OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
April 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022
SEMIANNUAL
REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
CONTENTS
1 OIG PROFILE
OIG Profile
OIG Organization Chart
Fiscal Year 2022 Results
GSAs Management Challenges
7 SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Significant Audits
 Summary of ContractAuditReports
 FAR Disclosure Program
 Statistical Summary ofOIGAudits
31 SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS
 Significant Investigations
 Criminal Investigations
 Civil Settlements
 Investigations of SeniorOcials
 Fleet Card Fraud
 WPA Art Investigations
 Other Significant Work
 Statistical Summary ofOIGInvestigations
49 GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES
 Government-wide PolicyActivities
55 APPENDIXES
 APPENDIX I
Acronyms and Abbreviations
 APPENDIX II
Significant Recommendations FromPriorReports
 APPENDIX III
Audit and Inspection ReportRegister
 APPENDIX IV
OIGReports over12MonthsOld, FinalAgencyActionPending
 APPENDIX V
OIG Reports Without ManagementDecision
 APPENDIX VI
Management Decisions Revised or With Which the Inspector General is in Disagreement
 APPENDIX VII
Peer Review Results
 APPENDIX VIII
Government Contractor Significant Audit Findings
 APPENDIX IX
Unimplemented Recommendations
 APPENDIX X
Reporting Requirements
Cover Photo: GSA Building Exterior
MESSAGE FROM THE IG
I am pleased to submit to Congress our Semiannual Report for the period of April 1, 2022,
through September 30, 2022.
This report closes out a fiscal year in which our oce again provided a strong return
on the American taxpayers’ investment in us. During Fiscal Year 2022, our audit and
investigative work identified nearly $468 million in potential cost savings and recovered
more than $127 million for the federal government.
During this period, we issued to the agency multiple audit documents identifying
significant deficiencies in GSA’s Multiple Award Schedules (MAS) Program. Most notably,
we delivered an alert memorandum warning that although GSA was on track to greatly expand that
program’s Transactional Data Reporting (TDR) Pilot, persistent and extensive errors in the data render it
unusable for pricing purposes. We also issued an audit report finding that price analysis by GSA contracting
sta is so deficient across the entire MAS Program that the Federal Acquisition Service cannot provide
customer federal agencies with assurance that their purchases under the program meet statutory and
regulatory requirements. We will continue to engage in dialogue with GSAs senior leadership to seek
agency action addressing the significant deficiencies in the TDR pilot before its further expansion.
We also continued our oversight of GSAs activities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. During this
reporting period, we alerted agency management that GSAs Public Buildings Service did not test water
before re-opening child care centers closed due to COVID-19, and we found that the Public Buildings
Service faces challenges in its eorts to improve air filtration in GSA-controlled facilities to help prevent
workplace exposures to COVID-19.
Our special agents conducted successful investigations of fraud, misconduct, and criminal actions by
contractors and governmental ocials, including an Oklahoma Assistant Police Chief who stole GSA
firearms, an Army Program Oce Director who conspired to defraud the government, and a GSA Real
Estate Acquisition Director who received an illegal gratuity. They also uncovered a variety of procurement
fraud schemes, bringing to justice contractors who made false certifications in GSA’s System for Award
Management about their eligibility for federal contracts, and companies that provided non-conforming
products to government agencies, including one case involving substandard flame retardant clothing.
We appreciate the continued support for our work by Congress and the agency, and the dedicated eorts
of OIG sta to protect the integrity of the federal procurement system.
Carol F. Ochoa
Inspector General
September 30, 2022
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 i
Photo: The Internal Revenue Service Building, located in Washington, D.C.
OIG PROFILE
OIG PROFILE
ORGANIZATION
The General Services Administration (GSA) Oce of Inspector General (OIG)
was established on October 1, 1978, as one of the original 12 OIGs created by
the Inspector General Act of 1978. The OIG’s five components work together to
perform the mission mandated by Congress.
The OIG provides nationwide coverage of GSA programs and activities. Our
components include:
THE OFFICE OF AUDITS, an evaluative organization staed with auditors
and analysts that provides comprehensive coverage of GSA operations
through program, financial, regulatory, and system audits and assessments
of internal controls. The oce conducts attestation engagements to assist
GSA contracting ocials in obtaining the best value for federal customers
and American taxpayers. The oce also provides other services to assist
management in evaluating and improving its programs.
THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, a professional support sta that provides
budget and financial management, contracting, facilities and support services,
human resources, information technology (IT) services, and administers the
OIGs records management program.
THE OFFICE OF COUNSEL, an in-house legal sta that provides legal advice
and assistance to all OIG components, represents the OIG in litigation arising
out of or aecting OIG operations, and manages the OIG legislative and
regulatory review.
THE OFFICE OF INSPECTIONS, a multi-disciplinary organization that analyzes
and evaluates GSAs programs and operations through management and
programmatic inspections and evaluations that are intended to provide
insight into issues of concern to GSA, Congress, and the American public.
The oce also coordinates quality assurance for the OIG, and analyzes
potentially fraudulent or otherwise criminal activities in coordination with
otherOIGcomponents.
THE OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS, a statutory federal law enforcement
organization that conducts nationwide criminal, civil, and administrative
investigations of illegal or improper activities involving GSA programs,
operations, and personnel.
2 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
OIG PROFILE  OIG PROFILE
OFFICE LOCATIONS
Headquarters:
Washington, D.C.
Field and Regional Oces:
Atlanta, Georgia; Tacoma, Washington; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois;
Denver, Colorado; Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Fort Worth, Texas; Kansas City,
Missouri; Laguna Niguel, California; New York, New York; Oakland, California;
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Sacramento, California; and Washington, D.C.
STAFFING AND BUDGET
As of September 30, 2022, our on-board stang level was 266 employees. The
OIGs Fiscal Year 2022 budget was $69 million in annual appropriated funds plus
$600,000 in reimbursable authority.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 3
OIG PROFILE  OIG PROFILE
As of September 30, 2022
OIG ORGANIZATION CHART
COMMUNICATIONS
Sarah Breen
CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS
Robert Preiss
OFFICE OF COUNSEL TO THE IG
Edward J. Martin
Counsel to the IG
ASSOCIATE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Larry Lee Gregg
OFFICE OF INSPECTIONS
Patricia Sheehan
AIG for Inspections
Audit Planning, Policy, and
Operations Sta
Administration and
Data Systems Sta
Real Property Audit Oce
Information Technology and
Finance Audit Oce
Budget and Financial
Management Division
Human Resources Division
Information Technology
Division
Facilities and Contracting
Division
Records Management
Program
Center for Contract Audits
REGIONAL
AUDIT OFFICES
New York
Philadelphia
Atlanta
Chicago
Kansas City
Fort Worth
Oakland
Policy and Compliance
Unit
Civil Enforcement Unit
Operations Division
FIELD OFFICES
Washington, D.C.
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Atlanta
Chicago
Kansas City
Fort Worth
Tacoma
Denver
Laguna Niguel
Fort Lauderdale
Sacramento
OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS
James E. Adams
AIG for Investigations
OFFICE OF AUDITS
R. Nicholas Goco
AIG for Auditing
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
Kristine Preece
AIG for Administration
Digital Crimes and
ForensicsUnit
Data Analytics Division
Criminal Intelligence Unit
Intelligence Division
INSPECTOR GENERAL
Carol F. Ochoa
DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
Robert C. Erickson, Jr.
4 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
OIG PROFILE  OIG ORGANIZATION CHART
Photo: U.S. Custom House in New Orleans, Louisiana
FISCAL YEAR 2022 RESULTS
During Fiscal Year 2022, OIG activities resulted in:
Over $467.5 million in recommendations that funds be put to better use and
questioned costs. If adopted, these recommendations ultimately result in
savings for the taxpayer.
Over $127 million in criminal, civil, administrative, and other investigative
recoveries.
49 audit reports, 5 audit memoranda, and 1 inspection management alert
report that assisted management in improving the eciency and eectiveness
of GSA operations.
79 new investigations opened and 96 cases closed.
78 subjects accepted for criminal prosecution and 19 subjects accepted
forcivil litigation.
66 criminal indictments/informations and 44 successful prosecutions on
criminal matters previously referred.
16 civil settlements and judgments.
6 employee actions taken on administrative referrals involving
governmentemployees.
142 contractors/individuals suspended and debarred.
3 lost pieces of Works Progress Administration artwork recovered.
1,578 hotline contacts received. Of these, 96 were referred to GSA program
ocials for review and appropriate action, 17 were referred to other federal
agencies, 50 were referred to the OIG Oce of Audits, 2 were referred
to the OIG Oce of Counsel, 1was referred to the OIG Human Resources
Division, and 118 were referred to investigative field oces for investigation
orfurtherreview.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 5
OIG PROFILE  FISCAL YEAR 2022 RESULTS
GSAS MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
The Reports Consolidation Act of 2000, Public Law 106-531, requires the Inspectors General
of major federal agencies to report on the most significant management challenges facing
their respective agencies. The following table briefly describes the challenges we identified
forGSAforFiscal Year 2022.
CHALLENGE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CHALLENGE
Establishing and
Maintaining an Eective
Internal Control
Environment
GSA continues to face significant challenges in establishing a comprehensive and eective system of internal control.
Since our Assessment of GSA’s Management and Performance Challenges for Fiscal Year 2019, we have cited pervasive
internal control weaknesses as a challenge for GSA. During Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, our long-standing concerns were
amplified by GSA’s eorts to interfere with our oversight of its response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Improving Contract
Administration
GSA faces a challenge in providing appropriate oversight of its contracts and leases through its contract administration.
GSA is responsible for the procurement of billions of dollars’ worth of products, services, and facilities for federal
government agencies. GSA has taken action to improve contract administration by strengthening policy, addressing
performance and training needs of contracting sta, and implementing contract administration process improvements.
However, additional action is needed as we continue to identify deficiencies in GSA’s contract administration practices.
GSA should take comprehensive and proactive steps to improve its oversight of contracts and leases to protect the
Agency against the risk of undetected fraud, waste, and abuse and violations of applicable laws and regulations.
Enhancing Government
Procurement
GSA continues to set the strategic goal to establish itself as the premier provider of ecient and eective acquisition
solutions across the federal government. As an integral part of GSA, FAS has significant responsibility in meeting this
goal. It is undertaking a number of acquisition solution initiatives intended to help it meet GSA’s strategic goal and ensure
compliance with recent legislation. However, the initiatives also significantly change FAS’s processes and programs,
creating challenges to FAS’s ability to meet its mission.
Maximizing the
Performance of GSA’s Real
Property Inventory
GSA must maximize the performance of its real property inventory in order to provide its tenant agencies with space that
meets their needs at a reasonable cost to American taxpayers. To achieve this goal, PBS should plan the best approach to
reduce and consolidate space, reduce leasing costs, and meet operations and maintenance needs of increasingly aging
buildings. Further, GSA must properly administer the capital construction program and ensure eective management of
energy and utility contracts.
Managing Agency
Cybersecurity Risks
Like all federal agencies, GSA is dependent upon information technology to fulfill its mission. However, as cyber threats
continue to emerge, sensitive government information and systems must be adequately secured to safeguard against
internal and external threats that could compromise critical information and systems. GSA is not immune to these threats.
Accordingly, GSA is challenged in eectively monitoring and eciently identifying and responding to cyber threats
against Agency systems and data. GSA will have to continuously identify technical solutions and implement controls
to mitigate such threats as bad actors find new ways to penetrate and navigate government networks and systems
undetected.
Safeguarding Federal
Facilities and Providing a
Secure Work Environment
GSA plays a significant role in providing a safe, healthy, and secure environment for federal employees and visitors at over
8,800 federally owned and leased facilities nationwide. Part of GSA’s responsibility is implementing its PBS Facility Safety
and Health program to ensure compliance with safety and health requirements. Additionally, with the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, GSA is responsible for the installation, maintenance, and repair of approved security fixtures, including
physical access control systems. However, there is an ongoing need for GSA management to monitor the safety and
security of federal facilities. In particular, recent audits and inspections have found problems with GSA’s management of
access cards and enforcement of security protocols.
Managing Presidential
Initiatives
Since the presidential transition in January 2021, President Bidens administration has issued multiple executive orders
(EOs) that directly impact GSA, addressing areas such as fair contracting practices, the purchase of American-made
products, and environmental and sustainability policy. These EOs will require GSA to pivot quickly and refocus purchasing
strategies, both within FAS and PBS. GSA must also implement strong controls and oversight to ensure that it consistently
achieves the intent of the EOs.
Managing the Impact of
COVID-19
GSA faces significant challenges responding to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. As of March 27, 2022, there have been
over 21,000 reports of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases in GSA-owned or GSA-leased facilities. During a pandemic
emergency, a primary GSA responsibility is to protect the health and safety of its employees, tenants, contractors, and
visitors at its facilities. To do so eectively, PBS must monitor evolving Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state,
and local health department guidance, and ensure that it is adhered to at GSA-owned and GSA-leased facilities. PBS must
be able to track suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases in its facilities, provide timely notification to building occupants
when there are COVID-19 incidents, and conduct timely disinfection and cleaning. As GSA and tenant agencies begin to
return to facilities, PBS must also ensure that heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems are updated to increase
ventilation and improve air filtration to minimize the spread of the virus. Further, PBS must ensure that potable water is
available in facilities where decreased occupancy has increased the potential for water quality degradation.
6 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
OIG PROFILE  GSA’S MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
The Oce of Audits conducts independent and objective audits to improve
the eectiveness and eciency of GSA’s management and operations. These
audits focus on GSAs programs, internal controls, information technology
infrastructure, and compliance with federal laws and regulations. Audits
are also performed to assist GSA contracting personnel in obtaining the
best value and price for federal customers. During this reporting period, we
issued 27 audit reports, including 16 contract audits. Our contract audit work
identified over $324.3 million in potential cost savings and recoveries for the
federalgovernment.
PREAWARD AUDITS
GSA provides federal agencies with products and services through various
contract types. We oversee GSA’s procurement program, which generates
billions of dollars in annual sales through thousands of contracts, by conducting
preaward, postaward, and performance audits. Historically, for every dollar
invested in our preaward audits, we recommend at least $20 in cost savings
to the government through lower prices or more favorable contract terms and
conditions for the benefit of the taxpayer.
The pre-decisional, advisory nature of preaward audits distinguishes them from
other audit products. Preaward audits provide vital, current information enabling
contracting ocers to significantly improve the government’s negotiating
position to realize millions of dollars in savings on negotiated contracts.
During this reporting period, three of our more significant preaward audits
were of schedule contracts with combined projected government sales of
over $639 million. Through these audits, we identified potential savings
and recoveries of over $282 million. We found, among other things, that
Commercial Sales Practices (CSP) submissions were not current, accurate, or
complete; proposed labor rates were overstated; unqualified labor was used;
GSA schedule sales were not adequately accumulated and reported; and price
reduction provisions were ineective.
8 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS8 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
PERFORMANCE AUDITS
ALERT MEMORANDUM: FAS IS PLANNING TO EXPAND
THE TRANSACTIONAL DATA REPORTING RULE DESPITE
ONGOING DATA QUALITY AND ACCESS ISSUES
Memorandum Number A210081-2, dated July 18, 2022
We issued an alert memorandum on the ongoing audit of the Federal
Acquisition Service’s (FAS’s) Transactional Data Reporting (TDR) pilot due to
concerns regarding FAS’s plan to expand the TDR Rule to the entire Multiple
Award Schedules (MAS) Program. This expansion is occurring despite
persistent issues with the quality of TDR data and contracting personnel’s lack
of access to TDR data that is usable for pricing decisions.
We found that FAS does not consistently verify the product and pricing
information entered by contractors, which could result in the retention of
inaccurate information in the TDR database. In fact, in an evaluation of Fiscal
Year 2022 TDR data focused on part number information, FAS found that 64
percent, or approximately $1.6 billion, of all reported TDR product sales listed
part numbers and product information that did not match the contractors’
price lists. In addition, TDR data for professional services is almost completely
unusable and was never included in any GSA evaluations, even though the
expansion of TDR will include professional service-based contracts. This is
significant because, according to FASs Schedule Sales Query Plus website,
service-based contracts represented 75.5 percent of total reported GSA sales
during Calendar Year 2021.
Furthermore, FAS contracting personnel have never used TDR data for pricing
decisions during the time periods GSA evaluated the TDR pilot. As a result, FAS
is deciding to expand TDR before providing FAS contracting personnel access
to TDR data that can be used for pricing decisions, before observing how FAS
contracting personnel use TDR data when making pricing decisions, and before
evaluating the eects of its actual use.
Therefore, FAS’s planned expansion of TDR for all MAS contracts could place
government agencies at further risk of overpaying for products and services
when ordering from MAS contracts.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 9
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
FAS CANNOT PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT MAS
CONTRACT PRICING RESULTS IN ORDERS ACHIEVING
THE LOWEST OVERALL COST ALTERNATIVE
Report Number A200975/Q/3/P22002, dated September 30, 2022
We performed this audit of FAS’s MAS Program due to concerns about how
FAS’s contracting personnel are performing price analyses for MAS contract
awards and option extensions. Our objective was to determine whether FAS’s
contracting personnel are negotiating and awarding MAS contracts and
option extensions in accordance with the intent of the MAS Program, federal
regulations, and FAS policy.
According to the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 (CICA), the procedures
established under the MAS Program are competitive as long as MAS
orders and contracts result in the lowest overall cost alternative to meet the
government’s needs. However, after examining 20 recent MAS contract and
option awards, valued at $4.3 billion, we found that FAS price analyses cannot
provide customer agencies with assurance that orders placed against MAS
contracts will result in the lowest overall cost alternative.
Our audit analyzed the pricing methodologies FAS used on MAS contracts that
participate in the TDR pilot, as well as contracts that required CSP disclosures,
and found that the price analyses under both methodologies were deficient.
When performing price analyses on TDR pilot contracts, we found that FAS
contracting personnel do not have access to TDR data that can be used for
pricing decisions; as a result, they mainly compared proposed pricing to other
MAS and government contracts. However, this approach does not provide
customer agencies with assurance that FAS achieved pricing that reflects the
oerors’ best pricing and will result in the lowest overall cost alternative to meet
the government’s needs. In addition, 7 of the 11 FAS contracting personnel we
interviewed expressed concerns to us about the TDR pilot’s value to the MAS
Program and concluded that, in their opinion, the TDR pilot should becanceled.
Meanwhile, when performing price analyses for contracts subject to the CSP
requirement, we found that FAS contracting personnel frequently accepted
commercial pricing information from oerors that was unsupported, outdated,
or that identified no comparable commercial sales. As a result, FAS cannot
provide customer agencies with assurance that MAS contract pricing will result
in the lowest overall cost alternative to meet the government’s needs.
10 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Based on our audit finding, we made four recommendations to the FAS
Commissioner: (1) cancel the TDR pilot in accordance with FAS Policy and
Procedures 2016-11, Transactional Data Reporting – Federal Supply Schedule
Program Implementation, Paragraph 8(G), Pilot Cancellation; (2) inform
customer agencies that they should perform separate and independent price
determinations because relying on MAS contract pricing and following the
ordering procedures in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 8.405, Ordering
procedures for Federal Supply Schedules, may not ensure compliance with
the CICA requirement that orders and contracts result in the lowest overall
cost alternative; (3) establish requirements and controls to ensure that FAS
contracting personnel adequately analyze CSP information; and (4) explore
new pricing methodologies that can ensure that FAS’s contracting personnel
are able to leverage aggregate government buying power to negotiate and
award MAS contracts that result in orders that reflect the lowest overall cost
alternative to meet the needs of the government.
The FAS Commissioner disagreed with three of the four report
recommendations.
FAS’S USE OF THE 4P TOOL ON CONTRACT AND OPTION AWARDS
OFTEN RESULTS IN NONCOMPLIANT PRICE DETERMINATIONS
Report Number A201045/Q/3/P22001, dated July 27, 2022
FAS developed the Price Point Plus Portal tool (4P tool) to help its contracting
personnel evaluate proposed pricing on MAS contracts that oer products.
We performed an audit of the 4P tool to assess whether FAS is using it in
accordance with federal regulations and FAS policy and guidance and if the
4P tool is a reliable source to determine price reasonableness when awarding
contracts and option extensions. Our audit objectives were to determine
whether: (1) FAS has sucient and appropriate policy, guidance, and internal
controls related to the use of the 4P tool; (2) FAS contracting ocers are using
the 4P tool in accordance with federal regulations and existing FAS policy and
guidance; and (3) the 4P tool provides accurate data for price analysis.
We found that FAS contracting personnel used flawed methodologies and
practices when performing analyses with the 4P tool. In doing so, FAS
contracting personnel: (1) improperly relied on the 4P tool to establish price
reasonableness without conducting additional price analysis; (2) awarded
proposed pricing based on a 4P tool comparison to the current pricing on
the same contract (self-hits); (3) awarded proposed pricing based on a 4P
tool comparison to other government pricing, despite the 4P tool identifying
better commercial pricing; and (4) awarded pricing that either exceeded the
market thresholds established by the 4P tool or for which the 4P tool found
no market research comparisons, without any further justification or analysis.
We also found that FAS contracting personnel rely on the 4P tool although
it often contains outdated or inaccurate pricing data that could skew price
analysisresults.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 11
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Based on our audit findings, we made seven recommendations to the FAS
Commissioner: (1) develop and implement oversight controls to ensure
contracting personnel adhere to FAS Policy and Procedures 2020-02 and
2021-05, and only use the 4P tool as part of a larger negotiation strategy that
seeks the lowest overall cost alternative to meet the needs of the federal
government, as required by the CICA; (2) update the 4P Application User
Guide to require contracting personnel to conduct additional price analysis
on products for which the 4P tool returns only self-hits; include commercial
market pricing information presented in the 4P tool in price evaluations
and provide justification when the awarded pricing exceeds the lowest
commercial market price found; seek, analyze, and document justification for
product pricing that exceeds the market threshold; and manually research an
appropriate sample of products for which the 4P tool found no market research
comparisons to ascertain applicable market pricing information; (3) provide
training to contracting personnel regarding the use of the 4P tool, focusing on
updated 4P Application User Guide requirements; (4) develop and implement
oversight controls to ensure contracting personnel are following the updated
4P Application User Guide; (5) include commercial market pricing research on
the 4P tool overview tab; (6) include “no competitive research found” flags and
a competitive research rate in 4P reports, exclusive of self-hits; and (7) design
and implement procedures to ensure only accurate, current pricing is included
in 4P reports.
The FAS Commissioner largely concurred with our report recommendations,
but contended that the methodology used to derive the recommendations
does not substantiate the conclusion that the 4P tool often contains outdated
or inaccurate pricing data. In addition, the FAS Commissioner disagreed with
our report recommendation that contracting personnel should use commercial
market pricing information presented in the 4P tool to evaluate GSA schedule
pricing and provide justification when the awarded pricing exceeds the lowest
commercial market price found.
AUDIT OF SECURITY CAMERA AND ALARM
SYSTEMS AT GSA-OWNED BUILDINGS
Report Number A210033/P/5/R22006, dated June 22, 2022
GSA, through its Public Buildings Service (PBS), is the primary federal real
property and asset management agency, with a portfolio consisting of more
than 9,000 federally owned and leased buildings. In conjunction with the U.S.
Department of Homeland Securitys Federal Protective Service, GSA has an
important role in protecting these buildings.
Our audit objective was to determine whether the security camera and alarm
systems in GSA-owned buildings are eectively protecting the safety of the
public, employees, and property. We performed this audit based on concerns
over the condition of security camera equipment in GSA-owned buildings
raised by GSA ocials and prior GSA Oce of Inspector General reports.
12 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
We found deficiencies in security camera and alarm systems at GSA-owned
buildings, some of which were long-standing. Although GSA and the Federal
Protective Service have a memorandum of agreement in place to coordinate on
these issues, little action is being taken to address the situation.
Based on our audit finding, we made two recommendations to the GSA
Administrator, in conjunction with the Federal Protective Service, to
(1) assess the conditions, formulate a plan, clarify the interagency memo,
and(2) addresstherelated funding issues.
The GSA Administrator agreed with our first report recommendation and
partially agreed with our second report recommendation. In response, we
made certain revisions to our second report recommendation.
ALERT MEMORANDUM: PBS DID NOT TEST WATER PRIOR TO REOPENING
GSA CHILD CARE CENTERS CLOSED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Memorandum Number A201018-8, dated September 6, 2022
In May 2022, we initiated an Audit of GSA’s Response to the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Assessment of Water Quality in GSA-Controlled
Facilities. During the survey phase of this audit, we learned that PBS did not
eectively test for water contamination prior to reopening GSA child care
centers that were closed during the pandemic. The purpose of this alert
memorandum was to notify PBS of this concern.
GSA’s child care center program provides space in GSA facilities across the
nation for 92 independently operated child care centers. Prior to COVID-19,
these centers provided daily care for more than 7,000 children. In response to
the COVID-19 pandemic, GSA temporarily closed 84 of these centers. Since
that time, 74 of the 84 child care centers in GSA facilities that closed during the
pandemic have reopened.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance states that a
temporary shutdown or reduced building operations and decreased water use
can lead to water stagnation in a facility’s plumbing system. Stagnant water
increases the risk of corrosion in the plumbing systems, which can trigger the
release of lead and copper into the facility’s drinking water. Stagnant water can
also increase the risk of growth and spread of Legionella bacteria. Exposure to
these contaminants can lead to serious health problems.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 13
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Despite these risks, PBS did not conduct water testing before reopening 71
of the 74 child care centers that reopened, including centers that previously
reported elevated levels of contaminants. After reopening, PBS tested water
in 38 of the 71 child care centers that were previously untested. The testing
identified contaminants above the Environmental Protection Agency’s action
levels for three GSA child care centers in Kansas City, Missouri; Lakewood,
Colorado; and Ogden, Utah. As of June 2022, the remaining 33 child care
centers remained untested. Moreover, PBS’s water testing has not been
comprehensive because it did not test for potential contamination from
Legionella bacteria.
Water testing in child care centers is critical to ensure that children and sta
have access to safe drinking water. Although PBS has tested water in some
reopened child care centers, the testing has not been comprehensive enough
to enable PBS to fully assess potential contamination so that it can take
appropriate corrective action.
GSA’S PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE FACES
CHALLENGES IN USING FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THE
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND JOBS ACT
Memorandum Number A220036-2, dated August 11, 2022
The purpose of this memorandum was to identify the challenges that PBS faces
in using the $3.418 billion received under the Infrastructure Investment and
Jobs Act (IIJA), which was signed into law on November 15, 2021.
Under the IIJA, GSA received $3.418 billion for the acquisition, construction,
and repair and alteration of Land Ports of Entry. PBS faces multiple challenges
as it executes these projects, including: (1) ensuring the eective stewardship
of taxpayer funds; (2) addressing the need for qualified project managers
and contracting ocers; (3) providing eective oversight of construction
management contractors; (4) managing potential project delays and cost
overruns; (5) preparing and maintaining complete and accurate documentation;
(6) awarding eective construction contracts; and (7) safeguarding Land Port
ofEntry access.
PBS should take appropriate measures to address the challenges identified
above and strive to meet the Oce of Management and Budget’s call to ensure
the implementation of IIJA-funded projects is “ecient and eective to deliver
the best results, protect taxpayer dollars, and ensure public trust.
In response to our memorandum, the PBS Commissioner stated that PBS has
established a Program Management Oce that will guide and oversee the
use of the IIJA funding, proactively mitigate risks, and develop a program
mitigationplan.
14 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
COVID-19: PBS FACES CHALLENGES IN ITS EFFORTS TO
IMPROVE AIR FILTRATION IN GSA-CONTROLLED FACILITIES
Report Number A201018/P/4/R22008, dated September 30, 2022
In April 2020, we began monitoring GSAs activities in response to the
nationwide public health emergency resulting from COVID-19 and GSAs
implementation of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.
During our monitoring eorts, we identified concerns with air filtration practices
in GSA-controlled (owned and leased) facilities that may lead to an increased
risk of exposure to COVID-19. As a result, we began this audit to determine
whether GSA has implemented the CDC recommendations and GSA policy to
limit exposure to COVID-19 in GSA-controlled facilities by improving central air
filtration in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.
The CDC’s Guidance for Businesses and Employers Responding to Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) recommends improving building ventilation to slow
the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. To do so, the CDC recommends
increasing ventilation and air filtration to the highest possible level without
significantly reducing design airflow. It also advises employers to check
air handling unit air filters to ensure they are within their service lives and
appropriately installed.
We found that PBS cannot install the CDC-recommended minimum eciency
reporting value (MERV) air filters in some GSA-owned facilities because the
aging HVAC systems cannot handle higher eciency air filters that are capable
of capturing airborne viruses. In addition, PBS has not accurately assessed
existing air filter conditions at some of its owned facilities. Further, most
operations and maintenance (O&M) contracts we reviewed do not specify a
MERV rated air filter, and PBS is not consistently verifying that O&M contractors
change air filters or meet preventive maintenance requirements.
We also found that PBS is not consistently inspecting GSA-leased facilities to
ensure that air filters meet lease requirements. In some cases, lessors used
noncompliant air filters or did not change them regularly. In addition, lessor
representatives impeded our eorts to access mechanical rooms to determine
if the installed air filters met lease requirements.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 15
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Based on our audit findings, we made two recommendations to the PBS
Commissioner. For GSA-owned facilities, we recommended the PBS
Commissioner: (1) conduct an accurate and complete assessment of HVAC
systems to identify deficiencies in air filtration and maximize central air
filtration in existing HVAC systems without significantly reducing design
airflow; (2) review and update current and future O&M contracts to ensure
that they clearly identify the required MERV air filters and preventive
maintenance schedules; (3) establish controls to ensure that PBS obtains
and maintains complete preventive maintenance records; and (4) ensure
that contracting ocer representatives conduct inspections of mechanical
rooms and preventive maintenance records to ensure that air filters meet
MERV requirements. For GSA-leased space, we recommended the PBS
Commissioner: (1) review and update current and future lease agreements to
ensure that they clearly identify the required MERV air filters and preventive
maintenance schedules; (2) ensure that lessors maintain and provide required
preventive maintenance records and provide timely access to mechanical
rooms; and (3) ensure that PBS representatives inspect mechanical rooms
and preventive maintenance records to ensure that air filters meet MERV
requirements.
The PBS Commissioner partially agreed with our report recommendations. We
made certain revisions to one recommendation, but the revisions did not aect
our findings and conclusions.
AUDIT OF THE SECURITY CONTROLS FOR BUILDING
AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN GSA FACILITIES
Report Number A210018/P/T/R22004, dated April 22, 2022
We performed an audit of the security controls for building automation
technologies in GSA facilities.
Based on our findings, we made seven recommendations to the PBS
Commissioner and GSA Chief Information Ocer. The PBS Commissioner and
the GSA Chief Information Ocer agreed with our report recommendations.
Due to security concerns regarding this matter, this report is restricted from
public release.
16 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
IMPROVEMENT NEEDED IN PBS’S USE OF CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER AS CONSTRUCTOR CONTRACTS
Memorandum Number A220057, dated August 17, 2022
The purpose of this memorandum was to convey our concerns regarding
PBS’s award and administration of capital construction contracts using the
Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) project delivery method. PBS
typically uses this delivery method for large, complex projects, such as
courthouses or major modernizations, when construction expertise is essential
during design. As of June 2022, PBS used the CMc project delivery method for
eight active capital construction projects, totaling approximately $1.2 billion.
Although PBS has taken steps to address our oce’s prior concerns with the
CMc project delivery method, we continue to observe problems with PBS’s
award and administration of CMc contracts. Of particular concern, contracting
ocers need to ensure that construction contractors appropriately accumulate
and report project costs. Additionally, contracting ocers need to avoid making
improper adjustments to the CMc contracts guaranteed maximum price (GMP),
and ensure that the CMc contract’s GMP is not converted to a firm-fixed price
prematurely. In light of PBS’s significant current and anticipated CMc workload,
failure to mitigate these concerns will put PBS at considerable financial risk for
overpaying for construction work.
AUDIT OF PBS’S APPROVAL PROCESS FOR MINOR
REPAIR AND ALTERATION PROJECTS
Report Number A190100/P/5/R22005, dated May 9, 2022
PBS’s minor repair and alteration projects cover repairs, remodeling,
improvements, and associated design and construction services for PBS’s
inventory of owned and leased federal buildings and courthouses. These
projects are designed to keep federal buildings in serviceable condition,
preventing small projects from becoming larger and more costly. We initiated
an audit of PBS’s prioritization process for funding these projects. The audit
objective was to determine whether PBS’s minor repair and alteration project
prioritization process ensures that the most critical projects are funded.
Since Fiscal Year 2015, Congress has authorized GSA to spend an average
of $346.5 million each year to fund minor repair and alteration projects. In
recent years, PBS has asserted that the repair and alteration needs of its aging
building inventory are far outpacing available funding. Accordingly, PBS must
carefully manage these projects to allocate funds to its most critical needs.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 17
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
In Fiscal Year 2015, the PBS Oce of Portfolio Management and Customer
Engagements Capital Assessment and Allocation Division (Portfolio
Management) established a centralized process to review and approve minor
repair and alteration project requests submitted by PBS’s 11 regional oces.
Portfolio Management’s approval process was intended to prioritize the minor
repair and alteration projects based on Decision Lens, a software tool that
scores projects nationwide using a common set of objective criteria.
However, we found that Portfolio Management’s review and approval process
had no discernible eect on which projects were actually performed in our
review period of Fiscal Years 2019 and 2020. Rather, Portfolio Management
approved projects based almost exclusively on project rankings submitted
by the PBS regions. Additionally, when a PBS region could not perform an
approved project, the region was able to redirect funding to other projects
without Portfolio Managements approval.
Based on our finding, we made two recommendations to the PBS
Commissioner: (1) conduct a comprehensive assessment to determine if a
centralized approval process is the most eective way for the Agency to ensure
its limited funding is directed to the most critical needs of its buildings; and
(2) improve PBS’s use of its Decision Lens software if the assessment shows
that a centralized approval process is most eective.
The PBS Commissioner agreed with our report recommendations.
AUDIT OF PBS NCR’S METROPOLITAN SERVICE CENTER
REIMBURSABLE WORK AUTHORIZATIONS
Report Number A210039/P/R/R22007, dated September 23, 2022
We performed this audit based on previous audits that identified deficiencies
in PBS service centers’ management and oversight of Reimbursable Work
Authorizations (RWAs). Our audit objective was to determine whether the
PBS National Capital Region’s (PBS NCR’s) Metropolitan Service Center
(MSC) is ensuring that RWAs are completed and closed in a timely manner in
accordance with GSA policies and regulations.
The MSC is one of five service centers in the PBS NCR that direct, manage,
and coordinate the day-to-day property management operations and programs
in GSA-controlled space. The MSC’s property management services include
assisting customers with real estate projects and services in GSA-controlled
space that are considered “above-standard” because they are not included in
a customer’s rental agreement. When a customer needs an above-standard
project or service, the customer submits an RWA to GSA. The RWA is an
interagency agreement that authorizes GSA to provide a project or service
on the customers behalf and receive reimbursement for costs plus applicable
GSAfees.
18 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
We found that the MSC is not fulfilling its stewardship responsibilities for
customer agency funding of RWAs. The MSC is not providing customer
agencies with milestone schedules or submitting written justifications when
contracts are not awarded within a reasonable time frame, as required by the
agencys RWA policy. We also found that the MSC and GSA’s Oce of the Chief
Financial Ocer (OCFO) are not recording substantial completion dates in the
RWA Entry and Tracking Application (RETA) in a timely manner. Taken together,
these deficiencies impair the MSCs ability to eectively manage and return
customer agency funding and increase the risk of appropriations law violations
and inaccurate financial reporting.
Based on our audit findings, we recommended that the PBS Commissioner
direct the Reimbursable Services National Program to update all applicable
policies and procedures to clarify the roles and responsibilities of PBS project
managers and OCFO budget analysts in updating RETA status for substantial
completion. We also recommended that the then Acting PBS NCR Regional
Commissioner: (1) ensure sta are trained on the RWA Policy requirements to
update RETA with a milestone schedule or written justification, (2) ensure sta
are trained on the RWA Policy to update RETA status for substantial completion,
and (3) coordinate with the OCFO to ensure national RWA policies and goals
are met for substantial completion dates to be entered into RETA.
The PBS Commissioner and then Acting PBS NCR Regional Commissioner
generally agreed with our report recommendations.
GSA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL’S FISCAL YEAR 2021
RISK ASSESSMENT OF GSA’S CHARGE CARD PROGRAM
Audit Memorandum Number A220041, dated September 23, 2022
We conducted a risk assessment of GSA’s charge card program to identify
and analyze risks of illegal, improper, or erroneous purchases related to GSAs
purchase and travel cards. We based our risk assessment on limited purchase
and travel card testing.
Through our limited purchase card testing, we found that the Oce of
Administrative Services should continue to improve controls over cardholders
uploading supporting documentation into GSA’s purchase card system of
record. In addition, the Oce of Administrative Services should ensure its
updates to their purchase card policies are made in a timely manner, and
continue to provide updated training material to purchase cardholders. Based
on the findings from our testing, and the centrally billed nature of purchase card
accounts, we assessed the risk for GSA’s purchase card program as moderate.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 19
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Through our limited travel card testing, we noted that the Oce of
Administrative Services improved its process to ensure that GSA travel
cardholders complete mandatory travel card training every 2 years. We
identified no significant internal control weaknesses with the travel card
program. The risk to GSA is inherently less because the travel card accounts
are individually billed and the cardholder is responsible for paying for the
charges against the travel card rather than GSA. Therefore, we assessed the
risk for GSA’s travel card program as low.
GSA COMPLIED WITH THE PAYMENT INTEGRITY
INFORMATION ACT IN FISCAL YEAR 2021
Report Number A220018/B/5/F22003, dated May 27, 2022
We performed this audit as required by the Payment Integrity Information Act of
2019. This law aims to improve eorts to identify and reduce government-wide
improper payments and requires federal agencies to review their programs
and identify those that were susceptible to significant improper payments. Our
audit objective was to determine if GSA complied with the Payment Integrity
Information Act of 2019 in Fiscal Year 2021.
We determined that GSA complied with the Payment Integrity Information Act
of 2019 in Fiscal Year 2021. Therefore, we had no reportable findings or report
recommendations.
IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
GSA’S PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE DOES NOT TRACK AND
REPORT ALL UNUSED LEASED SPACE AS REQUIRED, REPORT
NUMBER A160133/P/6/R18002, AUGUST 10, 2018
Assignment Number A220053, dated June 27, 2022
We performed an implementation review to determine whether PBS has taken
the actions as outlined in the corrective action plan for our August 10, 2018,
audit report, GSA’s Public Buildings Service Does Not Track and Report All
Unused Leased Space as Required.
The objective of the audit was to determine whether PBS accurately reports
the amount of vacant and unused leased space and whether PBS’s controls for
managing leased space are eective in preventing and reducing undue costs
to the government.
Our audit found that PBS does not track and report all unused leased space
as required, and PBS is not consistently following its policy for the use of non-
cancelable occupancy agreements.
20 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
Based on our audit findings, we made two recommendations to the PBS
Commissioner: (1) develop and implement a process to ensure that PBS reports
and mitigates all unused space for all non-cancelable occupancy agreements
in its lease portfolio; and (2) take action to ensure that existing and future
non-cancelable occupancy agreements comply with PBS policy. The PBS
Commissioner agreed with our report recommendations.
Our implementation review determined that PBS has taken appropriate
corrective action to address the report recommendations and that no further
action is necessary.
IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
AUDIT OF PBS’S LEASE EXTENSIONS AND HOLDOVERS,
REPORT NUMBER A190033/P/R/R20007, JUNE 22, 2020
Assignment Number A220062, dated September 15, 2022
We performed an implementation review to determine whether PBS has taken
the actions as outlined in the corrective action plan for our June 22, 2020, audit
report, Audit of PBS’s Lease Extensions and Holdovers. Our audit objective
was to assess if PBS implemented its project life cycle and leasing policies and
procedures to minimize the use of lease extensions and holdovers.
Our audit found that PBS leasing sta faced obstacles in adhering to planning
milestones, increasing the likelihood that PBS will have to enter into costly
extensions or holdovers. We also found that PBS is underutilizing the Simplified
Request for Lease Proposals and missing an opportunity to reduce lease
acquisition time and prevent extensions and holdovers.
Based on our audit findings, we made three recommendations to the PBS
Commissioner: (1) evaluate the upfront planning requirements to determine
if revisions are necessary to align the expectations of Central Oce and
regional oces to reduce extensions and holdovers; (2) increase collaboration
with tenant agencies and communicate the importance of compliance
with upfront planning milestones to reduce extensions and holdovers; and
(3) increase awareness and training of the appropriate uses of all Request
for Lease Proposals models. The PBS Commissioner agreed with the report
recommendations.
Our implementation review determined that PBS has taken appropriate
corrective action to address the report recommendations and that no further
action is necessary.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 21
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: PBS’S
$1.7 BILLION ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS ARE
NOT ACHIEVING ENERGY AND COST SAVINGS DUE TO INADEQUATE
OVERSIGHT, REPORT NUMBER A180017/P/5/R20004, MARCH 27, 2020
Assignment Number A220060, dated September 23, 2022
We performed an implementation review to determine whether PBS has taken
the actions as outlined in the corrective action plan for our March 27, 2020,
audit report, PBS’s $1.7 Billion Energy Savings Performance Contracts Are Not
Achieving Energy and Cost Savings Due to Inadequate Oversight. Our audit
objectives were to determine whether PBS: (1) has eective procedures in place
to verify that the energy savings calculated by the energy service company are
accurate and (2) administers the Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC)
projects in accordance with the applicable regulations and guidance.
Our audit found that PBS did not realize savings to fully fund payments on two
ESPC projects and risks paying for unsupported and overstated O&M savings
on other projects due to inadequate oversight. We also found that PBS did
not provide eective oversight to verify the accuracy of the energy service
company’s savings and did not adequately oversee ESPC file administration or
the administration of ESPC projects.
Based on our audit findings, we made seven recommendations to the PBS
Commissioner including: improving oversight of ESPC savings evaluation;
identifying and, if possible, recovering savings shortfalls; renegotiating
O&Mcontracts; ensuring witnessing and proper review of measurement and
verification reports; verifying that current and future ESPCs have all required
contract documents; ensuring that annual evaluations are completed for all
future ESPCs in accordance with the FAR; and increasing the oversight of the
regions’ administration of ESPCs through the performance period. The PBS
Commissioner agreed with our report recommendations.
Our implementation review determined that PBS has taken appropriate
corrective action to address the report recommendations and that no further
action is necessary.
22 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SIGNIFICANT AUDITS
SUMMARY OF
CONTRACTAUDITREPORTS
The Oce of Audits issues contract audit reports to provide assistance to
contracting ocials in awarding and administering GSA contracts. The two
primary types of contract audits include:
Preaward audits provide GSA contracting ocials with information to use when
negotiating fair and reasonable GSA contract prices.
Postaward audits examine GSA contractor’s adherence to contract terms and
conditions.
During the period April 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022, we issued 16 contract
audit reports. In these reports, we found:
11 contractors did not submit accurate, current, and complete information.
11 contractors either overcharged GSA customers or overstated their proposed
labor rates.
1
6 contractors assigned employees who were unqualified for their billable
positions to work on GSA schedule task orders.
6 contractors either did not comply with price reduction provisions or did not
have eective price reduction provisions.
3 contractors did not adequately accumulate and report schedule sales for
Industrial Funding Fee payment purposes and/or did not correctly calculate
and submit their Industrial Funding Fee payments.
1 contractor did not follow other terms and conditions of its contract.
We also recommended over $324.3 million in cost savings. This includes funds
that could be put to better use, which is the amount the government could save
if our audit findings are implemented. It also includes questioned costs, which
is money that should not have been spent such as overbillings and unreported
price reductions.
April 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022
CONTRACTAUDITREPORTS
Recommendations that funds be put to better use ,,
Questioned Costs ,,
1 This includes claims that have been submitted but not yet paid.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 23
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  SUMMARY OF CONTRACTAUDITREPORTS
FAR DISCLOSURE PROGRAM
The Federal Acquisition Regulation requires government contractors to
disclose credible evidence of violations of federal criminal law under Title 18
of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.) and the False Claims Act to agencies
OIGs. To facilitate implementation of this requirement, we developed internal
procedures to process, evaluate, and act on these disclosures and created a
website for contractor self-reporting.
FAR RULE FOR CONTRACTOR DISCLOSURE
Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.203-13(b) implements the Close the
Contractor Fraud Loophole Act, Public Law 110252, Title VI, and Chapter 1.
Under the rule, a contractor must disclose, to the relevant agency’s OIG, certain
violations of federal criminal law (within 18 U.S.C.), or a violation of the civil False
Claims Act, connected to the award, performance, or closeout of a government
contract performed by the government contractor or subcontractor. The
rule provides for suspension or debarment of a contractor when a principal
knowingly fails to disclose, in writing, such violations in a timely manner.
DISCLOSURES FOR THIS REPORTING PERIOD
As disclosures are made, our Oces of Audits, Investigations, and Counsel
jointly examine each acknowledgment and make a determination as to what
actions, if any, are warranted. During this reporting period, we received two
new disclosures. The matters disclosed included small business determination
inaccuracies and Trade Agreements Act compliance issues. We concluded
our evaluation of 2 disclosures, assisted on 8 disclosures referred by other
agencies because of the potential impact on GSA operations, and continued
to evaluate 12 existing disclosures during this reporting period. Our eorts
resulted in $868,640 in settlement and recoveries to the Government.
24 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  FAR DISCLOSURE PROGRAM
STATISTICAL SUMMARY
OFOIGAUDITS
April 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022
OFFICE OF AUDITS
Total financial recommendations ,,*
These include:
Recommendations that funds be put to better use ,,
Questioned costs ,,*
Audit reports issued 
Audit memoranda provided to GSA
GSA Management decisions agreeing with audit recommendations ,,*
* These totals contain $868,640 in questioned costs that are also included in the FAR Disclosure
Programsection.
Audit Reports Issued
The OIG issued 27 audit reports. These reports contained financial
recommendations totaling over $324.3 million, including more than
$322.9million in recommendations that funds be put to better use and
over $1.4 million in questioned costs. Due to GSA’s mission of negotiating
contracts for government-wide supplies and services, most of the savings
fromrecommendations that funds be put to better use would be applicable
toother federal agencies.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 25
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGAUDITS
Management Decisions on OIG Audit Reports
Table 1 summarizes the status of audits requiring management decisions during
this period, as well as the status of those audits as of September 30, 2022.
There were no reports more than 6-months old awaiting management decision
as of September 30, 2022. Table 1 does not include three implementation
reviews excluded from the management decision process.
Table 1. GSA Management Decisions on OIG Reports
NUMBER
OF REPORTS
REPORTS WITH
FINANCIAL
RECOMMENDATIONS*
TOTAL
FINANCIAL
RECOMMENDATIONS
For which no management decision had been made as of 04/01/2022
Less than 6 months old ,,
Six or more months old 
Reports issued this period   ,,**
TOTAL   ,,**
For which a management decision was made during the reporting period
Issued prior periods ,,
Issued current period  ,,**
TOTAL   ,,**
For which no management decision had been made as of 09/30/2022
Less than 6 months old ,,
Six or more months 
TOTAL ,,
* These totals include audit reports issued with both recommendations that funds be put to better use
andquestioned costs.
** These totals contain $868,640 in questioned costs that are also included in the FAR Disclosure
Programsection.
26 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGAUDITS
GSA Management Decisions on OIG Reports
withFinancialRecommendations
Tables 2 and 3 present the reports identified in Table 1 as containing financial
recommendations by category (funds be put to better use or questioned costs).
Table 2. GSA Management Decisions on OIG Reports with Recommendations that
FundsBePuttoBetterUse
NUMBER
OF REPORTS
FUNDS BE PUT
TO BETTER USE
For which no management decision had been made as of 04/01/2022
Less than 6 months old ,,
Six or more months 
Reports issued this period ,,
TOTAL  ,,
For which a management decision was made during the reporting period
Recommendations agreed to by management  ,,
Recommendations not agreed to by management 
TOTAL  ,,
For which no management decision had been made as of 09/30/2022
Less than 6 months old ,,
Six or more months old 
TOTAL ,,
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 27
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGAUDITS
Table 3. GSA Management Decisions on OIG Audit Reports with Questioned Costs
NUMBER
OF REPORTS
QUESTIONED
COSTS
For which no management decision had been made as of 04/01/2022
Less than 6 months old ,
Six or more months old 
Reports issued this period ,,*
TOTAL ,,*
For which a management decision was made during the reporting period
Disallowed costs ,,*
Costs not disallowed 
TOTAL ,,*
For which no management decision had been made as of 09/30/2022
Less than 6 months old ,
Six or more months old 
TOTAL ,
* These totals contain $868,640 in questioned costs that are also included in the FAR Disclosure
Programsection.
28 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGAUDITS
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 29
SIGNIFICANT AUDITS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGAUDITS
Since 2001, GSA OIG has worked with the agency’s Fine Arts Program to recover for the federal government more than 700 pieces of
WorksProgress Administration (WPA) artwork with a comparative value of more than $8 million.
SIGNIFICANT
INVESTIGATIONS
Photo: Fresco paintings surrounding doorway to room 5138, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS
The Oce of Investigations conducts independent and objective investigations
relating to GSA programs, operations, and personnel. The oce consists
of special agents with full statutory law enforcement authority to make
arrests, execute search warrants, serve subpoenas, and carry concealed
weapons. Special agents conduct investigations that may be criminal,
civil, or administrative in nature and often involve complex fraud schemes.
Investigations can also involve theft, false statements, counterfeit or
substandard products, embezzlement, bribery, anti-trust violations, credit
card fraud, diversion of excess government property, and digital crimes.
During this reporting period, the oce opened 37investigative cases, closed
38investigative cases, referred 76 subjects for criminal prosecution, and
helped obtain 29 convictions. Civil, criminal, and other monetary recoveries
resulting from our investigations totaled over $53million.
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
FORMER GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR PLEADED
GUILTY IN BRIBERY SCHEME
GSA OIG initiated an investigation into allegations that Keith Seguin, a former
U.S. Air Force employee; Rubens Fiuza Lima, the owner of Impex, Inc.; and
David J. Bolduc, Jr., one of the owners of QuantaDyn Corporation, conspired
in a bribery scheme that spanned more than a decade and involved GSA
contracts valued at over $400 million. In October 2019, a federal grand jury in
San Antonio returned an indictment charging QuantaDyn, Bolduc, Seguin, and
Fiuza Lima with conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit
wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Specifically, from 2007
to 2018, Bolduc and QuantaDyn allegedly paid more than $2.3 million in bribes
to Seguin, who administered GSA and DoD contracts. In return, Seguin used his
federal position to steer government contracts for military training simulators to
QuantaDyn. The indictment further alleged that a portion of the bribe money
paid to Seguin was laundered through Fiuza Limas company, Impex, Inc.
On August 16, 2022, John Hancock, a former program manager with a
defense contractor, pleaded guilty to wire fraud conspiracy for colluding
with Seguin, Bolduc, QuantaDyn, and Karen Paulsen, also a former program
manager with a defense contractor, and others to steer a $413 million GSA
Alliant Governmentwide Acquisition Contract to his employer with the
understanding that work would be sole-sourced in subcontracts to QuantaDyn
Corporation. Asspecified in Hancocks plea agreement, the financial losses to
the government directly attributable to his activities were over $23.7 million.
Hancock is awaitingsentencing.
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 33
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS
QuantaDyn previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and
was sentenced to 5 years’ probation. QuantaDyn was also ordered to pay
$37.7 million in restitution, a $6.3 million fine, forfeit $7.1 million in seized assets,
and pay a $22.8 million forfeiture money judgment.
Seguin previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, tax fraud,
and making false statements for his involvement in the scheme. Seguin also
pleaded guilty to additional relevant conduct for his involvement in stealing
$239,388 worth of government-owned simulator parts that he sold online.
Seguin was ordered to forfeit two vehicles and $362,515 in proceeds from
the combined sales of two real estate properties and was ordered to pay a
$2.3 million forfeiture money judgment. Seguin is scheduled to be sentenced
inOctober 2022.
Paulsen previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the government.
As specified in her plea agreement, the financial losses attributed to Paulsens
activities were over $8 million. Paulsen is scheduled to be sentenced in
October 2022. GSA OIG continues to investigate this case with IRS-CI, DCIS,
Army CID, and AFOSI.
JURY FINDS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OWNER
GUILTY OF DEFRAUDING SDVOSB PROGRAM
A GSA OIG investigation found that from approximately 2004 through 2017
Michael Padron, Michael Wibracht, and Ruben Villarreal conspired to defraud
the United States to obtain valuable government contracts under programs
administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA) that their companies
were ineligible to receive. As part of the scheme, Padron and Wibracht installed
Villarreal, a service-disabled veteran, as the ostensible owner of a general
construction company held out as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small
Business (SDVOSB). Villarreal falsely certified in GSAs System for Award
Management (SAM) that he and his business earned the majority of the profits
and made all decisions involving the joint venture in order to secure over
$250 million in government contracts, despite Padron and Wibracht exercising
disqualifying financial and operational control of the company. The two of
them were ineligible to receive the contracts due to their larger, non-qualifying
businesses. On June 29, 2022, a federal jury convicted Padron on conspiracy
to defraud the government and wire fraud for his involvement in the scheme,
and he awaits sentencing. Wibracht and Villarreal each previously pleaded
guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States, and they are awaiting
sentencing. GSA OIG investigated this case with SBA OIG, VAOIG, DCIS,
ArmyCID, and the Army Audit Agency.
34 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
FORMER ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF PLEADED
GUILTY TO STEALING FIREARMS
A GSA OIG investigation concluded that former Assistant Police Chief Shawn
Karr of the Boswell Police Department in Boswell, Oklahoma, pawned seven
federally-owned firearms that were loaned to the Department through GSA’s
Federal Surplus Personal Property Donation Program and the Defense
Logistics Agency’s Law Enforcement Support Oce. Agents conducted
exhaustive searches of pawn shops throughout Oklahoma and obtained
transfer documents associated with each transaction to prove Karr pawned the
firearms as collateral in exchange for cash. Agents successfully recovered all
of the firearms, and on August 17, 2022, Karr pleaded guilty in federal court to
possession of stolen firearms. GSA OIG investigated this case with DCIS.
JURY FINDS GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR
GUILTY IN HUBZONE FRAUD SCHEME
A GSA OIG investigation revealed that ocers and employees of Odyssey
International, Inc. (Odyssey), falsely certified in SAM that the company was
located in a Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) in order to bid
on federal contracts set aside for HUBZone businesses. On June 1, 2022, a jury
found Odyssey and its owner, Whitney McBride, guilty of conspiracy to commit
wire fraud, wire fraud, and major fraud against the United States. McBride was
also found guilty of making false ocial statements and false declarations to a
court. McBride is awaiting sentencing.
Kin Shing Paul Lee, Chief Financial Ocer, and Michael Tingey, Chief Operating
Ocer, previously admitted to conspiring to generate documents that
supported their claim that Odyssey employees resided in a HUBZone, knowing
the documents were fictitious. As a result of the scheme, Odyssey received
over $90 million in federal government construction contracts that it was
not eligible to receive. Tingey pleaded guilty to wire fraud, and Lee pleaded
guilty to wire fraud, money laundering, and aiding and abetting in the filing of
a false tax return. As part of their guilty pleas, Lee and Tingey agreed to asset
forfeitures totaling over $7.8 million. Both are awaiting sentencing. GSA OIG
investigated this case with SBA OIG, IRS-CI, Army CID, AFOSI, and the FBI.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 35
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
CONTRACTOR SENTENCED FOR ROLE IN A GOVERNMENT
PURCHASE CARD FRAUD SCHEME
A GSA OIG investigation revealed that two Department of Energy (DOE),
Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), contract employees conspired with
associates to make nearly $1 million in illicit government purchase card (GPC)
purchases. The WAPA contract employees intentionally deleted warehouse
supplies from the electronic inventory system and purported to replenish
the items by making fictitious GPC purchases from companies created by
the associates. The investigation found the items were never removed from
the warehouse shelves, and the supplies were never actually purchased.
On June 8, 2022, Jared Newman, who worked as a contract employee in
the WAPA warehouse, was sentenced to 55 months’ imprisonment, 3 years’
probation, and ordered to pay $879,392 in restitution, jointly and severally
with co-conspirators for his role in the scheme. Additionally, he was ordered
to forfeit $652,292. Four other co-conspirators were previously convicted and
sentenced for their roles in the scheme. GSA OIG investigated this case with
DOE OIG and the FBI.
DEBARRED BUSINESS OWNER SENTENCED FOR WIRE
FRAUD AND AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT
A GSA OIG investigation found that Kentey R. Fielder, owner of Clean
Contracting Services, Inc., fraudulently registered his company in SAM by
falsely claiming that he was not presently debarred from doing business with
the U.S. Government. Fielder was subsequently awarded a U.S. Army contract
for janitorial services, and he caused another company to believe that it had
been awarded the same contract. He collected over $14,000 on the contract
while the other company performed the work. Fielder previously pleaded
guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. On May 10, 2022, Fielder
was sentenced to 40 months’ incarceration, 3 years’ supervised release, and
was ordered to pay $14,220 in restitution. GSA OIG investigated this case with
AFOSI, Army CID, Department of Commerce OIG, DCIS, DHS OIG, DOJ OIG,
DOS OIG, EPA OIG, HHS OIG, IRS-CI, NCIS, SBA OIG, and VA OIG.
36 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
COMMISSARY CONTRACTOR SENTENCED IN VETERAN FRAUD SCHEME
A GSA OIG investigation found that Vicki Rice, owner of CAM Services, Inc.
(CAM), devised a scheme to fraudulently obtain SDVOSB set-aside contracts.
From October 2012 to May 2018, Rice made material false certifications in
SAM that CAM was owned and controlled by a service-disabled veteran and
that it was qualified to obtain set-aside contracts. In fact, the company was
actually controlled by Rice, who was not a service-disabled veteran. On behalf
of CAM, Rice fraudulently submitted bids and was awarded over $11 million in
commissary contracts at two military bases. On April 12, 2022, Rice pleaded
guilty to a false statement charge, and she was sentenced on June 28, 2022,
to 14 months’ incarceration, 3 years’ probation, and ordered to pay $480,000
in restitution and a $7,500 fine. GSA OIG investigated this case with DCIS,
SBAOIG, and IRS-CI.
FORMER PROGRAM OFFICE DIRECTOR FOUND GUILTY
FOR INVOLVEMENT IN A $7 MILLION 8(A) FRAUD
SCHEME TO OBTAIN SET-ASIDE CONTRACTS
A GSA OIG investigation revealed that three government contractors and
a lobbyist submitted false statements through GSA’s Central Contractor
Registration and Online Representations and Certifications Application and
were subsequently awarded $7 million in set-aside contracts that they were
not eligible to receive. The individuals conspired to charge lobbying and other
unauthorized costs to U.S. Army contracts through falsified invoices. The
contracts supported the Big Crow Program Oce (BCPO) of the U.S. Army
Space and Missile Defense Command, which operated electronic warfare
testing aircraft.
The four individuals were indicted in 2017 for conspiracy, wire fraud, major
fraud against the United States, and false statements. Contractors Joe Diaz and
Arturo Vargas previously pleaded guilty in 2018 for their roles in the scheme,
and lobbyist George Lowe pleaded guilty in 2020. On June 27, 2022, a federal
jury seated in the District of New Mexico found Milton Boutte, former director of
the BCPO, guilty of conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to
commit wire fraud. All four are awaiting sentencing. GSA OIG investigated this
case with Army CID, DCIS, SBA OIG, and the DCAA.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 37
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
PRISON FOOD CONTRACTOR PLEADS GUILTY FOR
INVOLVEMENT IN COLLUSIVE BIDDING SCHEME
The investigation determined that from 2013 to 2018, Edgar Porras, a food
supply contractor, conspired with other contractors to win low bid food supply
contracts from the United States Bureau of Prisons (BOP). In perpetrating the
fraud scheme, Porras submitted false certifications in SAM and conspired with
other contractors to suppress and restrain competition by rigging bids to obtain
111 food supply contracts worth $1.9 million awarded by BOP. On April 5, 2022,
Porras pleaded guilty to violating the Sherman Antitrust Act, and he is awaiting
sentencing. GSA OIG investigated this case with DOJ OIG in collaboration
with the DOJ’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force for the Central District
ofCalifornia.
CONTRACTOR SENTENCED IN SERVICE-DISABLED
VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS FRAUD
A GSA OIG investigation determined that Valerie Gonzalez, owner of Primus
Group, a furniture and flooring wholesaler located in Overland Park, Kansas,
acted as a figurehead and lent her name and service-disabled veteran status
to a scheme that allowed another contractor to fraudulently obtain $4.2 million
in SDVOSB federal contracts. Gonzalez falsely claimed, on a Veterans
Administration vendor verification form, that she owned 99% of Primus Group.
This enabled her to obtain government contracts for a Johnson County flooring
and furniture business that was ineligible to receive SDVOSB contracts. On July
5, 2022, Gonzalez was sentenced to 3 years’ supervised release and ordered
to pay a $6,000 fine. Gonzalez previously pleaded guilty to wire fraud and was
suspended from receiving government contracts. GSA OIG investigated this
case jointly with VA OIG and DOL OIG.
38 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS SENTENCED TO
PRISON IN SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS AND 8(A) FRAUD SCHEME
A GSA OIG investigation determined that Stephon Ziegler, owner of Zieson
Construction Company (Zieson), acted as a figurehead and allowed Matthew
McPherson and his co-conspirators to run the business and perform almost all
of its daily functions. This allowed Zieson to fraudulently obtain $335 million in
federal contracts set aside for veteran and disadvantaged businesses that it
was ineligible to receive. The investigation also found that Rusty Simon, owner
of Simcon Corp., whose company was eligible for SBA 8(a) disadvantaged
business set-aside contracts, received payments from Michael Dingle to allow
Dingle, McPherson, and Matthew Torgeson to use Simcon’s name and status
to fraudulently obtain $11.3 million in such contracts. On September 22, 2022,
Dingle was sentenced to 8 years’ incarceration with 3 years of supervised
release. Dingle was also ordered to forfeit over $4.6 million and pay $615,847
in restitution to the IRS. On May 12, 2022, Ziegler was sentenced to 12 months’
incarceration with 3 years of supervised release. Previously, McPherson and
Simon were sentenced for their roles in the scheme and a court ordered
forfeitures totaling more than $12.2 million from the alleged co-conspirators and
their aliated companies. GSA OIG investigated this case with DCIS, VA OIG,
SBA OIG, IRS-CI, USDA OIG, USSS, DOL OIG, Army CID, AFOSI, and NCIS.
GUILTY VERDICT, SENTENCING BASED ON ILLEGAL ACCESS
TO GSAS SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT
A GSA OIG investigation revealed that the SAM account of a government
vendor was fraudulently accessed, and the vendors bank account information
was altered to deliberately misdirect government payments into an account
controlled by Hurriyet Arslan. The illegal access was facilitated by a phishing
attack through which the authorized user’s credentials were obtained. On
October 10, 2018, the Defense Logistics Agency attempted to issue a payment
of $23.4 million to the vendor, but those funds were illegally diverted into
Arslan’s account. On April 28, 2022, Arslans co-conspirator, Sercan Oyuntur,
was found guilty of conspiracy to commit wire, mail and bank fraud; bank
fraud; use of unauthorized access devices to commit fraud; aggravated
identity theft; and making false statements to law enforcement. Oyuntur fled
the United States while awaiting sentencing. On September 20, 2022, Arslan
was sentenced to 20 months’ incarceration, 3 years’ supervised release, and
was ordered to pay over $23.4 million in restitution jointly with co-conspirator
Oyuntur. Arslan previously pleaded guilty to money laundering and conspiracy
to commit mail, wire, and bank fraud. This case is being investigated by
GSAOIG, DCIS, HSI, and DOJ.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 39
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
FORMER GSA EMPLOYEE PLEADED GUILTY AND TWO GSA
CONTRACTORS SENTENCED IN CORRUPTION SCHEME
A GSA OIG investigation found that Charles Jones, a former GSA Supervisory
Construction Control Representative, received bribes and gratuities from
Jennifer Strickland, President of SDC Contracting, LLC, and Daniel Crowe,
President of Contractors USA Inc., in exchange for steering government
contracts to their companies. On April 15, 2022, Strickland pleaded guilty to
paying Jones over $43,000 in bribes in return for favorable treatment on GSA
construction contracts. On August 12, 2022, Strickland was sentenced to 18
months’ monitored home confinement, 36 months’ probation, fined $20,000
and was ordered to forfeit $43,500. On April 19, 2022, Crowe pleaded guilty
to paying Jones over $411,000 in gratuities for favorable treatment on GSA
construction contracts. On August 30, 2022, Crowe was sentenced to 8 months’
incarceration, 1 year of probation, and he was ordered to forfeit $252,742.
On June 17, 2022, Jones pleaded guilty to receiving bribes and is awaiting
sentencing. GSA OIG investigated this case with the FBI, DCIS, andNCIS.
CIVIL SETTLEMENTS
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION AGREED TO PAY $2.8 MILLION TO
RESOLVE SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING FRAUD ALLEGATIONS
On May 6, 2022, Hensel Phelps Construction Company agreed to pay $2.8 million
to resolve allegations that it improperly manipulated a federal subcontract
designated for a business owned and operated by a service-disabled veteran.
The subcontract was awarded under Hensel Phelps Contruction’s GSA contract to
construct the Armed Forces Retirement Homes New Commons and Health Care
Building located in the District of Columbia. GSA OIG investigated this case with
VA OIG, DCIS, DHS OIG, AFOSI, Army CID, and NCIS.
DAKOTA OUTERWEAR AGREED TO $1 MILLION SETTLEMENT
TO RESOLVE FALSE CLAIMS ACT VIOLATIONS
On May 26, 2022, Dakota Outerwear, a GSA contract holder, agreed to pay
$1million to resolve allegations that the company violated the False Claims Act
by supplying counterfeit military clothing and other goods that did not comply
with the Trade Agreements Act or Berry Amendment. This investigation revealed
that, between 2013 and 2018, multiple individuals and companies supplied
counterfeit military uniforms and equipment made in China and Pakistan through
GSA contracts. We previously reported that TerryRoe, Sales Manager, Dakota
Outerwear, conspired with Ramin Kohanbash, owner of California Surplus, Inc.,
FR-HQ LLC, and Gan Eden LLC; and Bernard Klein, owner of the Almont Group,
to manufacture (using other unnamed/uncharged companies) and supply Dakota
with uniforms and equipment made in China andPakistan, while claiming they
were Berry Amendment andTradeAgreements Act compliant.
40 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CIVIL SETTLEMENTS
Previously, Kohanbash pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit wire fraud and
agreed to forfeit $20 million. In addition, Kohanbash agreed to pay $694,398 to
settle a claim under the False Claims Act and is awaiting sentencing. Kohanbash
and his businesses were indefinitely suspended from federal procurements.
Additionally, Klein was previously arrested and pleaded guilty to an information
charging him with conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Klein admitted to conspiring
with Kohanbash to supply the counterfeit goods, including some items that
did not meet standards for flame resistance or possess the required near-
infrared signature management technology to make the wearer more dicult
to detect with night-vision goggles. Klein agreed to pay $348,000 to settle
a claim under the False Claims Act. Klein was also sentenced to 18 months’
incarceration, 3 years’ supervised release, and was ordered to pay a $15,000
fine and $200,000 in restitution. Klein and his businesses were also indefinitely
suspended from federal procurements. GSA OIG investigated the case with
DCIS, HSI, and AFOSI.
VE SOURCE LLC AND OWNERS AGREED TO PAY OVER $7.9
MILLION TO RESOLVE FALSE CLAIMS ALLEGATIONS
On August 2, 2022, VE Source LLC, a government contract holder, agreed
to pay $7.6 million under a consent judgment for its role in a scheme to
defraud the federal government by falsely claiming that VE Source was
eligible for government contracts set aside for SDVOSBs. VE Source services
included specialty textile apparel design, raw material sourcing, and product
manufacturing. Additionally, the company’s owners, Sherman Barton and
Christopher Neary, and a related entity, Vertical Source LLC, finalized a civil
settlement agreement and agreed to pay $75,000, $120,000, and $180,000
respectively, to resolve allegations they violated the False Claims Act. GSA OIG
investigated this case with USDA OIG and DCIS.
CAPE HENRY ASSOCIATES AGREED TO PAY $425,000
TO SETTLE FALSE CLAIMS ALLEGATIONS
On May 18, 2022, Cape Henry Associates (CHA), a GSA contract holder, agreed
to pay $425,000 and take other corrective actions to resolve allegations that it
failed to disclose relevant information to contracting ocers about two separate
conflict of interest issues related to their government contracts. First, an ocer
of CHA allegedly held an undisclosed ownership interest in KOVA Global,
a CHA subcontractor. Second, CHA allegedly failed to disclose a conflict of
interest arising from the advisory and assistance services performed by Q.E.D.
Systems, Inc., a CHA subcontractor, in 2015. GSA OIG investigated this case
with DCIS, Army CID, DCAA, and NCIS.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 41
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  CIVIL SETTLEMENTS
INVESTIGATIONS OF
SENIOROFFICIALS
FORMER GSA OFFICIAL SENTENCED FOR RECEIVING ILLEGAL GRATUITY
A GSA OIG investigation determined that Kevin Richards, the former GS-15,
Director of Real Estate Acquisition in PBS for the New England Region, held
an outside position as a licensed real estate agent for a real estate company
for 3 years. Without disclosing his relationship with the company owner to
GSA, Richards notified that person about a job opening within his purview,
substantively edited the applicant’s resume, provided confidential GSA
interview questions, and hired this person. Richards also recommended and
obtained approval from other GSA ocials for this new employee to receive an
above-normal salary and an increased accrual rate for annual leave. Although
Richards received no commissions from his outside employment at the real
estate company for almost 2 years, shortly after the company owner began
working for GSA, this person chose Richards to be a listing agent for two
dierent properties and paid Richards a $10,250 commission when one of the
properties sold. Additionally, when Richards filed his financial disclosure report
for 2020 with GSA, he falsely stated that he had not held any positions outside
GSA that year. The investigation found when Richards filed his 2020 federal tax
returns, he reported a net loss of $14,592 working for the real estate company.
Richards previously pleaded guilty to receiving illegal gratuity as a public ocial
and making false statements to a federal agency. On July 12, 2022, he was
sentenced to 4 months’ incarceration, 1 year of supervised release, ordered to
pay a $7,500 fine, and forfeit $10,250.
FLEET CARD FRAUD
The Oce of Investigations collaborates with GSA’s Fleet Loss Prevention Team
to prevent, detect, and investigate fraud involving GSAs government-wide
Fleet Program. These investigations have uncovered unauthorized personal
use of GSA Fleet credit cards, fraudulent charges by vehicle repair and
maintenance facilities for work not rendered, and complex credit card skimming
operations led by organized criminal groups.
During this reporting period, our Fleet card fraud investigations resulted in 16
arrests and 5 pretrial diversion agreements.
42 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  INVESTIGATIONS OF SENIOROFFICIALS
One Fleet card investigation found that between 2018 and 2021, Umer Hassan
Mir, while working as the manager of a gas station in Metuchen, New Jersey,
collected and saved the credit card numbers from at least 17 people who
purchased fuel, including transactions made with GSA fuel cards for vehicles
owned by GSA. Mir later used the fuel card numbers to manually enter
fictitious purchases into the gas station’s point of sale system and withdrew
cash in the amount of the fraudulent sales. On July 12, 2022, Mir pleaded
guilty to fraud and related activity in connection with an access device, and
heawaitssentencing.
Another investigation resulted in Emmanuel Nina-Perez, Jandry Artigas Reyes,
and Iraldo Pereda-Mendez each pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit bank
fraud and aggravated identity theft for their roles in a credit card skimming
and fuel theft ring. They were jointly and severally ordered to forfeit $38,372.
Previously, Yarislani Padron-Cruz was sentenced to 4 years’ imprisonment and
5 years’ probation, and ordered to pay $201,468 in restitution for her role in the
scheme, and Yofre Napolean Almonte was sentenced to 180 days’ imprisonment.
Additionally, Shannon Wheeler, an employee of the Bureau of Indian Aairs,
admitted to using multiple GSA Fleet cards to make over $11,000 in fraudulent
purchases for his personal benefit. On June 28, 2022, he pleaded guilty to theft
and is awaiting sentencing.
WPA ART INVESTIGATIONS
The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was an employment program created
in 1935 as a result of the staggering unemployment rate during the Great
Depression. WPA artwork was produced by artists who created thousands of
paintings, sculptures, and works on paper. The federal government loaned
the available art to public agencies and nonprofit institutions throughout the
nation. GSA is responsible for stewardship of the WPA artwork, which includes
inventorying and accounting for the loaned pieces of art. This is an ongoing
project, which now encompasses more than 23,000 pieces of WPA artwork.
As a direct result of the cooperative eorts between the OIG and the GSA
Oce of the Chief Architect’s Fine Arts Program Oce (FAP), two lost pieces of
WPA artwork were recovered during this reporting period; “Wilmette Harbor
by Walter Burt Adams, and “The Wizard of Oz” by Ruth Harper. WPA artwork
is not subject to public sale, but the comparative value of the two recovered
pieces totals $18,000. Since cooperative eorts between the OIG and FAP
began in 2001, 793 WPA pieces have been recovered, with a comparative
value of $8,759,850.*
* This number includes all pieces of artwork recovered through the joint publicity/recovery efforts of the
OIG and FAP. Not all recoveries require direct intervention by the OIG; some are direct “turn ins” to the
FAP as result of our combined public information campaigns and/or internet searches which reveal the
claim of ownership by the government.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 43
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  WPA ART INVESTIGATIONS
“The Wizard of Oz” by Ruth Harper
“Wilmette Harbor” by Walter Burt Adams
44 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  WPA ART INVESTIGATIONS
OTHER SIGNIFICANT WORK
SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT INITIATIVE
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) authorizes federal agencies to suspend
or debar individuals or companies for the commission of any oense indicating
a lack of business integrity or business honesty that directly aects the present
responsibility of a government contractor or subcontractor. The OIG has made it
a priority to refer to GSA instances of misconduct by individuals and companies
so GSA can take appropriate suspension and debarment actions and protect the
government from fraud, waste, and abuse.
During this reporting period, the OIG made 28 referrals for consideration of
suspension or debarment to the GSA Oce of Acquisition Policy or other federal
debarment ocials. There were 73 actions issued based on current and previous
OIG referrals.
INTEGRITY AWARENESS
The OIG presents Integrity Awareness Briefings nationwide to educate
GSA employees on prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse. This period, we
presented 28 briefings attended by 1,167 GSA employees, other government
employees, and government contractors. These briefings explain the statutory
mission of the OIG and the methods available for reporting suspected
instances of wrongdoing. In addition, through case studies, the briefings make
GSA employees aware of actual instances of fraud in GSA and other federal
agencies and thus help to prevent their recurrence.
HOTLINE
The OIG hotline provides an avenue for employees and other concerned
citizens to report suspected wrongdoing. Hotline posters located in GSA
controlled buildings encourage employees to use the hotline. Our hotline
also allows internet submission of complaints. During the reporting period,
wereceived 783 hotline contacts. Of these, 58 were referred to GSA program
ocials for review and appropriate action, 8 were referred to other federal
agencies, 21 were referred to the OIG Oce of Audits, 1 was referred to the
OIG Oce of Counsel, and 73were referred to investigative field oces for
investigation or furtherreview.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 45
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  OTHER SIGNIFICANT WORK
STATISTICAL SUMMARY
OFOIGINVESTIGATIONS
April 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022
OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS
Referrals for criminal prosecution, civil litigation, administrative action,
suspension&debarment

Indictments and informations on criminal referrals* 
Subjects accepted for criminal prosecution 
Subjects accepted for civil action 
Convictions 
Civil settlements/judgments
Contractors/individuals suspended and debarred 
Employee actions taken on administrative referrals involving government employees
Investigative Reports**
Number of subpoenas 
Total Investigative Receivables and Recoveries*** ,,
* The total number of criminal indictments and criminal informations include all criminal charging
documents resulting from any prior referrals to prosecutive authorities.
** The total number of investigative reports include reports of investigations and letterhead reports, which
summarize the results of an official investigation and were referred to GSA officials for a response in
consideration of taking administrative action or for information only.
*** This includes civil judgments and settlements; ordered criminal fines, penalties, and restitution;
forfeiture; administrative recoveries; and recovered government property.
Investigative Workload
The OIG opened 37 investigative cases and closed 38 cases during this period.
Referrals
The OIG makes criminal and civil referrals to the DOJ or other authorities for
prosecutive and litigative consideration. The OIG also makes administrative
referrals to GSA ocials on certain cases disclosing wrongdoing on the part
of GSA employees, contractors, or private individuals doing business with
thegovernment.
46 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGINVESTIGATIONS
Actions on OIG Referrals
Based on these and prior referrals, 46 subjects were accepted for criminal
prosecution and 15 subjects were accepted for civil litigation. Criminal cases
originating from OIGreferrals resulted in 35 indictments or informations
and 29convictions. OIG civil referrals resulted in 7 subject settlements/
judgments. Based on OIGadministrative referrals, GSA management debarred
56contractors or individuals, suspended 17contractors or individuals, and took
1personnel action against a government employee.
Table 4. Summary of OIG Referrals
TYPE OF REFERRAL CASES SUBJECTS
Civil  
Criminal (DOJ)*  
Criminal (State/Local)**  
Administrative Referrals for Action/Response 
Suspension
Debarment 
TOTAL
 
* The total number of persons referred to DOJ for criminal prosecution includes both individuals and
companies which have been referred to DOJ for criminal prosecutorial consideration.
** The total number of persons referred to state and local authorities includes both individuals and
companies which have been referred to authorities, other than DOJ, for criminal prosecution.
Referralsto military authority for prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice are also
included in this metric.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 47
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGINVESTIGATIONS
Monetary Results
Table 5 presents the amounts of fines, penalties, settlements, recoveries,
forfeitures, judgments, and restitutions payable to the U.S. government
as a result of criminal and civil actions arising from OIG referrals. Table
6 presents the amount of administrative recoveries and forfeitures as
a result of investigative activities. Criminal, civil, and other monetary
recoveries arising from our work totaled more than $53 million.
Table 5. Criminal and Civil Results
CRIMINAL CIVIL
Fines and Penalties ,
Settlements/Judgments ,,
Recoveries/Forfeitures ,,
Restitutions ,,
TOTAL
,, ,,
Table 6. Non-Judicial Recoveries*
Administrative Recoveries ,
Forfeitures/Restitution 
TOTAL
,
* This total includes the FAR disclosures reported on page 24.
48 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
SIGNIFICANT INVESTIGATIONS  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OFOIGINVESTIGATIONS
GOVERNMENT-WIDE
POLICYACTIVITIES
GOVERNMENTWIDE
POLICYACTIVITIES
We regularly provide advice and assistance on government-wide policy matters
to GSA, as well as to other federal agencies and committees of Congress.
In addition, as required by the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, we
review existing and proposed legislation and regulations to determine their
eect on the economy and eciency of GSA’s programs and operations and
on the prevention and detection of fraud and mismanagement. Because of
the central management role of GSA in shaping government-wide policies and
programs, most of the legislation and regulations reviewed aect government-
wide issues such as procurement, property management, travel, and
governmentmanagement and IT systems.
Interagency and Intra-Agency Committees and Working Groups
Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Eciency (CIGIE).
The IG is a member of the CIGIE Budget, Investigations, and Legislation
Committees. Through CIGIE, we also participate in the following:
Pandemic Response Accountability Committee. The Oce of Audits
and the Oce of Investigations both participate in CIGIE’s Pandemic
Response Accountability Committee. The government’s coronavirus
response includes $2.6 trillion in economic relief to individual citizens,
loans for businesses, and support for hospitals and other medical
providers, as well as economic relief for aected businesses; industries;
and state, local, and tribal governments. The committee’s mission is to
promote transparency and ensure coordinated, comprehensive oversight
of the governments spending and coronavirus response.
Federal Audit Executive Council Information Technology Committee.
The Oce of Audits participates in the Federal Audit Executive Council
(FAEC) IT Committee. This committee provides a forum to share
information and coordinate audits of significant IT issues with the OIG
community and the federal government. The committee also develops and
recommends best practices to be used by OIGs in addressing IT issues.
Federal Audit Executive Council Digital Accountability and
Transparency Act Working Group. The Oce of Audits participates in
the FAEC Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) Working
Group. The working group’s mission is to assist the OIG community in
understanding and meeting its DATA Act oversight requirements by:
(1) serving as a working-level liaison with the U.S. Department of the
Treasury, (2) consulting with the GAO, (3) developing a common review
approach and methodology, and (4) coordinating key communications
with other stakeholders. The Oce of Audits participates in the working
group to stay abreast of the latest DATA Act developments in order to
monitor GSA’s implementation of the DATA Act.
50 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES  GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES
Federal Audit Executive Council Contracting Committee. The Oce of
Audits participates in the FAEC Contracting Committee. The committee is
involved with addressing contract, program, and acquisition management
issues that have common interest throughout the OIG community. The
committee shares information on audit topics, successful audits, and
related techniques.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Working Group. The
IG participates in CIGIE’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
(DEIA) Working Group, which seeks to promote DEIA throughout the OIG
community. This working group is an important resource; it guides our
strategy on how to engage our workforce and enhance our workplace
environment to deliver maximum value to the diverse public we serve.
Enterprise Risk Management Working Group. The Oce of Audits
participates in CIGIE’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Working
Group. The working group’s mission is to contribute to the promotion
and implementation of ERM principles in accordance with OMB Circular
A-123, Management’s Responsibility for Enterprise Risk Management and
Internal Control, within OIGs and their respective agencies. The Oce of
Audits participates in the working group as part of a collaborative eort
with other OIGs to oversee the sharing of processes and best practices
used to analyze, prioritize, and address risks identified and relevant to
implementing ERM in the federal government.
Geospatial Data Act Working Group. The Oce of Audits participates
in the Geospatial Data Act (GDA) Working Group. The working groups
mission is to assist the OIG community in understanding and meeting
its GDA oversight requirements by: (1) consulting with the Federal
Geospatial Data Committee, (2) developing a common review approach
and methodology, and (3) coordinating key communications with other
stakeholders. The Oce of Audits participates to stay abreast of the
latest GDA developments in order to monitor GSA’s compliance with
GDArequirements.
Infrastructure Working Group. The Oce of Audits participates in CIGIE’s
Infrastructure Working Group. The working group was established to share
information and coordinate oversight of the Infrastructure Investment and
Jobs Act. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act provided $1.2 trillion
in funding for infrastructure programs across the transportation, energy,
and water sectors through a combination of grants and loans. The working
group shares information on oversight and audit issues.
Blue Book Working Group. The Oce of Inspections participates in
the CIGIE Blue Book Working Group. The working group is comprised
of inspection and evaluation (I&E) professionals from the IG community
who worked to review, update, and revise the CIGIE Quality Standards
for Inspection and Evaluation (Blue Book) issued in December 2020.
Theworking group continues to provide education and instruction on the
revised Blue Book standards.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 51
GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES  GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES
Inspection and Evaluation Peer Review Working Group. The Oce
of Inspections participates in the I&E Peer Review Working Group. The
working group is comprised of I&E professionals from the IG community
responsible for promulgating and interpreting the Guide for Conducting
Peer Reviews of Inspection and Evaluation Organizations of Federal
Oces, along with administering the 3-year cycle of peer reviews. The
working group updated the Guide in December 2021 to coincide with
the new Blue Book published in December 2020. Currently, the working
group is continuing to provide education and instruction on the external
peer review process.
Collaboration Working Group. The Oce of Inspections participates in
CIGIEs Collaboration Working Group. The working group is comprised
of I&E professionals from the IG Community who are working to enhance
the I&E collaboration site. The working group continues to identify best
practices, templates, and other items to encourage collaboration across
the IG Community.
Inspection and Evaluation Roundtable. The Oce of Inspections
participates in the CIGIE I&E Roundtable. The Roundtable provides a
forum to share information and coordinate issues of importance within the
OIG inspections and evaluations community.
Data Analytics Working Group. The Oce of Investigations participates
in the CIGIE Data Analytics Working Group. The working group’s projects
include identifying new data analytics methods and techniques, sharing
information about data and data sources available to the OIG community,
and identifying crosscutting initiatives using data analytics to detect fraud.
Investigations Training Subcommittee. The Oce of Investigations
participates in the CIGIE Investigations Training Subcommittee.
The subcommittee establishes and promotes training resources for
investigative sta throughout the OIG community.
Investigations Undercover Review Committee. The Oce of
Investigations participates in the CIGIE Undercover Review Committee.
This committee provides recommendations and approvals on the
suitability of undercover operations involving sensitive circumstances in
accordance with CIGIE and Attorney General’s guidelines.
52 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES  GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES
DOJ Antitrust Division’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force (PCSF). The
Oce of Investigations is a partner agency of the PCSF. The PCSF leads a
coordinated national response to combat antitrust crimes and related schemes
in government procurement, grant, and program funding at all levels of
government-federal, state, and local.
DOJ Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative Working Group. GSA OIG investigators,
attorneys, and auditors participate in the OIGs partnership with the Civil
Cyber- Fraud Initiative Working Group. The working group leverages the False
Claims Act to hold accountable entities or individuals that put U.S. information
or systems at risk by knowingly providing deficient cybersecurity products
or services, misrepresenting their cybersecurity practices or protocols,
or violating obligations to monitor and report cybersecurity incidents and
breaches.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 53
GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES  GOVERNMENTWIDE POLICYACTIVITIES
Photo: East lobby decorative door, EPA East and West, located on 12th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.Photo: John Minor Wisdom U.S. Court of Appeals Building, New Orleans, LA
APPENDIXES
APPENDIX I
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
4P Tool Price Point Plus Portal Tool
AFOSI U.S. Air Force Oce of
Special Investigations
Army CID U.S. Army Criminal
Investigation Division
BCPO Big Crow Program Oce
BOP Bureau of Prisons
CDC Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention
CICA Competition in Contracting
Act of 1984
CIGIE Council of the Inspectors General
on Integrity and Eciency
CMc Construction Manager
as Constructor
COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019
CSP Commercial Sales Practices
DATA Act Digital Accountability and
Transparency Act of 2014
DCAA Defense Contract Audit Agency
DCIS Defense Criminal
Investigative Service
DEIA Diversity, Equity, Inclusion,
and Accessibility
DHS Department of Homeland Secuity
DoD Department of Defense
DOE Department of Energy
DOJ Department of Justice
DOL Department of Labor
DOS Department of State
EOs Executive Orders
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ERM Enterprise Risk Management
ESPC Energy Savings
Performance Contract
FAEC Federal Audit Executive Council
FAP Fine Arts Program
FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation
FAS Federal Acquisition Service
FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation
FSH Fire, Safety and Health
FY Fiscal Year
GAO Government Accountability Oce
GDA Geospatial Data Act of 2018
GMP Guaranteed Maximum Price
GPC Government purchase card
GSA General Services Administration
HHS Department of Health
and Human Services
HSI Homeland Security Investigations
HUBZone Historically Underutilized
Business Zone
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and
Air Conditioning
I&E Inspection and evaluation
IIJA Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act
IRS-CI Internal Revenue Service
Criminal Investigations Division
IT Information technology
ITP Insider Threat Program
MAS Multiple Award Schedules
MERV Minimum Eciency Reporting Value
MSC Metropolitan Service Center
NCIS Naval Criminal Investigative Service
NCR National Capital Region
O&M Operations and maintenance
OCFO Oce of the Chief Financial Ocer
OIG Oce of Inspector General
OMB Oce of Management and Budget
PBS Public Buildings Service
PCSF Procurement Collusion Strike Force
RETA RWA Entry and Tracking Application
RWA Reimbursable Work Authorization
SAM System for Award Management
SBA Small Business Administration
SDVOSB Service-Disabled Veteran-
Owned Small Business
TDR Transactional Data Reporting
Treasury Department of the Treasury
U.S.C. United States Code
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
USSS United States Secret Service
WAPA Western Area Power Administration
WPA Works Progress Administration
56 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX I  ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
APPENDIX II
SIGNIFICANT RECOMMENDATIONS
FROMPRIORREPORTS
The GSA Oce of the Chief Financial Ocer, Oce of Audit Management
and Accountability is responsible for tracking the implementation of audit and
inspection recommendations after a management decision has been reached,
and thus furnished the following status.
Prior Semiannual Reports to the Congress included eight reports with
recommendations that have not yet been fully implemented. These
recommendations are currently being implemented in accordance with
established milestones.
AUDIT OF PBS LEASE ADMINISTRATION
Period First Reported: April 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021
Our audit objective was to determine if PBS administers lease contracts in
accordance with GSA policies and regulations, oversees the completion of
required annual inspections, and ensures that lessors comply with lease
terms and conditions. We made three recommendations; one has not
beenimplemented.
The remaining recommendation involves the PBS Commissioner reviewing,
updating, and providing adequate lease administration manager training by
ensuring training addresses the importance of obtaining and maintaining
required documentation for proper lease administration. The recommendation
is scheduled for completion by October 31, 2022.
EVALUATION OF THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION’S
USE OF AN AD HOC APPRAISAL PROCESS FOR AN EXECUTIVE
Period First Reported: April 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021
Our objective was to examine the circumstances that resulted in an outside
third-party disciplinary report used to determine a senior executive final
summary rating for FY 2017. We made two recommendations which have not
been implemented.
The recommendations included that the Administrator should take appropriate
action to remedy the harm caused to the senior executive by a tainted
performance review process that resulted in an unsatisfactory rating and in
their removal from the Associate Administrator position, as well as the loss of
any opportunity for a FY 2017 performance period pay increase or bonus. In
addition, the GSA General Counsel and Chief Human Capital Ocer should
review current processes and procedures to ensure sucient oversight of
employee misconduct and disciplinary reviews, including timely referral to the
OIG. The recommendations do not have a completion date.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 57
APPENDIX II  SIGNIFICANT RECOMMENDATIONS FROMPRIORREPORTS
APPENDIX I SIGNIFICANT AUDITS FROM PRIOR REPORTS
UNRESTRICTED SUMMARY: FACILITY SECURITY
INSPECTION OF A HIGH-RISK GSA BUILDING
Period First Reported: April 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021
Our objective of the inspection was to determine whether GSA had assessed,
prioritized, and implemented facility security controls of a high-risk GSA building.
We made two recommendations; one has not been fully implemented.
The recommendation addresses issues categorized as physical security
information under GSA Order Security for Sensitive Building Information Related
to Federal Buildings, Grounds, or Property, PBS 3490.3 CHGE 1, March 22,
2021. Therefore, the recommendation is not available to the public. However,
the recommendation is scheduled for completion by October 31, 2022.
PBS HAS NOT IDENTIFIED ALL HIGH-RISK USES OF
SPACE, RESULTING IN POTENTIAL SAFETY RISKS
Period First Reported: October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022
Our audit objective was to determine whether PBS is performing fire, safety,
and health space evaluations on GSA-controlled (both owned and leased)
space to identify all high-risk uses of space, in accordance with PBS Order
1000.4 CHGE 1, Fire, Safety and Health (FSH) Space Evaluation Policy
(space evaluation policy). We made five recommendations: four have not
been implemented.
The recommendations involve the PBS Commissioner: (1) revising and
strengthening the space evaluation policy, including the permit referenced
in “Appendix B. GSA Fire, Safety and Health (FSH) Program Potentially High
Risk Use Permit,” by using plain language and better defining policy terms
and conditions; (2) developing and implementing a centralized tracking
mechanism for all high-risk use space types in the PBS Real Estate Across the
United States system; (3) providing formal, standardized training to the Oce
of Facilities Management, the Oce of Portfolio Management and Customer
Engagement, and the Oce of Leasing regarding the space evaluation policy
and the oces’ respective roles and responsibilities; and (4) developing and
implementing appropriate internal controls to ensure program oversight of the
space evaluation process. The recommendations are scheduled for completion
by March 24, 2023.
58 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX II  SIGNIFICANT RECOMMENDATIONS FROMPRIORREPORTS
APPENDIX I SIGNIFICANT AUDITS FROM PRIOR REPORTS
AUDIT OF PBS’S MANAGEMENT OF ASBESTOS AT THE CHET
HOLIFIELD FEDERAL BUILDING IN LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIFORNIA
Period First Reported: October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022
Our audit objective was to determine whether PBS adheres to applicable
asbestos management laws, regulations, and policies at the Chet Holifield
Federal Building in Laguna Niguel, California, to ensure the health and
safety of individuals in the building. We made two recommendations; one
has not been implemented.
The remaining recommendation involves the PBS Regional Commissioner
of the Pacific Rim Region developing and implementing internal controls
to ensure adherence to federal and state regulations and PBS policy for
asbestos management. These controls should ensure that PBS develops
and maintains an accurate, current, and complete Chet Holifield Federal
Building asbestos-containing materials inventory. The recommendation is
scheduled for completion by January 31, 2023.
AUDIT OF A HOTLINE COMPLAINT: PBS GREATER SOUTHWEST
REGION’S OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS
Period First Reported: October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022
Our audit objectives were to determine whether PBS Greater Southwest
Region: (1) conducted price reasonableness, realism, and responsibility
determinations for the award of the 2017 operations and maintenance
(O&M) contracts and the 2018 replacement O&M contracts in accordance
with federal regulations and PBS national and regional policies; and
(2)administered the O&M contracts in accordance with federal regulations,
PBS national and regional policies, and contract terms and conditions.
Wemade three recommendations; two have not been implemented.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 59
APPENDIX II  SIGNIFICANT RECOMMENDATIONS FROMPRIORREPORTS
The remaining recommendations involve the Greater Southwest PBS
Regional Commissioner reviewing current O&M contracts and developing
and implementing policies for current and future O&M contracts as
follows: (1) when procuring O&M contracts, ensuring price reasonableness
by: (a) using price analysis techniques recommended by the Federal
Acquisition Regulation, such as evaluating labor, equipment and material,
and subcontractor cost categories of price proposals; and (b) ensuring
independent government estimates are prepared using detailed analysis
of the required work, including appropriate stang levels and labor rates,
equipment and material costs, and subcontractor costs; and (2) when
administering O&M contracts: (a) ensuring consistent application of the
shared liability clause and seeking approval from contracting ocers
prior to requesting additional services work orders, (b) following contract
terms and conditions for costs related to additional services performance,
including the application of overhead on subcontract labor and
reimbursement of contract labor for personnel to escort subcontractors,
(c)enforcing stang requirement in O&M contracts and ensuring consistent
interpretation of prescriptive- and performance-based contract language,
and (d) developing detailed quality assurance surveillance plans and
performing and tracking quality assurance and building inspections in
accordance with PBS policy and contract terms and conditions. The
recommendations are scheduled for completion by December 15, 2022.
AUDIT OF GSA’S INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM
Period First Reported: October 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021
Our objective was to assess whether GSAs Insider Threat Program (ITP)
hascontrols in place to prevent, deter, detect, and mitigate actions by
trusted insiders who represent a potential threat to Agency personnel,
facilities, operations, and resources. We made two recommendations
whichhave not been implemented.
The recommendations involve the GSA Deputy Administrator and the ITP
Senior Designated Ocial establishing eective controls to: (1) enhance
cross-organizational communication and collaboration with the ITP by
re-establishing consistent group collaboration with the Oce of Human
Resource Management, Oce of GSA IT, the Oce of the Chief Financial
Ocer, the Oce of Mission Assurance, and other relevant oces to
consult on broader, non-case-specific, insider-threat-related issues; and
(2)enhance oversight of the employee separation and termination process
by establishing procedures that ensure the ITP is informed and aware of
insider threat risks posed by separated and terminated employees. The
recommendations are scheduled for completion by October 31, 2022.
60 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX II  SIGNIFICANT RECOMMENDATIONS FROMPRIORREPORTS
GSA’S NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION INTERNAL FLEET IS UNDERUTILIZED
Period First Reported: October 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021
Our objective was to determine whether GSA managed its National Capital
Region (NCR) internal fleet throughout FY 2019 in accordance with federal
and GSA requirements. We made four recommendations; one hasnot been
implemented.
The remaining recommendation involves the Oce of Administrative Services
Chief Administrative Services Ocer evaluating the Executive Driver Program
current usage against commercially available transportation sources and rates
to balance needs and achieve cost savings beneficial to the Government.
Therecommendation is scheduled for completion by October 31, 2022.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 61
APPENDIX II  SIGNIFICANT RECOMMENDATIONS FROMPRIORREPORTS
APPENDIX III
AUDIT AND INSPECTION REPORTREGISTER
FINANCIAL RECOMMENDATIONS
DATE OF
REPORT
REPORT
NUMBER
TITLE
FUNDS BE PUT
TO BETTER USE
QUESTIONED
COSTS
(Note: Because some audits pertain to contractawards or actions that have not yet been completed, the financial recommendations
related to these reports are not listed in this Appendix.)
PBS PERFORMANCE AUDITS
04/22/2022 A210018 Audit of the Security Controls for Building Automation Technologies in GSAFacilities
05/09/2022 A190100 Audit of PBS’s Approval Process for Minor Repair and Alteration Projects
06/22/2022 A210033 Audit of Security Camera and Alarm Systems at GSA-Owned Buildings
06/27/2022 A220053 Implementation Review of Corrective Action Plan: GSA's Public Buildings
Service Does Not Track and Report All Unused Leased Space as Required,
ReportNumberA160133/P/6/R18002, August 10, 2018
09/15/2022 A220062 Implementation Review of Correction Action Plan: Audit of PBS's Lease Extensions
and Holdovers, Report Number A190033/P/R/R20007, June 22, 2020
09/23/2022 A210039 Audit of PBS NCR's Metropolitan Service Center Reimbursable Work Authorizations
09/23/2022 A220060 Implementation Review of Corrective Action Plan: PBS's $1.7 Billion Energy
Savings Performance Contracts Are Not Achieving Energy and Cost Savings Due to
Inadequate Oversight, Report Number A180017/P/5/R20004, March 27, 2020
09/30/2022 A201018 COVID-19: PBS Faces Challenges in Its Eorts to Improve
Air Filtration in GSA-Controlled Facilities
PBS CONTRACTAUDITS
04/22/2022 A210079 Independent Examination of a Claim: FEI-Winmar Joint Venture,
ContractNumberGS-11-P-17-MK-C-0017
08/15/2022 A220015 Independent Examination of a Claim: At Your Service Companies, LLC,
ContractNumber GS-09P-09-KS-D-0229
09/15/2022 A220021 Independent Examination of a Cost Accounting Standards Board Disclosure
Statement: Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC, Contract Number 47PD0121C0005
FAS PERFORMANCE AUDITS
07/27/2022 A201045 FAS's Use of the 4P Tool on Contract and Option Awards Often Results in
Noncompliant Price Determinations
09/30/2022 A200975 FAS Cannot Provide Assurance That MAS Contract Pricing Results in Orders
Achieving the Lowest Overall Cost Alternative
62 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX III  AUDIT AND INSPECTION REPORTREGISTER
FINANCIAL RECOMMENDATIONS
DATE OF
REPORT
REPORT
NUMBER
TITLE
FUNDS BE PUT
TO BETTER USE
QUESTIONED
COSTS
FAS CONTRACTAUDITS
04/19/2022 A210056 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: Reston Consulting Group, Inc., Contract Number GS-35F-457GA
04/26/2022 A210061 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract Extension: Research Management Consultants Inc.,
ContractNumberGS-35F-493GA
04/26/2022 A210065 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: NTT Data Federal Services, Inc., Contract Number GS-35F-518GA
05/12/2022 A220023 Independent Limited Scope Postaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract: Axiologic Solutions, LLC, Contract Number GS-35F-159DA
,
05/25/2022 A210078 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: Java Productions, Inc., Contract Number GS-35F-0637T
06/03/2022 A220020 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
ContractExtension: DCI, Inc., Contract Number 47QSMA18D0004
06/13/2022 A210047 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
ContractExtension: Signet Technologies, Inc., Contract Number GS-07F-0322T
06/29/2022 A210077 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
ContractExtension: IntelliWare Systems, Inc., Contract Number GS-10F-0473Y
$38,538
07/26/2022 A220025 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract:HillASC,Inc., Solicitation Number 47QSMD20R0001
07/29/2022 A210058 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award
Schedule ContractExtension: Lyme Computer Systems, Inc.,
Contract Number GS-35F-465GA
$5,618
08/12/2022 A220045 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract:DexisInteractive, Contract Number GS-10F-098AA
08/23/2022 A201029 Independent Limited Scope Postaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract: Capp, Inc., Contract Number GS-21F-0116X
,
09/26/2022 A210080 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract:Maximus Federal Services, Inc., Contract Number GS-35F-685GA
,
OTHER PERFORMANCE AUDITS
05/27/2022 A220018 GSA Complied with the Payment Integrity Information Act in Fiscal Year 2021
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 63
APPENDIX III  AUDIT AND INSPECTION REPORTREGISTER
APPENDIX I SIGNIFICANT AUDITS FROM PRIOR REPORTS
APPENDIX IV
OIGREPORTS
OVER12MONTHSOLD,
FINALAGENCYACTIONPENDING
Section 6009 of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, Public Law
103-55, as amended by Section 810 of Public Law 104-106, requires the head
of a federal agency to complete final action on each management decision
required with regard to a recommendation in an Inspector General’s report
within 12 months after the date of the report. If the head of the agency fails to
complete final action within the 12-month period, the Inspector General shall
identify the matter in the semiannual report until final action is complete.
The Oce of Audit Management and Accountability provided the following list
of reports withaction items open beyond 12 months:
DATE OF
REPORT
REPORT NUMBER
TITLE
CONTRACT AUDITS
03/30/2017 A150001 Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract Extension:
Noble Sales Co., Inc., Contract Number GS-06F-0032K
05/27/2020 A190070 Independent Postaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract: KPaul Properties, LLC, Contract Number GS-21F-0095U
06/02/2020 A200959 Independent Postaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule
Contract: Exponent, Inc., Contract Number GS-23F-0390K
09/29/2020 A190088 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: United Rentals, Inc., Contract Number GS-06F-0068R
11/02/2020 A180025 Independent Limited Scope Postaward Examination of Multiple Award
Schedule Contract Extension: CSP Enterprises, LLC, Contract Number
GS-35F-045BA
02/11/2021 A200986 Independent Examination of a Claim: Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC,
Contract Number GS-11-P-17-MM-C-0002
03/31/2021 A201040 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: Invictus International Consulting, LLC, Contract Number
GS-35F-305DA
06/09/2021 A201000 Independent Examination of a Claim: Berkel & Company Contractors,
Inc., Subcontractor to Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC, Contract Number
GS-11-P-17-MM-C-0002
08/27/2021 A200997 Independent Examination of a Claim: Kirlin Design Build, LLC,
Subcontractor to Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC, Contract Number
GS-11-P-17-MM-C-0002
09/17/2021 A201024 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: Promark Technology, Inc., Contract Number GS-35F-303DA
09/28/2021 A210024 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: Slalom, LLC, Contract Number GS-35F-053GA
09/30/2021 A201025 Independent Preaward Examination of Multiple Award Schedule Contract
Extension: Hyland Software, Inc., Contract Number GS-35F-249DA
64 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX IV  OIGREPORTS OVER12MONTHSOLD, FINALAGENCYACTIONPENDING
DATE OF
REPORT
REPORT
NUMBER
TITLE
PROJECTED FINAL
ACTION DATE
INTERNAL AUDITS
02/17/2021 A190016 Audit of GSA's Insider Threat Program 10/31/2022
09/21/2021 A201011 Audit of PBS Lease Administration 10/31/2022
DATE OF
REPORT
REPORT
NUMBER
TITLE
PROJECTED FINAL
ACTION DATE
INSPECTION REPORTS
02/25/2021 JE21-001 GSA's National Capital Region Internal Fleet is Underutilized 10/31/2022
09/14/2021 JE21-002 Evaluation of the General Services Administrations Use of an
AdHoc Appraisal Process for anExecutive
none
09/30/2021 JE21-003 Unrestricted Summary: Facility Security Inspection of a
HighRisk GSA Building
10/31/2022
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 65
APPENDIX IV  OIGREPORTS OVER12MONTHSOLD, FINALAGENCYACTIONPENDING
APPENDIX II AUDIT AND INSPECTION REPORT REGISTER
APPENDIX V
OIG REPORTS WITHOUT
MANAGEMENTDECISION
Section 5(a)(10)(A) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires
a summary of each report issued before the commencement of the reporting
period for which no management decision has been made by the end of the
reporting period.
There are no OIG reports that meet this requirement this reporting period.
66 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX V  OIG REPORTS WITHOUT MANAGEMENTDECISION
APPENDIX II AUDIT AND INSPECTION REPORT REGISTER
APPENDIX VI
MANAGEMENT DECISIONS
REVISED OR WITH WHICH THE
INSPECTOR GENERAL IS IN
DISAGREEMENT
Section 5(a)(11) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires
a description and explanation of the reasons for any significant revised
management decision made during the reporting period. Section 5(a)(12) of the
Act requires information concerning any significant management decision with
which the Inspector General is in disagreement. There were no such decisions
during this reporting period.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 67
APPENDIX VI  MANAGEMENT DECISIONS REVISED OR WITH WHICH THE INSPECTOR GENERAL IS IN DISAGREEMENT
APPENDIX VII
PEER REVIEW RESULTS
Section 5(a) (14)-(16) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended,
requires each Inspector General to submit an appendix containing the results
of any peer review conducted by another Oce of Inspector General (OIG)
during the reporting period or, if no peer review was conducted, a statement
identifying the date of the last peer review conducted; a list of any outstanding
recommendations from any peer review conducted by another OIG that
have not been fully implemented, the status of the recommendation, and an
explanation why the recommendation is not complete; and a list of any peer
reviews conducted by the OIG of another Oce of Inspector General during
the reporting period, including a list of any outstanding recommendations made
from any previous peer review that have not been fully implemented.
In FY 2021, the GSA OIG Oce of Audits underwent a peer review by the
Department of Labor OIG. On September 30, 2021, the Oce of Audits received
a peer review rating of “pass.” The peer review team found that the Oce of
Audits’ system of quality control is suitably designed and complied with to provide
it with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with the
quality standards established by CIGIE in all material aspects. No outstanding
recommendations exist from any peer review conducted by anotherOIG.
Also in FY 2021, the GSA OIG Oce of Inspections underwent a peer review by
the Library of Congress OIG and Architect of the Capital OIG. The peer review
team found the Oce of Inspections’ policies and procedures generally met
the selected seven standards established in the January 2012 CIGIE Quality
Standards for Inspection and Evaluation. The peer review team also found
the selected report generally met the quality standards and complied with
the Oce of Inspections’ internal policies and procedures. No outstanding
recommendations exist for the Oce of Inspections.
In FY 2022, the GSA OIG Oce of Inspections conducted a peer review of the
United States Oce of Personnel Management, Oce of Evaluations. The peer
review team found the Oce of Evaluations’ policies and procedures generally
met the selected seven standards established in the January 2012 CIGIE Quality
Standards for Inspection and Evaluation. The peer review team also found the
selected report generally met the quality standards and complied with the Oce
of Evaluations’ internal policies and procedures. No outstanding recommendations
exist for external peer reviews performed by GSA OIG Oce of Inspections.
In FY 2020, the GSA OIG Oce of Investigations underwent a peer review
by the Department of Education OIG and received a passing rating. The peer
review team found that the systems of internal safeguards and management
procedures for the Oce of Investigations complied with the standards
established for investigations by the Attorney General Guidelines and CIGIE.
There were no outstanding recommendations from prior peer reviews.
68 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX VII  PEER REVIEW RESULTS
APPENDIX VIII
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR
SIGNIFICANT AUDIT FINDINGS
The National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008, Public Law 110-181, Section
845, requires each IG appointed under the Inspector General Act of 1978, as
amended, to submit an annex on final, completed contract audit reports issued to
the contracting activity as part of its Semiannual Report to the Congress.
The annex addresses significant audit findings — unsupported, questioned,
or disallowed costs in excess of $10 million — or other significant contracting
issues. During this reporting period, there are no OIG reports that met
theserequirements.
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 69
APPENDIX VIII  GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR SIGNIFICANT AUDIT FINDINGS
APPENDIX IX
UNIMPLEMENTED
RECOMMENDATIONS
UNIMPLEMENTED RECOMMENDATIONS FROM REPORTS ISSUED BEFORE
THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS SEMIANNUAL REPORTINGPERIOD
The table below provides a summary of each audit, inspection, or evaluation
report issued before the commencement of the reporting period for which there
are any outstanding unimplemented recommendations, including the aggregate
potential cost savings of those recommendations.
RECOMMENDATIONS UNIMPLEMENTED THAT ARE IN PROCESS
FISCAL
YEAR TITLE
NUMBER OF
UNIMPLEMENTED
RECOMMENDATIONS
POTENTIAL
COSTSAVINGS
2021 Audit of GSA's Insider Threat Program 2 $0
2021 Audit of PBS Lease Administration 1 $0
2021 GSAs National Capital Region Internal Fleet is Underutilized 1 $2,073,129
2021 Evaluation of the General Service Administration’s Use of an
Ad Hoc Appraisal Process for an Executive
2 $0
2021 Unrestricted Summary: Facility Security Inspection of a High-
Risk GSA Building
1 $0
2022 Audit of a Hotline Complaint: PBS Greater Southwest
Region's Operations and Maintenance Contracts
2 $0
2022 Audit of PBS's Management of Asbestos at the Chet Holifield
Federal Building in Laguna Niguel, California
1 $0
2022 PBS Has Not Identified All High-Risk Uses of Space, Resulting
in Potential Safety Risks
4 $0
Totals: 8 14 $2,073,129
70 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX IX  UNIMPLEMENTED RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS UNIMPLEMENTED DUE TO
AGENCY MANAGEMENT DISAGREEMENT
The table below provides a summary of each audit, inspection, or evaluation
report for which there are any outstanding unimplemented recommendations
due to an Agency management decision with which the Inspector General is
indisagreement.
RECOMMENDATIONS UNIMPLEMENTED DUE TO DISAGREEMENT
FISCAL
YEAR TITLE
NUMBER OF
UNIMPLEMENTED
RECOMMENDATIONS
POTENTIAL
COSTSAVINGS
2017 GSA's Decisions to Vacate And Renovate the Leased Federal
Courthouse in Pensacola Are Based on Faulty Premises
2 $0
2017 PBS National Capital Region's $1.2 Billion Energy Savings
Performance Contract for White Oak was Not Awarded or
Modified in Accordance with Regulations and Policy
3 $0
2018 Evaluation of GSA Nondisclosure Policy 1 $0
2019 Evaluation of GSAs Management and Administration of the
Old Post Oce Building Lease
1 $0
2021 GSA's Transactional Data Reporting Pilot Is Not Used to
Aect Pricing Decisions
2 $0
Totals: 5 9 $0
APRIL 1, 2022  SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 71
APPENDIX IX  UNIMPLEMENTED RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX III  OIG REPORTS OVER 12 MONTHS OLD, FINAL AGENCY ACTION PENDING
APPENDIX X
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The table below cross-references the reporting requirements prescribed by the
Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, to the specific pages where they
are addressed. The information required by the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 and the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, as
amended, are also cross-referenced to the appropriate pages of the report.
REQUIREMENTS
INSPECTOR GENERAL ACT OF 1978, AS AMENDED
SECTION PAGE
4(a)(2) Review of Legislation and Regulations 
5(a)(1) Significant Problems, Abuses, and Deficiencies i, 6
5(a)(2) Recommendations with Respect to Significant Problems, Abuses, andDeficiencies -
5(a)(3) Prior Recommendations Not Yet Implemented -
5(a)(4) Matters Referred to Prosecutive Authorities -
5(a)(5) and 6(c)(2) Summary of Instances Where Information Was Refused none
5(a)(6) List of OIG Reports -
5(a)(7) Summary of Each Particularly Significant Report -
5(a)(8) Statistical Tables on Management Decisions on Questioned Costs 
5(a)(9) Statistical Tables on Management Decisions on Recommendations That FundsBePut
to Better Use

5(a)(10)(A) Summary of OIG Reports Issued Before the Commencement of the
Reporting Period Which No Management Decision Has Been Made
none
5(a)(10)(B) Summary of OIG Reports Issued Before the Commencement of the
Reporting Period Which No Agency Comment was Returned within 60 Days
none
5(a)(10)(C) Summary of OIG Reports Issued Before the Commencement of the ReportingPeriod
for Which there are Unimplemented Recommendations
-
5(a)(11) Description and Explanation for Any Significant Revised Management Decision none
5(a)(12) Information on Any Significant Management Decisions
with Which the Inspector General Disagrees
none
5(a)(13) Compliance with Federal Financial Management Improvement Act none
5(a)(14)-(16) Peer Review Results 
5(a)(17) Statistical Tables of Investigation Metrics 46-48
5(a)(18) Description of Investigation Metrics 46-47
5(a)(19) Investigations of Senior Employees where Misconduct was Substantiated 42
5(a)(20) Description of any Instance of Whistleblower Retaliation none
5(a)(21) Description of any Attempt by the Agency to Interfere with OIG Independence none
5(a)(22)(A) Description of each Inspection, Evaluation and Audit Not Publicly Disclosed 62-63
5(a)(22)(B) Description of Investigations involving a Senior Government Employee
NotPubliclyDisclosed
42
OTHERS
PL 103-355, Sec 6009 Management Decisions and Implementation of Audit Recommendations 
PL 110-181, Sec. 845 Government Contractor Significant Findings 
72 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL | SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS
APPENDIX X  REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Make
like
it’s your
money!
It is.
To report suspected waste, fraud, abuse, or
mismanagement in GSA, call your
Inspector General’s Hotline
Toll-free 1-800-424-5210
Washington, DC metropolitan area
(202) 501-1780
or write: GSA, IG, Hotline Officer
Washington, DC 20405
or access the Web:
https://www.gsaig.gov/hotline/
www.twitter.com/GSA_OIG https://www.gsaig.gov/content/rss-feeds
Photo: Staircase alcove in former General Post Oce, Tari Building; now the Monaco Hotel, Washington, D.C.
Oce of Inspector General
U.S. General Services Administration
1800 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20405
https://www.gsaig.gov