
1.1 The consolidation of the Spanish institutional machinery on
gender equality
In about three decades, Spain has moved from being a dictatorship and a latecomer in
gender equality policies to being one of the European pioneers in the promotion of gender
equality.
Between Franco’s death in 1975 and Spain’s entry in the European Community in 1986,
the national agency for gender equality, the Woman’s Institute
1
, was created in 1983.
From that moment, the starting point for Spanish state feminism and public policies on
the issue, gender equality policies and the institutional framework created around them
have developed very quickly in Spain both at the national and regional levels, with the
creation of gender equality agencies in the Spanish Autonomous Communities and the
consolidation of the national equality machinery
2
.
The institutional framework around gender equality policies at the national level was
progressively strengthened with the creation of the Equality Policies General Secretariat
3
in 2004, which is of a higher rank than the Woman’s Institute, and the establishment of
the Ministry of Equality
4
in 2008. These institutional changes reinforced the gender
framework but also allowed the adoption of a broader perspective and the inclusion of
other inequalities
5
. In Spain, there are currently separate equality agencies for each
inequality in Article 13 of the EC Treaty except sexual orientation
6
. However, steps are
being taken within the Ministry of Equality to deal with all inequalities mentioned in
Article 13 of the EC Treaty (sex, race or ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, religion or
belief, and disability) within a single body that is likely to be the current Ministry of
Equality. The consolidated character of the Spanish gender equality machinery is
noticeable in the fact that the Woman’s Institute will be maintained as a structure to
promote gender equality, together with the future body that will cover all six inequalities,
including sex
7
.
Acknowledgments: I wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the European Social
Fund for funding my research through the 2006 Ramón y Cajal Program, the European Commission and the
team members of the European FP6 QUING Project on the Quality of Gender Equality Policies (www.quing.eu
),
the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality of the European Parliament for commissioning this
briefing note, María Bustelo for commenting it, and Eduardo Jáuregui for proofreading it.
1
Ley 16/1983, de 24 de octubre de 1983. See Bustelo and Ortbals 2007; Valiente 1995.
2
This overview of the main recent policies and legislation, for reasons of brevity, is by no means exhaustive. It
can only tackle a selection of issues of the Spanish gender equality policy. Moreover, despite the relevance of
the regional policy level when addressing gender equality in Spain, in this paper the national level is the main
object of analysis.
3
Real Decreto 562/2004, de 19 de abril de 2004; Real Decreto 1600/2004, de 2 de julio de 2004.
4
Real Decreto 438/2008, de 14 de abril de 2008; Real Decreto 1135/2008, de 4 de julio de 2008.
5
The two EU anti-discrimination directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC have been partially transposed
through the Ley 62/2003 de medidas fiscales, administrativas y sociales. See Bustelo 2009.
6
On gender the Woman’s Institute and the Equality Policies General Secretariat; on race and ethnicity, the
Council for the Advancement of Equality of Treatment and no Discrimination of People on the grounds of Racial
or Ethnic Origin, the Forum for the Social Integration of Immigrants, the Spanish Observatory on Racism and
Xenophobia, and the Council of Roma People; on disability, the National Disability Council; on age, the Youth
Institute; on religion the Advisory Commission on Religious Freedom and the Directorate General of Religious
Affairs within the Ministry of Justice.
7
Bustelo 2009.
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
5
1.2 The political context of Spanish gender equality policies
The political context is crucial to understand developments in gender equality policies in
Spain. At the national level, the main factor for the creation of the Woman’s Institute in
1983 was the initiative of the Socialist Party in government at the time and the activism
of feminist socialist women
8
. Thus, up to the mid 1990s national gender policies in Spain
were identified with the Socialist Party. However, in 1996 the Popular Party took office
and women’s agencies and gender policies were also supported then by the new Cabinet.
United Nations (IV World Conference in Beijing) and European Union (EU) pressures were
key factors in the maintenance of state feminism in Spain
9
. After eight years of
conservative government, in March 2004 there was an important political change. The
new socialist government, led by Rodríguez Zapatero, had a considerable impact on
gender policies with measures such as a parity government, the creation of the Equality
Policies General Secretariat, and the approval of important laws such as the Law 1/2004
against gender violence
10
, the reform of the Civil Code which allows same-sex marriage
(Law 13/2005)
11
, the ‘Dependency law’ (Law 39/2006)
12
, and the Law 3/2007 on
Substantive Equality between Women and Men (from now on referred to as the Equality
Law)
13
. The re-election of Zapatero in 2008 has brought further change to the equality
machinery and legislation, such as the creation of the mentioned Ministry of Equality and
a recent law proposal on sexual and reproductive health and voluntary interruption of
pregnancy
14
. The Ministry of Equality is also preparing an Equal Treatment Act to combat
discrimination, on which an Expert Group created by the Ministry is currently working
15
.
2. POLICY INSTRUMENTS AND STRATEGIES FOR GENDER
EQUALITY IN SPAIN
2.1 Policy instruments: equality plans and laws
Prior to the approval in the last decade of equality laws and gender units within public
administrations and ministries (see sections 3 and 2.2), plans had been the main policy
instrument employed to implement public policies on gender equality in Spain. Gender
equality plans, formulated by public bodies encharged with the promotion of gender
equality policies such as the Woman’s Institute and adopted by the Cabinet, include
measures and goals that different governmental departments, and sometimes also civil
society organisations, need to implement during a specific period of time
16
. The
8
Valiente 1995.
9
Lombardo 2004.
10
Ley Orgánica 1/2004, de 28 de diciembre, de Medidas de Protección Integral contra la Violencia de Género.
11
Ley 13/2005, de 1 de julio, por la que se modifica el Código Civil en materia de derecho a contraer
matrimonio.
12
Ley 39/2006 de 14 de diciembre de 2006 de promoción de la autonomía personal y atención a las personas
en situación de dependencia.
13
Ley Orgánica 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, para la igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres.
14
Proyecto de Ley Orgánica de salud sexual y reproductiva y de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo
(121/000041). This law proposal aims at guaranteeing Fundamental Rights in sexual and reproductive health,
regulating conditions of the voluntary interruption of pregnancy that protect women’s rights and do not
discriminate women (among the provisions is the exclusion of abortion from the Penal Code, the enabling of it
until the first 14
th
week if a woman asks for it, and until the 22
nd
week for health reasons), and establishing
public obligations of information, education and provision of assistance by the National Health System. See
www.congreso.es
(accessed 30/09/2009).
15
Bustelo 2009.
16
Bustelo and Ortbals 2007.
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
6
introduction of equality laws, approved first in the Autonomous Communities and later at
the national level, shows the consolidation of gender equality policies in Spain. Unlike
plans, gender equality laws entitle individuals to take judicial action to claim their rights
in courts. The 2007 Equality Law and other important Spanish laws, such as the Law on
Gender Violence, will be discussed in section 3.
Equality plans and laws are now complementary instruments in developing gender
equality policies in Spain. Both may enable a transversal approach to policymaking, as
they may tackle different areas. The Equality Law 3/2007 legitimises the use of policy
plans as key instruments in gender equality policy, in addition to laws. The current plan,
which implements the 2007 Equality Law, is the Strategic Plan of Equality of
Opportunities 2008-2011
17
, which is based on principles of equality and non-
discrimination and includes measures in 12 priority areas such as socio-political and
economic participation, co-responsibility in family and work tasks, education, knowledge,
health, attention to diversity and social inclusion, violence, development, media, and
protection of the right to equality.
2.2 Policy strategies: gender mainstreaming
Gender equality policy plans and laws in Spain have been guided not only by the principle
of equality of opportunities between the sexes, but also by policy strategies, such as
gender mainstreaming and positive actions, that aim at achieving a broader equality of
outcome. Gender mainstreaming is the strategy adopted by the EU through Articles 2 and
3(2) of the EC Treaty to ensure that policymakers introduce a gender perspective into all
policies and processes, by analysing ex ante the potential impact that policy proposals
on, for instance, finance or research could have on women and men and by formulating
public policies that in their specific sectors promote gender equality. Spanish gender
equality policy plans have adopted a transversal approach, as they require different
governmental departments to adopt gender policy measures included in the plan.
However, the institutionalisation of gender mainstreaming has been explicitly formalised
in the 2007 Equality Law (especially, but not only, in Title II Article 15), which requires
public administrations to mainstream gender in the adoption, implementation, and
budgeting of all policies. To evaluate ex ante the potential impact of laws from a
gender perspective, and ensure that legislative proposals on issues such as transport or
education do not create or maintain gender inequalities but rather promote gender
equality, Law 30/2003
18
requires policymakers to draft a report to assess the gender
impact of all governmental laws. The 2007 Equality Law (Title II, Article 19) extends the
requirement to draft a gender impact assessment report prior to the adoption of policy
measures also to policy plans of special economic, social, artistic, and cultural relevance,
which is particularly important considering the key role of plans as privileged policy
instruments in Spain. In order to provide the necessary expertise for mainstreaming
gender into all policies, the Equality Law prescribes the creation of gender units within
all Ministries (Title VII, Article 77) so that experts in both gender and the policy field of
each specific Ministry may help in the design and implementation of policies with a
gender perspective and in the collection of data and elaboration of studies. Finally, to
help policymakers acquire the competence needed to plan, implement, and evaluate
public policies taking gender into account, the Equality Law requires the State General
17
http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/mujer/politicas/aqui.html (accessed 30/09/09).
18
Ley 30/2003 del 13 de octubre. Laws in the Catalan (Ley 4/2001), Andalusia, (Ley 18/2003), and the
Basque (Ley 4/2005) regional contexts also prescribe gender impact assessment.
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
7
Administration to organise gender training for all public administration personnel and to
introduce gender issues in the exam for becoming civil servants (Title V, Article 61).
While at the formal level important steps towards the institutionalisation of gender
mainstreaming have been taken in Spain, implementation is slower. Gender units within
all Ministries have been created, though with organisational and personnel differences -
according to data of the Ministry of Equality (2009). Gender impact assessment of a
number of laws and plans has been performed
19
while a gender impact assessment of the
National Budget Law has been conducted for the first time for the 2009 Budget Law
20
.
The latter analyses gender inequalities in each ministerial area (though not always
documented through gender disaggregated statistical data), the budget lines dedicated to
gender, and the plans for employing the budget to correct gender inequalities. Gender
experts and activists have appreciated the gender impact assessment of the 2009 Budget
Law as a good first step yet in need of improvements, as, for instance, it does not include
the gender impact of tax systems and does not analyse the invisible unpaid work that
women perform to care for dependant and ill relatives
21
. According to research performed
in the EQUAPOL project, the Spanish decentralised model has given regions a degree of
autonomy that has enabled some of them to make progress in gender mainstreaming
prior to the national level of government
22
. This can be noticed, for example, in the
experiences of gender budgeting in the Andalusian and the Basque regions. The
Andalusian government has created a Budget Commission that has elaborated gender
impact assessment reports of the Andalusian budget since 2006
23
. Emakunde, the
Basque Women’s Institute, conducted a pilot experience of gender budgeting in 6
governmental departments from 1996 to 2004
24
.
Gender training of public administrations is increasing in Spain, though training practices
are not systematically conducted in all public administration departments
25
. The gender
training of public administration personnel by the Andalusian Gender Equality Unit was a
pioneering experience in the implementation of gender mainstreaming through the
training of civil servants and the elaboration of manuals to help public administrators
incorporate a gender perspective in their daily work
26
. Gender disaggregated statistical
data are in process of development, and the Ministry of Equality, the Ministry of Public
Administrations and the National Institute of Security and Hygiene at Work are making
some progress in this direction
27
. One limitation of the Spanish gender mainstreaming
model is its scant emphasis on the participation of women’s organisations, which can be
seen in the lack of institutionalised channels for women’s participation in policymaking in
a country where gender equality policies began more than 25 years ago. An indicator of
this lack of participatory approach is, for instance, the fact that the Council of Woman’s
Participation announced in the Equality Law has not yet been created
28
.
19
Ministerio de Igualdad 2009.
20
See http://www.meh.es/es-ES/Paginas/Home.aspx (accessed 26/10/2009).
21
See http://impactodegeneroya.blogia.com/ (accessed 27/10/09).
22
Clavero and Daly 2004.
23
See http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/economiayhacienda/planif_presup/genero/informe.htm (accessed
28/10/09).
24
http://www.emakunde.euskadi.net/u72-home/es/ (accessed 28/10/09)
25
Espirito Santo et al 2007.
26
See http://www.unidadgenero.com/default.cfm (accessed 28/10/09).
27
Ministerio de Igualdad 2009.
28
The Council of State, on the 8th October 2009, has analysed the proposal to regulate functions,
competencies and composition of the Council of Woman’s Participation. Proyecto de Real Decreto por el que se
regula el régimen de funcionamiento, competencias y composición del Consejo de Participación de la Mujer
(Dictamen núm. 1.500/2009), http://www.consejo-estado.es/asuntos.php
(accessed 16/10/09).
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
8
2.3 Policy strategies: positive actions
Positive actions seek to correct the initial disadvantage of women, taking gender into
account in establishing the criteria for hiring and promoting personnel, and for
participating in decision-making institutions. In all of these situations, the application of a
compensatory measure means favouring, in cases of equal merit, a woman over a man.
The EU legal basis for positive actions measures is Article 141(4) of the EC Treaty. The
Equality Law in its Article 11 encourages Public Authorities to adopt positive actions ‘in
favour of women to correct obvious cases of inequality of outcome in relation to men’.
The Equality Law also introduces positive actions in the area of political representation
(see section 3.3).
3. LEGISLATION AND POLICIES ON GENDER EQUALITY
IN SPAIN: MAIN CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
3.1 Violence against women: ‘a public matter’
29
The first law approved by the Zapatero Cabinet in 2004 was the Organic Law 1/2004
on Comprehensive Protection Measures against Gender Violence
30
. The law, which
was approved with the support of all Spanish political parties, shows that the problem of
violence against women in Spain is not only a ‘public matter’ but also a high political
priority. Gender violence has shifted from being a ‘private matter’ to being a public issue
that concerns women’s Human Rights and that the state is responsible for solving. The
increasing public recognition of the problem of gender violence that led to the approval of
Law 1/2004 is a result of the mobilisation of the feminist movement in favour of a
comprehensive law on violence against women since 1993
31
.
The Organic Law 1/2004 against gender violence is considered as a ‘pioneering’ law at
least for five reasons. Firstly it defines gender violence as a problem of gender inequality
-‘the most brutal symbol of gender inequality’- as the Preamble states. Thus, it
overcomes the previous framing of the issue as ‘domestic violence’, which located
violence against women in a neutral ‘domestic’ space that did not specify relations of
inequality and the position of men and women in this space. Violence against women is
clearly defined in the 1/2004 Law as the result of patriarchal structures or the unequal
gender power hierarchies that place men in a privileged situation over women. The law
establishes Special Courts to deal with crimes of gender violence, where professionals are
trained for such cases. Secondly, the law makes clear that gender violence is a public
matter, explicitly bringing out this ‘invisible crime’
32
from the private sphere where it had
been placed for so long (‘violence is not an issue that belongs to the private sphere’
states the Preamble of the law). Thirdly, the law adopts a comprehensive approach to
solve the problem, which includes a variety of legal, penal, judicial, social, health, and
educational measures, together with measures for recognising women’s rights and
coordinating among different policy actors to prevent violence and protect victims.
Fourthly, the law creates two bodies located within the Ministry of Equality: a
Governmental Delegation on Gender Violence
33
, with the aim of promoting and
coordinating governmental policies against gender violence, and a State Observatory on
29
Bustelo, López and Platero (2007: 67).
30
Ley Orgánica 1/2004, de Medidas de Protección Integral contra la Violencia de Género.
31
Bustelo, López and Platero 2007.
32
Bustelo, López and Platero 2007: 92.
33
http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/violencia-mujer/Index_Delegacion.html (accessed 28/10/09)
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
9
Violence against Women
34
which collects data on gender violence and produces studies
on the evolution of the phenomenon. Finally, by drawing on the legal definition of gender
violence as that which is directed against women due to the mere fact of being women,
the law penalises men and women differently for the crime of violence against their
partners, with stronger measures reserved for male perpetrators.
Despite its progress, the Law on violence has some limitations. Concerning policy design,
the law was criticised for its limited definition of ‘gender violence’, which encompasses
only violence within partnerships and ex-partnerships, rather than including also sexual
harassment
35
, rape, trafficking in women, sexual violence outside partnerships, sexist
language, and so on
36
. Migrant women victims of violence have more difficulties in
receiving public protection. Amnesty International in 2005 denounced the fact that sans
papier migrant women victims of violence could not access economic benefits and
shelters provided by the Law 1/2004
37
. Law 14/2003
38
offers some protection to
battered migrant women whose residence permit depends on their perpetrator-spouse as
it enables them to obtain an independent residence permit, after the judge has issued a
protection order. Regarding policy implementation, one of the problems of the law is that
most of the measures must be implemented by the Autonomous Communities, and this
leads to different levels of protection in the regions. Insufficient economic resources for
the law have also been criticised
39
. In its 2008 Evaluation Report, the Ministry of Equality
conducted a first assessment of the effects of the application of the Law on the struggle
against gender violence
40
. The report states that the Spanish government, since the
adoption of the Law 1/2004, has spent almost 800 million euros in policies aimed at
preventing and tackling gender violence. It enumerates a great variety of policy
measures introduced to comply with the law. These include: educational, information,
training and awareness-raising actions targeted at different collectives; institutional
actions of the Government Delegation on Gender Violence and the State Observatory on
Violence against Women (such as the production of an annual report on the situation of
gender violence and the implementation of the Violence Law, and the elaboration of
indicators of gender violence to enable a more efficient collection of data)
41
, and the
setting up of 59 Violence Units in the Delegations and Sub delegations of the Government
to coordinate actions on violence in the whole territory; judicial assistance to victims
through the coordinated work of special police and judicial professionals and judicial
response and penalisation of perpetrators; and social assistance to victims. According to
the Ministry of Equality (2008), the number of reports on gender violence has increased
by 72.1% from 2002 to 2007 and the percentage of homicides due to gender violence
has decreased by 8.7% since the adoption of the Violence Law. Nevertheless, the
Government Report on the Evaluation of the Law also admits that 3 years is too short a
34
See http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/violencia-mujer/Observatorio.html (accessed 28/10/09).
35
Sexual harassment has been prohibited by the Equality Law 3/2007, transposing the EU Directive
2002/73/CE.
36
See Bustelo, López and Platero 2007 and CEDAW Shadow Report of the feminist Platform ‘Impacto de
género ya’ (http://impactodegeneroya.blogia.com/
(accessed 26/10/09).
37
Inmigrantes indocumentadas. ¿Hasta cuándo sin protección frente a la violencia de género? Amnistía
Internacional, 2005, www.es.amnesty.org
(accessed 28/10/09).
38
Ley Orgánica 14/2003, de 20 de noviembre, de Reforma de la Ley orgánica 4/2000, de 11 de enero, sobre
derechos y libertades de los extranjeros en España y su integración social. Real Decreto 1162/2009 in its Article
96.3 enables victims of violence to obtain a residence and work permit before the required 1 year legal
residence.
39
See Platform ‘Impacto de género ya’ http://impactodegeneroya.blogia.com/ (accessed 26/10/09).
40
Ministerio de Igualdad 2008.
41
Documents are available in English at http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/violencia-mujer/Observatorio.html
(accessed 28/10/09).
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
10
time period to evaluate a law that deals with a very complex structural problem. In any
case, the limitations in the policy design and in the implementation of the 1/2004 Law do
not overshadow the advances of a law that has represented a milestone in the public
action to end violence against women in Spain.
3.2 Reconciliation of work and family life and care issues
Reconciliation of work and family life has entered the Spanish political agenda in the last
decade. Issues of reconciliation of work and family life in Spain have mainly been framed
as policies necessary for improving women’s employability in the labour market and for
protecting the family rather than for promoting greater gender equality and equal sharing
of care responsibilities between the sexes
42
. However, recent developments introduced
by the Equality Law 3/2007 on an individual right to paternity leave of two weeks and the
Law 9/2009 on the extension of the fathers’ leave to four weeks show some progress
towards a more equitable redistribution of roles between women and men.
The Popular Party, in government from 1996 to 2004, placed the issue of reconciliation of
work and family life on the agenda. The main aims of policies adopted in this period are
promoting an efficient labour market and protecting the family, but not always fostering
gender equality. The Law 39/1999
43
known as ‘Reconciliation Law’ was adopted to
transpose the EU Parental Leave Directive 96/34/EC. It advanced in aspects related to
maternity leave, but it failed to promote more equal gender roles in childcare. The lack of
an individual right to paternity leave in the 39/1999 Law, which disregarded indications
included in the EC directive, contributed to perpetuate women’s roles as main caregivers
and men as ‘secondary’ in the care of their children
44
. Women appeared to be the ones
who needed to reconcile work and family life, while men were not asked to do so. As part
of the Comprehensive Plan for Family Support (2001-2004), the government adopted a
tax measure through Law 46/2002
45
, which enables ‘working mothers’ (not fathers, and
not mothers who are unemployed or working in the underground economy) to receive a
subsidy of 100 euros per month for each child below 3 years of age. The increasing
political attention to the issue is also indicated by the inclusion, in the Third and the
Fourth Plan for Equal Opportunities between Women and Men (1997–2000 and 2003-
2006), of a section on reconciliation of work and family life.
The Zapatero government kept reconciliation high on the political agenda and presented
it as an issue of gender equality. It introduced a series of measures, such as the 2005
Plan Concilia’ to help Public Administration personnel reconcile their work and
personal/family life through the introduction of flexible working times and longer parental
leaves
46
. The greater steps towards a more equal sharing of gender roles in care were
taken by the Equality Law that introduced an individual right to two weeks of
paternity leave
47
. The recognition of the role of fathers in care issues represents
progress towards achieving a greater gender equality, despite the fact that the length of
42
Peterson 2007.
43
Ley 39/1999, de 5 de noviembre, para promover la conciliación de la vida familiar y laboral de las personas
trabajadoras.
44
Peterson 2007; Lombardo 2004.
45
Ley 46/2002, de 18 de diciembre, de reforma parcial del impuesto de la renta de las personas físicas
46
http://www.mpt.es/documentacion/iniciativas/mejora_de_la_administracion_general_del_estado/funcion_pu
blica/concilia.html (accessed 19/10/09).
47
The Law 2/2008 has extended the paternity leave to 20 days in case of birth or adoption of a child on the
part of large families or when there is a disabled person in the family.
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
11
the leave and its non-binding character have been criticised by gender experts for being
‘a symbolic rather than substantial change’
48
. However, the right to paternity leave has
recently been extended to four weeks through the Law 9/2009 that will enter into
force on the 1
st
January 2011
49
with the aim of promoting men’s involvement in family
responsibilities. According to data of the Ministry of Equality, since the adoption of the
Equality Law, 80% of new fathers have benefited from the two weeks’ leave
50
. While the
Equality Law frames reconciliation as a matter of gender equality, the promotion of an
increased participation of women in the labour market is maintained as a key political
goal. Moreover, demographic concerns about the low birth-rates rates in Spain (fertility
rate was 1.40 in 2007, the lowest one was 1.16 in 1996)
51
have moved the government
in 2007 to adopt an assistentialist birth-promoting measure through the Law 35/2007,
that assigns a 2500 euro subsidy or tax deduction for every child born or adopted
52
.
Thus, while the government placed a greater emphasis on gender equality in dealing with
the issue of reconciliation of family and work, they maintained the former focus on the
labour market and the protection of families.
Care issues were introduced in the agenda with the approval in 2006 of the 39/2006 ‘Law
for the Promotion of Personal Autonomy and Attention to Persons in Situations of
Dependency’
53
. The so-called ‘Dependency Law’ was presented as the fourth pillar of
the Spanish welfare state as it assigned some state responsibility in the provision of care
for elderly, disabled, and dependent people
54
within the Spanish context, where public
spending on elderly and other recipients of care is below the EU average
55
. The
Dependency Law promotes the creation of public care services and introduces the option
of paying an allowance to thenon professional carer, that is, the person who is caring
for dependent family members. However, the law does not change the reality that the
family remains the main agent responsible for care, while the state merely holds a
subsidiary role in care. Feminist organisations such as Asamblea Feminista have criticised
the 39/2006 Law not only because of the insufficient funding provided but also due to the
risk that the allowance for the family care-giver would maintain women (de facto the
main family carers
56
) in the traditional position of being those responsible for care
57
. The
implementation of the Dependency law has also been criticised for being uneven across
the different regions, with delays in some regions in the attribution of benefits
58
. Overall,
the law does not solve the problem that most of the work of care in Spain is either
performed by women for free
59
, or carried out by migrant domestic workers, mostly
48
Peterson 2008: 17.
49
Ley 9/2009, de 6 de octubre, de ampliación de la duración del permiso de paternidad en los casos de
nacimiento, adopción o acogida.
50
Ministerio de Igualdad 2009.
51
Eurostat 2009, Demographic changes: Total fertility rate.
52
Ley 35/2007, de 15 de noviembre, por la que se establece la deducción por nacimiento o adopción en el
IRPF y la prestación económica de pago único de la Seguridad Social por nacimiento o adopción.
53
Ley 39/2006, de 14 de diciembre, de promoción de la Autonomía Personal y Atención a las personas en
situación de dependencia.
54
Bustelo and Peterson 2007.
55
Social benefits for family and childcare was 1.2% of the GDP in Spain in 2006, while EU-27 average was
2.1%; public expenditure on elderly care in 2006 was 0.34% of Spanish GDP, while EU-27 average was 0.48%;
total public expenditure on social protection was 20.9% of GDP in Spain while EU-27 was 26.9% (Source:
Eurostat 2009).
56
According to data of the Ministry of Equality (2009), 83% of non professional care-givers are women.
57
López 2008.
58
El País 6/10/2009, www.elpais.com (accessed 6/10/2009).
59
Durán 2000; Carrasco 2006.
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
12
women, whose work is regulated by a Special Regime of social security that provides less
protection than that offered to other workers
60
. The reform of the Special Regime of
Domestic Workers, recently announced by the government, is currently under discussion
by different social actors
61
.
Despite the criticisms to care and reconciliation measures from the perspective of
advocates of a greater gender equality, Spanish policies on reconciliation of work and
family life show some progress towards the achievement of a greater gender equality.
3.3 Women’s political representation: parity government and the
‘40-60 share’
62
Over the last years, Spain has joined the ranks of states with a high number of women in
elected political positions. While until the end of the 1980s women made up about 6% of
the MPs in the Spanish national Parliament, during the 1990s their number rose to 15%,
reaching 28% in 2000, 36% in 2004, and 36.29% in 2008
63
. In some of the regional
parliaments, the percentage of women’s political representation in 2009 is higher than
40%
64
. Reasons for this increase can be related mostly to the introduction of voluntary
party quotas in the left-wing parties, and partly to the approval of a parity provision in
the 2007 Equality Law (see next paragraph), and the adoption, on the part of a number
of regional governments, of parity legal provisions that establish minimum shares for
women and men on candidate lists
65
. In addition to the struggle of female politicians
within political parties to promote gender equality in politics, especially from the left
66
,
the role of some male political leaders has been highlighted as crucial to bringing about
changes in women’s political representation
67
.
Progress for women’s political representation at the national level came in March 2004,
when Zapatero won the general elections and created the first parity government in
Spain, appointing an equal number of female and male Ministers (8 of each sex) and a
female Vice-President of Government. This decision was maintained when Zapatero
repeated his victory in the 2008 general elections, and the current government is
composed of 9 female Ministers and 8 male Ministers. However, below the ministerial
level only 4 out of the 17 Ministries respect a 40-60 percentage of women and men
among personnel of the General State Administration
68
. After the 2004 elections, the
number of women MPs reached 36% in the Congress (Lower House). To make such
changes more long-lasting, the government approved a provision in the Equality Law
that requires political parties to respect a share of no more than 60% and no less
60
Peterson 2008.
61
See INSTRAW-Spain http://www.un-instraw.org/es/md/global-care-chains/agenda-politica-espana.html
(accessed 27/10/09).
62
See Lombardo and Bustelo 2009.
63
Source: Woman’s Institute
http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/mujer/mujeres/cifras/poder/poder_legislativo.htm
(accessed 5/10/09).
64
Source: Woman’s Institute http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/mujer/mujeres/cifras/index.htm (accessed
9/10/09).
65
See www.democraciaparitaria.com (accessed 29/09/09). The Basque Law 4/2005 for Equality of Women and
Men is the most advanced regional law as concerns provisions on parity. It affects not only electoral laws, by
establishing an obligation that in electoral lists for the Basque Parliament there is to be a quota of at least 50%
of women (whereas other regional laws prescribe a 40-60 share), but also Government Law, making it
mandatory that the Cabinet be composed of at least 40% of representatives from each sex. See Elizondo and
Martínez 2007.
66
Valiente 2005.
67
Threlfall 2007.
68
See www.democraciaparitaria.com (accessed 9/10/09).
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
13
than 40% of either sex on candidate lists in each group of five candidates
69
. The
Equality Law also establishes the principle of ‘balanced presence’ (40-60) for
appointments of people for leading positions within the General State Administration,
bodies involved in the selection of personnel, and boards of directors of companies where
the state is involved. Although in June 2007 the Popular Party took the provision on
parity to the Spanish Constitutional Court with the accusation of unconstitutionality, the
Constitutional Court, with its sentence of 29 January 2008, has rejected this claim, giving
its approval to the parity provision of the Spanish Equality Law.
However, the March 2008 general elections have shown a limited implementation of the
parity provision in the Equality Law, with a percentage of 36.29% female MPs (only
0.29% above the 36% reached in 2004), and a higher increase in the percentage of
female Senators (31.73% in 2008 and 25.96% in 2004)
70
. The small increase in the
number of elected women in the Parliament from 2004 to 2008 could be due to the fact
that political parties have placed female candidates in more disadvantageous positions on
the list, while giving male candidates better positions in order to favour their election (for
instance, in each group of five candidates, a woman opened and closed the list or two
women were placed at the end, while men were placed in central positions). We can draw
at least two conclusions from these electoral results. Firstly, they show that the legal
formula of 40-60% for each group of 5 candidates, without a provision regulating the
position of candidates on the list to ensure equal possibilities to be elected (the so called
‘zipper’ system that alternates a woman and a man on the list), could disadvantage
women. This is because parties tend to assign women the lowest proportion of
candidature, that is the 40%, and to place men in the higher ranks of the five top
positions in the list and women in the less favourable positions
71
. Secondly, they indicate
that, in spite of the undeniable achievements of a parity government and a 40-60 share,
more needs to be done to challenge the pervasiveness of patriarchal political cultures
embedded in existing institutional frameworks and to achieve an effective implementation
of the parity provision of the Equality Law.
69
The provision also applies to local elections in city councils with more than 5000 inhabitants.
70
See data of the Spanish Ministry of Interior http://www.mir.es/DGPI/Elecciones/index.html (accessed
12/10/09).
71
See Verge forthcoming.
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
14
CONCLUSIONS: SPAIN, FROM ‘LATECOMER’ TO ‘PIONEER’
IN GENDER EQUALITY POLICIES
72
From being a ‘latecomer’ in gender equality policies, Spain has moved, in three decades,
to becoming a country with a parity government, with a relatively good ranking in
women’s political representation (36%) among European countries, and with an avant-
garde Law against gender violence. Spain has consolidated its institutional framework
around gender equality policies at the national level with the creation of the Woman’s
Institute, an Equality Policies General Secretariat and a Ministry of Equality. It has
developed political strategies of equal opportunities, positive actions, and gender
mainstreaming. It has implemented gender equality policies through instruments such as
equality plans and, more recently, laws. It has adopted in 2007 an Equality Law which,
through the use of the three strategies mentioned, covers a wide range of issues, from
paternity leave to a more gender balanced political representation. This young ‘pioneer’ in
gender policies, however, has many challenges ahead. These include, among others, a
better implementation of the Laws on Gender Violence, Dependency, and Equality,
including an increase in the budgetary support for the laws, the introduction of a longer
and binding paternity leave so that men will more equally share care responsibilities with
women, the development of a universal and quality public care system for children and
dependants to discharge women from their main role of carers, the need to improve the
formulation and implementation of the parity provision of the Equality Law, a greater
participation of women’s organisations in policymaking, and a more systematic
implementation of positive actions and gender mainstreaming to ensure equality of
outcome in all social areas and gender equality in all public policies and processes.
72
See Lombardo and Bustelo 2009.
Spanish policy on gender equality: relevant current legislation and policies
15
REFERENCES
Bustelo, M. 2009. ‘Spain: intersectionality faces a strong gender norm’, International
Feminist Journal of Politics 11(4): 530-546.
Bustelo, M. and C. Ortbals. 2007. ‘The Evolution of Spanish State Feminism. A
Fragmented Landscape’ in J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola eds. Changing State
Feminism. Houndmills: Palgrave, pp. 201-223.
Bustelo, M., S. López and R. Platero. 2007. ‘La representación de la violencia contra las
mujeres como un asunto de género y un problema público en España’ in M.
Bustelo and E. Lombardo eds. Políticas de igualdad en España y en Europa.
Madrid: Cátedra, pp 67-96.
Bustelo, M. and E. Peterson. 2007. ‘The representation of domestic work(ers):
Intersections of gender, class, and nationality in the care debate in Spain: The
case of the new Dependency Law’, ECPR, Pisa, 6-8 September.
Carrasco, C. 2006. ‘La economía del cuidado, los estándares de vida y los presupuestos
públicos’ in M. De la Fuente and L. Ortiz eds. Els Pressupostos amb perspectiva de
gènere, repte per als governs locals, Barcelona: ICPS, pp 27-49.
Clavero, S. and M. Daly. 2004. ‘Spain: analysis of policy context and policies’. EQUAPOL
National Reports, http://www.equapol.gr/
(accessed 29/09/09).
Durán, M.A. 2000. ‘Uso del tiempo y trabajo no remunerado’. Revista de Ciencias
Sociales 18: 56-70, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República,
Montevideo.
Elizondo, A. and E. Martínez. 2007. ‘Ley Vasca para la igualdad de mujeres y hombres:
elaboración contenidos y balance’ in M. Lois and I. Diz eds. Mujeres, instituciones
y política. EGAP: Xunta de Galicia, pp 309-330.
Espirito Santo, A. et al. 2007. ‘Opera Report on Gender Training in All Countries’. QUING
unpublished report D29, www.quing.eu
(accessed 19/10/09).
Eurostat. 2009. Living conditions and welfare: Social protection; Demographic changes:
Total fertility rate http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
(accessed 8/10/09).
Lombardo, E. 2004. La europeización de la política española de igualdad de género.
Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.
Lombardo, E. and M. Bustelo. 2009. ‘Promotion de l’égalité de genre en Espagne: de la
parité politique à la lutte contre les violences domestiques’. Informations sociales
151: 118-126.
López, S. 2008. ‘Spain: General Gender Equality Policies’. QUING unpublished report
D40, www.quing.eu
(accessed 8/10/09).
Ministerio de Igualdad. 2008. Informe Ejecutivo ‘Evaluación de la aplicación de la Ley
Orgánica 1/2004, de 28 de diciembre, de medidas de protección integral contra la
violencia de género’, http://www.migualdad.es
(accessed 30/09/09).
Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs
16
Ministerio de Igualdad. 2009. ‘2 años de aplicación de la Ley orgánica 3/2007 de 22 de
marzo para la igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres’ Informe-balance,
http://www.migualdad.es
(accessed 30/09/09).
Peterson, E. 2007. ‘El género en los marcos interpretativos sobre la conciliación de la vida
familiar y laboral’ in M. Bustelo and E. Lombardo eds. Políticas de igualdad en
España y en Europa. Madrid: Cátedra, pp 35-66.
Peterson, E. 2008. ‘Framing care matters: Envisioning gender equality and the welfare
state in feminist theory and Spanish policy debates’, Umeå University, 12 June.
Threlfall, M. 2007. ‘Explaining Gender Parity in Spain: The Internal Dynamics of Parties’,
West European Politics 30 (5): 1068–95.
Valiente, C. 1995. ‘The Power of Persuasion: the Instituto de la Mujer in Spain’ in D. Stetson
and Amy G. Mazur eds. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp
221-236.
Valiente, C. 2005. ‘The women’s movement, gender equality agencies and central-state
debates on political representation in Spain’ in J. Lovenduski ed. State feminism
and political representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 174-194.
Verge, T. Forthcoming. ‘Gendering Representation in Spain: Opportunities and Limits of
Gender Quotas’. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy.